What is Digg?332 Comments
- Jimmyb207, on 10/30/2007, -16/+135Headline should read, "FOX NEWS HOST SEAN HANNITY DISMISSES REALITY." Fox News has never been about the Truth...
- SoyJames, on 10/30/2007, -12/+78Hahahaha... Ron Paul: "You mean your own poll isn't any good?" :D
Hannity you warmongering dumb f*ck, get a clue. - buckybadger9876, on 10/30/2007, -12/+72http://youtube.com/watch?v=WpeDVDSrpYk
PROOF YOU CAN'T VOTE TWICE. - chessmasterjoe, on 10/27/2007, -12/+60I would like to see what the other candidates would have to say if they were asked if they are going to support Ron Paul when he wins the nomination.
- erikph7, on 10/29/2007, -13/+59Sean, you have to stop doing this on the air -- denying your own polls. You look like a buffoon when you do that. Sheesh. You know what Mr. Hannity, what are you worried about? Acknowledge the reality of Ron Pauls polls and stop being so negative on the guy. I think a lot of non-Ron Paul supporters would respect you more for doing that. (HINT) Question: Are you -that- concerned he's going to win? Really... now ask yourself that question --- Are you honestly so concerned that you have to be so ridiculous on air? It's embarrassing -- so STOP IT.
- sparkleprincess, on 12/10/2007, -1/+46Even if you don't care for Ron Paul its very unprofessional on Fox News part to make snide comments like they do. Then again they never really been known for their professionalism. I think of Fox News more as "entertainment news", sort of like the show "Talk Soup".
- hendrixlives64, on 10/25/2007, -3/+45"y'know you got your ron paul folks out there so i'm not a big believer in that poll..."
apparently the fact that ron paul has supporters completely negates the reliability of this poll. - uselessexpert, on 10/28/2007, -5/+42The reality of the fact is that Ron Paul is the only candidate with balls to say what he feels its right and what defends our freedoms, wether people like it or not. The rest of the candidates are just flip flopping to get people to like them.
- schlef, on 10/24/2007, -3/+38Here is going to be the problem. I really like what Ron Paul says, and I am a registered voter; however, if the past is any indicator college aged kids will not vote, even if they like a candidate. You guys need to get out and register and actually vote and not just sit here on Digg and talk about Ron Paul. People need to act.
- siss101, on 11/06/2007, -12/+44You could tell the entire debate was rigged to make Paul look bad. I would love an investigation into those in the audience that booed Ron Paul, to find out whose payroll they are on. Not to mention the Fox plants interviewed at the end of the debate. This station should actually be taken off the air for treating a presidential candidate with such a lack of respect, and insinuating those that voted for him are liars.
Fox's dishonest practices are going to come back to haunt them. I am so fed up with the treatment of Ron Paul that I swear if he doesn't get the nomination I am going to vote for Hillary Clinton. - relaxeder, on 04/17/2009, -2/+29"You've got your Ron Paul folks out there...."
Yeah, you've got your Giuliani folks out there, and your Huckabee folks out there, too. What the ***** does that mean? Congressman Paul has some incredibly strong support right now, that's what. - aliengoods, on 10/26/2007, -2/+25But Ron Paul supporters have 183 phones each!
- obelisky, on 10/27/2007, -4/+25i don't agree with ron paul's views but... i'm kinda getting tired of this *****... it's like if there was a candidate who i agreed with 100% (there isn't, but seems like a lot of rp fans do agree with him), this would happen to them as well..
- Jareth86, on 10/24/2007, -5/+26If Ron Paul isn't nominated, he should run as an independent. He's the only electable republican candidate, and I'm sick of choosing between the lesser of two evils.
- FloppyLlamaDigg, on 10/24/2007, -12/+31Allow me to paraphrase: "Supporting your candidate whenever possible is NOT FAIRRR! *insert baby cry sound*"
- EndersGame, on 10/25/2007, -11/+29It would be "comedic gold" you moron. And I think you accidentally replied to the wrong person because Jimmy didn't give any indication of how out of touch with reality he is. He didn't say 9/11 was an inside job, he didn't say Ron Paul is going to win the 2008 election, for ***** sake he didn't even say he is a supporter of Ron Paul. But if he was a merely a supporter of Ron Paul it wouldn't be hypocritical at all to say Sean Hannity is delusional when he says Ron Paul somehow cheated to win the debate poll, clearly Hannity is distorting reality to fit his opinion.
Basically what I am getting at is you are one of the biggest idiots on Digg, so do us all a favor and go back to Myspace. - shadowspires, on 10/24/2007, -1/+18I love it! This is the best part of the campaign... time after time after time, Ron Paul wins when the poll is open to the public. It just shows the unbridled enthusiasm the core supporters have for Ron Paul!
- TheTaoOfBill, on 10/26/2007, -1/+18Yup. We organized enough people to flood the polls. And guess what? We will organize enough people to flood the primaries too which btw are generally famous for their low turn out rates. Ron Paul will win.
- inactive, on 10/26/2007, -1/+17Hannity is a hack, and knows little about anything other than presenting a phony image to his viewers. Seriously, that is his only skill.
- inactive, on 11/06/2007, -11/+27Sean Hannity registers as a big blip on my gaydar.
- omenmedia, on 10/29/2007, -2/+18Why can't Faux just admit for once that maybe, just maybe, there are a lot of *legitimate* voters out there that, oh I don't know, LIKE Ron Paul and AGREE with what he is saying. I hate how they continually say things like "Ok, Ron Paul at 34%.... (long pause)... moving right along." Christ, I'm an Australian and I want to vote for him!
- Coven, on 10/24/2007, -4/+19Now don't do anything you'll regret in the morning...
- icewater, on 10/26/2007, -12/+27Hannity's been bought and paid for, as has Faux news.
- inactive, on 10/26/2007, -2/+16Nah, we'll just let you sleep, you'll do less damage that way.
- Gooble74, on 10/25/2007, -2/+16Who really gives a ***** what sean hannity has to say? Alot of people, apparently. Which is very, very, very sad.
- EndersGame, on 10/24/2007, -1/+15Sure but what Hannity said was unprofessional. If Rudy had won the poll by 35% or even 50% do you think Hannity would have dismissed it as cheating? No, he would talk about how strong a candidate Rudy is, even though in both cases the polls would be just as inaccurate.
- aliengoods, on 10/24/2007, -3/+16First, he didn't say Fox News was out of touch with reality. He said they dismissed it, indicating they know what reality is but choose to ignore it. Second, I see no mention of being a Ron Paul supporter or a 'truther', and even if those are his assertion, that wouldn't dismiss his point as long as he could back up his assertions with FACTS. It wouldn't qualify him as a hypocrite either. And just so you know the definition of hypocrisy:
the act of condemning or calling for the condemnation of another person when the critic is guilty of the act for which he demands that the accused be condemned
How does supporting Ron Paul or believing we haven't heard all of the facts about 9/11 (which I think is pretty damn apparent) make him a hypocrite. He's not actively trying to dismiss anything with those beliefs.
So my question to you, Herk, is: How did you manage to stick your head so far up your own ass? - mikesocal, on 10/26/2007, -2/+15next target, voting booths.
- mcnab32, on 10/24/2007, -4/+17Curious...Why do you not support him? Im not saying you have to jump on with the RP followers, but who do you feel is a better candidate? I guess what I see is a candidate who is honest, and has the right direction for the US, and is VASTLY different from what ANY other candidate is offering at the moment. When I see all the other mainstream candidates, all I see if more of the SAME *****.
So who do you support? Don't take this as an attack, Im generally curious as to who you think is BETTER for this country, or what it is about RP that makes you NOT want to support him. - inactive, on 10/27/2007, -14/+26More proof that Hannity hates America and everything it stands for.
- mikesocal, on 10/26/2007, -3/+15Now you want proof. Where was the proof when you were calling paul an idiot, he supports just about everything he says with facts. I love digg everyone has a voice no matter how stupid they sound.
- inactive, on 10/29/2007, -15/+27Its been well proven that Rupert Murdoch's Fox News is a neocon right-wing extremist propaganda outlet for the Republican party & the Bush administration. Don't watch it unless you want to know what the opposite of the truth is & what GOP propaganda their brainwashing people with. And tell your friends & family about them. Also check out http://mediamatters.org/ (started by an ex-Republican aide) to see their lying bias for yourself. Lastly watch OutFoxed where ex-Fox employees & media analysts speak out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuorIjt1HG0, its a must watch documentary. Also check out http://foxattacks.com/ for more info. And also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3kI8LNTqNo
- MrCobaltBlue, on 10/26/2007, -2/+13Sean Hannity is a Douche.
- TheTaoOfBill, on 10/24/2007, -1/+12Scientific polls use a base from people who were die hard neo con enough to vote for Bush in the primaries last year despite the fact he was uncontested. Those people are not going to be Ron Paul fans. Those polls also do not count the countless amount of people who have switched parties to support Ron Paul.
- Jimmyb207, on 10/26/2007, -4/+15 Now Herkimer56 wants to be a PWOOFER........
- StarlessKnight, on 10/24/2007, -3/+13If they're that concerned about skewed results, maybe they should stop putting up unscientific polls.
- Boondoggle, on 10/24/2007, -0/+10I'm pretty sure plans like that need approval of more than just the president. Just because he likes that idea doesn't mean it will ever happen even if he IS elected. I'm pretty sure he knows that too.
- bmang, on 10/26/2007, -2/+12It's really easy for a small government to stand up to a big corporation as long as they have integrity. But, it's hard to find politicians with integrity. That's why, the bigger the government is, the less integrity it has as a whole, and big corporation can use them for their own will. Corporations love big government. This is where we are today. Our current government is the biggest it's ever been and things are getting worse. I really hope everyone starts to realize this.
- vsujohn2, on 10/24/2007, -1/+11You've been watching too much South Park
- fac3less, on 10/24/2007, -0/+10*ding* You win.
Your voice can only be heard if you project it in the polls. - Boondoggle, on 10/24/2007, -2/+11Hannity is an inflammatory ***** that makes rational conservatives everywhere look bad.
- inactive, on 10/24/2007, -6/+15Ron Paul removes lime scale and soap scum better than any other cleanser!!
- NatrlSelection, on 10/28/2007, -0/+9Paul should have turned the question around on Hannity and ask "Would you support me if I make the Republican nomination?"
- mikesocal, on 10/26/2007, -1/+10which is why he's a great choice. Vica versa he would put a stop to wasteful spending and pet projects that are tacking onto bills with no relation to one another. Veto Veto Veto. No war! A step in the right direction.
- StarlessKnight, on 10/26/2007, -1/+10They're still working on the old psychological mindset of physical attributes suggesting one's intelligence or leadership abilities. Square-jaw = Heroic, Strong. High Forehead = Intelligent. Politician saying something = Truth and Justice for all. Kind of falls apart when you examine it too closely.
- iancgi, on 10/26/2007, -0/+9The company I work for makes thats SMS text voting software and I know for a fact they had double vote casting turned off. Ron Paul won and when reality is too much for people in denial they reject even reality.
- StarlessKnight, on 10/24/2007, -0/+9See, here's the problem... You're assuming Ron Paul will have the same authority as Bush. I, on the other hand, don't think any one will have the free and unquestioned reign that George W. "Integrity" Bush has had and continues to have. Seeing how it's unlikely Ron Paul would have Congress rubber stamp everything he wants, not only would the President want to abolish the reserve, but Congress would have to agree to legislate it.
- WiseWeasel, on 10/26/2007, -0/+9It could be because a clear pattern of abuse emerges when you take a broad look at their election coverage in general. It can't all be coincidence; after a certain point, it's pretty clear that there's a MO being implemented.
- flygirl62, on 10/24/2007, -0/+9But, interestingly enough, this is the first time that I can imagine the college-age ADULTS actually voting in large numbers. And this is the group that has seen what their parents have paid into the system and how little they get back, along with *seeing* their rights getting taken away.
I don't have any crazy expectations that he will win, but I sure wouldn't feel comfortable dismissing the possibility and I know that, as a well-past-college-age adult, I will vote my conscience regardless of the polls. - mrurc, on 10/24/2007, -1/+10If someone states that they do not support Ron Paul, that does not necessarily mean that they think that anyone is better than Ron Paul. Frankly, I think that only Ron Paul is honest about his policies but I disagree with his policies (in the same way as p0ss, above). Until I see someone in the race who is honest, experienced, and who says things that make sense to me, I am not supporting ANY of them. I would totally vote for Jon Stewart.
Being vastly different than the rest of the candidates should not be a good thing in and of itself. It should only be a good thing if you support the way in which the candidate is different. -
Show 51 - 100 of 332 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is