What is Digg?180 Comments
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -11/+98dont believe em when they stage another attack to justify war wit iran and start martial law
- EntropyMan, on 10/12/2007, -10/+84The plan's official title is: "Operation Die in a Fire" also known as "Impeach me, motherf*cker? Impeach you!" and "Go f*ck yourself!"
- fatfinger, on 10/12/2007, -6/+7715 bucks says its a nuke attack from "Iran"
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+67 This alarmist reaction from Bush only suggests he wants to do some more damage to the world
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -12/+69George Bush has long been an enemy of America. Nothing is too depraved, dastardly or vicious to be disqualified as a potential course of action for that God-damned traitor.
- Urusai, on 10/12/2007, -6/+51Maybe if Bush hadn't given everyone in the world a reason to blow up Washington...
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -3/+47Karl Rove's man-diaper.
- paradexes, on 10/12/2007, -9/+48Here comes the dictatorship. This seems awfully familiar....Oh wait Hitler pulled something similar with that fire that also forced martial law....OH WAIT!! was'nt Precott Bush (GWB's grandaddy) a Nazi symphatizer? OH WAIT!!! Did'nt Emperor Palpitine (yea I know fictional) pull a series of stunts to consolidate power and allow him to have all the political power?
History is full of these things both fictional and non fictional. The monkey in chief and Cheney are consolidating their powerbase. After that we will see martial law. Whether or not John Titor was a time traveller I dont know. If he was'nt he had hell of a god foresight. (www.johntitor.com) If he was then we are on track to everything he said. - stealthc, on 10/12/2007, -4/+42Oh *****.
Watch for a 10 kiloton nuclear device in an American port or city. The CFR said something recently about the possibility of nuclear terror being used in starting a war with Iran, and their predictions have an eerie habit of coming true. They even used the term "false flag" but improperly. Moreover, the government has been running drills mentioning "10 kiloton" terrorist nukes.
I'm not claiming all the conspiracy crap is true, but I just want people to know this is what the elites have been talking to each other about. - SteveCUBE, on 10/12/2007, -6/+43Protecting themselves from a possible revolution.
- Conwaysb0718, on 10/12/2007, -5/+41So what is their plan going to be when the ones initiating a "decapitating" attack are the pissed off United States citizens?
- d00ley, on 10/12/2007, -2/+34I smell a "terrorist" attack coming.
- nogami, on 10/12/2007, -5/+35I was under the impression that the US federal government had been effectively decapitated since late 2001 or so...
N. - mauiwowi, on 10/12/2007, -4/+32Notice the quotes around Iran. It doesn't matter who does it they will blame it on whoever is next on their hit list.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+25I think it's every American's duty to be at least a little worried
- LordZaos, on 10/12/2007, -6/+28"to prepare contingency plans for a surprise, "decapitating" attack on the federal government"
Is it me or does it sound like he knows something is coming?
and second thought... should I be worried.....
Truly scary stuff! - laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -4/+26Probably to cut off food and petroleum to rebelling sectors, then fill up the Halliburton internment (or interment - both words seem to fit) facilities with the survivors.
Halliburton is a corporate nation now, and a deadly enemy of American self-determination. - danarama, on 10/12/2007, -2/+23If a nuke is blown up in Washington they did it themselves.
- sathias, on 10/12/2007, -4/+24Key sentance in my mind...
"Other former Bush administration officials said the directive formalizes a shift of authority away from the Department of Homeland Security to the White House."
With the wrong person in power and the right set of circumstances, this could be an enabling directive to move America's political structure from a democracy to a dictatorship. And we all know what GWB said about that.
So the question isn't whether the Republicans or Democrats will win next year, but if there will be elections at all. - pongjinn, on 10/12/2007, -4/+23I'm sorry, the Executive branch is not the only branch there is. Surprisingly, there are two other, co-equal, branches of goverment that have their own powers and responsibility. Including *gasp* oversight.
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -4/+23If Bush's main concern was an attack from a foreign power, why does he treat the American people like his arch-enemies?
- FunkyWitDaSysTm, on 10/12/2007, -2/+21ooo, two things that are never good to hear together in a headline: "Bush" and "Emergency Shadow Government"
creepy - mabhatter, on 10/12/2007, -1/+18notice it's mid 07 and there are Zero viable Republican candidates. Cheaney has no intention of taking the big chair (he'd be impeached WHILE taking his oath of office!) McCain has played out... he would have been a good choice INSTEAD of Bush because he doen't keep the same friends... but he's over the hill. Ron Paul sounds nice.. so they'll have him out of the running before primaries. I've got a BAD feeling about something nasty happening real soon. perhaps it's time to start buying lots of guns and sharp pointy things.
- mabhatter, on 10/12/2007, -1/+18but these guys of PNAC don't believe in "justice" the way the Constitution lays it out. They view the courts as there to "thin out the dregs" of society so they don't have to support them... right and wrong have less to do with "justice" than getting in the way of their plans. What we've already seen is an outward representation of much darker intentions inside for 30+ years. People with that long of a memory of hatred to their fellow man are sleeping monsters of the darkest kind.
- DeskFlyer, on 10/12/2007, -6/+23Bush actually knows how to change something?
- noreturn, on 10/12/2007, -2/+19Loosecannon. You're right in some aspects. America was not everyone's favorite country before Bush. However, you can't say he's helped the situation at all. Pre-Iraq, Malaysia's currency was linked to the USD. Nowadays, well, let's just say you should see the kind of spin they put on the local news, if you can even call outright negative bias a spin.
- Beatmiser, on 10/12/2007, -2/+18I'm sure that whatever this plan entails, Blackwater will be on tap to provide private security.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater_USA - laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -13/+28Almost five million (5,000,000) Iraqis are dead since G. H. W. Bush invaded Iraq in '91. Four million died of starvation and medical complications because of the U.S.-mandated 'Oil for Food' extortion and over 550,000 have been murdered by G. W. Bush's military campaign.
I'd say the Hitler comparison may be too much for the current Bush alone to bear, but not for both Bushs taken together. Clinton gets honorable mention in this for not reversing the 'Oil for Food' embargo; he didn't even try. - JackPallance, on 10/12/2007, -0/+15Tony Snow stated that "Decapitating attack" may also include the end of the president's second term.
I see nothing wrong here...
/sarcasm - noamsml, on 10/12/2007, -2/+17Um, not that I don't think false flags operations happen (because I know they do), but do you honestly think the White House would agree to blow up Washington, WHERE THE WHOLE GOVERNMENT RESIDES, just as an excuse to start a war with Iran?
- sathias, on 10/12/2007, -2/+16Ah I see they have started "Operation End-Game"
/me packs up and heads to the hills - JanYpe, on 10/12/2007, -0/+14*wipes off the ashes*
...oh. - Maaarrrk, on 10/12/2007, -3/+17Is Bush planning to bomb Congress??????
- kethraal, on 10/12/2007, -5/+19And so it begins, brothers and sisters.
I advise you all start reading the Army's manuals on building improvised weapons. - noamsml, on 10/12/2007, -9/+23You're getting it wrong, this isn't about a long-range nuclear attack. This is about a nuclear attack launched from within the US.
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -4/+18Why bother? Just ask a soldier. Bush's administration is by far their deadliest enemy.
- danarama, on 10/12/2007, -4/+17They'd blow something up to start another war I'd garuntee you that. When Boston gets blown the ***** up they say ooo it was a 'surprise change of plan' or something. But it's beginning to sound likely if the ships going to sink then set the nuke off to get off the hook. Just blame Iran.
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -6/+19If Bush could speak his native language, muster the balls to serve out the champagne tour his father handed to him on a silver platter, plan a military campaign or keep the support of at least a third of his nation, I might agree.
- JanYpe, on 10/12/2007, -3/+15Man I hope I don't have to spend the eternal afterlife sitting next to you.
- laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -2/+13They're creepy *****, that's for sure.
- Wizardo55, on 10/12/2007, -2/+12@noamsml
Bush will be on vacation that week. - enamresu, on 10/12/2007, -2/+12@jll3sonex
funny, I'd bet a beer on the former.
and um, popular mechanics is fascist trash. - laserblazer, on 10/12/2007, -9/+19Just because former presidents incited hatred doesn't mean Bush didn't aggravate it.
Your logic sucks as much as your polarized view on politics. Go suck a lit fireplace, asswipe. - williamdyer, on 10/12/2007, -2/+12@d00ley
Evidently, 9/11 wasn't a big enough "Pearl Harbor" to take us all the way to Tehran. And now that McCain has had his "YEARRRGHHH" moment, the'll have to get the next war started while Bush is still in office. - Look4Truth, on 10/12/2007, -5/+14Hmm, I suppose 9/11 wasn't big enough for the "Pearl Harbor" effect they were looking for. I'm guessing that they won't pull any stops next round. We're in big trouble folks. There are many things that this corrupt and evil world government might do, dark times are around the corner. They've already taken away our rights and the economy is set up to implode, all they have to do is pull the trigger on another fake terrorist plot. It's coming soon, I suggest you all get ready...
"Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." - John 3:3 - Look4Truth, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11I don't post here to "win" arguments, I post the truth because time is running short. Will some people not like it? Yep but that doesn't matter to me. It's just the same as why people talk about Ron Paul, the NWO, 9/11 etc...because it's the truth and I'm trying to wake people up just as we all are. Just as we all are awakening to what the criminal NWO is doing, I'm also trying to wake people up to what I know. A friend of mine woke me up to 9/11 almost a year ago and I'm repaying the favor by sharing what I know. I realize that some people won't like it just as I didn't like being told about our criminal government for the first time. But the truth is the truth and I share because I care...
"Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." - John 8:32 - m2313, on 10/12/2007, -1/+10@mabhatter I agree. It might be less scary if it wasn't at this specific time. I mean under normal conditions I'd think "Oh terrorists" or "oh coverup" but this seems like it could get much bigger than 9/11.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11Decentralised government sounds like a superb idea: how about all 50 states going it alone and dumping the federation?
- siszam, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11I think dumbo is finally catching on to how far and wide the hate for him goes.
- m2313, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11What I think is that if the conspiracy theories are true the following will happen. A few months before George Bush steps down nukes will go off and alot of major cities. At this point there will be a buffer period of "shock shock OMG!!!!!!!!!" from everyone. Then Bush will announce that he is prolonging his presidency, blame the attack on a random opposing country or organization and assume "temporary" dictatorial powers which will infringe on our civil rights.It's a long shot but from what I've seen so far it doesn't sound too far off. Also are there any historic precedents of the scenario I just described?
-
Show 51 - 100 of 180 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is