13 Comments
- tcbishop12, on 04/24/2008, -1/+6Perhaps the tide turned the other way and got lost today when she wasn't looking. It's going to take some pounding before the MSM - who appears infatuated with the purported comeback - notices.
- dinot, on 04/24/2008, -0/+5In some ways she probably is. Let me explain:
1. haircut - Hillary's is what you might call the "ex-wife" haircut, while Hitler was going for the faux "emo" look.
2. moustache - while Hitler's was defined, and shows power and finality, Hillary's moustache is blurred and cannot be distinguished since it's the same color as her skin. only on closer inspection can you see it. why is she trying to hide it?
3. evilness - Hitler was evil, truly evil. He ate evil for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. But Hillary only has an air of pandering evilness, and everybody knows she goes home to an actual human family and not reptiles. Hitler was a badass. - zephyear, on 04/24/2008, -0/+3liar, manipulative, only cares about herself, incredibly negative campaign
- marabout40, on 04/24/2008, -0/+3She wants to "obliterate" Iranians.
- tcbishop12, on 04/24/2008, -0/+3As James Zogsby noted yesterday: “Senator Clinton is a talented and an extraordinarily intelligent person. Her tragic flaw is her belief that only she is capable of leading. It is this that has caused her to engage in an effort to demean her opponent and engage in the kind of campaign that she once decried as "the politics of personal destruction." It is this that I call her narcissism, and the degree to which it has damaged not only the Democratic chances in November, but also her reputation - defines the pathological self-destruction that so often follows from narcissistic behavior.” The simple fact obvious to most of us: the only big ideas fueling Hillary's mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled candidacy are selfish ambition and a thirst for power that all the Gatorade in Florida and Texas can't quench.
- PATSCRU, on 04/24/2008, -0/+3I used to be a huge clinton supporter, and even supported hillary at the beginning of her candidacy. However seeing a dishonest person next to a genuine one really sheds light on the lesser person's flaws; and seeing Hillary employ fearmongering rovian tactics to garner votes leaves such a bad taste in my mouth i can no longer even come close to supporting her.
- scottc, on 04/24/2008, -0/+2Dozens is an unfair way to describe it - hundreds would be accurate - but the post was funny enough for a digg anyway.
- ePuck, on 04/25/2008, -0/+1Digg users see a lot of the 'crazy' news articles. When 90% of the articles coming from Hillary's campain off the wall derogatory or fabricated it's hard not to wonder.. What the hell is she thinking!
- ePuck, on 04/25/2008, -0/+1Come on be fair.. Baker's dozens
- bigriley, on 04/25/2008, -0/+1Avoiding the sound of her condescending voice, probably... I literally can not stand the listen to her, regardless of her message. Also, she will never, ever, ever recover from lies she repeated about her time in Bosnia. I could never trust anything she would say about any future foreign issues because of that. What other country's leaders would trust her?
- imgstacke, on 04/24/2008, -0/+1It's not just on digg, but everywhere, even in Indiana, obviously.
- Pherdnut, on 04/25/2008, -0/+1We finally saw idealism taking hold and Hillary dragged Obama's optimistic higher-ideal appealing campaign into the mud of Rove-style politics. We were betrayed by somebody that was supposed to be on the same damn team.
- manningbowl135, on 04/24/2008, -5/+2What is with just the overwhelming hate of Hilary on digg? I understand she's Obama's opponent, but reading digg, someone would think she's worse than Hitler.


What is Digg?
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official