What is Digg?Sponsored by Sony Pictures
Do you believe the 2012 Mayan Prophecy? view!
whowillsurvive2012.com - The Mayan Calendar predicts the end of time: 2012. See the trailer for 2012, opening November 13.
84 Comments
- demicritter, on 04/21/2008, -8/+25Scaife, one of the world's power-elites, never invests in anything that doesn't pay a dividend. What does he want from the Hilldog? Is there a Blue Suit in the wings?
- FulcrumVitesse, on 04/21/2008, -8/+23Yep , the crazy neocons want Hillary vs McCain. But they won't get it.
- blackcloud333, on 04/21/2008, -3/+13Don't know much about the guy but I would guess he is doing what that ultra-conservative obese pill popper said to do. Support Hillary for the Republican win.
- mojo31979, on 04/21/2008, -3/+12He probably wants McCain to win overall. But if Barak gets the nomination he will most likely win the election. If Hillary get the nomination she'll probably lose(God save us if she wins) I bet you if Barak wins the nomination Scaife will turn around and endorse McCain. Guess We'll find out what happens after tomorrow.
- inactive, on 04/21/2008, -4/+12Wow Republicans backing Hillary. Since they are the ones voting for her, nobody should be too surprised.
- rmxz, on 04/21/2008, -6/+14Methinkns he wants McCain to win. Obama's the biggest threat to that. And endorsing Hillary is the biggest hope of Obama losing.
- life036, on 04/21/2008, -4/+10What a see through son-of-a-bitch. He obviously wants the weaker candidate to go up against McCain
- lamiaconfitor, on 04/21/2008, -1/+6She is obviously the candidate of evil now. The republicans should flock to her.
- Waiting2awake, on 04/21/2008, -0/+5OK, who put the ice cubes in Lucifer's drink? Digging up Noah, makes me feel creepy - but damn it he is right.
- inactive, on 04/21/2008, -1/+6Yep, on a national level, left and right are just an illusion.
- lamiaconfitor, on 04/21/2008, -0/+5Don't start taking rush seriously. Let him die in peace and obscurity. if we ignore him, he will just go away.
- queenstarsha, on 04/21/2008, -1/+6NO. i prefer obama, but you don't know what the ***** you're talking about. mccain likes the way bush has bankrupted the country by cutting rich people's taxes. mccain is cool with being in iraq for 100 years. mccain got a 100% approval rating from the folks who hate birth control pills. mccain doesn't give a ***** if the poor kids that result when you don't use birth control can afford to see a doctor. NONE of that is true of hillary clinton. i don't know where your comment came from, but it wasn't an informed brain.
- Chrispyc1211, on 04/21/2008, -2/+7Yeah, I sure wish she was able to make things happen, too. What if she was courageous enough to actually take on health care reform outside of closed doors?
- PHiZ187, on 04/21/2008, -1/+6This just shows how scared Neocons are of Obama. Hillary is the Republicans candidate of choice, they know that McCain can't win against Obama. Hillary doesn't excite the Dem base, but she will motivate repubs to get out and vote on election day.
- noahhoward, on 04/21/2008, -2/+7Okay I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but you're going to have to explain something to me. What possible reason, based on her merits, or rather lack there-of, could anyone possibly have for supporting Hillary? She's mismanaged her campaign, she's run solely on the basis of what her opponent is or isn't, what he can or can't do, never on her own merits, she quotes being the First lady as presidential experience, she flat out lies then try's to blame it on the hour of the day, not once but multiple times. Why in gods name would ANYONE see any logical reason to see this woman in office. When a bumbling moron drives your nation into the ground common sense says don't vote for a bumbling moron.
So, explain to me, what reason does this man have to throw his weight behind Hillary, this isn't your average voter, this is someone who stands to gain or lose millions based on how this nation is run, why vote for the person who has demonstrated the least ability to do so. - connieLingus, on 04/21/2008, -3/+7operation chaos, anyone? this is rush limbaugh's rather nutty plan to get republicans to endorse hillary in order to help mccain win the general election by making obama have to fight harder for the democratic nomination.
whatever. - inactive, on 04/21/2008, -1/+5This tells me that neither Scaife nor Clinton have any integrity. But I already knew that.
- atomicrobot, on 04/21/2008, -0/+4"In sharp contrast, Clinton is far more experienced in government — as an engaged first lady to a governor and a president, as a second-term senator in her own right," the paper said. "She has a real voting record on key issues. Agree with her or not, you at least know where she stands instead of being forced to wonder."
--What a load of bull *****. I'm an engineer, but that doesn't make my wife qualified to do engineering because she's married to me. Obama has more seat time as an elected official. And voting record? Please. Do your ***** homework. This is the same bitch that promoted NAFTA and is now saying she never did so, voted for the IRAQI war and "survived a hail of sniper fire" in Kosovo.
God, sometimes the media makes me want to shart. - inactive, on 04/21/2008, -0/+4I look at your posting history and I see no evidence of astute ability to foresee the future. Quite the opposite, I see idiotic statements, ad hominems and no ability to form an argument.
- stealthc, on 04/21/2008, -0/+3If this paper had endorsed Obama, this would have been a submission about how Barack is just so damn sexy even the neocons can't resist his mojo.
- mochaman, on 04/21/2008, -0/+3Endorse in the primaries and then dump in the general elections, how clear does it need to be.
- mattmollysdad, on 04/21/2008, -1/+4makes sense. Of the 3 people running Hillary is the most conservative.
- inactive, on 04/21/2008, -0/+3I don't believe you have a girlfriend. Enjoy your hand.
- hachijuhachi, on 04/21/2008, -0/+2This is one reason I'm all for closed primaries. I haven't done a WHOLE lot of thinking about it, but it seems like members of a party should have the right to decide who their candidate will be, not saboteurs from the opposition.
- lamiaconfitor, on 04/21/2008, -1/+3Ive got no problem with saying: Both. too bad you are lying about dating her. no idiot would post pictures on digg about someone for whom they cared. I hope it was fun pretending.
- FreakyBeaky, on 04/21/2008, -6/+8Maybe Bushonomics hasn't worked out all that well for his investments ... there aren't too many people for whom Bushonomics has.
- jaxcs, on 04/21/2008, -0/+2Yet another lie. Obama and Hilary have served almost the same amount of time in office, they have almost the same record. The tale of the tape puts them very close to each. Where they differ is in their electiblity. Does the most polarizing woman in America laughed at for lies about snipers and nafta support make the grade or does a black man hammered for bittergate and lapel pins. One makes sniper fire part of her stump speech the other makes at most a gaffe. But what do you care. You're voting McCain. If you can show that he personally held racist views, or bombed bulidings like the weather underground, that would be something but all you have is innuendo.
- stonewaljacksn, on 04/21/2008, -1/+3that makes so little sense. mccain has been nearly invisible, while baracks face is everywhere. i highly doubt he's going to Obama rallies and converting supporters.
also, do you really think that like, 90% of people don't already know who they are voting for in november? come on. - warringgael, on 04/21/2008, -0/+2Dugg for Irony!
- designer, on 04/21/2008, -1/+3I always look to the local paper before I vote. I'm lost without the local paper telling me what to do.
- Hillsfar, on 04/21/2008, -0/+2You know what they say... "Politics makes for strange bedfellows."
Here, we see Hillary Clinton stooping lower than she's ever stooped before. - mattmollysdad, on 04/21/2008, -0/+2I like Obama also but of the three at least with McCain u do know his postiitons... as for Hillary ur either one of her famous "uneducated older, low income white women" or you r a fool who believes her bull ***** stories.
... your move - hnsez, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1The Clinton's bathe in *****. It sustains them.
- fmaxwell, on 04/21/2008, -1/+2Same rules: Look at why the person is endorsing. If a producer of child snuff porn endorses Hillary, that's not a reflection on her. But when conservatives endorse her, ask yourself why. Is it because she really is conservative? I don't think so -- not compared to McCain. Is it because polls show that Obama is the stronger candidate and has fewer negatives? Yes, that's probably why. If you want McCain to win and there are two Democrats running in the primaries, which would you endorse? The strong one who might kick his @ss in the general election? Or the one who's weaker, has fabricated stories about sniper fire, who has exaggerated her role in foreign policy (when she was really on the "spousal bus" as Bill handled foreign policy), has failed in her appointed health care reform role under Bill's administration, who has been tainted by investigations into various scandals while her husband was in office?
- fmaxwell, on 04/21/2008, -2/+3Dear Clueless (AKA RRJackson),
Scaife wants the Democrats to field the weakest possible candidate so that the Republicans win the general election. Of course he's endorsing Hillary. Duh!
As to 'giving' her the nomination, don't count on it. The super delegates have political futures and don't want to jeopardize them by going against the will of the Democratic party voters, who now prefer Obama by a significant percentage.
Now, about your decision to skip your meds today... - AlbinoRaven, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1"..that led to President Clinton's impeachment in 1998."
Clinton was never impeached, he finished his second term then America voted for Al Gore bu the Supreme court had other ideas. How short the media memory is and how muddled... - lickmylovepump, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1*yawn* another clinton bashing story.... this is so last week. Seriously, is there anyone here on digg that isn't voting for the Obamasiah? besides me that is.
- chaosium, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1READING IS HARD
- fmaxwell, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1chaosium, you hit the nail on the head. Obama's big mistake is NOT being an elitist. He actually trusts the American public to make themselves into informed voters by reading something that's a little longer and more nuanced than a bumper sticker.
- jbenson2, on 04/21/2008, -1/+2You just don't get it. It is NOT Hillary vs McCain that the neocons want. It is HIllary vs the O-man with a very expensive fight all the way to the Denver convention. The democrats have fallen for this. The republicans view it as a gift from the gods.
- lamiaconfitor, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1Thats funny, you respect him. God you suck.
- smacksaw, on 04/21/2008, -4/+5Old news...but still.
Is this what she means when she says she knows how to deal in DC? Healing old rifts or perpetuating the lock on power that the insiders have? - inactive, on 04/21/2008, -3/+4Are you kidding me? Obama fans do it on a daily basis.
They want a clean campaign and then they post articles at Huffpost about McCains family recipes. - jbenson2, on 04/21/2008, -1/+2Operation Chaos continues to succeed
- fmaxwell, on 04/21/2008, -1/+2*****. Obama has taken a stand on many issues and it's all laid out in complete detail on his web page. http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
- gyronic, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1Bwhahaha silly Americans think their vote "counts".
Courts decide DNC nomination in 5,4,3..... - realperson, on 06/13/2008, -0/+1to think you can take that money and be strings free is a mistake
- stealthc, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1I don't think the word "conservative" has meaning anymore in American politics, so for all we know, you both may have your heads up your asses.
- swizzcheez, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1One might want to note that he's only endorsing her for the Democratic primary, not the general election. It wasn't real clear to me what the headline was exactly implying...
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opi ... - HystErica79, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1I'm really sick of people touting her experience as a senator. I live in Western NY, and our experience with her as a senator has been rather disappointing. A bunch of glad-handing and empty promises. No new jobs, no real improvement on the waterfront (a lot of studies and agreements, but no ACTION!), and now she's too busy campaigning to do her job on the Senate floor (Obama and McCain are guilty of this too). I thought she was nothing but a glorified carpet-bagger when she came here, trying to create a list of so-called accomplishments before spring-boarding off our backs into the presidency. It looks like I was right.
So vote for her if you really want to, but don't expect much in return. -
Show 51 - 84 of 84 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is