What is Digg?50 Comments
- principle, on 11/21/2007, -10/+27The Democrats do not have to impeach Bush. All they have to do is start investigations, and he will simply resign. Instead, they are blocking them.
- UrbanVoyeur, on 11/21/2007, -1/+10Scotty just burned a lot of bridges. I wonder why?
- mishaco, on 11/21/2007, -9/+17of course theres something there ! follow the ***** . when scott mcclellan comes up missing , pardoned or newly appointed to a cushy job thats the tell to the lie . chris dodd should jump on this .
- espo111, on 11/21/2007, -1/+5his 'relevancy' is a US Senator with the power of oversight.
- popothebright, on 11/21/2007, -3/+7Where were you 3 years ago?
And what? An "investigation"? Democrats have no balls. I'm saddened to say that the Republicans are just 'better' at this sh*t than Democrats are. Apparently we suck. We are completely and utterly impotent. - Randinn, on 11/21/2007, -3/+6I like Ron Paul despite you idiots.
- mtiffany71, on 11/21/2007, -0/+3Follow the *****? Where would you start? The Bush Administration is *nothing* *but* *******...
- kageki, on 11/21/2007, -3/+6Please explain why you feel it is so insignificant when oddly enough I believe it is a pretty big ordeal. Plame was a deep covert agent working in the counter-proliferation department (coincidence?) where it has allegedly caused the death of 70 covert agents that were working for her.
Her outing as a CIA agent was a criminal act of high treason. How is this insignificant? It is a very serious and worthy addition to the long list of indictments against Bush the war criminal. - inactive, on 11/21/2007, -7/+10Plame was a covert agent protected under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18924679/
http://news.aol.com/elections-blog/2007/03/16/cia- ... - otatop, on 11/21/2007, -1/+3What's up with all the spaces?
- Jamihabs, on 11/21/2007, -2/+4I heard they renamed some post offices.
- Beon, on 11/21/2007, -1/+3Doesn't need to be a democrat president or a democrat congress. Just a prosecutor with some jurisdiction and a grand jury. That's not a very high bar. A little time, a little distance and the right rock getting overturned. It could happen.
- kreneskyp, on 11/21/2007, -1/+3I highly doubt even a democrat president with a democrat supermajority congress will pursue anything after bush leaves office. Most of the democrats believe all the ***** the republicans say about impeachment and investigations being a distraction from their "real work" of passing ***** laws
- mishaco, on 11/22/2007, -0/+1he needs a job .
- headt0thebunker, on 11/23/2007, -0/+1Armitage admitted he learned of it via memo from Cheyne.......and Novak still says...he never spoke with Armitage before that day and thought it was odd the way Armitage provided the information.........Armitage was just the delivery boy.....What the rest of them have been lieing about is the fact that they had knowledge and where hiding it.......BUSH SAID IF ANYONE FROM THE WHITEHOUSE WAS INVOLVED HE WOULD FIRE THEM>>>>>>>>Instead he pardoned Libby.......Once they put Armitage on a witness stand that fat ***** will sing.....If he lives that long
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -2/+33 years ago he was 'in' the machine. Perhaps he wanted to get out, like Michael Corleone, but was constrained by implication in what happened around him. Perhaps it has taken this long for him to disentangle himself.
I don't really think that. To me he's just a duplicitous *****. - acudoc, on 11/22/2007, -1/+2Nothing will come of this latest revelation. The Democrats have had plenty of opportunity to act with integrity. They can't because like their Repulbican counterparts, they are nothing but partisan hacks. The era of partisan politics is over, and the Demopubs are clueless. I am voting for RP, one of the few men of integrity left in D.C., the Den of Charlatans.
- headt0thebunker, on 11/23/2007, -0/+1They have yet to even start....thats all....there is no lack of crimes to prosecute....Just the will to do it.....
- headt0thebunker, on 11/23/2007, -0/+1Don't underestimate the power of a pissed off registered voter.
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -1/+2He became enlightened.
- Beon, on 11/21/2007, -4/+5Although Potus and the Veep will avoid being impeached while they're in office, avoiding indictment after they leave may be the bigger challenge. People who were actually there will have stories to tell and a lot fewer reasons not to tell them.
- espo111, on 11/21/2007, -3/+4are we there YET?!?
!!! I-M-P-E-A-C-H N-O-W !!!!!! - MagCynic, on 11/22/2007, -2/+3No it was Richard Armitage. He admitted it already on his own free will.
- Kikokun, on 11/23/2007, -0/+1he's just one of MANY RATS jumping ship.
- MagCynic, on 11/22/2007, -1/+2But I thought Bush was a moron? It seems that the Democrats are always getting scuttled by this moron. What does that make them I wonder?
- inactive, on 11/22/2007, -1/+2Bush isn't the one that came up with this plan, though. He's just a stooge they can use as a figurehead, and pretty much keep him out of the loop.
- Jamihabs, on 11/21/2007, -5/+5Perhaps the Democrats should have an investigation into why they have had so many fruitless investigations.
- Jamihabs, on 11/21/2007, -3/+3don't forget that he also caused global warming.
- skews13, on 11/21/2007, -4/+4if the democrats win the white house.they need to put a pitbull of an investigator,on this case.until there are so many bite marks on the asses of the president,vice president,and anyone who even slightly supports them.that they not walk,but run out of dc as fast as their get away car can carry them.we know where they live when it comes time to issue the indictments.i just hope cnn's cameras are there.so we all get to see the perp walk.
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -6/+6Really? Of all the things you could investigate you want to investigate the ***** most insignificant ***** that happened in the last years?
Impeach the guy who cleans Bush's office! Let's investigate every single piece of crap we can and not invest any ressources into the fact that he's a ***** WAR CRIMINAL. - Jamihabs, on 11/21/2007, -3/+3Pitbull? Democrat? Hahahahahahaha!!!
- inactive, on 11/22/2007, -1/+1You should've read the news and followed politics for the last 7 years.
- MadN, on 11/21/2007, -8/+8Bush killed every foreign contact Plame ever had when he "outed" her.
This whole Republican cluster is nothing but a cover for raising the price of oil for the Saudis
(Iraq, Afghanistan, war on terror, Iran being next and possibly 9-11) - bluenash, on 11/22/2007, -1/+1that's a slippery slope you're standing on there, *****.
- AsusMobo, on 11/21/2007, -1/+0Forget, the justice department was compromised a long time ago.
- tvstare, on 11/21/2007, -3/+2or just for the hell of it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWuKsrn6AI8
- MagCynic, on 11/22/2007, -2/+1Didn't they raise the minimum wage to some randomly selected number in an attempt to solve our poverty problem?
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -3/+2I feel it's insignificant simply because it can't even compare with being responsible for the wrongful death of hundreds of thousands of civilians, the amputation of millions, the displacement of millions of refugees, the destruction of an entire country and crimes against humanity such as the legalization of use of torture on POW.
Bush should have been impeached five years ago. In fact, I'll go right ahead and say that the entire executive branch should be hung for treason (because that's what happens to traitors). - Jamihabs, on 11/21/2007, -5/+4If what you say is true, why wasn't anyone charged with leaking her name?
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -4/+3and Karl Rove
- GeorgeClayton, on 11/22/2007, -1/+0I'm no fan of Bush, but seriously, it's funny that despite the millions of accusations they have yet to pin anything on Bush.
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -7/+5Do Democrats do anything else besides investigate?
- MagCynic, on 11/22/2007, -3/+1Wow. Never heard of any of that. Do you have any sources for your outrageous claims? My guess is not.
- floorman56, on 11/21/2007, -8/+5Humm you are aware that it wasn't Bush that outed her. It was Richard Armitage
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -6/+3They'll never find anything. The key difference which people don't realize between Bush and Clinton is that Clinton's problems essentially arose from a moment of poor self-control over his own bodily urges. The things that the Bush administration have done were planned out in detail, in advance, and done in such a way to ensure they either wouldn't get caught, or would be able to explain away as some sort of legal interpretation. Just because they didn't have any plan in Iraq doesn't mean they can't plan when they really care about something.
- Dolomite, on 11/21/2007, -7/+1I wonder who's fault this is?
- inactive, on 11/21/2007, -11/+5Good God....This is as bad as the Ron Paul posts.
- minox, on 11/21/2007, -18/+6Bush calls for investigation into Dodd's relevancy
- totaldepravity, on 11/21/2007, -23/+3Vote Ron Paul!
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is