What is Digg?122 Comments
- Dumbledorito, on 10/12/2007, -2/+52FTA: "The American people have wanted change in Iraq, and they got it," Perino said. "The president announced a new policy on January 10th that was quite different and divergent from where we were before."
Remind me to never let the president "help" me with any problem, ever. He's likely to resolve a flat tire by busting out my car's windows.
FTA: Perino said, "The terrorists that are seeking a safe haven in Iraq, if we were to leave, would find one, just like they have one in Afghanistan, and they can hurt us and..."
They have one in Afghanistan? Really? How did THAT happen, I wonder?
And then Perino pulled the well-worn 9/11 card out, despite its complete irrelevance. Nothing to see here, move along. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+44""Why won't FOX News show you this?http://www.rense.com/general74/afgg.htm""
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Why should we hear about body bags and deaths? I mean it’s not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?”
-Barbara Bush defending her son on Good Morning America March 18, 2003 - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+42Before anyone clicks on that link, you should know it contains extremely graphic photos
- jstroot, on 10/12/2007, -3/+25FTA: The White House spokesperson agreed that Congress has a "constitutional role" to play, noting that "the president's been dealing with Congress since we got here in 2001."
WTF?! The president does not 'deal' with congress!!!! This attitude alone shows that he has the wrong opinion of what being the president entails. - elvenseven, on 10/12/2007, -6/+28"War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength" - George Orwell
- noodlez, on 10/12/2007, -1/+21We must go forwards, not backwards; upwards, not forwards; and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!
- glasnostic, on 10/12/2007, -4/+19Choosing not to lower oneself to the level of FOX news is not chickening out. its having a glimmer of respect for reality based news.
- avolant, on 10/12/2007, -1/+16the french, pioneers in cosmetic surgery, developed a device in 1792 capable of removing between 8 and 10 pounds from a patient in a matter of seconds. reportedly, many who partook in the procedure were perceived as kinder, more intelligent, and markedly less talkative. while the machine was primarily fashionable among powerful french figures from 1793 to 1794, recent speculation suggests substantial potential for a resurgence in modern america.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+19REPUBLICANS SH!T ON OUR TROOPS!!!
"We don't care how many of you die. We can't admit we were wrong." - Dumbledorito, on 10/12/2007, -1/+13You left out the fact that while you're waiting for someone to winch your car out of the river you just drove into, you're paying your friend who owns a nearby gas station three times the cost of his gas to keep your engine running. Aw, hell, the engine stopped, so you're just giving him money to piss fuel into the river. Where's the money coming from? Well, you just happen to have a debit card tied to the kids' college fund, and screw them anyway; You're the decider of the family, after all.
Besides, there's just enough cash in there to go buy a bigger car that just might make it across the river. The guy selling it to you says if you go fast enough, it'll float, so what the hell... - Dumbledorito, on 10/12/2007, -2/+14Let's see, you call deciding to not appear on a network that's rabidly against your party and will give you nothing resembling a fair hearing "chickening out," yet you seem to support a president who is so fragile that he won't give a speech unless the audience has been hand-picked for their loyalty and reverence.
Good logic, there. - Sambone67, on 10/12/2007, -2/+13Except for the fact that she'll devour you when it's over.
- glasnostic, on 10/12/2007, -1/+11What if you discover that there is no way to get to your destination by car? Do sit in your car and wait for somebody to build a bridge, or do find a way of getting to your goal that doesn’t involve a car?
- lichme5000, on 10/12/2007, -4/+13Jesus, dude. A little warning is in order.
- m3th0dm4n, on 10/12/2007, -3/+12"lone"?
Hypocrite. - glasnostic, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11i was going to rant, but really.. if the wool is still over anybody's eyes, those eyes and the body they belong to should be on the next flight to iraq. perod
- GeneralFault, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9No there are four lights!
- habfan29, on 10/12/2007, -3/+11She later added that, in fact, 2+2 indeed does equal 5!
- nickels, on 10/12/2007, -4/+12You know that about 70% of this country wants nothing to do with this administration and their actions right?
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos! - GeneralFault, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8Yah, they had to "deal" with the voters in 2000 as well. But we all now know that if you control 2/3 branches, you don't really have to "deal" with anyone.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+9"People who quote historical figures on internet message boards without offering any insights of their own are ***** idiots" - Benjamin Franklin
- CourtesyFlush, on 10/12/2007, -2/+9Yep.....the headline contains the proper buzz words.
This will be on the front page for hours and absolutely nothing new will be said at all. - GeneralFault, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8"Obama and Clinton chickened out on a debate on Fox TV"
From a member of the party that needed a signed "loyalty oath" just to attend their national convention... Damn. - ClassicJBC, on 10/12/2007, -5/+11I think it's important that people see those images and understand what's going on, but really, exercise a little tact, please. You run the risk of turning away people who would otherwise lend a sympathetic ear (or eye, as it were).
- avolant, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7why does everyone think america would be afraid to leave a country in complete ruin. we do it all the time! dont worry. we'll leave when we've gotten what we want.
- LucidOne, on 10/12/2007, -3/+9Lexinton, no it's not the fault of every American, it's the fault of every American that voted for Bush and Cheney. The blood of 650,000 Iraqi civilians and over 3,000 American service personnel is on their hands! And that's not to mention the human suffering shown by these pictures that will go on for decades if not centuries! Hope you all are real proud of yourselves and your president.
- CourtesyFlush, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6"There was a better way, but your so-called leader refused to do it."
Human Rights Watch defies your account.
INDICT SADDAM
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2002/03/22/iraq12900.htm
"Washington was a logical first choice, and ultimately the Clinton administration endorsed the case. But restrictions in the U.S. ratification of the Genocide Convention stood in the way of a successful suit. "
The entire international community refused to to indict Saddam Hussein and avoid a war.
The US was constrained by a legality. - blizzok, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH - spyd3rweb, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6everytime you pull off 1 layer of wool you find 10 more beneath it.
- haggie, on 10/12/2007, -3/+8Using Bush's logic, when Americans wanted a "change" in civil rights in the 60's, the correct action would have been to lynch more African Americans...
- kazem, on 10/12/2007, -4/+9That's the most disgusting thing I've ever seen.
- GeneralFault, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6No, you blow up the red light, kill the cop sitting next to the light (so you can get away with it) taking out the nearby coffee-shop and it's patrons in the process (but hey, all is fair in city-driving) and forget where you were going in the first place (or did you ever really have a destination?).
- rstarr, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6Depends on if he invests into diebold enough.
- GeneralFault, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6@lexington86
Nice "everybody does it" defense. I'm proud to be an American that opposed this war from the beginning. I'm proud of most of our history, but I'm ashamed at the direction this country has chosen to take since about 2001. There is no doubt in my mind that this decade will be viewed as one of America's darkest, most bigoted, ignorant, angry, hateful, greedy, blood thirsty times. I fear that the next couple of decades will be viewed as our time of retribution. I wonder if it will be worth it to pay for your mistakes for the rest of my life just for the privledge of living in the land that I love. - niradg, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7yeah, but Tony Snow was better at it. I mean, he really made me want to punch the TV
- GeneralFault, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4I wonder what would have happened if the British had gone to war against guerrilla fighters (worldwide) instead of the guerrilla fighters of the American Colonies. Not only would we have won our independence, but England would either be gone, or still fighting that conflict. Some should note that England would have lost that war either way.
- lexington86, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5Agreed.
I've also found that posting comments that actually contain intelligent and well thought-out positions/arguments is completely useless on Digg stories like this. - spyd3rweb, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5@GeneralFault
dugg for TNG reference - spyd3rweb, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5@hdtvdust
how about breaking the FISA law by wiretapping without warrants. And if this is a true 'War on Terror' terrorists should be considered POW's and given all the rights granted to them by the Geneva Conventions. However Bush has them tortured in secret CIA prisons. I could continue but you wont listen anyway. - ronito, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5LOL.
You are not going to get peace with millions of armed men. The chariot of peace cannot advance over a road littered with cannon. ~David Lloyd George
Honestly this war will not end until either Bush leaves office or a draft is re-enstated. - acroyear2, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5That sounds like Bush's cogent logic.
- polyGone, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6***** your war against a _tactic_
- kuzotz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3"The president announced a new policy on January 10th that was quite different and divergent from where we were before."
Did she just say divergent to sound intelligent?
My ***** god these politician types are ***** nazi's. - stepnw1f, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3yeah.... we noticed your post.
- RMorris, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3"We're from the government, we're here to help."
- bkocher, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Sorry BohicaTwentyTwo, wrong!
"More than 30 pages of the report consist of biographies of commission members and lists of people they interviewed; we counted just five pages devoted to the matter of U.S. troop levels in Iraq. . . ."[12] Increasing those levels was not considered in depth as it was not considered a viable option..."
referenced from:
"A bipartisan path to surrender?". The Washington Times, LLC. (December 7, 2006). Retrieved on 2007 January 30. - Maddoktor2, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4@ hdtvdust:
Thanks for your informative and constructive reply, you dumb, worthless *****. - stepnw1f, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3They won't do any worse then your guys. *****, instead of protecting us, you've been attacking our rights and calling us traitors for using our Freedoms. Nice try, Orwell.
- Silencer7, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Do Not Enter
Severe Tire Damage
"*****. Stay the course!" - Karmalary, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Black is White, War Is Peace, Mouths are *****
Oh wait... -
Show 51 - 100 of 117 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is