139 Comments
- atheinostic, on 01/19/2008, -10/+92How many laws do they have to break before we can begin impeachment proceedings?
- drunkentoad, on 01/19/2008, -5/+40In America, they usually get really, really rich and live happily ever after
- inactive, on 01/19/2008, -6/+34i think everything is ok... unless you be a blow job....
- randomerratum, on 06/10/2008, -2/+29Allright, you guys go ahead and impeach him now..... guys?
- AbortionsTickle, on 01/19/2008, -8/+30Umm..I think once they kill Jesus and call him gay, right about then will be sufficient (for Congress).
- relaxeder, on 04/17/2009, -4/+23The level of passivity displayed by the Congress for almost the last decade has been stupefying.
- Strykar, on 01/19/2008, -5/+20One.
- QueenDoc, on 01/19/2008, -5/+19if they haven't impeached him so far, what makes you think its gonna make a difference now?
- loggia, on 01/19/2008, -6/+20Why doesn't any journalist actually ASK someone who knows about computer archiving and data storage what the likelihood of losing this much data is?
(Answer: Zero). - inactive, on 01/19/2008, -4/+17i meant unless you get a blow job.... stupid keyboard.....
- aockey, on 01/19/2008, -5/+14They get a 3rd term?
- Dugout21, on 01/19/2008, -4/+12Incredible. He can do whatever he damn well pleases.
- dood, on 01/19/2008, -0/+8Zero? Accidents happen. That doesn't excuse them, but zero is definitely not the answer to your question.
- netfool, on 01/19/2008, -6/+14Lets see here:
- "Bush's contempt for the law", 192 Diggs
- "The 5 Most Horrifying Bugs in the World", 4,298 Diggs
Judging by that, I'd say the Bush Administration could willingly admit they knew there were no WMDs, that they know & have known where Osama is the last 7 years, helped orchestrate the attack on the WTC, admit that they rigged two elections, admit they plan on rigging the next one, tell us they've had the cure for cancer but just didn't want to give it to us, have known about & frequently talk to aliens, Cheney's a alien, and...know how to stop ice cream from melting. That's what it would take. I think. 4,298 IS a lot of diggs though... - msqueak, on 01/19/2008, -2/+10I think the problem was really in between the keyboard and chair.
- lordmetroid, on 01/19/2008, -4/+11Like government would adhere to their own rules... Muhahahah, don't you get it? They are the government and you are not. They are better than you~!
- inactive, on 01/19/2008, -4/+10You Americans sure have a problem. Which makes one wonder, why your running around the World spreading something that is not working for yourself.
- Strykar, on 01/19/2008, -4/+10lawl blame the keyboard.
- jon30041, on 01/19/2008, -3/+8I'll take that bet! Let's get a Democrat in the big building so we can observe the effects on diggers' opinions.
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, on 01/19/2008, -3/+8http://bash.org/?5300
- pimpofpixels, on 01/19/2008, -4/+9How guilty do they have to act before we start to treat them accordingly?
- StarlessKnight, on 01/19/2008, -2/+7They'll just get around the other half of Congress that supports Bush... how, exactly? And you presume all the Democrats want to impeach Bush.
- Dugout21, on 01/19/2008, -7/+12If only....he would have been impeached about 10 times by now...
- StarlessKnight, on 01/19/2008, -3/+7http://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/law ...
More of a guideline, eh? - atheinostic, on 01/19/2008, -2/+6It was actually more like 2 and a half years, but your point is still valid.
- inactive, on 01/19/2008, -4/+7is anyone still under the delusion that our government is run by our representatives for us?
its run by criminals and murderers with no respect for us, or the law - AlienMushroom, on 02/21/2008, -5/+8I'm suspecting GWB is a Taliban spy.
- yournightmare, on 01/19/2008, -2/+5Worst...grammar...nazi...EVER.
- ChaosMotor, on 01/19/2008, -3/+6I don't think I know any man who hasn't lied about a blowjob under scrutiny.
- atheinostic, on 01/20/2008, -0/+3I hate the Democrats, but I really ***** hate the Republicans.
- bill1328, on 01/19/2008, -6/+9you know what happens to tyrants, right?
- dizilbdog, on 01/19/2008, -4/+7Anybody Notice when the Feds were giving the Speech about the Economy that there was Ehm Another Conference that 3,000 more Troops were sent to Afghanistan.... Interesting
- twomeyw23334, on 01/19/2008, -3/+6'he lied'
well... that "depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is" - Urusai, on 01/19/2008, -4/+7Why would the corporate-controlled Congress impeach the corporate-controlled President?
- StarlessKnight, on 01/19/2008, -2/+4"You are so consumed with hatred that you try to pin as much garbage on him as possible, no matter how stupid or baseless it is."
And you're consumed with some sort of crusade to put "people like me" in my place. As I said, if the White House could posit a reasonable explanation on how their IT Dept just happened to lose 2.5 YEARS worth of email that is mandated by law be kept as a backup, then that'd be a nice step towards the thought they're not criminals. What is more likely, however, is that they'll try to put this issue to rest quietly and pretend it never happened, or fire someone and promise it won't happen again without saying what, exactly, went wrong in the first place.
Like the source said, though, the investigation is, as the White House said, still underway. We'll have to wait, it seems, even though it's been a few years since the problem was seemingly resolved. Apparently they just didn't care 2.5 years worth of email went missing. *Shrug* We'll see what unfolds. - jsmu, on 01/19/2008, -0/+2We know you are, but what are we?
- mmmmmbiscuits, on 01/19/2008, -1/+3"How guilty do they have to act before we start to treat them accordingly?"
You just need to cry bigger tears, Nancy, and IT WILL HAPPEN! - StarlessKnight, on 01/19/2008, -3/+5There's a law stating 'backup Presidential and Vice Presidential email. Period.' Here's an "IT Guy" with a Tape Backup scheme: "Durrr... I wonder what all these backup tapes are for? I'll just use one... over and over and over... durrrr. I get paid monies." They also have auditors that somehow missed the backups not capturing these email messages? The backups suddenly started picking up around October 2003 during the Plame scandal? What great timing. Wouldn't want to appear like you were trying to hide--wait, uh oh.
Know what would help? If the White House actually said how they screwed up; that'd require them to admit something went wrong, first. - atheinostic, on 01/19/2008, -0/+2The procedure in place when Bush took office was to use new tapes rather than to re-use backup tapes. Someone made the decision to change that procedure when Bush took office.
- pushmouse, on 01/19/2008, -4/+6In order for them to be guilty they need to be Democrats. Otherwise its not illegal. Seems that way anyhow.
- atheinostic, on 01/19/2008, -4/+6You fail at trolling
- MacSuxWindozSux, on 01/19/2008, -5/+7LO! WTF
And Bush cheated in the 2000 Presidential election. his campaign manager was placed in charge of removing invalid names off the Florida eligible voting list.
What she and Jeb Bush (George bush's Brother, and then Florida Govenor) was take lists of Texas inmates and remove 90% Black Florida voters from the list that had similar names. Statistically those people voted 80% Democrat.
These were tens of thousands of votes. 500 votes is a drop in the bucket.
This is one of the highest crimes that someone can commit against a democracy. The right to vote is the very most found priniciple of Democracy, the very core value of America. And they stole that right. That's why it's a crime.
Even if you voted Bush and you like what he's done... You cannot in your right mind stand for this. - yournightmare, on 01/19/2008, -3/+5He shouldn't have even been asked about the damn blowjob to begin with.
- StarlessKnight, on 01/19/2008, -6/+8Elect one, we'll find out.
- mmmmmbiscuits, on 01/19/2008, -2/+4Um, did you see the doofus that the Democrats put on the ballet?
- jaxcs, on 01/19/2008, -2/+4This isn't hatred. This is disbelief. What I can't understand is why you think the claim to incompetence is reasonable. All organizations have retention policies, for the white house, retention of their records is actually a matter of law. I find it difficult to believe that an IT dept is unaware of it's own mandate. I don't know how much the presidential IT guys make but it has got to be a pretty plum assignment. we're not talking about IT support for the Kansas botanical society here, this is the white house. Aside from this, the secrecy the administration has exercised has exhausted most people's patience. It seems altogether too convenient. That is, except for true believers like yourself.
- jsmu, on 01/19/2008, -0/+1More like recognizing blatant felonies, high crimes, misdemeanors, and fraud when the stench from them is so overwhelming that we live in the Augean stables. Cleansing coming soon. You should move to a suitably fascist right-wing state. Try the Middle East.
- protium, on 01/19/2008, -3/+4You mean like Christianity? spreading the name of god in exchange for land? well buddy, democracy is the new Christianity, and who ever has oil, we'll make sure they're have a 'democracy'.
- MadN, on 01/19/2008, -5/+6"Impeachment is off the table"
Is a recall of Nancy Pelosi "off the table"?
I am starting to think Connecticut was right with the Secession plan... - inactive, on 01/19/2008, -1/+2"his campaign manager was placed in charge of removing invalid names off the Florida eligible voting list."
Only to counter the quadrenial effort by the liberal elite to conduct massive voter registration fraud. Convicted felons can't vote, fool. -
Show 51 - 100 of 142 discussions



What is Digg?