5 Comments
- reed311, on 12/07/2007, -0/+1THIS MUST MEAN THAT EVERY POLL THAT SHOWED RON PAUL AT 2-3% WAS A LIE!
- Ebacherville, on 12/07/2007, -1/+2You can verify the number pressed by the tone, try 7 on your phone it sounds nothing like 6.. see for your self.
Vote Ron Paul in 2008 - reed311, on 12/07/2007, -1/+2John Kerry was only ahead in meaningless straw and Internet polls. Bush had the lead in the polls going into the election and he won.
- XxtraLarGe, on 12/07/2007, -1/+2It doesn't really matter if they pressed 6 or 7, what matters is that Ron Paul was excluded. There's 10 numbers on the pad, why not use all of them, and include Paul, Hunter & Tancredo, then use 9 to be removed from the poll?
- Minutemen, on 12/07/2007, -3/+2Why didn't they just have Ron Paul's name as an option? Polling doesn't matter anyways, if it did John Kerry would have been our president (god help us). In the end people need to start making up their own minds and not just voting for who Katie Couric or Bill O'Reilly tell them to vote for. Go Ron Paul.


What is Digg?