What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Play the flash game. view!
DragonAgeJourneys.com - Play the free companion flash game to Dragon Age: Origins.
250 Comments
- brentinkc, on 01/07/2008, -14/+1499/11...9/11
Bigger military
Tax cuts
9/11 9/11 9/11
Suppose he's got anything else to say? - heysuburbia, on 01/07/2008, -5/+100FOX is completely in the wrong here.
They said that they didn't include him because his low poll numbers, HOWEVER he is 4th in the NH polls (only 3 points behind Huckabee for 3rd!) according to realclearpolitics.com.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/presi ...
If FOX did what they said, Guliani and Thompson are far behind in the NH polls - kris.mallory, on 01/07/2008, -4/+78This headline pisses me off. Fox should not exclude ANYONE. To agree with this is like agreeing with limiting the people's choice... With that out of the way, I'd like to point out that I think Giuliani is a douche.
- LordSkywalker, on 01/07/2008, -12/+83Paul and his supporters will storm NH.
- hiphoc, on 01/07/2008, -4/+65First it was... Ron Paul cant raise money with the other candidates, then it was, he does not show up in the polling numbers. But the fact that he showed up in an actual vote means nothing to fox. Ron Paul could raise 100 mil, and won Iowa and fox would have made up another reason to exclude him from the debate. "They" know that if Paul wins New Hampshire or shows strong, they will have to start mentioning his name and the election could turn around.
How about this, instead of voting for a president. Lets just see who wins a poll and put him in the whitehouse. - spyd3rweb, on 01/07/2008, -0/+44Leave Giuliani in, the more he talks the more he looks like an idiot.
- spaceman84, on 01/07/2008, -1/+40Typical Fox News behavior. They LOVE Giuliani.
- inactive, on 01/07/2008, -15/+47i say let rudy wear his favorite pink dress tonight.. that bad little boy he is. oh yooooooooohooooooooooooo donald.. rudy wants you.
- nosuddenmoves, on 01/07/2008, -1/+31I agree, EVERYONE SHOULD BE INCLUDED in the debates. I don't understand how this could even happen.
My husband and I set up this site everyonespeaks.com so that you can file a complaint with the FCC and FEC about this in one click. Go check it out and get your voice heard! - schnikies79, on 01/07/2008, -9/+32I'm a huge Ron Paul fan, but there is NO reason to ban Rudy or any of the other candidates.
Banning Rudy is no different than banning Ron. - LeeSoong, on 01/07/2008, -1/+24tax cuts? - who's going to pay for all the special services for his lady and pals ?
- Clad, on 01/07/2008, -5/+23Or how about they just include Ron Paul and give everyone a fair playing field?
- Minarchian, on 01/07/2008, -2/+19Oh the irony
- Bing11, on 01/07/2008, -4/+21How is this hypocrisy? I don't think any Paul supporters (myself included) mind having Rudy in the debate, but there's no excuse to have him in without also having Paul in.
- banmaster, on 01/07/2008, -0/+15No, they shouldn't exclude anyone. Thats the whole point.
But they did, and if they now stick to those reasons they would have to ban Rudy instead as he has polled lower in one of thje actual polls (not some rigged telephone poll that doesn't include all of the candidates). - RpgActioN, on 01/07/2008, -1/+16Tax cuts for the rich, dumb dumb.
- patrickHenry23, on 01/07/2008, -14/+29I bet he has panties on under that suit?
- Bing11, on 01/07/2008, -2/+17That doesn't mean he supports them though. If a KKK/Nazi member says you're a great guy, should I assume you agree with the KKK or Nazism?
- Nahor, on 01/07/2008, -3/+17"Otherwise, Fox should be forced to declare the expense of their debates to the FEC as campaign contributions"
Absolutely brilliant. - LeeSoong, on 01/07/2008, -1/+14Fox is so 1990s - I seriously wonder how they stay on the air,
and why anyone would want to buy stock in a company that can not even get the candidates correctly lined up for a simple debate ? - banmaster, on 01/07/2008, -0/+12So what if he looks like an old fart?? Its NOT what a candidate looks like, its their policies and intelligence that should be all that matters.
Unfortunately you and your ilk are just too damn shallow! - neopolaris, on 01/07/2008, -2/+13Oh foolish one, WE watch...
WE watch to find out what they are making everyone else believe...NOT for any news. - banmaster, on 01/07/2008, -2/+13Let me guess, Fox NEWS told you this right??
- MillionsLivio, on 01/07/2008, -4/+15It was a carcus, in ***** Iowa.
- LeeSoong, on 01/07/2008, -0/+11There was a time when age and wisdom was respected in our culture,
now people just want to see Brittany and Paris kissing . . . - MillionsLivio, on 01/07/2008, -4/+15"Paultard" is extremely immature and even more annoying, shut the hell up.
- reuscel, on 01/07/2008, -1/+11I say leave Rudy in the debates. The more people see and hear him, the more they loathe him.
- stockjones, on 01/07/2008, -1/+11Exactly. Both should be included.
- Maloney, on 01/07/2008, -1/+11 A phenomenal waist of time? Yeah, their belts must be over 9000 minutes long.
- banmaster, on 01/07/2008, -1/+11Exactly, thats the whole point!
Honestly, you're an idiot if you actually read the article and did get that! - MillionsLivio, on 01/07/2008, -1/+11That is the most ignorant thing I've read all day, I pitty your lack of intelligence.
- Ouze, on 01/07/2008, -15/+24Only if you can do it from a computer chair.
- Ouze, on 01/07/2008, -3/+12I think, 9/11, that Guiliani, 9/11, is the best 9/11 hope this country has, 9/11, against the (9/11) terrorists.
- kreneskyp, on 01/07/2008, -1/+10hes not a ron paul supporter. He'll keep on spamming with his website trying to make money with advertisements.
- McMaster88, on 01/07/2008, -1/+10FOX doesnt want RP to win, he is anti-war... If we get out of the war, then FOX will not have anything to "report".
- JettaMan, on 01/07/2008, -2/+10It is totally up to the owners of the station who they want to include on their program. The government should have no say. However, FOX is dumb to exclude Ron Paul after he has done so well in Iowa and is polling so well in NH. This will come back to haunt them.
- deuceswilde, on 01/07/2008, -0/+8At first I figured the source might be questionable but as an aggregate source it has some definite strengths and I don't think there's any way FOx could logically use that argument anymore. Then again Fox and logic have never gone hand in hand.
- mediaspree, on 01/07/2008, -2/+10I have tuned into every republican deabte except this one. Sponsors, care to sell to me?
- Bing11, on 01/07/2008, -0/+8Dugg up, for making a good point. I see what your saying, and in hindsight I should have phrased my original post differently. The submitter SHOULD have titled it "According to their logic, Fox Should..."
I still stand by what I originally said (and I'm glad you understood my meaning -- I hate the ignorant Digger), but I would amend it if I could. - fantasyflamz, on 01/07/2008, -0/+8Hello, if you had completely read the article, he stated that everyone should be included.
- L4WL3RS34L, on 01/07/2008, -0/+8"terrorists terrorists terrorists"
- ostracize, on 01/07/2008, -0/+7Notice how he had to expand his repertoire:
Jihadists
extremists
Islamofascists
Seriously, WTF is an islamofascist? - Geronimo1918, on 01/07/2008, -27/+34Great article.
- RyanCoke, on 01/07/2008, -2/+9It's really starting to irritate me as well. Yesterday it was Dennis Kucinich, and today Guiliani. I don't really care for either of them; but they still need to be heard. No one should tell people what politicians to hear. It's the media exposure that will actually help get them votes in the end. I love corporate news, they tell us the candidates worth listening to, limiting others ability to communicate and claiming free speech all at the same time.
Everyone should be heard. You never know when you might hear something brilliant. - bill66, on 01/07/2008, -5/+12The 5 PM show caused the servers to crash. I wonder if the show will be available from some other site?
- exomni, on 01/07/2008, -4/+11***** Fox news.
- banmaster, on 01/07/2008, -5/+12You guys are both missing the point.
Dr. Paul was excluded because of his low polling numbers, and then in Iowa he polled a lot better than Rudy.
So, if fox were actually honest about the reason Paul was excluded they should now treat Rudy in exactly the same way and let Dr. Paul in because Paul got the most votes between the two.
Now this won't happen of course, but ifg, as the article says, they STILL let rudy and his pathetic 4% into a debate, they should be forced to declare the whole thing as a political contribution for Rudy as there is no other reason they would still let him in if they were honest and treated all candidates based on their actual polling numbers. - tidu, on 01/07/2008, -0/+7his lady? which one?
- bomb288, on 01/07/2008, -0/+7the point is Guiliani did worse in Iowa than Ron Paul, but they still let him join the debate but banned Paul because of his low polling numbers.
- banmaster, on 01/07/2008, -1/+7You are forgiven my son!
Your penance is to either put up 50 Ron Paul 2008 flyers, or call 5 people and get them to google him! -
Show 51 - 100 of 250 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is