7 Comments
- FloppyLlamaDigg, on 12/18/2007, -0/+4FTA: But he said he was disappointed that his fundraising efforts -- not his policies -- had gained so much attention.
So true. His policies should have gotten him some face time long before this huge money bomb did. That said, though, this is a great step forward in Ron Paul's campaign. - mediaspree, on 12/18/2007, -0/+3Probably the further decline of the country and what could have been.
- mediaspree, on 12/18/2007, -0/+2CNN will get some ratings tonight.
- Minarchian, on 12/18/2007, -0/+1"I still donated to the money bomb. Why? What he's doing for grassroots politics is good for America"
Exactly. And that is the reason I donated to Kucinich even though I will be voting for Paul. - sfitzger, on 12/18/2007, -0/+1George W. Bush?
- Volcainx92, on 12/18/2007, -0/+1As a liberal democrat I support almost nothing that Ron Paul believes in, but I still donated to the money bomb. Why? What he's doing for grassroots politics is good for America. He's making other candidates see that we respect someone who shies away from the corporate sponsorship and isn't afraid to be honest. He'll never win this election or poll well because a lot of his support comes from liberals approving of his character, but not his ideals.
- irvman21, on 12/18/2007, -3/+1So when RP gets attention from the MSM and still doesn't manage to make a dent in any primary, what are you guys going to whine about then?



What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the