What is Digg?211 Comments
- Paktu, on 10/24/2007, -6/+407Before everyone screams "conspiracy", let's look at this case by case:
First link on the page: Todd Blue, died 9/12. Ok, this one is definitely suspicious.
Second link: They haven't released the names of those killed, so how do we know they were involved with flying the B-52?
Third: This story is also about Todd Blue, so it's just a dupe of the first link
Fourth: Story is dated July 5, two months before any of this occurred
Fifth: Dated July 20. Again, how are these guys connected to the nuke incident when they died months before it happened?
Sixth: Possibly legitimate, but there's no evidence to show he worked at Minot
This site is batting about one for six today, so I would take it with a grain of salt. - wageslaven, on 10/10/2007, -25/+216"Mistake"? Those nukes didnt fly across the country on a mistake. The controls in place to put them on the plane (take them from storage, move them, load them etc etc) is very organized. Someone opened their mouth and let the cat out of the bag - someone who wasnt supposed to notice, someone who wasnt supposed to understand? I havnt got a clue, but Nukes just dont move around like that without anyone noticing..
Im not suggesting its a vast evil conspiracy, but we certainly havnt been told what happened - there is far too little real information on the matter, too many simple questions havent been asked. - gn0stik, on 10/18/2007, -11/+81"Im not suggesting its a vast evil conspiracy"
Oh, come on, yes you are. - hawkspur, on 10/24/2007, -8/+63Why does everyone keep digging this story when it's not accurate? Several of the people listed died before the incident even occurred.
- KMye, on 10/18/2007, -2/+49Thank god someone else actually bothered to look at dates as well. Looking at this author's apparent attention to detail, I'd also rather see his evidence for those who hadn't already died being linked to the incident than just take his word for it. The three accidents in September could be seen as suspicious, but from an airbase of 8000+ people, it seems much more likely, at least to me, that it was just a bad week for car accidents. If someone can show actually evidence these last 4 people were somehow involved with the mishap, and could maybe proffer some sane reason why the Air Force would be out to kill these people after the story's already broken, then I would take a second look.
- mortigon, on 10/18/2007, -7/+54Dude shut up.
They're watching... - r1y23, on 10/18/2007, -2/+45Yes....this is very concerning indeed. It appears the CIA has reactivated their time cop squad and is killing the people before the event ever happened....It will not be long before the event never happened
- kaelyiesta, on 10/18/2007, -3/+34While a nuke 'accidentally' flown over the US mainland screams coverup, I think your assessment is sound. These investigations need to be more rigorous and done by someone not just pulling up random nonsense. I think questions are in order, but not hasty conclusions.
- ccyr85, on 10/18/2007, -2/+32Your analysis reeks of logic, reason, and critical thinking. Therefore it must be ***** and you are obviously part of the conspiracy
- JonnyTrombone, on 10/24/2007, -11/+39Everyone who diggs this article will die in an accident! The Government is coming!
- Crispin, on 10/10/2007, -2/+30Please read the stories linked in the article. Two are about the same guy who was from Minot. Two happened on a date well before the nuke mistake. One was a guy from Barksdale AFB not Minot. The other had no names released. I don't think "the Pundit" was paying attention when he/she pasted all these links together.
- WonderBoy55, on 10/10/2007, -1/+26Way to ruin everyone's fun. What happened to the good old days when anyone could create any conspiracy they wanted without proof or evidence, but just by simply saying that it's true?
- sweetleaf10, on 10/10/2007, -17/+40Sounds Like the Terrance Yeakey story. Never forget Terry - http://www.apfn.org/APFN/yeakey.htm (Dont who know Terry is? Read about it now)
- noahhoward, on 10/10/2007, -13/+35You realise this article is false right? I'm tired of you stupid morons yelling inside job when you can't even be bothered to read an article for comprehension.
- dvsbastard, on 10/10/2007, -1/+21Pffftt... Why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory?!
- tehpwnrate, on 10/10/2007, -0/+20I hope everyone who reads your comment buries this as inaccurate. Otherwise I predict another case where something gets like 3k diggs, and those 3,000 people tell their friends about the evil conspiracy that was proven false before they all circle jerk to Loose Change.
- oldhick, on 10/10/2007, -4/+18Come on... There's not one bit of evidence in that whole article. Just conjecture and a good story. It was an entertaining read, but not much more. As for the story about the nukes, read Paktu's comments. Its all *****. The dates don't make sense. Several of the deaths have no link to the base at all.
- Typhoon2009, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14In case of a crash, you'd have a better chance of meteors slamming into earth and simultaneously resurrecting the dinosaurs than the nukes going off. They're very very very precise... gotta give ethem the right codes, the right signals, the right drop altitude, and probably lots of other top secret stuff before they can go off. Otherwise there's just some atomic sludge that can be cleaned up by HAZMAT.
- Hoovooloo, on 10/10/2007, -3/+17Uhhh, no, he's mocking claims that a car accident is clear evidence of some conspiracy, by sarcastically pointing out that car accidents happen all the time
- mtrip, on 10/10/2007, -2/+15Ok, please don't try and confuse us with facts. And even if this story is bunk, don't you see that would just make it a false false-flag operation, to confuse us? Sheep!
- Dumbledorito, on 10/10/2007, -0/+13Fine print, no matter what the occasion, is a bitch.
- SuperCow1127, on 11/02/2007, -1/+14INVOICE #56729341
Expected ship date: 9/22/2007
3-Day ground
Item(s):
(1) Acme Sarcasm Detector
Recipient: Konstantino
We hope you enjoy our product and continue to shop with us in the future! - Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -3/+13Not only that, but has anyone actually worked with SFS? Just because someone was in the 5th doesn't mean they had direct involvement with the plane carrying nukes; The people in SFS's get rotated between more than a hundred on-base jobs regularly.
- mediablitz, on 10/10/2007, -8/+18Amazing. 57 diggs added in two minutes, and I bet not ONE person spent the time to research and realized the story is BS.
I am convinced one in a hundred people actually read the stories on Digg... - Sogui, on 10/10/2007, -2/+12Apparently Todd Blue counts as two people, cool.
- mikes1, on 10/10/2007, -7/+16Dugg for the opposing view on that page. Read it.
- subterfuge, on 10/10/2007, -4/+13they obviously DID sign a confidentiality agreement, or they wouldn't have been assassinated
- subterfuge, on 10/10/2007, -11/+20this happened like two weeks ago. what do you mean "all but one of the rest died well before this happened"? they died before the nukes were carried? how could they have been associated with the messup, then?
- noahhoward, on 10/10/2007, -12/+21Exactly.
- Castronaut, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8that is what a laughable cliche comment looks like.
- tehpwnrate, on 10/10/2007, -13/+21Car accident? Come on. Who would get in a car accident? All you have to do is avoid the other car. And please, as if anyone would risk their life by hitting another car. Nope, there are no car "accidents," only people purposefully ramming each other.
(Your logic is ***** retarded because it's based on your own silly assumptions and lack of knowledge) - noahhoward, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10Just go ahead and admit you didn't read the article before we all make you feel really really stupid.
- mtrip, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10digg is proof that those days are alive and well.
- WiseWeasel, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9Blocked and reported. Die, spammer!
- douggmc, on 10/10/2007, -5/+13I'll make a hasty conclusion. This story is a ***** joke. Buried.
- cygnus2112, on 10/10/2007, -6/+13Of course.. they don't have the launch capabilities yet. They would have to detonate it inside to bomb us. Duh!
- odessit, on 10/10/2007, -3/+10most of the "evidence" is inappropriate....beginning from the dates of some of the articles, to the fact that there is no relation of the people to the actual incident, except that all of them were somehow related to the air force.....
ahhhh....those conspiracies! - bbear, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Because people digg articles to bookmark them for later reading.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9Good rebuttal, buried for the lame conspiracy and the OP not actually reading the article.
- Dumbledorito, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6And they have nukes!
- dirtyhand, on 10/10/2007, -2/+8oh ***** how do I erase my comment!!
- oldhick, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7The odds are astronomical because it didn't happen. Read Paktu's comments then go back and look for yourself... The story is *****.
- noahhoward, on 10/10/2007, -3/+9Three comments up from you the whole article is throughly debunked.
- b3owulf, on 10/24/2007, -3/+9buried as inaccurate
- mniwill, on 10/10/2007, -3/+9if you actually clink on the links most of the deaths happened before the accident, so yea....
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7Amazingly, one of the guys involved died MONTHS before he was involved in the accident! So clearly the government is not only killing these people, but they have invented a time machine to do so! A pre-emptive cover up!
(Also, I love how they link to one where no names are given and just say "Ths guy was involved. We say so, so believe it." Not to mention how there is no evidence that ANY of them were involved, other than this web site saying so.) - dtilford, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Is there are way I can dig you up more than once for finally read the entire contents of an article and researched it before posting? I'm so tired of people just believing this stuff because it makes the government, cops, etc...etc look bad. A round of applause for common sense and seeing every side of a story.
- Razster, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7The dates don't seem to match and how do some of these even link if they don't know who they are and if they worked there? 2 of them died before this even happened... Helps to read I guess.
- Blackbow, on 10/24/2007, -3/+8Buried as inaccurate, or at least until some real solid information can back up this claim.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 205 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is