What is Digg?11 Comments
- hawkeye17, on 12/03/2007, -0/+6Bush caught in a lie again? Surprise, surprise, surprise! This guy makes politicians all over Washington look like Superman by comparison.
- inactive, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4Update: National security adviser: 'We were right' to be worried about Iranian nuclear ambition
WTF? While admitting that they have been wrong & therefore lying & warmongering for two years against Iran, they also say that they were right to do so?! That's called double-speak in my book. Also, the White House said at the same time that they are going to be even tougher on Iran! WTF? So, despite the facts, aka reality, the Executive Branch of warmongering neocons not only will not apologize/admit being wrong again about WMDs, but they want to stay on their course which will likely lead to another illegal, immoral, & unnecessary war with a oil rich country.
This is BIG breaking news because the NIE report was just released, as well as it is amazing that our 16 intel agencies are now in agreement that we have been wrong for demonizing Iran for the past two years. Aka, Bush, Cheney, Israel, & the other neocon warmongers have serious egg on their face as of today! They have been lying all along & its now proven as of today!
I say, throw the bums out! (or worse) - Calann, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2You would think that everyone would be happy to learn that a potentially threatening country is not currently perusing nuclear weapons. Yet Republicans seem upset with the news.
Why would anyone not be happy to find out Iran is not building nukes, unless they are just looking for a reason for another war? - principle, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2The status of Bush’s latest plans…
Plan A: start a war with Iran (faltering)
Plan B: overthrow Musharraf in favor of the Islamic extremists (failed)
Plan C: “terrorist” attack on US soil (unknown)
From the latest NIE it is abundantly clear that the intelligence community will no longer play the role of a pinata. Based on this, we can only hope that Plan C is now facing an insurmountable resistance from our military, and intelligence. - Balt, on 12/07/2007, -0/+1This just goes to show you that all their "intel" is false. They know it's false but they continually force it not only on us but on other countries with the intent to get a large coalition against the enemy How are we supposed to believe anything they tell us when they have all this info in their hands but instead lie to their country and the world just to push their agenda through.
- inactive, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1Ohhhhhhh *****. Now I understand. I guess Bush is going to force Israel to make the first move.....actually kind of slick if you ask me.
- inactive, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1**
- inactive, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1Good point, dude. You know what would be really funny? What if Bush supported the intel.
- inactive, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1Let me get this straight. U.S. intelligence is accurate now, but their intel concerning WMD's in Iraq was false.
Why do you wackos believe them now? Is it because it fits your anti-Bush political agenda? - inactive, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1I don't follow you.
- inactive, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1Let me make it simple for you, dumbass. Maybe he doesn't want to be the guy who commits the U.S. to WW3.....hell of a legacy.
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is