What is Digg?350 Comments
- arrogantprick, on 12/04/2007, -5/+263Changing one's mind is rooted in the ability to think.
- GhostyBoy, on 12/04/2007, -4/+187President Bush will never flip-flop!
He sticks to his guns, and he isn't about to let any silly facts, laws or public opinion get in his way! - quakerorts, on 12/04/2007, -6/+166The facts don't jibe with his plans.... once again.
- Lomstradamus, on 12/04/2007, -15/+172Idiot!!
- inactive, on 12/04/2007, -3/+91Update: National security adviser: 'We were right' to be worried about Iranian nuclear ambition
WTF? While admitting that they have been wrong & therefore lying & warmongering for two years against Iran, they also say that they were right to do so?! That's called double-speak in my book. Also, the White House said at the same time that they are going to be even tougher on Iran! WTF? So, despite the facts, aka reality, the Executive Branch of warmongering neocons not only will not apologize/admit being wrong again about WMDs, but they want to stay on their course which will likely lead to another illegal, immoral, & unnecessary war with a oil rich country.
This is BIG breaking news because the NIE report was just released, as well as it is amazing that our 16 intel agencies are now in agreement that we have been wrong for demonizing Iran for the past two years. Aka, Bush, Cheney, Israel, & the other neocon warmongers have serious egg on their face as of today! They have been lying all along & its now proven as of today!
I say, throw the bums out! (or worse) - louise12345, on 12/04/2007, -5/+87Have some balls people! Get the word out on Impeachment. It's the strongest message we can send, short of showing up in DC with torches and a gallows.
- mrfreeziexp, on 12/04/2007, -1/+58Or the Constitution!
- stilesja, on 12/04/2007, -2/+54The NIE is irrelevant. The decider has decided and Iran is dangerous. He's not letting some nerds with their "reports" go against his tried and true "gut instincts".
- inactive, on 12/04/2007, -2/+40You aren't concerned NOW about Japan turning out he best cars and consoles, but you are upset because someday the ARABS might do it?
What an ignorant racist dick.
Seriously, you say some stuff that is so clueless it's almost funny.
But what a good little neocon "muslims are evil" shill you are.
Hey, I bet a recruitment office is open near you. Why not enlist and save the world from Arab game consoles? - totorototoro, on 12/04/2007, -3/+40Wow, Digger OC73 wins for most obsessive Digg commenting in a single post today! :p
- chronichyjinx, on 12/05/2007, -3/+37"Most of the world understands that Iran with a nuclear weapon could be a serious danger to peace,"
SO IS WAR YOU ***** NUT - arbouler, on 12/04/2007, -3/+37I don't get why other national powers haven't met to discuss the rogue state of america just yet...
how this person is still not considered an international terrorist is beyond belief... - iiiichaos, on 12/05/2007, -4/+36http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBHHt1MbSzg
Ron Paul: "Iran doesn't have a nuke and they're not likely to get one in ten years according to the CIA."
Bill O'Reilly: "That's not true. Everybody says it's five years or less."
Ron Paul was right again. O'Reilly was wrong/lying again. - oreonblade, on 12/04/2007, -3/+34"Our policy remains the same," Bush said. "I see a danger, and much of the world sees the same danger."
Mr. Bush, you really need to look beyond your cabinet of yes-men. The world does not see the same danger as you. - shyner, on 12/04/2007, -4/+30***** you, Mr. Bush.
- laterthandawn, on 12/04/2007, -2/+27Is anyone surprised?
Facts are a minor nuisance to be disregarded, as far as this guy is concerned.
What's more upsetting is that I have yet to see someone in the media (aka: someone with access in a public forum) really challenging him on his Warmongering, Part 2 routine. - JlmAWP, on 12/04/2007, -1/+24Wait, what? How does it strengthen the case for the Iraq war?
- inactive, on 12/04/2007, -0/+21Oh, right, regime change of other nations because you right wing asshats don't like them.
Not only do you reply to every comment, somehow you get dumber every time you type. - inactive, on 12/04/2007, -0/+21So nice of you to defend corruption and scandal.
See, the guy you responded to wrote that he was upset because the adminstration is more concerned with saving face than behaving in a moral or ethical fashion.
As a right wing scumbag who supports the failures and scandals and corruptions you immediately go to the "you hate America" right wing failsafe stupidity.
I guess hoping for an ethical and moral government is too much for you.
Man, why don't you just get ass cancer? Seriously.
Scumbags like YOU are the problem in America.
The problem is you are too cowardly to step up and put your money where your mouth is.
Enlist, you ***** coward.
How do you live with yourself? - inactive, on 12/04/2007, -2/+21Good job chimp!
- whataboutdave, on 12/04/2007, -2/+20Say what you will about the man, but Bush doesn't let facts get in the way of his opinions.
- MarkKezner, on 12/05/2007, -1/+17@OC73: You suck at backing up your points. Stop embarrassing yourself.
- duggtodeath, on 12/04/2007, -5/+21OC73, you have replied to almost every post here. Are you constantly refreshing the page? Are you paid to be here? Dude, seriously, you are getting dugg down each time. Why return? You are worse than a neocon, you are a loser. Get a life, get some friends and stop hunting down comments.
- morningmatters, on 12/04/2007, -2/+18The surprising thing here is not the fact that Bush continues to ignore his faults, but the amount of people who are still defending Bush's.
- avengingturnip, on 12/05/2007, -1/+17"Iran was dangerous, Iran is dangerous, and Iran will be dangerous if they have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," Bush said.
I should bury this for being inaccurate. I am quite certain he said, "nucular" and not "nuclear" but I will let it slide this time. - pcflea, on 12/04/2007, -6/+21Why hasn't he been assassinated yet???
- inactive, on 12/05/2007, -3/+18I'm just happy right now because all of OC73 's comments got dugg down. Ha...I hope he commits suicide now. "CNN: 13 year old commits suicide after being dugg down over 200+ times on popular site Digg"
- tonaros, on 12/04/2007, -2/+17Well said, arrogantprick!
- mrsteveman1, on 12/05/2007, -1/+15Christian Zionists was a pejorative in this case, as was Christian missionaries.
Christians aren't bad, but the specific subsets of Christians he was complaining about are ***** idiots. In fact he gave specific names. Don't assume people who complains about those idiots are referring to you just because you are Christian, or all Christians for that matter. Lumping yourself in with those people makes you look bad.
In fact since you are Christian you should be even more offended by Pat Robertson and the rest. - CannedMango, on 12/04/2007, -1/+15The problem with the current approach isn't that they are playing hardball with Iran (which as you point out may have lead to the 2003 decision to halt the nuclear arms program), but that the purpose of it is to build up the idea of Iran as a threat to the point where they can garner public support to attack them. The only reason they haven't attacked Iran yet is because they haven't yet reached the point where the public will support them. This report hurts that goal, so they will do everything in their power to discredit it and then continue down the path towards war rather than openly hold talks with Iran.
- yutt, on 12/04/2007, -1/+15...what?
- thebellmaster1x, on 12/05/2007, -2/+16And I'm free to block you so I don't have to see your *****, OC73.
- inactive, on 12/04/2007, -4/+18Am I the only one who thinks this idiot funny…..and dangerous?
- Cinaga, on 12/04/2007, -3/+16What a Warmonger. Or if you want that in Arabic, Mr. Bush.... مُثير للحَرْب داعِيَه لَها
- jon30041, on 12/05/2007, -1/+13My safest guess is you, because how ELSE would you know there's someone knocking on his door?
Besides, when did we start hounding Iran about its nuclear aims? About two years ago, or so I keep reading. And they stopped working on their nuclear program four years ago. But, due to pride and the fact that Tehran finds Washington so untrustworthy, they bluffed and continually scared the balls off of some people, and the current administration didn't discredit it at all though they knew they had no hand.
I'm trying to start an intelligent debate with you, OC73, because you keep getting ad hominems. What's the most we could lose if Iran got nuclear power for peaceful purposes, ie, electricity? Sure, there's an off chance that they might start producing the world's best cars or video game consoles or computers and lab techs in the future. That's a possibility for EVERY nation, ESPECIALLY the US. So how do we beat them? Invading and denying them their right to pursue economic power through peaceful means like industry and hard work? How is THAT American? "All men are created equal" does not equate to just Americans, buddy.
If we want to stay on top, we should start focusing on science, education, and industry instead of war. No one will die, and our country will get better. We can be #1 again, but it won't happen if we keep throwing money away on pointless wars in the Middle East. - xartion, on 12/05/2007, -0/+12I hope you made that comment while out of town on an open wireless access point 300 miles from your house, while behind a tor proxy, and using a self-destructing laptop
- Tangeuray, on 12/04/2007, -0/+12you mean like how we treated their President on a recent visit....the "Supporters of the war" looked like Shortbus Toolbags
- masgaster, on 12/04/2007, -2/+14When has intelligence ever changed Bush's mind?
- kushed, on 12/04/2007, -2/+14I wait for the day when his is dragged out of the office by his feet.
- synthox, on 12/04/2007, -2/+14with jibberish
- vladin, on 12/05/2007, -0/+12OC73.. Give it up already. Head back to the right wing and hide.
- greenriver572, on 12/05/2007, -1/+12neither has mine, i still think you're the self-loathing, corporate induced, retard who bought his way into office and destroyed what little dignity this country had. *****.
- theangrybaby, on 12/05/2007, -1/+12I love how even when gets proven wrong, he finds a way to say he was right..
- mrdeathgod, on 12/04/2007, -3/+14STAY THE COURSE!
- jon30041, on 12/05/2007, -0/+11Was al Qaeda there BEFORE our invasion? Sure, there's going to be members of an extremist group scattered all over the Middle East, there'll be some in the US RIGHT NOW, I'm fairly certain. But invading Iraq and dethroning it's Warlord only created a black hole in the structure that CALLED for people to try and fill that void. What do you think would happen if a major crime lord was suddenly removed from his seat? All of the petty thugs would run around like idiots, committing theft and murder and so on even worse than if they had a head, all until someone steps in to fill the hole. Crime and corruption is NOT like a deer, wolf, or human. It's like a tapeworm. Every piece is capable of setting up on its own, and so it will try.
- LordBalderdash, on 12/04/2007, -3/+13dick cheney
- Tangeuray, on 12/04/2007, -2/+12Keith Olberman is the only guy speaking the truth in Dinosaur-Media
- MattB123, on 12/04/2007, -1/+11We should let UN inspectors make the call then. They were right last time.
- shootinputin187, on 12/05/2007, -0/+10When was Iran ever dangerous; in what way is it dangerous now; and where is the evidence of this danger? Yea, I thought so.
- aamer, on 12/05/2007, -0/+10what's really sad is that his profile says he is 36.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 351 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is