What is Digg?160 Comments
- motivatedmama, on 04/28/2008, -9/+46All week long and every third article...more support for the next President of the United States!
- thirdcoastborn, on 04/28/2008, -6/+32hillary's plan will garnish your wages if you don't purchase health insurance.
- had3l, on 04/28/2008, -6/+29FTA: "as the neck-in-neck race for the Democratic nomination continues with New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.". What neck-in-neck race?
- br0wnstar, on 04/28/2008, -3/+22Well damn. Charlene Fernandez has decided? Hillary is bound to quit now.
- inactive, on 04/28/2008, -8/+25Over in the republican camp.
- synaesthesia, on 04/28/2008, -0/+10The manufactured one engineered to keep ratings high after a year-long campaign.
- InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+11I know, we should stop trying to defend the 1.6 million million Muslim American citizens that he happens to be referencing in that passage.
*****, don't you hate it when someone who actually read the book comes around? - Stevanoski, on 04/28/2008, -3/+13What a crooked way to run an election, super delegates my arse, let the people vote.
- nreynolds, on 04/28/2008, -1/+10I'm going to believe you, but only because you sound crazy.
- TheSwashbuckler, on 04/28/2008, -0/+9We CANNOT win the war - the war is between the Iraqis. We're just in the middle.
- synaesthesia, on 04/28/2008, -1/+10Yea, OBAMA is the weepy one. Riiiight.
- makkaveli19, on 04/28/2008, -0/+7OMG THAT WAS AMAZING, OSAMA AND OBAMA OMG THEY ARE RELATED!
dumbass - Genetico, on 04/28/2008, -0/+7As happy as I am to hear more support for Obama; I still Can't get over my frustration over the tedious and useless need for super delegates. All these extra rules for circumstances that don't even apply to this age just make things confusing and give Americans less of an urge to participate in the election process.
- yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -1/+7You should pay attention more and stop getting all your news from Digg comments.
- ZiggityZhang, on 04/28/2008, -0/+6well, now it's what, another 41 superdelegates for Obama to cinch the nomination? everyone of them counts toward it.
- threemagic, on 04/28/2008, -2/+8no, YOU'RE wrong on both counts...
- Dested, on 04/28/2008, -0/+6It works in other countries you know... Are you saying that americans are to greedy to have free healthcare?
- adcat, on 04/28/2008, -4/+10You're wrong.
- yellowfish04, on 04/28/2008, -0/+6Well we're all familiar with the old adage, "As goes Charlene Fernandez, so goes the rest of the nation."
- withincontext, on 04/28/2008, -1/+6*yawn*
- jgtg32a, on 04/28/2008, -1/+6Only 56% of the US uses the internet, and I'm willing to be most just do the Email routine.
- Lazydriver, on 04/28/2008, -2/+7Seriously, shut the ***** up you elitest cow. You have no idea on how poor people got to where they are, so really, shut the ***** up unless you are one.
- yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -1/+6Digg bias toward Obama!?!?!? Say it ain't so!
- zappa027, on 04/28/2008, -0/+5Who will win the war?
- DeejayPancake, on 04/28/2008, -0/+4If you're talking about McCain, I can only hope that America has more sense than that.
- bphicke, on 04/28/2008, -1/+5The Democratic Party is not very democratic.
- forgiste, on 04/28/2008, -4/+8In the trash.
- cafesuada, on 04/28/2008, -2/+6I thought Hillary won Arizona. Then shouldn't the super delegate vote with the popular vote and go with Hillary?
- jbenson2, on 04/28/2008, -2/+6Thanks sonny, just keep paying your taxes to pay for the retired folks and the baby boomers. Certainly appreciate it.
- makkaveli19, on 04/28/2008, -1/+5haha. speak for yourself. canada's health care is just fine.
- bfrank72, on 04/28/2008, -2/+6Necks inside of necks!?
- synaesthesia, on 04/28/2008, -3/+6Obama Butt Boy? What are you, nine?
- InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4OH lawd, don't you know that poor people are always lazy and stupid? It's scientific fact that rich people are smart, handsome, well-mannered, and generally superior people! Just look at the original poster!
Oh. Wait. I nearly forgot about how that statement is so completely erroneous it's silly. - pyronik, on 04/28/2008, -3/+6next, we can take all the money of rich people and divide it among the poor by creating a wealth tax.. They dont need it!! Go Obama!!!!
- yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4The Dems can't trust the voters to make a decision like that.
- chrissku, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3The thing I thing has disappointed me the most in this election would have to be the media. It is really sad how they have see sawed weekly between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. We all know Obama has this nomination won. There is simply no way that the superdelegates will overturn his popular vote and pledged delegate count lead. The only reason why Hillary thinks she has a shot is because our "unbiased" media keeps telling her she does. This whole thing is f'in ridiculous.
- InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3Why would we want Reagan back again?
- kday, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3I'll go with #2.
There are new superdelegates every day pledging votes for Obama and Hillary. This front-page story is just as bad as the MSM spam you see on CNN and Fox News.
I have nothing against political news, but articles like this really aren't newsworthy. Is there anyone willing to contradict this statement? If so, please let me know why. - LordVance, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3Yes. This is exactly the sort of post that screams "I am a high school graduate" (let alone a college grad).
- akatsuki, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3They had a valid reason for a specific instance of hijacking of the party by radical interests. Just not a campaign where both people are in the Democratic fold...
Dean has hinted at changing the system which would be good - they need to weigh the system more for general electability by discounting solidly Dem states where the candidate doesn't matter and weigh swing states much heavier to determine electability with also an eye towards electoral college proportions (e.g. if the state is proportional federally, then that is how Dem delegates should go). Superdelegates should vote based on how it advances the Democratic agenda in their region. (I know these factors are strong Obama points, but this is for after this nomination process anyway).
Basically the system should be set up to create a stronger party every election cycle and to make strong advances. - InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4I can't fathom why anyone would need over 200,000 a year for a family of five. If mine can survive in what I consider pretty good conditions on 100,000 then really there isn't any good reason to have more.
Well, I guess people got to have computers and flat screens in every room, by God. - InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4But giving an entire state's population's vote to one candidate certainly is. Guess what bozo, the electoral system is broken no matter which party you're on.
- slabdigger, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Healthcare would be one of the taxes I would most be happy to pay. At least with a national health care plan, you get something directly for your money. And more importantly, every single US company becomes more profitable. oh. Except the insurance companies.
- chrissku, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Well lets see she has CNN and ABC doing everything they can to get her elected.
- Kyan, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Absolutely pathetic. I agree with you.
- Kyan, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2He is? Link?
- InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+3***** off *****, the only one who denigrates people on welfare is someone born into wealth and who assumes they deserve it.
Go ahead, tell me that the people in my community are not the hardest workers I know, because they have to work every day and night just to make enough to feed their families. Tell me that my parents have not done more work than you ever will to make a nice living for me. Tell me that so I can laugh in yo face idiot. - DeejayPancake, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Wtf? We'll win the war? Oh yes, sir, we'll win it. After years of our men dying, and the fact that we're already plenty of men down. But no fear, Iraq'll totally thank us in the end.
- InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Wait. Did you just hate on him because he can't afford *****?
Wow. Darn those poor people, always complaining about how they can't pay for things. What's next, amirite? - 1longtime, on 04/28/2008, -1/+3"this is cause [sic] by democrats" -- Not sure how to approach something so stupid. Your numbers are fudged, you've forgotten that a Democrat (Bill) recently led the way in paying down our debt and balancing the budget (with a surplus, no less!). Oh, and you're a jerk.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 148 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is