What is Digg?25 Comments
- Protectionist, on 11/07/2009, -6/+37As Nick says, close the door now.
The LibLabCon would have us believe that doing so would damage this county.
I for one do not think jobs and housing for the Indigenous British would damage this country.
Our children do not see a future because they see little prospect of finding a job or setting up homes of their own.
Historically, invasions have always been vigorously resisted, and with good reason. - johansalmon, on 11/07/2009, -5/+35Sooner or later these people will have to be removed.
- TRUESTORIES, on 11/07/2009, -6/+36They've ruined most of Africa with their population explosions and now they've come to ruin us.If you care about this you really ought to be doing something about it.The first step is easy,vote for the British National Party every time you get the chance and tell your friends too.
- JoeBrown9876, on 11/07/2009, -6/+31And as the BNP tell us they are always first in the queue for jobs, housing and everything else.
One thing for sure. Voting for the Lib/Lab/Conners isn't going to change this disgracefull situation. Only voting BNP will do that. - heechee1010, on 11/07/2009, -5/+29Simple message to the free loaders invading our country and all the illegal criminal sneaking in.
"Don't unpack, you're going back!"
Vote BNP and see this actually happen. No lies, no compromise just action. - ENDEUARABIA, on 11/07/2009, -3/+19any other non-European country would
- RealDemocracy, on 11/08/2009, -3/+15We are FAST approaching the tipping point - soon the non-whites will be a majority in OUR country, and there will be nowhere left to run to get away from them, and all their 'wonderfulness' that the government and media keep telling us they have to offer us all.
What is their plan
For YOU, white man? - 14justice, on 11/07/2009, -5/+16Historically countries weren't governed by traitors who supported the invasion! Let's face it, somebody is actually voting for those guys... but, why?
- Aetion, on 11/08/2009, -1/+12Thanks for that comment BB!! You've probably shown any undecided voters who are reading this page where they ought to put their cross on the ballot-paper if they really want to do something about it.
- johansalmon, on 11/07/2009, -4/+14There can't be any messing about, or our race is done for.
- TolerateThis, on 11/08/2009, -3/+9http://bnp.org.uk/policies/
- TolerateThis, on 11/08/2009, -2/+8I'll explain it as being morally wrong to displace an established civilization. Those living on land which was purchased or that was not previously allocated a use have no compulsion to leave that land.
Once a civilization is established and the land is allocated to a particular use within that civilization, then it is morally wrong and an aggressive act for an outsider to attempt to take possession of it by force or by deception. It is also morally wrong for an outsider to attempt to change the culture of another civilization by subversive means. - Va1kyrie, on 11/08/2009, -2/+8We will kick the multiracialist universalists out of Britain. What you are saying reminds me of the scene from 300 where the messenger from Xerxes tries to convince Leonidas that he must accept multiracialism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkWS9PiXekE
THIS IS BRITAIN!!!!! - TolerateThis, on 11/08/2009, -1/+6Well provided we respect each others right to an opinion that differs from our own that's fine. Immigration, race and religion have a major effect on our lives. Berating anyone who attempts to raise these issues is an attempt to deny freedom of thought and freedom of expression.
In reply to your question, what specifically is unfair about copyright law as it stands? Copyright law gives people a right to earn income from their own work. If consumers want a more flexible way to consume content then that is an issue for copyright holders and publishers to address, not the government. I believe the present government is / already has made changes to copyright law to permit people to lawfully make copies of things they own for their personal use, or to share something they own (lending not copying) amongst a group of friends. I don't think the BNP has any policy for/against these issues. - johansalmon, on 11/08/2009, -2/+7There are no where near as many British people in non whites countries as vice versa.
- Va1kyrie, on 11/08/2009, -1/+5This is exactly the sort of question that Nick should be asked on Question Time so that the anti-BNP could just stop obsessing about our policies on race. I am sure the BNP policy would be consistent with our ideology which would NOT be fascistic and would not punish people downloading music or movies for their private collections. That goes together with our policy that we should not pay the TV license. You will find that this is nothing to do with race.
- johansalmon, on 11/08/2009, -1/+5Yes, anyone who wants an un-biased look at their excellent policies can do so on their website.
- lurcherman, on 11/09/2009, -0/+3@Frostek. You are wrong to imply that a large amount of British people have emigrated to overcrowded islands. There are some Brits who've moved to the Canaries or the Caribbean but after that you'd be hard pushed to find overcrowded countries to which Brits have retired/emigrated. You seem a bit confused about all of this population demographics business.
- TolerateThis, on 11/08/2009, -1/+4I agree that we should be able to make personal copies of things we own. I can't think of any justifiable reason why we shouldn't. Some copyright holders just want to make a buck every time they republish the same content in a new medium/format. Any government representing the consumer-majority who elected it should act in their favour, rather than bow to pressure of corporations on this issue. However at the same time copyright holders, large corporations included have every right to defend themselves by reasonable means from those who attempt to deny them an income from those works.
It's true that the internet changes the way information is shared. Over time the result of this should be that individuals own and benefit from their own work, and are no longer dependent on large corporations to publish their work for them. - MrNobody808, on 11/08/2009, -3/+3You would be wrong to think that about the government and the changes they have made to copyright laws. In fact it is still illegal to rip a CD to your iPod.
Copyright, as it stands at the moment, only benefits the large corporation who hold the rights. They are outdated laws for the last century and are totally incompatible for the digital age, when communication anyone anywhere on the planet is instant. - MrNobody808, on 11/08/2009, -4/+3WOW Trying to bury me for asking a question that is not related to race or religion or immigration! That is mature! o_0
- Frostek, on 11/08/2009, -6/+2And how do you explain it to those British people who emigrated who all have to move back to the UK because of you?
- Frostek, on 11/08/2009, -10/+4Do they even have any other policies?
- MrNobody808, on 11/07/2009, -15/+4Personally, i don't give a rats arse about immigration, race, religion and that type of thing. What i want to know is, what are the BNP's policies on the unfair copyright laws, and global distribution of content? There is heehaw about this on the BNP website.
- BerateBirthers, on 11/08/2009, -16/+2Change is coming to England and there's nothing you can do about it. The Angles have had the land since the 5th century, now it's everybody's turn to run the place.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is