What is Digg?77 Comments
- dennisrhidalgo, on 05/21/2008, -6/+49This is phenomenal! I can't believe my eyes. If Hagel dares to challenge the presumptive republican nominee in this way it may mean that a majority of people in the U.S. will at last see the light in November.
Am I dreaming? I thought I will never see this day. - SovereignGFC, on 05/21/2008, -7/+49Can you say "VP?"
- rz8472, on 05/21/2008, -2/+33Joe Lieberman, meet your far more intelligent and rational alter ego.
Personally I'm rooting for Wes Clark as VP since he and Obama share far more in common on economic issues (also he's a Clinton surrogate, which could go a long way to healing the party), but Hagel would make a great Secretary of State or Defense imo. Would be much better than passive-aggressive Condi. - inactive, on 05/21/2008, -4/+34His positions on abortion and economics might conflict with Obama if he were the VP, but I could see him as secretary of defense, where his views on these subjects don't matter.
- lsumed, on 05/21/2008, -3/+30Chuck Hagel, an Obamacan?
- EnviroChem, on 05/22/2009, -5/+30You know, McCain can keep Liberman, Hagel sounds like a much more rational and pragmatic politician. It will be certainly interesting to see if he ends up in Obama's administration if Obama wins in November.
- relaxeder, on 04/17/2009, -5/+20Obama/Hagel '08... There's a ring to it.
- Pillage, on 05/21/2008, -2/+17Obama/Biden/Olbermann/Hagel '08!
- MidwestDrummer, on 05/21/2008, -2/+15As a Nebraskan, and registered Independent, this pleases me. Though, I know some of Hagel's motivation is to win over a few Democrats. Anyone with half a brain knows that Chuck Hagel plans to run for president someday. It's just a matter of when. He's always been a liberal Republican, but it won't hurt to win over a few more Democrats. Chuck Hagel is quite possibly the most level headed Republican that has served in the Senate in the last 25 years. It's a shame he won't be there after this year's elections. Whether he runs as a Republican or Democrats, here's to hoping Hagel makes it into the White House someday.
- A11YND, on 05/21/2008, -1/+13I believe Hagel would be a nice fit in an Obama administration, it would just go to show his commitment to wanting to inter-party relationships. Obama understands that no matter what party or race a person is, if they're qualified and have the experience you need them on your team.
- Nodaki, on 05/21/2008, -0/+10Watch the Bill Moyer's special Bush's War. You will see very clearly that both Powell was meant to be the fall guy the entire time. He tried very hard to counter the Rumsfeld/Cheyne juggernaut but failed.
His speech in front of the U.N. was his undoing in politics. He will always be remembered as a fool. - SjHoward, on 05/21/2008, -0/+9Setting himself up for a Sr Democratic post VP, Sec Def, or State. Very interesting play for him and will be a huge play for Obama, giving him big time bipartisan pub. But I don't think it is a secret that Hagel hates the Bush admin.
- A2007HokieAlumn, on 05/21/2008, -4/+13Chuck Hagel is my favorite Republican
And to make that comment acceptable, I should mention that Ron Paul is my 2nd favorite Republican. - Schul983, on 05/21/2008, -2/+11thats just awesome.
- sodade, on 05/21/2008, -2/+10Colin Powell proved that he was just a tool. He should have been the one that nailed these neocons.
- bigskygirl, on 05/21/2008, -5/+12SovereignGFC, OooOOOoohh, I agree with you. As long as it's an Obama/Hagel ticket and not on a mcSAME ticket.
:o) - krc1, on 05/21/2008, -2/+8"This is why you shouldn't get all your news from some blog"
I guess in your zeal to bash the Huffington Post you didn't note the word "BLOG" in the link you posted. If you bothered to read the Wapo Blog and the Huffington Post, you would discover that they said the same thing, with the only difference being the Wapo piece was much shorter. Also, here's the credentials of the Huffington Post writer:
"Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity. He has a masters from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and is a graduate of Dartmouth College."
Read next time, to save yourself from looking like a moron. - glamourandco, on 05/21/2008, -0/+6I can just say fantastic. My issue is not Rep's vs Dems, it's the lack of desire to admit that we need change...and then actually promote change. This staying the course philosophy that McCain has should be disturbing to ALL people, no matter what your affiliation is. Yes there is alot of reasons for example, that gas and oil prices are out of control, but don't blame the other party for shooting down exploration bills, do something about it.
Saudi Arabia/OPEC has said they are doing enough, meaning they are liking the fact that Americans are struggling to keep food on the table, pay our mortgages, and keep clothes on our backs. the Democrats recognized this defiant act and said were not sending you the arms that you so desperately need and computer upgrades for the weapons you already have. Bush says we cannot do that, I say we can. Don't you think it's time to start playing hardball with these other countries?
I'd like to know where the Kuwaiti oils at. Remember Kuwait, the country we liberated from Sadaam, saved their people, etc. Where's the gratitude? Where's the Kuwaiti Prime Minister saying we will help the American people because they have helped us...nowhere is where they are. Yes, they cannot produce the same volume of oil that we need, but it would definitely help, and we don't push the issue.
I think it's time that Americans worry about and take care of Americans. Look around, the Saudi's are laughing at us, Iran is defiant against us. We are not the power we once were, and we need to get back to that level once again. It won't happen with John Mccain at the helm and no matter what your party affiliation is you need to realize this. With our money worth nothing, Unemployment over 5%, gas over $4.00 a gallon, food prices soaring, companies closing, how can you honestly say it's great to be on the Republican side of the Isle?
I don't see a Obama/Clinton ticket, but a Obama/Edwards ticket..Change is what we need, desperately need - elizabethb221, on 05/21/2008, -0/+6Can I brag for a second? I was in the audience of The Daily Show when Chuck Hagel was on.
:) - getbusyliving, on 05/21/2008, -1/+7The time has come, and it is now. Change for one and all.
Obama '08 - Bhima, on 05/21/2008, -0/+6Has there ever been a winning 2 party presidential ticket in America?
If that is what it takes to stop talking about lapel pins & appeasement and start actually solving problems and confronting real issues SIGN ME UP! - tiger2471, on 05/21/2008, -0/+6I'm an Obama supporter and a lifelong Democrat, and I really do not care for Republicans. BUT, this Republican Chuck Hagel has my vote for VP. It's about the issues people, that's it, it shouldn't be about party affiliation it should be about ISSUES and the direction of the policy held by the candidate. Chuck Hagel would be an excellent VP and a direct contrast to John McCain, not to mention the damage it would do to the Republican party and their stance on the issues at hand. He is speaking nothing but the TRUTH and the truth has been fleeting under the current administration.
- sqwirl, on 05/21/2008, -0/+6I know. It's almost as if it's a presidential election year.
- Infidelcastr0, on 05/21/2008, -1/+5Hagel is one of the good ones, and definately deserves a place in an Obama administration.
- OniSyphon, on 05/21/2008, -0/+4A ticket no...unless you want to count Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.
I think it would be a great idea and could help bridge some of the divides in this country. - thestranger, on 05/21/2008, -0/+4That was brilliant point he brought up "talking with the enemy" rhetoric. From what I inferred, it seems like he was saying that McCain needs to not attack Obama for sitting down with "the enemy". Simply because McCain WILL have to do the same in some fashion or another, and will make him look like lair and *gulp* an appeaser, so he should not target talk-down positions that almost any half-way decent president will end up doing.
- inactive, on 05/21/2008, -2/+6Actually, with Hagel's background and heavy interest in foreign policy, I could see him fitting better as Secretary of State. Bring Colin Powell back as Secretary of Defense.
- Nosferotu, on 05/21/2008, -1/+5Being a strong liberal and growing up (and still living in) Nebraska is difficult. It's a solid red state when it comes to voting for the presidency. However, we have one Democratic senator, and the other is a Republican who doesn't just pander to party lines but actually seems like a genuine intellectual - what real politicians should be. He's one of the few Republicans I'd feel comfortable handing power to (ie. the presidency). To be fair though, I used to say that about McCain... but that's neither here nor there!
Hagel is one of the few things I am proud of, living in Nebraska. - ZenFountain, on 05/21/2008, -1/+4http://www.amazon.com/America-Chapter-Questions-St ...
Not to crudely flop out a pitch for Senator Hagel, but it's the most intelligent and poignant book authored by a politician I have read in a long time. I've always been very proud to be represented by Hagel and sincerely hope he continues to serve in some facet after his retirement from the Senate. However, just because he said good things about Obama doesn't mean he's angling for a position. He's always said what's on his mind and never been afraid to support what he believes is is best for America, no ulterior motives required. I'm an Obama supporter too but let's stop wooing every time someone says something positive about the man...hmm? Just a thought. - FRodriguez719, on 05/21/2008, -0/+3Here's an EXCELLENT video of Chuck Hagel on "Real Time with Bill Maher" from last September. This is the first time I've respected a Republican in a LONG time.
If you're against the war in Iraq and appreciate people who are brave enough to stand by their principles when they're not inline with you're "broken" party (as he insinuates), then you'll respect him within the 1st minute of this 8 minute interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTHPMtNyn_8 - inactive, on 05/21/2008, -0/+2The problem with Condi is that she's constantly hamstrung by Bush and Cheney. She tends to be much more pragmatic when allowed to make decisions on her own.
- BobbleBingnut, on 05/21/2008, -1/+3Hagel has spoken out twice now of impeachment for Bush. Hope he includes Cheney; they must be brought to justice.
- netant, on 05/21/2008, -0/+2He'll be the perfect attack dog against McCain as well. What's more damning that having a respected Republican point out every McCain flipflop in his 24+ year career? Its just not the same when you have a "contemptible" Democrat shrilling about the flipflops Democrats care about, not the flipflops Republicans care about!
- malcolmlo, on 05/21/2008, -0/+2Now that is ballsy. Much respect for this guy, whoever he is. I agree with the poster who said "this guy made my republican A. List". Same here.
- EtherGnat, on 05/21/2008, -0/+2...and worthless posts like yours cluttering the page of every story about Obama. Remove 2008 US Elections from your topics if it's a problem for you, or spend time digging non-Obama articles.
- Cornfedhusker, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1Too bad he's not running again next year for senate, though this might be because he thinks he'll get a spot in the Obama administration. And as for Nebraska being a solid red-state, I'd say Obama has a good chance of winning Nebraska's second district. (Omaha) Although that's pretty much because people here think Obama's a moderate while Hillary is far left. And Mccain just seems like Bush lite.
- EtherGnat, on 05/21/2008, -1/+2From your link: "Sen. Chuck Hagel -- a close friend of McCain's -- suggested tonight that McCain's rhetoric stems from presidential politics, not conviction."
In other words, "Hey, don't worry about McCain, he's full of ***** and won't do anything he says he's going to do!". I'll concede that all Presidential candidates twist their positions some trying to get elected, but McCain has taken that to an extreme I've never seen before over the last 8 years. /former McCain fan - Cornfedhusker, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1I don't think so, I've been living in Nebraska all my life and I have never heard of a negative comment about Chuck Hagel. Although I am only 15 years old.
- grlykool, on 05/21/2008, -2/+3Hagel for VP! Obama/Hagel 08- It is time to Unite America!
- grlykool, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1Oh yes that book is great. That is one reason I would love for Hagel to be VP. Everyone needs to read his book especially conservatives. It shows that we really have more in common than we would like to admit.
- spinchange, on 05/22/2008, -0/+1You didn't need the RP qualifier. Hagel is a lot of digger's & democrat's favorite Republican...beside, Paul really isn't republican (in name only) he's a libertarian - probably *the* libertarian standard bearer, actually
- Rednik2011, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1Harrison/Tyler (effectively) and Lincoln/Johnson as well.
- kelstock, on 05/22/2008, -0/+1I'm skeptical of Hagel's integrity, and would like to know if anyone has looked into him further, before endorsing him for Obama's VP. Hagel was Chairman and CEO of Election Systems & Software (ES&S). "ES&S was the ONLY company whose machines counted Hagel's votes when he ran for election in 1996 and 2002." http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7e4_1185745091
- baylorbear, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1Why is race even mentioned? That's a non-issue in the point you're trying to make.
- Michelle2001, on 05/27/2008, -0/+1I think they'd be an unstoppable team. He should do it now and Hillary would go away into the night. Finally!
- spinchange, on 05/22/2008, -0/+1Care to explain Hagel's voting record, then? It's more conservative than McCain's or any of the other "RINOs" the tools in conservative talk radio slap with the label who aren't strictly an automaton of the White House. Turn off Rush/ Savage nation and read a little.
- bluenash, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.
- inane, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1What the article doesn't say is that Hagel isn't running for re-election because he has continually pissed off his constituents so much he would be completely embarrassed by his landslide loss.
- inane, on 05/21/2008, -0/+1Guess you've never read any history books.
- A11YND, on 05/22/2008, -0/+1I was just illustrating that Obama seems like the guy who isn't going to turn any qualified person down based on a trivial reason like sex, race, color, party, etc.
-
Show 51 - 77 of 77 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is