238 Comments
- jeffbw, on 03/30/2009, -6/+194"Journalist standards"? Surely you jest.
- aFoxy21, on 03/30/2009, -6/+161Karl Rove? Now THAT's a tool!
Jackass... - novenator, on 03/30/2009, -9/+163Fox propagandizing something? No.....how could that be? They say they are fair and balanced!
- jeffbw, on 03/30/2009, -8/+130Speaking of tool, take a look at this: http://crooksandliars.com/2006/09/22/president-cli ...
Chris Wallace is a total piece of *****. - normlsparky, on 03/31/2009, -6/+116Shouldn't Mr. potato head be in jail right now?
- frontaxle, on 03/30/2009, -6/+89Edit-mongers. Crap-pushers. Fear-Makers.
- Grova, on 03/30/2009, -6/+76Say it ain't so Fox....I trusted you!
- wheresmclean, on 03/31/2009, -6/+64Fox did something untrustworthy? WHATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT?
- Ecuno, on 03/30/2009, -3/+40Karl Rove needs to be imprisoned, he is the puppet master of the whole Bush administration.
- seantubridy, on 03/31/2009, -4/+40To be fair, they cut things on The Daily Show all the time from longer...
Oh wait, that's not a "news" program. Never mind. - Ecuno, on 03/30/2009, -1/+30Yea, he is a douche bag, plain and simple.
- DangerCollie, on 03/31/2009, -4/+33He's not jesting.
And don't call him "Surely". - swrostmore, on 03/31/2009, -8/+35Fox airs the anti-war criticisms of Rove (et all) because the average Fox News viewer thinks 'Greeted as liberators' was an accurate statement. Fox naturally cuts the substantive criticisms, because exposing their audience to proven Republican criminality would cause uncomfortable cognitive dissonance.
- JMitchell242, on 03/31/2009, -1/+26I gaurantee 75% of all statistics are made up by 4 out of 5 people wanting to believe things without any basis in reality.(the other 1 in 5 are tools)
- Dennisisok, on 03/31/2009, -0/+22Its because the "news" programs are so similar to Stewart's COMEDY show.
Thats the problem. - flammablewater, on 03/31/2009, -0/+22Refusing to testify is a good one too
- inactive, on 03/31/2009, -0/+21Actually, Cheney was the Emperor...Rove was like Count Dooku...kinda.
- Elranzer, on 03/31/2009, -0/+20Treason. Perjury. Take your pick...
- mparker21311, on 03/31/2009, -15/+34Remember when Ron Paul owned everyone in the debates and Fox News excluded it on the re-air?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md-XtUbkzPo - wild, on 03/31/2009, -5/+24If you are editing a video, you put up a disclaimer that the video was edited. There really isn;t any defense of it.
- kenedamick, on 03/31/2009, -1/+19Supremacist = DailyTroll.
- captnkurt, on 03/31/2009, -0/+17Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.
- Daemastrius, on 03/31/2009, -3/+19It's impossible to make Bush look good from his 8 years in office.
- EricAnderton, on 03/31/2009, -1/+16@jeffbw, @DangerCollie
I just want to tell you both "good luck". We're all counting on you. - SpeedSteamBoat, on 03/31/2009, -0/+15Contempt of congress.
- teamgwho, on 03/31/2009, -0/+15that's like saying he's the least violent member of the Manson family.
- inactive, on 03/31/2009, -3/+18Bush didn't need any help to look bad. All you had to do was read his policies.
- wendelgee2, on 03/31/2009, -0/+15You did?
Why? - Iatethecrayon, on 03/31/2009, -0/+13O'Reilly would never do such an underhanded thing! No Spin Zone, right guize?!
- JackSrenton, on 03/31/2009, -3/+16@Supremacist
Someone named Supremacist calling someone ignorant?
Pot. Kettle. Black. - pandawa, on 03/31/2009, -2/+15thats true only if you look at glenn beck, but then again, he's a self-proclaimed psycho
- hiriumi, on 03/31/2009, -4/+17I'm just wondering where is the ethic and responsibility by the broadcast organization? People take it for granted that Fox is always faux, but I just can't believe the oranization is never held responsible for its false and fake news for their conservative agenda. Where is the real journalism? I thought United States was all about law and order with dignity... I guess I was delusioned.
- Nogger, on 03/31/2009, -2/+14Yes they do. But when they cut it, you always see that they edited it. When they splice something, there is a quick fade to white and back.
This is completely different from just cutting in a way that makes it appear as there was no editing. - dasdef, on 03/31/2009, -0/+12however christopher wallace aka biggie smalls is a legend
- diggduggDOOM, on 03/31/2009, -0/+11What about Cheney?
- avianeddy, on 03/31/2009, -1/+12"30+ years Obama has cut out of his life" ????
w.t.f????
i knew Foxheads were stupid, but they can be pretty creative too... - JackSrenton, on 03/31/2009, -1/+12Yeah they totally doctored that clip about a doctored clip. /s
Use your brain. If you have one. - DangerCollie, on 03/31/2009, -8/+18Hey, remember when Huffington Post replayed a video that was doctored by someone at the TV station? Remember how the righties went absolutely freaking berserk over that?
Maybe we should dig through some of those old comments and see if any of them have the nads to face up to it when it's one of THEIR media outlets? Or maybe they'll keep their mouth shut like a true hypocrites. - inactive, on 03/31/2009, -3/+13"Justice Department officials over the last six years illegally used “political or ideological” factors to hire new lawyers into an elite recruitment program, tapping law school graduates with conservative credentials over those with liberal-sounding resumes, a new report found Tuesday."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/washington/24cnd ... - JMitchell242, on 03/31/2009, -1/+11Careful man, your crazy is showing! Better tuck it back in!
- Valyn, on 03/31/2009, -2/+12Of course people watch more daily/colbert than actual news. There is no "actual news" on TV (at least in the US) anymore. Prolly more "actual news" in China.
What do you consider "actual news" Surely you're not trying to imply that Fox is "actual news." They ***** up the local news just as much. Even though most of Digg's news is one sided, its still more truthful news than Fox. - Kelto1, on 03/31/2009, -1/+10Where? Show me a time line of his life that's missing a 30 year chunk of info. You know, evidence as opposed to talking out your ass.
- evilJaze, on 03/31/2009, -0/+9Or as one Canadian editorial writer put it: "Flatulence Emitters"
- bono4u, on 03/31/2009, -1/+10showing part of an add isn't but putting pieces of it in a new way together is kind of a deception, at least to me. But you are right that others do too, but pointing that out doesn't make it better.
- Willow01, on 03/31/2009, -6/+15Fox News would never do something like this! They are such a trustworthy and reliable source of unbiased news.....everyone knows that......
- 4321234, on 03/31/2009, -1/+1030 missing years? You've been sarcastically calling Obama "the messiah" for so long, you've got him mixed up with Jesus.
- domenics, on 03/31/2009, -3/+11I don't get it, isn't the message essentially the same cut or uncut? "Karl Rove is Bad". Usually when you "deceptively cut" something, you're trying to change its message.
- Tddupre, on 03/31/2009, -1/+9http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE4_VFeD-xU&fea ...
He did that to himself - JMitchell242, on 03/31/2009, -0/+8Except one is intentionally funny.
- captnkurt, on 04/01/2009, -0/+8@jeffbw, @DangerCollie
I just want to tell you both "good luck". We're all counting on you. -
Show 51 - 100 of 241 discussions



What is Digg?