18 Comments
- silentboom, on 12/02/2008, -1/+22This is just too much, leaves you speechless. The right to enter your home on an administrative search warrant?
- dirtpoorchris, on 12/02/2008, -1/+19*Cough NAZIS *Cough
- JKap, on 12/02/2008, -4/+21A model for Obama's U.S.S.A. (and I don't subscribe to the twin wings of the War Party so don't even try it).
- Striker101, on 12/02/2008, -1/+17There are thousands and thousands of intrusion of almost every type you might imagine. It's been goning on for years and years, insidiously, one imposition at a time, seemingly not worth raising Cain over, but they add up to such extent as to render our Constitution to be both ignored and without recourse. The people cannot afford, nor should they have to pay, for the great loss of time and expense of litigating all these things, which would clog the courts to a point of dysfunction. It is the communism too many seek for us all, and unfortunately including this unacceptable president-elect. December 5th, then December 15th are critical dates.
- sheeplescareme, on 12/03/2008, -1/+16isn't that precious. well, our bill of rights was clipped to a bill of right some time ago. trying this is really no big surprise.
- silentboom, on 12/02/2008, -0/+14Did you read that this has been passed in two other communities previously?
- JKap, on 12/02/2008, -3/+13Comment buried for intellectual dishonesty.
- silentboom, on 12/02/2008, -2/+12Yes and also buried for his username.
- Jimmyb207, on 12/03/2008, -0/+7It's seems the Bill of Rights might get relabeled as the Bill of Wrongs if certain Anti-American Government officials could get their way.
Those Kenneth City, Florida officials wouldn't last 2 minutes in the state of Maine before they got their asses blown to shreds!! - StingingNettle, on 12/03/2008, -0/+6"The proposal basically sets standards for upkeep and appearance and gives town officials the right to enter homes. If the owner refuses to allow the official to enter, the town can go to a judge for an "administrative search warrant" to allow access to the interior of buildings. Violations would cost up to $250 a day."
And they believed they had the authority to do that because why? - Pssdoff, on 12/03/2008, -2/+7You can rest easy at night knowing that you do not have to quarter British soldiers in your home.... For now....
- jojopumpkin, on 12/03/2008, -0/+5FTA:
"The proposal basically sets standards for upkeep and appearance and gives town officials the right to enter homes. If the owner refuses to allow the official to enter, the town can go to a judge for an "administrative search warrant" to allow access to the interior of buildings. Violations would cost up to $250 a day."
Step into my house on a ***** warrant to see the interior of my home? To make sure I'm keeping it up? I can understand health officials wanting in if your house smells like animal feces or dead things and can be smelled from the street or another apt. unit or you managed to contract some nasty disease because you never take out the garbage and for the sake of humanity get your illness identified and eradicated. Other than those reasons you will need a full warrant with probable cause or SWAT. - inactive, on 12/03/2008, -3/+6Next it won't be the British soldier's, it will be others - use your imagination on this one.
- inactive, on 12/04/2008, -0/+2Nice to see you douchebag! Never an article about civil rights or Constitutional issues without a BS comment from the douchebag.
- cquinnd, on 12/03/2008, -7/+1What communities? And what was the reaction after their passing?
- inactive, on 12/02/2008, -16/+3The title is BS. The citizens there are going to stop this. I fail to see how this is really news.
- NoLibertarians, on 12/02/2008, -20/+3Comment buried for being a drama queen
- NoLibertarians, on 12/02/2008, -23/+4Nice Bull ***** title..The real title is:
"Kenneth City delays decision on neatness ordinance "


What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the