What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Join the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Facebook view!
facebook.com/DragonAgeOrigins - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
660 Comments
- Curlz31, on 01/19/2008, -29/+549Fox news shows this while most results are putting him clear in second place, by the way.
To those who say there is no conspiracy...can you see NOW?! - GabrielGray, on 01/19/2008, -10/+396I saw it Ron Paul was in second, but the anchors said Romney, then said, "Next McCain" and finished by mentioning Huckabee and didn't show Paul at all, even though he was in second according to the numbers at the bottom of the screen.
- Hisnameis, on 01/19/2008, -20/+344RON PAUL IS IN SECOND!!! SCREW FOX NEWS!!
- ScottyC32, on 01/19/2008, -15/+331Of course there is a conspiracy. Fox News hates Ron Paul.
- Scremf, on 01/19/2008, -8/+301Anybody surprised? Seriously?
- JeffHenderson, on 01/19/2008, -9/+291I think the problem is that Fox News doesn't have any pictures of Ron Paul and they don't have an internet connection.
- penguinomint, on 01/19/2008, -12/+249***** you Murdoch!
- MisterSparky, on 01/19/2008, -3/+228If RP won, Fox wouldn't even be mentioning Nevada.
- akula89, on 01/19/2008, -11/+222someone needs to put the Fox feed out of commission
- EdwardNigma, on 01/19/2008, -6/+196Why does this channel still exist?
- rycodge, on 01/19/2008, -19/+178***** Christ... Who makes these graphics?
- inactive, on 01/19/2008, -6/+158I quit watching Fox News after they left Ron Paul out of their 5-candidate New Hampshire candidates forum, even though he was in the top five in Iowa and New Hampshire.
I'll never watch them again. - Trillion08, on 01/19/2008, -12/+162FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK HUCKABEE
- ScottyC32, on 01/19/2008, -2/+112For anyone who might be confused, the table in the lower right hand corner clearly shows Paul in 3rd place. However, Faux News excluded him from the main graphic. Just one of many, many incidences of complete BIAS against Dr. Paul in the MSM.
- staupostek, on 01/19/2008, -3/+101If they are this biased in something that can easily be proved, then how can we trust their reporting on Iraq, the economy, or anything else which is less easy to check.
- Xihix, on 01/19/2008, -2/+96Imageshack will eventually stop the image once a lot of people start looking, so here's an alternate:
http://i12.tinypic.com/7292uiu.jpg - silverseeker123, on 01/19/2008, -7/+100I pray people will at least, just to humor themselves, start to see through the blatant attempts by our "news" media to either ignore or smear Ron Paul at every turn. Like last night ABC Nightline spends 10 minutes @ the Bunnyranch in NV... what does that have to do with Ron Paul's message??? Please wake up people!
- inactive, on 01/19/2008, -11/+87Fox news will be defeated in the marketplace of ideas.... they are hurting their own business by being so biased.... so it will hurt them financially.
- stoanhart, on 01/19/2008, -2/+77Ron Paul is in 3'rd place (see bottom of pic), but Huckleberry is in the third photo at the top despite having half of Paul's votes.
- thechitowncubs, on 01/19/2008, -1/+67Screw you fox news.
- domains, on 01/19/2008, -3/+68Fox News Sucks
- Frostman3D, on 01/19/2008, -0/+65Ron Paul is in 2nd place again.
- kidal25, on 01/19/2008, -2/+65I hope fox news burns in hell in my lifetime.
- Frostman3D, on 01/19/2008, -2/+64I noticed that earlier, but now they finally put his pic up in 3rd place, but they said none of the other candidates really tried to get votes in nevada, and Ron Paul was heavily organized there and had very devoted followers.
Fox News can't be fair and balanced when it comes to Ron Paul. They hate him. - xander, on 01/19/2008, -5/+62*****
- JimInNY, on 01/19/2008, -4/+59FAUX News sucks. They aren't even worth talking about.
- TheTaoOfBill, on 01/19/2008, -12/+65Fox news is scared. They cannot handle their own lies anymore. And no matter who is president their channel will cease to exist. Enjoy this moment as horrid as it is. Because it's just one more shovel full of dirt over the fox news grave. We will have a respectable media again.
- jeffiek, on 01/19/2008, -1/+48Latest results (2:08 EST) here: http://www.nvgopcaucus.com/results
Paul is currently in third, but it's real close with McCain for second. Paul has a real lead over Huckabee and Thompson.
Too close to call right now. 2nd or 3rd????? - Darksaber11, on 01/19/2008, -3/+45I wish I had half your faith in that.
- juk3box, on 01/19/2008, -2/+44The media has traditionally been used by the people in power to push their agenda. It's good to see that people are now actively investigating this. It's kind of funny to think people would actually believe a free media can exist when it's so important as a propaganda tool for the people in power. This is what we americans get for letting the media go unchecked. We deserve every bit of what comes out of unchecked power. WE THE PEOPLE are responsible for making sure there is a balance of powers in the USA. It's a shame that it takes an obvious crisis to get people moving on things like this.
- garryw, on 01/19/2008, -7/+46I am a Romney supporter and I think this is BS. Ron Paul should be credited for Nevada, not the Huckster.
- 2trkpony, on 01/19/2008, -2/+40Paul is 2nd so Faux puts Huckabee's picture up there? 'Fair and balanced' for sure! What a joke.
Watch Outfoxed (1 hr 18 min), get the truth about the sham that is "Fox 'News':
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743 ...
"Outfoxed examines how media empires led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News have been running a 'race to the bottom' in television news. This film provides an in-depth look at Fox and the dangers of ever-enlarging corporations taking control of the public's right to know." - StormCommander, on 01/19/2008, -7/+44In case of pic failure:
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/2164/nvqo0fl2.j ...
Ya, imageshack still, but it won't have same bandwidth commin to it - rebelrider68, on 01/19/2008, -0/+36Fox news needs to start reporting the news and strop trying to create the news. I don't watch it any more, they've proven themselves to be anything but fair and balanced...fraudulent and biased is more like it.
- juk3box, on 01/19/2008, -1/+36Because it still helps guys like romney and huckabee, industries like halliburton, cronies like the neoCONs, etc, etc. It's an effective propaganda institution. Why stop when they're still at the top of their game?
- NeoConned08, on 01/19/2008, -4/+38he isnt a front runner for the very reason this digg article is up. Electioneering my friend. A complete media black out against ron paul is going on. If things like the pictures you see arent enough to convince you, you probably still believe the terrorists are attacking us because we're *free*.
- Barman, on 01/19/2008, -0/+32Not one bit.
- kpezzy, on 01/19/2008, -3/+35are you people fed up yet? Don't you realize that when they do this all they are saying is that you are a stupid moron that takes what they feed you, Faux we aren't as dumb as you think
- tidu, on 01/19/2008, -1/+32that was like a week ago. They were fine up until then?
- insomniac8400, on 01/19/2008, -3/+34There is also the matter of calling it with less than 1% of the vote counted.
- cfoster100, on 01/19/2008, -3/+33Maybe they should just change that "You Chose" graphic down in the lower left to "We Chose"? Problem solved...
- caseyh, on 01/19/2008, -4/+33You QUIT watching Fox News? You were watching Fox in the first place? What the *****? Honestly. They revealed themselves as worthless within their first week of broadcast. Have you ever even ***** heard Bill O'Reilly talk?
- WilliamDavis, on 01/19/2008, -5/+33Are you stupid in real life, or just on the internet?
- triscuitbiscuit, on 01/19/2008, -1/+29CNN has it that way as well so its not just fox by the way...
- Mdigg007, on 01/19/2008, -4/+32I can't believe you let this propaganda channel to be broadcasted in the US. WTF!
- Frostman3D, on 01/19/2008, -0/+27Once they showed that same graphic, and he was in 2nd place.
- ScottyC32, on 01/19/2008, -0/+27We can't.
- timbellomo, on 01/19/2008, -2/+25I think it's funny that there's a check (the universal "calling it for" symbol) next to Romney when there's less than 1% of the vote in... why even show any numbers at that point!?
- dmoney22, on 01/19/2008, -1/+23*****!
- inactive, on 01/19/2008, -4/+26No, we don't want them to change a damned thing. Let them dig their own hole so that everyone will realize the degree to which they are biased, unprofessional and completely unconcerned about honest journalism.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 660 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
