What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Join the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Facebook view!
facebook.com/DragonAgeOrigins - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
737 Comments
- kp998, on 02/26/2009, -30/+706Asshat.
- treehugger87, on 02/26/2009, -21/+593With propaganda like this, who needs facts?
- theberlindoctor, on 02/26/2009, -25/+437How are these ***** still on TV?
- djarum001, on 02/26/2009, -23/+409"You Have To Keep Repeating Things To Catapult The Propaganda"
GWB- - JamesK, on 02/26/2009, -26/+293Hannity's watchers take it on faith that his word is gospel and infallible. Facts be damned.
- freshyill, on 02/27/2009, -18/+253LA LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LA LA LA NANCY PELOSI LA LA LA LA I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN LA LA LALA LA LA
- waydee, on 02/27/2009, -14/+184Thank ***** for the BBC.
- ScienceDoc, on 02/27/2009, -27/+191The face of the complete neocon collapse. They have nothing but lies and deception....and oh yeah, their secret weapon....Bobby JIndal.
- C0ntraRadical, on 02/26/2009, -29/+178Meh, the fact that the right has to make up criticisms from whole cloth bodes well for Obama.
- captainglobal, on 02/27/2009, -12/+126FTA "Sean, that -- those words are absolutely not in the bill, and you know it."
I wish that truth burned these clowns, like holy water does vampires. - trolleyfan, on 02/27/2009, -21/+132Let's sneak a signal into his broadcasts that sterilizes anyone who watches his show for more than two episodes...future generations will, therefore, be much better off.
- McDutchie, on 02/27/2009, -2/+102“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.” - Joseph Goebbels
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” - Joseph Goebbels - sirron811, on 02/27/2009, -16/+114Hannity and the rest of the NeoCons have NO room to talk about fiscal conservatism. I heard Judd Gregg respond to Obama's budget proposal last night and while laughable, it is saddening that the serious issues of our time are pushed aside to play the game of politics. None of these Republican critics of the Stimulus Package are serious about improving our nation or they would've acted conservatively to PREVENT where we are now and how we got here over the past 8 years. Instead they return to Rovian tactics to discredit the other side and polarize the populus with half-truths, misinformation and propaganda lies.
Our country is getting sucked down the drain exactly because of this type of crap and its time we as citizens get angry about it and demand these SOBs get serious about fixing our nation instead of running their mouths bad-mouthing one another. - RealmDown, on 02/27/2009, -5/+91When thousands complain, that mean thousands are watching. It doesn't matter if you hate or love them. A network, ANY network, would rather have 50,000 people watching who HATE them, than having 10,000 people watching who love them.
It's the numbers that count, not your opinion.
Want to make a difference? *IGNORE THEM* More than anything else, this is what they fear. - athinnes, on 10/01/2009, -10/+89Facts aren't Hannity's strongpoint
- bsmang, on 02/27/2009, -11/+89Hannity is 100% pure moron. Always was and probably always will be.
- shadus, on 02/27/2009, -8/+74Hannity, Limbaugh, and Coulter... really don't have even a tenuous grip on reality. Petty things such as the "truth" or "facts" don't effect them. Rush has always been a self-centered prick but at one time he *DID* have a grip on reality, but that was a long long time ago. They more or a less live in their own made up delusional worlds where they're the center of the universe and everything is a conspiracy against them and their beliefs. Reality, Sanity, and Facts have no bearing.
- AmazingSteve, on 02/27/2009, -10/+74It's the Republican way. When all else fails, throw a tantrum like a five year old, then resort to fud, then drag Clinton out of the closet. I'll give them one thing, they've got an answer for everything but unfortunately for them it's always wrong.
- Sean42, on 02/27/2009, -13/+75Everyone knows that facts have a liberal bias. Therefore, we must shout louder to ignore them.
Hannity is more useless than a bag of smashed-*****. - srs2000, on 02/27/2009, -12/+72Fox News? NEVER. They are fair and balanced.
*bursts into laughter* - ClosedCaption, on 02/27/2009, -7/+62Sestak: Those words are not in the bill
Hannity: Of course because you're trying to hide it
So, Hannity says admits that the words aren't in the bill and the reason according to Hannity is because people are hiding it. But didn't say where he found it. If I blew the lid off of hiding spending for a mouse and was outraged. I might have where I found it written down, that adds something Hannity lacks, credibility - firesphotons, on 02/27/2009, -9/+63Hannity backs away from the truth, as predictable as the effects of gravity. Proving once again that America loves mental illness with a microphone in their entertainment mix.
- seltaeb4, on 02/27/2009, -15/+65Yes, yes, Sean Hannity is the best commentator in the whole world...
...for ME to POOP ON!!! - homercles337, on 02/27/2009, -6/+52Add NPR and PBS to your ***** list.
- thespiff, on 02/27/2009, -6/+52The ***** this man says is almost criminal. How can a political talk show on a national news network not be beholden to the facts? It boggles the mind that people tolerate this nonsense. All this rubbish does is make Americans less informed and more angry at each other. It has absolutely no value to furthering political discourse.
- einrobstein, on 02/27/2009, -5/+50RTFA
- treehugger87, on 02/27/2009, -3/+47"“Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.” Noam Chomsky
- Bologner, on 02/27/2009, -3/+45"I like Turtles.' - Jonathan the Zombie
- inactive, on 02/27/2009, -8/+49You city folk can take your fancy facts and shove them! Us Real Americans™ get all the news we need from Fox & Co. Unlike BHO and the rest of the liberal media, the guys at Fox actually have our interests in mind and are fair and balanced in their coverage.
/s - kingofinternet, on 02/27/2009, -13/+54that's what happens when your source is republican talking points, i.e. *****.
- seanstuart, on 02/27/2009, -3/+43Hence their low ratings. Wait, what?
- bababoosh, on 02/27/2009, -16/+54I think that "those words are not in the bill" sounds more like...
Sean Hannity is a LIAR. - inactive, on 02/27/2009, -8/+44Yeah, because he's pocketing so much of that money.
***** idiot. - hellsing47, on 02/27/2009, -6/+39I find Bill O'Reilly entertaining in the sense that he's not supposed to be, but Hannity is just a douche.
- Nightfall, on 02/27/2009, -1/+32Its because people would rather watch a news program that caters to their views on the world than watch an unbiased news program. This is why Fox News has always remained popular with the conservatives and has very high ratings.
- cJw314, on 02/27/2009, -1/+30Compared to Obama's predecessor, a turd could appear to be worshiped. I think it's more so just a matter of great excitement to have a PotUS who's capable of speaking ***** English.
- homercles337, on 02/27/2009, -9/+37To my knowledge i have never heard of an instance where Olberman was wrong (im sure he has been though), but if he was im sure he would make the appropriate corrections. The left does not operate like the right at all when it comes to facts, logic, and reason.
- freshyill, on 02/27/2009, -0/+27Wow, you're retarded.
- tschau, on 02/27/2009, -6/+33Olberman annoys the hell out of me, but he does have a small bit of intellectual integrity his republican counterparts lack. I wish they would all just go away though, on both sides.
- altgeeky1, on 02/27/2009, -1/+27"Republican talking points". They are distributed electronically.
You've never noticed on a news story, that Republicans COAST TO COAST manage to say the exact same thing for the microphone? There isn't even enough time for one to say "I like what he said... I'm using that", it's all coordinated.
Maybe you were trolling, or just new to politics? I'm explaining the obvious in case you fit into the latter case, and you might wonder why you are buried. - raquel9e, on 02/27/2009, -5/+31FTA:
"The bill does not direct high-speed rail funds to any specific high-speed rail project. Furthermore, any funding would be allocated by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a former Republican congressman." - MacEnvy, on 02/27/2009, -2/+27Hannity says they are in the bill. It is up to him to prove that the things he says are true. It's not up the congressman to prove that they *aren't* in the bill - he didn't make the original claim. How do you "give specifics" about something that doesn't exist? The burden of proof is on Hannity to confirm that the things he says aren't just retarded lies from FWD:FWD:FWD e-mails that he repeats on national television. (Hint: the claims Hannity makes came from an e-mail from a House staffer who later admitted that they were untrue.)
Hannity and his ilk are a cancer on this nation. They are the lead cheerleaders for the ignorant dumbing down of society, and we'd all be better off if they suddenly dropped dead. That you could support them as you do demonstrates both a willful lack of knowledge and an ethical lapse as you prop up those who appeal to the most base and ignorant natures of man. - tetsuo29, on 02/27/2009, -4/+28I wanted to digg you up, but you claimed that Rush once had a grip on reality. Please, tell us, and provide evidence, of that one time he had a grip on reality.
- deathandtaverns, on 02/27/2009, -32/+55Okay so Hannity lies. I like me some MSNBC because it really doesn't challenge my beliefs at all. I understand this isn't a healthy way to get my news, but it isn't the only place. Now given its liberal bias and we'll use their most sensationalist talking head Olberman for this, at least he's honest right? I understand that he isn't fair and he sure as heck isn't balanced but can anyone think of an example where he lied like Hannity did and didn't retract it later? I'm honestly curious about this.
- Wetzilla, on 02/27/2009, -2/+25He couldn't say that no money would be spent on those projects because he doesn't know if it eventually be spent on that project. Sean Hannity was saying that there is specific wording in the bill giving money to these projects, which is wrong. I've read the section on funding for high speed rail corridors, and there is no mention of any specific project. That's how the entire bill is. Setting money aside for different area's without funding specific projects, so that the people in charge of those area's can choose the projects they think will help the most.
Maybe it was poor wording, but if the words aren't in the bill, then it's not an earmark. - duncan202, on 02/27/2009, -0/+22Almost as good a name as the "Patriot Act" -- I think my new litmus test will be to just put "Un-" in front of any name given to the bills that come out of Washington for an accurate description of what they really are.
- davey68, on 02/27/2009, -2/+24You Think this is Sarcasm I love in Utah This is how everyone thinks. I was over at a friends house we were playing wii and the conversation we were having switched to current issues in the world. my friend said to everyone there,
"Fox news is the only REAL news. You can't watch any other channel Fox news is the only news that doesn't lie. Sean Hannity is the Only man In the News I trust."
I looked at him and asked if he was serious. Outright This is how Utahns THINK. Get me out of this *****. - gl77, on 02/27/2009, -3/+25"OW! MY BALLS!"
- Stavrosian, on 02/27/2009, -2/+24Worst secret weapon since Monty Python's giant wooden rabbit.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 750 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is