2 Comments
- siriusly, on 06/10/2008, -0/+2Actually, I think a "leaderless jihad" is more dangerous and more difficult to stop. On the other hand, I don't think Al Qaeda/terrorism -- organized or not -- would be a threat if we applied ourselves to eliminating its causes: poverty and suppression of civil rights in third world countries coupled with imperialist aggression in same.
- nikamarie, on 06/09/2008, -0/+2""If it's a 'leaderless jihad,' then I can find something else to do because the threat is over," said Peter Bergen, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan New America Foundation,"
My response to this statement above and the whole thing on the fight on terrorist since 911 is; well, find something else to do then! Seems like nothing good has come out of all of this. Look at our economy, complete ***** does Bush even care? Is the question. ahhhhhh!!!!!!!


What is Digg?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our