What is Digg?299 Comments
- daaaveg, on 12/20/2007, -8/+143So long Mr. Bush. Thanks for destroying our nation's economy and reputation!
- Jareth86, on 12/20/2007, -3/+109Who cares. Didn't you hear, that Spears girl is pregnant!!
- clownguyx, on 12/20/2007, -3/+73Based on the last 7 years, I have no confidence that Bush will ever face any charges or consequences for his actions.
- inactive, on 12/20/2007, -13/+79Bush is toast.
- deadlyhaiku, on 12/20/2007, -4/+65I hope this is what does it. Nancy better quit apologizing and start serving impeachment for dinner.
- inactive, on 12/20/2007, -2/+62Bush could eat a live baby infront of Congress and he would still not get impeached.
He's been impeachable for 4 years now. It won't happen. He'll leave like Nixon did. "I did nuttin' wrong", wave goodbye, and he'll live a quiet and peacefull life in his mansion. - inactive, on 12/20/2007, -4/+60Give Bush a 3rd Term -
in Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary. - fractalman, on 12/20/2007, -4/+44If she doesn't support impeachment now, she should be impeached for conspiracy to defraud the public trust.
- crichton101, on 12/20/2007, -3/+40and cue the secret service knocking on your door in 4, 3, 2, 1.
- lhbaker, on 12/20/2007, -1/+36You're right. We're nuts. All we care about is the Constitution, health care, education, and the rule of law. What a bunch of crazies. But at least we have something constructive to say, unlike some people: http://digg.com/users/bigtrees
- tempusrob, on 12/20/2007, -1/+32It's not "war," it's "liberation." It's not "torture," it's an "alternative interrogation method."
Nothing is anything when you can redefine everything! - inactive, on 12/20/2007, -6/+37The military can do its job without politicians playing games with rhetoric on issues like torture. America has a long-standing tradition of working against injustice at home and abroad. The fact that our president got involved in this messy political situation is his own damned fault and I'm not going to give him a pass on the issue and neither should you.
- ScornForSega, on 12/20/2007, -1/+32Of course the United States doesn't torture. That's unamerican.
Now, if we can get an army of legislators and lawyers to redefine torture and make sure that all acts of alternative interrogation are hidden from the populace, well that's the American way. - SeethisPass, on 12/20/2007, -4/+32They need torture to be able to get "confessions" that take the bush administration off of the hook. The torture that was in the destroyed tapes obviously didn't do that, It most likely did the opposite.
The very idea of torture being done and applauded by OUR government is absurd. - awasson, on 12/20/2007, -3/+30Hey numnuts... Your dollar has never been weaker (well in 30 years or so) which is great for sales but not so good for profits. The housing market is in the pits and the treasury is devaluing the dollar by pouring more cash into the system. Ya, your economy if fcuked up!
- nblsavage, on 12/20/2007, -1/+27dammit...I hate it when Digg truncates
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&si ... - nblsavage, on 12/20/2007, -1/+25Congratulations, you're officially part of the problem.
Doing the right thing means just that, not just doing the right thing when it's easy or convenient. Anyone can do that. It takes courage and strength to keep your morals in the face of adversity. - kooft, on 12/20/2007, -2/+21"Notice how the liberals with "Bush Derangement Syndrome" are ALWAYS on the side of our enemies?"
Since when is upholding the Constitution and the values this country was founded upon supporting America's enemies? Oh wait, that must mean you're _not_ for those things. Sorry, I get it now. - inactive, on 12/20/2007, -2/+20All the nutbags are in Iraq making things go boom.
- sieteRevueltas, on 12/20/2007, -3/+21George W. Bush....The most influencial politician ever - for all the wrong reasons
- notque, on 12/20/2007, -4/+21It's too "polarizing" to impeach for war crimes?
Is it too polarizing to stop war crimes?
... So we HAVE to let war crimes continue...
Then what makes us better than any other war criminal country?
... Nothing. - Spectre74, on 12/20/2007, -9/+24How has this president, with all the nutbags out there, not been assassinated yet?
- akilleen, on 12/20/2007, -1/+16Like George Carlin said, it seems to only be the people who preach peace and equity that get assassinated. MLK, Ghandi, etc.
- Dumbledorito, on 12/20/2007, -1/+15How have we won in Iraq? Where's the democracy? Where's the [insert solution to latest reason given for us being there]? Where's Bin Laden?
Face it. Bush has had this war for six years and it's been a colossal *****-up from one end to the other. Afghanistan has the Taliban part 2, Iraq is still a terrorist recruiting tool, nobody has been held to account for the fraud, missing money and weapons, we're employing mercinaries, we're screwing our veterans out of the health care they should get. How is this not a "loss?" If a Democrat was prosecuting a snafu of this degree, you'd be calling for impeachment and execution, not neccesarily in that order. But your "Bush Blinders" apparently make you see a rosy picture that isn't costing us trillions and resulting in more terrorists, higher energy prices, larger defecits, and just about every nation in the world hating us. - CaptainKrontos, on 12/20/2007, -2/+16Don't worry guys, we've always been at war with Eastasia.
- nem0, on 12/20/2007, -1/+14Two words: Dick Cheney
- Turambar, on 12/20/2007, -2/+14successful troll is successful
seriously guys, just digg him down and don't even comment. - notque, on 12/20/2007, -2/+14Evidence of war crimes?
Nuremberg stated the supreme war crime was the act of aggression which contains all crimes that occur from that act.
We committed an act of aggression against Afganistan, and Iraq. Evidence is vast that we invaded those countries. - jcaino, on 12/20/2007, -2/+14why must you offend toast so?
- notque, on 12/20/2007, -3/+15@dshPls
He has most certainly broken international law. He invaded a sovereign nation. That's the supreme act of aggression which contains all other acts within it. - donnydarko, on 12/20/2007, -7/+18the United States does not torture George W. Bush
Yeah... well they should - ironhide, on 12/20/2007, -2/+13Gotta love double-speak. "Hey trust me...we don't torture anyone, but if we did, it's ok because they are bad"
Darkness against darkness is useless. Light against an eternity of darkness is still light. - inactive, on 12/20/2007, -2/+13The United States does not lie!
- Waiting2awake, on 12/20/2007, -1/+12Not sure how most Americans can control their anger and not be knocking on their rep's doors.... How much further down does it have to get before you get it?
You are not avioding a big bad fight with the government - that fight already started, they have been hitting and hitting and hitting you. Even if one side isn't fighting back, it is still a fight. Clearly, accepting things isn't working out..... - enki25, on 12/20/2007, -1/+12"We" are not experiencing growth. The top 1% is experiencing growth. And considering you are wasting your time on digg, I doubt you are in the top 1%. Those people spend their time getting spoon fed and bathed by legions of servants. Sure their investments may provide some jobs (to their servants) but that money would be far better off in the hands of the middle class.
- inactive, on 12/20/2007, -3/+14You can't discredit someone who has no credibility.
- inf0, on 12/20/2007, -2/+13lol @ economic growth...
- a5tr0cr3ep, on 12/20/2007, -1/+12every time i see articles like this i cant but help think back to a time where America lost there mind over a blow job....now most Americans are apathetic to this... i don't get it??
- notque, on 12/20/2007, -1/+11Is being possibly libelous worse than committing war crimes?
- notque, on 12/20/2007, -1/+11I think people realize it would do nothing but make things worse. So the real president (Cheney) becomes in charge, and they can use the assassination for a brutal reign of oppression. What does that help?
- notque, on 12/20/2007, -2/+12The American people have a long history of working against injustice. The Military, which is an arm of Politicians has a long history of terrorism and war crimes.
- BlacklabelSAR, on 12/20/2007, -1/+10Welcome back from your coma. It's 2007. Please try to catch up on current events so you don't look like an idiot.....again.
- inactive, on 12/20/2007, -1/+10A leaked report on a military investigation into two killings of detainees at a US prison in Afghanistan has produced new evidence of connivance of senior officers in systematic prisoner abuse.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/22/international/as ...
On the day of his death, Dilawar had been chained by the wrists to the top of his cell for much of the previous four days.
"A guard tried to force the young man to his knees. But his legs, which had been pummeled by guards for several days, could no longer bend. An interrogator told Mr. Dilawar that he could see a doctor after they finished with him. When he was finally sent back to his cell, though, the guards were instructed only to chain the prisoner back to the ceiling.
"Leave him up," one of the guards quoted Specialist Claus as saying. Several hours passed before an emergency room doctor finally saw Mr. Dilawar. By then he was dead, his body beginning to stiffen.
It would be many months before Army investigators learned a final horrific detail: Most of the interrogators had believed Mr. Dilawar was an innocent man who simply drove his taxi past the American base at the wrong time.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/22/international/as ... - SeethisPass, on 12/20/2007, -10/+19Regarding the subject above. The United States does not torture George W. Bush but it would be much better if they did.
- sieteRevueltas, on 12/20/2007, -2/+10He's brown bread as my father says:)
- kooft, on 12/20/2007, -3/+11Like the kind they serve at Outback?
- nblsavage, on 12/20/2007, -1/+9*****. No morals, no convictions and no courage. I'll risk beheading if it means not giving in to the dark. I thought situational ethics were anathema to a conservative.
- megaloid, on 12/20/2007, -4/+11...surrounded by a regiment of heavily armed men. Probably in another country.
- Calcularius, on 12/20/2007, -1/+8Are you drinking retard-aid?
Obviously, you don't know the difference between "surplus" and "deficit" -
Show 51 - 100 of 295 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is