What is Digg?Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate
Readers have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate.Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Play the flash game. view!
DragonAgeJourneys.com - Play the free companion flash game to Dragon Age: Origins.
653 Comments
- ronpaulftw, on 01/17/2008, -14/+163digg, just as bad as any other lying corporate machine.
you should be ashamed of yourself.
reddit.com - delelles, on 01/17/2008, -11/+124If this is the case, then all articles with a Presidential candidate in the tite/description should be removed from the index after 1 bury as well.
- ronpaulftw, on 01/17/2008, -11/+111Warning: The Content in this Article May be Accurate
Readers have reported that this story contains information that may be accurate and factual. Digg is a Joke. - CaptainNoPants, on 01/17/2008, -26/+117I love Ron Paul. He loves freedom. Anyone that doesn't love Ron Paul hates freedom. Anyone that hates freedom hates America. Anyone that hates America is a terrorist. Anyone that doesn't love Ron Paul is a terrorist. Digg is a terrorist organization founded specifically to undermine the Ron Paul for President campaign. There is no democracy, only democrazy. Prisonplanet.com is the most truthful and unbiased site on the internet because it loves Ron Paul, freedom, and puppies.
- debbiemae, on 01/17/2008, -11/+90Now they put up a warning on this article which proves it is fact.
Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate
Readers have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate. - ronpaulftw, on 01/17/2008, -13/+85Just keep resubmitting it.
- illeagalhunter, on 01/17/2008, -12/+84Yellow media at work again
- drxavier, on 01/17/2008, -9/+78Who reads Digg any more? I used to, but it became a big waste of time.
- towne420, on 01/17/2008, -20/+85Bury digg their a crap site. People need to start more and more web pages and digg them all flood the bastards.
- DoktorJeep, on 01/17/2008, -17/+75If the neocon trolls could be found out perhaps they can be put on trial someday after the revolution.
In Germany they only got it half right at Nuremburg by trying only the leaders. They didn't round up all those Germans who supported Hitler directly, reported neigbors to the Gestapo, censored newspapers, helped destroy the cafe culture, kept foreign slave workers in the factories and farmsm and were complicit in other levels of the crime.
Censoring free speech, hijacking political processes, and facilitating a warlike police state are offenses worthy of judicial review even for those who never wore a uniform, got paid for it, or "followed zee orders".
It may seem radical but there are people on FR who imply that RP supporters should be rounded up. If that is ever attempted, it will be like grabbing the wrong end of a running chainsaw. - proctorsurf, on 01/17/2008, -18/+749/11 was an inside job
- Vinadetta, on 01/17/2008, -12/+66Yeah,
I've been noticing Digg doing this for some-time now!!!! This website has been hijacked as well!!! I think even Reddit is a lot better than Digg at this point, plus this site never lets me access my friends stories!!! Shame on you Digg, this makes me sick!!! - amishdigger, on 01/17/2008, -7/+59Digg is just as 'democratic' as the government: When it comes to _real_ issues, the democracy stops and the cheating begins.
- itsnt4me, on 01/17/2008, -8/+56The best weapon we have is Boycott but it's never used. I will from this moment on Boycott Digg. Easy just don't ever come over here any more.
Ron Paul 2008 - npd1969, on 01/17/2008, -11/+55Gotcha, Digg! Hopefully everyone will see you for what really are: Anti Free Speech, just plain anti American. Democracy are Two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. The sheep's opinion doesn't matter and is eaten!
- XPIOLT, on 01/17/2008, -13/+55Digg and Wikipedia are doomed to extinction. They both are controlled by the CIA and Zionists to suppress information from the dumbed down public. The sheeple are waking up like neo in the Matrix and are hopping pissed. Karl Rove said the neo-cons make reality, with the help of Digg, Wikipedia and the re-written History channel they are. Which means we have a lot of work to do.
- THEROC, on 01/17/2008, -8/+505% of all stories ever submitted are buried.
95% of all Ron Paul stories ever submitted are buried. - stanneh, on 01/17/2008, -10/+51[QOUTE] "Warning: The Content in this Article May be InaccurateReaders have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate."
what a load of rubbish Digg just lowered itself to fox news levels.
i will never visit this website again! - jasonacoker, on 01/17/2008, -10/+51There's a major shift in American politics coming down the pike. With polls in recent years showing that younger Americans were increasingly socially liberal, the Democratic party thought it was poised to take over. Turns out, a huge number of these 18-25 year olds aren't really democrats...they're libertarians. Ha!
- PSWTyrant, on 01/17/2008, -9/+49Digg is rigged!
- NRX22, on 07/23/2008, -9/+49Exposed again.
- rich6985, on 01/17/2008, -7/+45WHAT THE ***** DIGG!!!
- darthchaosrspw, on 01/17/2008, -9/+46I guess next is for Digg to take a cue from FreeRepublic, which is to reject all Infowars and Prison Planet articles during the submission process. (And yes, FreeRepublic does in fact do that. If you try to submit an article from Infowars or Prison Planet or Rense, it says "Infowars/Prison Planet/Rense not welcome.)
- phillybilly, on 01/17/2008, -4/+41Goodbye DIGG, I promise you I will NEVER visit your site again
- DahuiHeeNalu, on 01/17/2008, -6/+40Digg that's TREASON!!!
- TheLittleVoice, on 01/17/2008, -4/+36I had the story about Bush possibly involved in some cult murders, matching bite marks, cover up, etc. -- disappear after reading the story and clicking to view the comments. DIGG IS RIGGED!
- mango42, on 01/17/2008, -12/+43So yet another 'great American idea' goes ***** up.
I have suspected digg for some time of manipulation - now it is confirmed. Just another spook-controlled organisation determined to obliterate the US Constitution.
In other words - traitors.
Why not tell them direct - their email is feedback@digg.com. Be polite in how you phrase the 'bunch of America-hating turds' they are showing themselves to be... - MacBigot, on 01/17/2008, -11/+42Wake up, Digg. Our Founding Fathers warned us about democracies (like Digg) long ago:
"[D]emocracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." - James Madison
"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - John Adams
"A democracy is a volcano which conceals the fiery materials of its own destruction. These will produce an eruption and carry desolation in their way.... The known propensity of a democracy is to licentiousness [excessive license] which the ambitious call, and ignorant believe to be liberty." - Fisher Ames, Author of the House Language for the First Amendment
"We have seen the tumult of democracy terminate . . . as [it has] everywhere terminated, in despotism. . . . Democracy! savage and wild. Thou who wouldst bring down the virtuous and wise to thy level of folly and guilt." - Gouverneur Morris, Signer and Penman of the Constitution
"[T]he experience of all former ages had shown that of all human governments, democracy was the most unstable, fluctuating and short-lived." - John Quincy Adams
"A simple democracy . . . is one of the greatest of evils." - Benjamin Rush, Signer of the Declaration
"In democracy . . . there are commonly tumults and disorders. . . . Therefore a pure democracy is generally a very bad government. It is often the most tyrannical government on earth." - Noah Webster
"Pure democracy cannot subsist long nor be carried far into the departments of state, it is very subject to caprice and the madness of popular rage." - John Witherspoon, Signer of the Declaration
"It may generally be remarked that the more a government resembles a pure democracy the more they abound with disorder and confusion." - Zephaniah Swift, Author of America's First Legal Text - AAjax, on 01/17/2008, -6/+35this will never see the front page. Perhaps we should take the "***** You Frank" mantra and apply it to Kevin?
- inactive, on 01/17/2008, -11/+38Hahahahaha I knew this day would come. Digg has been caught with the pants down. I'm going to send an email asking why one bury can cause an article to become buried.
- iassocuwinun, on 01/17/2008, -5/+31I was getting really bored reading about Steve Jobs, Bittorrents, and dorks in their Mom's basement slobbering over a Maxim girl pic. This makes things interesting again! Thanks!
- blueagle, on 01/17/2008, -8/+33The reason we don't have to worry about this digg media manipulation crap is that freedom is infectuous.... and that is what these neocon media war loving whores really worry about ....they can't sleep at night knowing the people are starting to wake up.
- canewediggit, on 01/17/2008, -3/+27sarcasm got us the patriot act?
- Vigilo, on 01/17/2008, -6/+29I`ll visit the site still just to try and promote truth in the comment sections but this is sad news even though i knew digg was a racket seeing the evidence is pretty depressing. Its like almost every institution is corrupt these days and to see it with your own eyes is sad. Anyway we should maybe find another site and give it support and build it up then when that becomes corrupt we do it again. We are the reason digg is what it is so we will just do it again with another site.
- mango42, on 01/17/2008, -13/+34Not with 1 (ONE) bury wiping out 50+ diggs. That is not democracy. It is Fascism.
- JohnFive, on 01/17/2008, -8/+29Digg has been going down hill for me since I joined. All their lil fancy social perks are pointless when one person has control of what gets published. ***** digg. Every day its getting more in line with MSM. What kind of alternative is that?
- Look4Truth, on 01/17/2008, -10/+29No surprise here, they're part of the establishment.
- 1bcwtjc6, on 01/17/2008, -1/+19Should I switch to reddit?
- honestjoe, on 01/17/2008, -9/+27This has been happening for quite some time and the preponderance of evidence proves that they actively engage in censorship! There is a lot of irrefutable evidence out there. Here is just a brief example as I do not have time to post much of it and it would take up to much space.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/216/481017943_46dd1 ...
http://digg.com/tech_news/I_Bought_Votes_on_Digg
http://digg.com/politics/Gitmo_Propaganda_Team_Bus ...
http://www.digg.com/security/OBJECTION_to_Digg_Cen ...
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/AACS_Key_Censorship_ ...
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/The_Digg_Revolt_The_ ...
http://www.digg.com/politics/VIDEO_Proof_DIGG_mand ...
http://www.digg.com/politics/Digg_and_Online_Censo ...
http://www.digg.com/odd_stuff/Why_All_The_Censorsh ...
http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Blocks_Fox_news
http://www.digg.com/software/Digg_Censoring_News_A ...
http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Bans_FOX_News_Porn_ ...
http://www.digg.com/politics/Pic_Digg_Censorship
http://digg.com/tech_news/Site_banned_from_DIGG_fo ...
http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Censorship_again_2
http://digg.com/tech_news/Hunting_Down_Digg_s_Bury ...
http://www.digg.com/odd_stuff/A_snapshot_of_Digg_l ...
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Bury_Search_Bar_Stor ...
http://digg.com/tech_news/DIGG_View_Wall_Street_Jo ...
http://www.digg.com/world_news/WTF_DIGG_CENSORS_SI ...
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Users_Revolt_Ag ...
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Crash_HD_DVD_censors ...
http://www.digg.com/odd_stuff/CENSORSHIP_PARTII
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/I_thought_the_censor ...
http://www.digg.com/odd_stuff/Digg_censorship_stil ...
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Censorship_The_ ...
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Digg_s_Hex_Censorshi ... - inactive, on 01/17/2008, -9/+27nah.. i disagree. this is absolutely true. i have experienced it multiple times first hand. TRUE... kevin rose is a neocon puppet boy. he is allowing this.
- Laprisamata, on 01/17/2008, -9/+27Digg, you giant screaming asshat!!
- GoatRoper, on 01/17/2008, -11/+28Don't know if the thread is going to take off or not but someone started on on ronpaulforums.com; http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=9235 ...
- royaljenster, on 01/17/2008, -9/+26Do not allow Digg to continue their hypocrisy. You can do something by emailing them and informing them, or outright call them out, on their blatant efforts to control content on a supposed "digital democracy." = feedback@digg.com
Voice your opinion and leave this joke of a site for good. - inactive, on 01/17/2008, -1/+17Oh I see what you've done here!
- COMPACTION, on 01/17/2008, -10/+26You cannot submitt any stories from this anti-globalization site so they are part of the crime.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ - poparf, on 01/17/2008, -11/+26The fact that you can bury submissions makes so sense to the whole make up of the site. What's the point of the whole story if you can vote stories down?
Pointless and stupid site.
Let's make one better people! We have the power...not some stupid corporate site! - spartacus409, on 01/17/2008, -5/+19Digg is private property and is free to run or exclude anything it likes. That is their right of .
The question remains is digg honest about it or not?
All they need to head of any criticism is to publish a disclaimer that certain users have more votes than others or their votes carry more weight and the whole issue of censorship goes away. I support diggs property rights but at the same time digg has the responsibility to provide full disclosure of the terms and conditions. That way when you read digg you know you are reading the opinions not of a self-selected group but of a pre-selected group and that they have the ability to weigh digg in the direction they are comfortable with.
It is really that simple. Just be honest and no one will have any cause to complain.
This the problem FOX has. They have an obvious editorial bias that influences the way stories are reported. No one denies this at least not seriously or with any credibility other than Fox. All Fox has to do is be up front about it and people can make their own decision about the veracity of the stories run on the network
If digg will be honest and say that the stories here are pre-selected by a small privileged group, then when we read digg we can take that into consideration when evaluating digg ratings.
How can anyone be against honest for forthright disclosures of editorial policy? That is the essence of free speech. - DahuiHeeNalu, on 01/17/2008, -7/+20Im changed from a republican to a libertarian after this election!
- Jockdoe, on 01/17/2008, -7/+19What would you do all day then?
- cyborgmind, on 01/17/2008, -6/+18Thank you for the "free" publicity...
-
Show 51 - 100 of 654 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 