Digg

Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

See the original image at globalresearch.ca

25 Intolerable Contradictions of the Official 9/11 Story

globalresearch.ca — At last there is a book about 9/11 that politicians and journalists can openly discuss without fear of being labeled "conspiracy theorists". 9/11 Contradictions advances no theories. It simply exposes 25 astonishing internal contradictions that will haunt the public story of this unparalleled event for all time.

Bury

SeethisPass 206 days ago

102 diggs
digg it

Look4Truth, on 03/18/2008, -15/+37http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-371925900 ...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=P-uWyjwHY7g
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7860484536 ...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8756795263 ...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-165688030 ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053 ...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/kaboom/loizeaux.html
- RomanThommassen, on 04/09/2008, -1/+2meaby you should explain what each link is, this is a bit confusing :P
jcm267, on 03/18/2008, -46/+17Buried as spam.
- RomanThommassen, on 04/09/2008, -0/+10Buried as jcm.
Herkimer56, on 03/18/2008, -44/+22This is nothing more than another load of truther ***** written by one of the most disingenuous members of the Cult of 9/11. Buried.
- Observant1, on 03/18/2008, -14/+24make that 26 intolerable contradictions, Herkimer56 and the pea-brain gallery.
  - rangerjoe8999, on 03/18/2008, -19/+11Which puts you and all the troofers in the "no-brains" gallery.
    - card51short, on 03/18/2008, -7/+17debunked
- chase001, on 03/19/2008, -10/+9Truth bad. Peace bad. MOOOO!
  - Herkimer56, on 03/19/2008, -11/+6Still lowing herd I see.
rexblade, on 03/18/2008, -10/+33Interesting the same "nay-sayers" must always add their 2 cents even though they NEVER look at the article being discussed. Its like clockwork. Always within the first few comments of an article. Do they search for these articles hourly? Several times an hour?
http://digg.com/users/Herkimer56/ 12,000+ comments and counting Wow hes been putting in overtime....
http://digg.com/users/jcm267 10,000+ comments since 01/2007 not quite as many as your idol but still a whole lotta trolling.
Lets give these guys a big round of applause for the hundreds if not thousands of hours they have contributed to trying to keep the cover up covered up. Its not very hard to see these people have an obvious agenda and intelligent debate is not part of it. "Think for yourself question authority". I really dont think your insults regarding "truthers" has changed anyones mind sorry guys.
- DJBALL, on 03/18/2008, -10/+21Just proves these chumps either have no lives OR are paid to pump disinfo
  My guess is a combination of the 2.
  Their so obvious with their smear campaigns that they actually do harm to the Bush Believers.
- Herkimer56, on 03/18/2008, -22/+14What makes you think that I didn't read the article? These are the same stupid points that Griffin has been trying to make since he laid down his theology books and started pretending to be educated in something useful. I'll make you a promise, you people stop posting this ***** and you'll see my comment count go way down.
  - h4ckler, on 03/23/2008, -0/+9If it irritates you so much, just stop clicking on the links. God your a moron. I wish I had half the spare time you and JCM267 have... I might cure cancer.
  - RomanThommassen, on 04/09/2008, -0/+7why do you waste time on this? you think Bush will like you this way?
  - gandhii, on 04/09/2008, -0/+2Honestly though... why is this so important to you?
- Hortnon, on 03/19/2008, -15/+7What's to read? It's an advertisement for a book.
- RomanThommassen, on 04/09/2008, -0/+10meaby they're the ones preventing our articles to get to the front page, cia agents.
LucidOne, on 03/18/2008, -9/+25This is an excellent book despite what the brain-dead government shills might say. The author does not put forth any conspiracy theories of his own but rather calls attention to some of the most glaring discrepancies in the "official" 9/11 conspiracy theory. The implications are clear: the US government is lying and covering up the worst mass murder in US history!
- card51short, on 03/19/2008, -0/+10but but herky says the book is a lie!
Herkimer56, on 03/19/2008, -23/+15FTA: "Within the philosophy of science, there are two basic criteria for discriminating between good and bad theories. First, a theory should not be inconsistent with any of the relevant facts....Second, it must be self-consistent, devoid of any internal contradictions. If a theory contains an internal contradiction, it is an unacceptable theory."

This is a quote allegedly from David Ray Griffin. Let's take a look at it, shall we? "First, a theory should not be inconsistent with any of the relevant facts." All of the truther theories, and I do mean all of them, are not consistent with the facts. Anyone who believes otherwise is simply ignorant of the truth, in denial or are selling something. (I'm looking at you, Griffin.) "Second, it must be self-consistent, devoid of any internal contradictions. If a theory contains an internal contradiction, it is an unacceptable theory." You people can't even decide among yourselves which theory you're going to go with. Will it be controlled demolition, mini-nukes, space lasers or missiles this week? Oops, I almost forgot the holographic airplanes. Mustn't forgot them. If it wasn't for your contradictions there wouldn't be much left of your little theories.
David Ray Griffin is a conman and a liar just like Steven Jones, Alex Jones, William Rodriguez and the rest of your heroes of the Cult of 9/11. If you believe that attacking me and making ridiculous assertions about me will change this fact I regret to inform you that you are very wrong. Your ignorance is sickening.
- jaymzdean, on 03/19/2008, -4/+14GRiffin hasn't said anything about mini-nukes, space lasers, missiles or holographic airplanes. You've done a ***** job of building the strawman that you tried, but failed to roundhouse kick in the face. You, my friend, are complete, and utter, ***** idiot. 911 was most obviously an inside job. Get used to the idea, *****, because you will eventually have to swallow the truth.
- Herkimer56, on 03/19/2008, -16/+6Proof?
  - jaymzdean, on 03/19/2008, -2/+13For starters:
    10 (ten) floors per second
    - Herkimer56, on 03/19/2008, -16/+2You tell me which building you're talking about and I'll tell you why you're wrong.
    - card51short, on 03/19/2008, -2/+11no YOU don't have any relevant facts. lol.
      Herky show us what is false about the info...or else you're just spewing your nonsense again.
    - Herkimer56, on 03/20/2008, -13/+2So some ***** makes a non sequitur and I'm supposed to be able to read his mind? Is that what you're saying, truther?
  - gandhii, on 04/09/2008, -0/+1So you're suggesting that two wrongs make a right?
    I don't know.. I'm just not getting what your argument is. Many 911 theorists are or may be full of it, so therefore the official story is legitimate?
    Perhaps a solid linear description of your logic would be more fruitful. Thanks.
bullcutter, on 03/19/2008, -19/+12no matter what you want to believe, the government has a very good reason for being secretive in this matter: the interest of national security (an angle most of you have never even considered).

but seeing as how many of you would just as soon watch the U.S.A. dissolve in flames as protect it, i know this reason won't hold water with you, so carry on in your mission to make yourselves look ridiculous.
- h4ckler, on 03/23/2008, -0/+9Not sure what national security would be at risk. But I tend to look at cause and effect relationships more than most people. I see where we were pre-9/11 and then I see post 9/11. Anyone with a working brain should be asking questions. Especially when Kennedy fired someone for talking about flying hi-jacked planes into US buildings to start a war.
  
  Fuel for the frenzy...fodder for the press.
- spaceman77, on 03/30/2008, -6/+1yes they should say 'because of national security' but that is their mistake. don't give them any help.
- munawarali2, on 04/09/2008, -0/+7So for the sake of National Security - the media and the people should just all sit down and be quiet? Isn't this against everything America stands for? That the Government be accountable to the people, that it be open and communicating. What would the founding fathers think?
timbofirstblood, on 03/19/2008, -9/+17I have one question regarding the alleged cover-up: If there are forces powerful enough to perpetrate the type of crime you people are alleging, why couldn't they come up with a good reason for invading Iraq? Seriously, if you can bring about the destruction of the WTC and successfully cover it up by creating an elaborate story involving radical Muslims, why couldn't you plant a few WMD's in Iraq? Maybe you could successfully even show a link between Iraq and 9/11? Give me a break.
- h4ckler, on 03/23/2008, -0/+4 No one here is accusing a cover up but rather why there are so many discrepancies in the "official" story. I think if you had a family member die in 9/11 you'd be wandering too.
theshizzler, on 03/19/2008, -12/+8How do these keep getting dugg? I suppose I should stop being shocked at the sheer number of ***** insane people in the world.
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 03/19/2008, -10/+6Alex Jones announces to his unwashed masses "Go to Digg, and digg up these articles, and then stalk these people and bury their comments, everywhere."
- card51short, on 03/19/2008, -1/+9"How do these keep getting dugg? I suppose I should stop being shocked at the sheer number of ***** insane people in the world."
  
  no YOU'RE ***** insane!!! No backsies.
  
  "Alex Jones announces to his unwashed masses "Go to Digg, and digg up these articles, and then stalk these people and bury their comments, everywhere.""
  
  Says the troll in the alex jones thread.
  
  Any adults want to debate the facts or do the kiddies want to keep calling people names?
imjustabill, on 03/19/2008, -11/+10There's so much stuff about WTC 7 being a controlled demolition. Why would they even blow it up anyways? Lets assume the government orchestrated the whole plot to run 2 planes into the wtc buildings, a plane (or a missile, or whatever the truthers say it is this week) into the pentagon, and they still decide that that isn't enough, so they plan a controlled demolition of some smaller side building that nobody cares about anyways? Why would they even do that? It doesn't really make any sense.
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 03/19/2008, -11/+6This week it's "Prozac and Rogaine in the drinking water caused 9/11!eleventyones!"
- card51short, on 03/19/2008, -1/+10"There's so much stuff about WTC 7 being a controlled demolition. Why would they even blow it up anyways? Lets assume the government orchestrated the whole plot to run 2 planes into the wtc buildings, a plane (or a missile, or whatever the truthers say it is this week) into the pentagon, and they still decide that that isn't enough, so they plan a controlled demolition of some smaller side building that nobody cares about anyways? Why would they even do that? It doesn't really make any sense."
  
  Many people believe building 7 houses much of the homing equipment used to broadcast a signal to the planes. But who really knows? That's the whole point...we need to find out.
  Guys like SpaceMonkeyZero will do ANYTHING in his power for people not to find out. Because he wants to invent theories of how the building came down. He doesn't want the truth.
  
  "This week it's "Prozac and Rogaine in the drinking water caused 9/11!eleventyones!""
  
  Last week the deniers were saying the drinking water is PERFECT. CNN comes out with an article saying there are drugs in our water and it's now fact.
- GlobalistShill, on 03/19/2008, -1/+12War is a racket, and companies are making huge profits. There is no question that criminal government elements and businessmen are crawling into each others laps. As for motivation for the demolition, consider the following:
  
  Who profited? http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/silverstein.html
  
  Was sensitive information destroyed?
  http://www.wtc7.net/lcache/wtc7.htm
- GlobalistShill, on 03/19/2008, -1/+8Addendum -
  
  Additional records destroyed in the building:
  http://www.wanttoknow.info/010917nylawyerwallstree ...
JustDino, on 04/09/2008, -0/+3imjustabill:
Maybe you should find out what was in #7 building---seems all the investigation of corporate fraud was being done there--nice to have that building and the investigation go away as well as the investigation at the Pentagon into 2.3 trillion dollars missing from DOD on 9/10/)01 just happened to be in that section of the Pentagon---on the opposite side of the building the Plane?? came in from.
- gandhii, on 04/10/2008, -1/+1references please
masx, on 07/31/2008, -0/+0It seems to me that no matter what real evidence shows up, or how unbiased you make an item on this subject, you'll still have those 'watchers' disputing everything you say and spreading their state of denial to each other anyway.
Login or register to add a comment

Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.

25 Intolerable Contradictions of the Official 9/11 Story

Login or register to add a comment