digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

What is wrong with that? (Barack Hussein 0bama)

olavodecarvalho.org — The motto of his campaign is “change”, but to bring it about he needs not even get elected: he has already changed everything about the electoral ways and customs of the American people, and he has changed it so much for the worse that many decades will be necessary to repair the damage, if indeed that is possible.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • fulibs, on 07/24/2008, -18/+67It just baffles me so many people chose to be blind to the problems with BO.

    • OwdenBowden, on 07/24/2008, -9/+33The answer is simple and was stated in the article.

      Obama is the epitome of “politically correct” blackmail. We have a nation so scared to offend anything and anyone that we are sacrificing our RIGHTS and LIBERTYs in the name of PC. Further, the average IQ of the people who support this man is around 80 and this is a problem because they THINK they are really smart when in fact they aren't (kind of like the people who know how to use MS office and then all of a sudden are Computer Techs).
      • farmerjohn48pan, on 07/24/2008, -5/+23Don't agree with your average IQ number but agree that a lot of people are not taking the time to find out the truth and then speak about it. They seem content to quote talking points and lame-stream media hype.
      • robbh66, on 07/25/2008, -10/+4You'd have an argument if the average IQ of people supporting McCain wasn't somewhere south of 70.

        Making up stats is fun!
    • pedepy, on 07/25/2008, -8/+5you mean just as baffling as the fact that you America elected Geoges W Bush to president ? Twice?

      • EntangledPhysx, on 07/25/2008, -3/+9Oh, you mean the electoral college? Not the "people"? Oh you hit the nail on the head with that one. Bravo!
      • AchaIemoipas, on 07/25/2008, -7/+2@ entangled

        You can only blame the electoral college for 2000. America did vote for Bush in 2004, after Iraq had started, while everybody (I.e.: sane people) knew the war was illegal.

        @Iconoclast:
        People who died because of Chretien: 0.
        People who died because of Bush: over one million.
      • AchaIemoipas, on 07/25/2008, -6/+2"flawed by strategical error in the beginning is now succeeding"

        What success?

        And I don't think an illegal war justified with fabricated evidence, against international laws, with nothing to justify an attack, even with fabricated evidence, counts as a strategical error.

        It's a crime against humanity, not a strategical error.

        "Atta and other terrorists came through Canada"

        And Osama was trained and funded by the US and the other 14 hijackers came directly to the US. Because they were Saudi.
      • AchaIemoipas, on 07/26/2008, -5/+2HAHAHA, so you're part of that tiny little minority that still believes there were terrorists and WMDS in Iraq.

        "the true crime against humanity is allowing leftists to breed."

        Ooooooooh. Way to lose a simple argument.

        You're clearly insane.
      • AchaIemoipas, on 07/26/2008, -5/+1HAHAHAHA, omg your like a real life caricature of an angry racist southerner.

        Nice comment history!

        It's not the unexistant situation you talk about that's funny, it's you. You're a ridiculous "human" being.
  • ramiro, on 07/24/2008, -18/+57Excerpt from "Lethal Delicacy", by the same author, Olavo de Carvalho:

    "... The senator has specialized in adolescent exhortations of the type “we’re going to change the world,” because he knows that no one expects him to actually do something in the presidency, only that he’ll be there as a symbol.

    A symbol of what? The ancient Latins said nomen est omen, “the name is prophecy.” Barak Hussein means “blessed descendent of the Prophet,” and there is conclusive evidence that its bearer is lying when he says he was never a Muslim (Daniel Pipes made that clear here
    http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286
    and here
    http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5354 ).

    It is more or less as if, in the midst of the Vietnam war, the USA had elected as its president a guy named John Paul Ho Chi Minh, educated in Hanoi, the son of a party member, who swore he had never been a Communist and became offended when anyone doubted it. Obama’s candidacy is a calculated provocation, serving as a gauge to assess the depth of the acquired habit of politically correct self-censorship now infused in the minds of Americans willing to be thrown into the oven to avoid offending the cook."

    http://www.olavodecarvalho.org/english/articles/08 ...
    • PabloMac, on 07/24/2008, -4/+25What other way could a Muslim be elected into the US Presidency than to outwardly lie about their faith? What better way for the Muslims to proceed in their quest for global domination than to arrange the election of a Muslim President of the United States of America?
    • chickenbig, on 07/26/2008, -0/+3"Obama’s candidacy is a calculated provocation, serving as a gauge to assess the depth of the acquired habit of politically correct self-censorship now infused in the minds of Americans willing to be thrown into the oven to avoid offending the cook."

      That is an absolutely phenomenal (and scary) statement, and it begs the question: "Who exactly is doing the calculating?"
  • lodibug3, on 07/24/2008, -13/+53What rings in my ears, is the prayer we heard in our church service on Sunday.... "We are a nation weak in ideals... unable to put forth a credible candidate for the highest office in the land..".
  • Cheezo, on 07/24/2008, -9/+43tea party soon
    • osko2052, on 07/25/2008, -3/+5I'm there!!
      • rjwusa, on 07/25/2008, -2/+4I think it is too late. The American people have lost their way and their will. It's a sad commentary, really.
  • Tugging, on 07/24/2008, -16/+47What the country seems to be asking for is more, more socialism. That's what I
    see with Obama. We don't need that.
    • JEAH, on 07/24/2008, -15/+6yea, cuz our schools and banks are doing oh so well under the free market!
      • jb1965, on 07/25/2008, -2/+11What kind of free market do we have when we have to work until mid-July to pay off our government tax bill?!

        Lessee! The more socialist the state or city is in this country, the worst their crime, economy and schools are! The liberal run urban center near me has a 70% drop-out rate from its liberal indoctrination centers, while the privately funded schools in the same neighborhoods have a 90% graduation rate.

        But, I don't want to confuse you with too many facts...good night.
      • osko2052, on 07/25/2008, -1/+10I'm just curious. Could you answer a question for me? How long have you been paying income taxes? America's taxpayers are sick and tired of bailing out everyone who makes stupid mistakes. The schools are messed up because it stopped being about educating the children and seeing how much taxpayers could be soaked for. The banks are messed up because a bunch of fat cat bankers made alot of really bad loans. Meanwhile the fat cat bankers are still stinking rich and Mr. & Mrs. Taxpayer are expected to bail them out so they don't lose their yachts.
      • JEAH, on 07/25/2008, -7/+3@jb1965
        while your facts support evidence that privately funded schooling works for a small percentage of the populace, they don't guarantee the same will hold true for the population as a whole, specifically when applied to poverty stricken areas. This is a huge leap of faith. While having a privately funded option is fine, I still believe we should give all children equal opportunity with a well funded educational system.

        @osko2052

        first of all, socialism != income tax. Besides, this is a irrelevant when comparing Obama and McCain.

        "The schools are messed up because it stopped being about educating the children and seeing how much taxpayers could be soaked for."

        you're kidding right? If not, please quote numbers that show problems in education linked to over-taxation.

        "The banks are messed up because a bunch of fat cat bankers made alot of really bad loans."

        Do you even understand the problem? Most conservative economic experts now feel that some regulation is required to keep banks from sinking themselves. The current problems are directly related to anti-socialist policy. I would love to think that the free market is ideal, but recent evidence suggests otherwise.

        "Taxpayer are expected to bail them out so they don't lose their yachts."

        and your plan is.. what? You do understand what will happen if those banks go under, right?
      • EntangledPhysx, on 07/25/2008, -1/+7@JEAH

        So what will happen when those banks go under? From what I am hearing, a bailout could potentially severely weaken the US dollar even further. How is this better then if those banks went under? This seems like a gray area.

        With socialism, the govt will start controlling the major industries. True, in this case, socialism != income tax. It instead creates a slippery slope where eventually the govt is running so many things, and is so big, that tax increases are the only way the govt can continue to run.
        For example, in my state (MN), the state govt is paying for the arts with tax payer dollars, because "it's so important." The govt is trying to control too many things. If the art is so important, let it fund itself, not with our tax dollars. This equates to higher taxes. Whether income, sales, or gas tax-- they are getting this extra money through taxes!

        There are many more examples I'm sure, especially if a liberal democrat gets into power and decides to give everything away and regulates everything instead of the free market. Tax tax tax.
        The government doesn't produce a damn thing--it takes money at gun point. You have no say where that money goes. This is especially true with public vs private schooling. That's another discussion altogether, though.
    • jb1965, on 07/25/2008, -2/+10Of course we're asking for it!

      Liberalism is easy. Promise everyone the sun moon and the stars. Tell them that you'll get someone else to pay for it and the mice will beat a path to your door.

      Use the lapdog media to beat everyone over the head with how bad freedom and liberty is and how the only answer is slouching toward serfdom and the sheep start to become accepting of your message.

      Keep voting for the lesser of two evils until the political gene pool is so diluted that you have a politically schizophrenic RINO and a Marxist ideologue as your choices from the good ol' boy parties.
    • Jareth86, on 07/25/2008, -8/+3Americans are ***** daffy. What the rest of the world sees as basic governmental responsibilities, you people see as socialism. What the rest of the world sees as corporate fascism, you see as "the free market".
      You people have been plowing down this same stupid path for years, and look where its gotten you. I'd say its time for a change.
      • EntangledPhysx, on 07/25/2008, -1/+6You mean what created the most prosperous country and economy in the world? OKAY... Just because we're in a slump right now doesn't mean everything we have ever done, and will do, is wrong.
  • ikbrooks, on 07/24/2008, -16/+37BHO the first African American (read affirmative action) POTUS. What a sham...great article though! I sent it to my wife also. She is learning politics here in America. She is from Brazil and finds my yelling at the radio and TV funny at times. She asks questions and most of the time we go to the Internet and research it. Used to be I would give her my opinion. Not anymore. I want her to form her own opinion not parrot mine. i figured this from someone from her country would do the trick. Thanks Ike!

    p.s. and we wonder why the world looks at blacks as 2nd class citizens. You cannot have it both ways and have the respect of the populace especially when you want everything, or at least many things, slighted in your favor because of your skin color. REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE!
    • rjwusa, on 07/25/2008, -5/+6In America, blacks (Not hard working conservative blacks) insist on keeping their ethnic identity by not wanting to assimilate into American culture. Blacks prefer things to be separate but equal.
  • drachemorder, on 07/24/2008, -12/+44Brilliant article! Yes, it's amazing how gullible the electorate seems to be. Nice words about change, the subconscious idea of "I'm going to prove I'm not a racist by voting for a black guy", things like that (rather than actual ideas and policies) seem like all it takes to win an election these days.
    • ozydingo, on 08/16/2008, -0/+1You sound like the folks who say people do drugs because they're illegal.
  • costi81, on 07/24/2008, -12/+35This article doesn't really say anything new but it sumarises perfectly most of what is wrong with Obama and with American electorate and media nowadays. everybody lets himself fooled by him just because of Politcaly correctness marxist ideology of twisting the minds of people. What is happening is an immense perversion!
    • ozydingo, on 08/16/2008, -0/+1You're right, Obama IS a marxist! Totally! !.
  • frofisrael, on 07/24/2008, -15/+29"(Obama) displays the kind of absolute trust in his own invulnerability that is so typical of revolutionary sociopaths." Yes, he really does have delusions of grandeur and divinity. He's one of the fools that rush in where angels fear to tread. The Bible calls the likes of him, TRAITORS, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away! (2 Timothy 3:4-5)
  • farmerjohn48pan, on 07/24/2008, -13/+31It's about time that someone pointed out the faults, distortions and flip flopping of this unsuitable candidate.
    • rjwusa, on 07/25/2008, -3/+6The press would brand that person as a racist. Therefore, no one will sprout the balls to do such a thing.
      • gmdmartyr, on 07/28/2008, -1/+2I have been silently hoping for Condi, too. Great choice for McCain!
  • twitchr, on 07/24/2008, -23/+8Yawn. nice copy and past job with this article. Got anything new to say? seems to be the same mud you guys have been throwing around for months. you know what? it ain't sticking.
    you know why? you all lost credibility when you voted twice for GWB.

    see ya in november when BHO is POTUS....
    America...love it or leave it!
    • drachemorder, on 07/24/2008, -5/+12Mater tua criceta fuit et pater tuo redoluit bacarum sambucus.
      • twitchr, on 07/24/2008, -12/+2Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries???
        ok....
    • zugzug01, on 07/24/2008, -5/+11Twitchr, the mud that you speak of cannot stick...I think it has something to do with the messiah's scales and slime. Just a theory....
  • Navigator7, on 07/24/2008, -15/+26I'm a pan handler and I'm all about "Change". Obama in November for me!

    (I also think most of America are panhandlers looking for something for nothing. øBama plan will only work if he takes from producers and gives to the sedentary. Socialism)

    """He listens to the Star-Spangled Banner with his hands on his genitals, and not on his heart""" ~ Olavo de Carvalho

    LOL...Now that is a good øBama line!!!


  • Navigator7, on 07/24/2008, -15/+16I'm a pan handler and I'm all about "Change". Obama in November for me!

    (I also think most of America are panhandlers looking for something for nothing. øBama plan will only work if he takes from producers and gives to the sedentary. Socialism)

    """He listens to the Star-Spangled Banner with his hands on his genitals, and not on his heart""" ~ Olavo de Carvalho

    LOL!!!!

    Now that is a great øBama line!!!


  • jabberwolf, on 07/24/2008, -16/+23I'm still wondering what committee Obama is going to claim he's on (that he's not on) or what bill that he's written that he has not!!

    MR CHANGE = Change my story all the dam time!
  • GWBARNHOUSE, on 07/24/2008, -12/+24The Obamanation is blind to all of this. But,then, they are in many cases foaming at the mouth socialists.
    • jb1965, on 07/25/2008, -2/+7Bolsheviks has a more romantic tone...
  • JEAH, on 07/24/2008, -20/+181. There's no correlation in American history between experience and effectiveness in the office of the presidency. In fact, most "experienced" presidents have been seen as the biggest failures in the latter half of the 20th century.

    2. Compared to the current administration, Obama's policy plan is a HUGE change. Not sure what's so unclear about this.

    3. Most of you would dislike Obama regardless of his actions. Either you don't like democrats in general or you're a racist. Usage of the words "liberal" "socialist" or "Hussein" usually expose your true problems with Obama. Most of you also probably supported Bush, which says a lot.
    • jabberwolf, on 07/24/2008, -8/+15"HUGE change."

      Like???
      You do know that Mccain was more of a thorn in Bushes side then - silent, no-where-to-be-seen, Obama !

      "Most of you would dislike Obama regardless of his actions."
      WHAT ACTIONS??!

      The whole point is that he HASNT done a dam thing, he never has, he hasnt been on many committees or drafted many bills at all.

      Or do you believe everything he tells you, like being on the Banking committee, which he wasnt!!
      • JEAH, on 07/24/2008, -11/+4Foreign Policy is probably the biggest difference. The majority of the country see Iraq as a mistake overall. Agree or disagree, this is a HUGE issue. Furthermore, as much as people claim "socialism" to be an evil word, most Americans swing left on healthcare, education, and the environment. I'm not telling you my opinion, but I am suggesting that perhaps you're out of touch with most Americans and their current values.

        Reagan was seen as "inexperienced" and clueless when he first ran for president and we all know how that ended up. Again, history doesn't indicate that it lack of experience amounts to failure in office. See: Reagan, Clinton, Nixon (for starters)
      • fulibs, on 07/28/2008, -0/+1@JEAH - I don't know what they are teaching in school these days, but your comment really made me think differently about my stance on education.
    • bluto36, on 07/25/2008, -5/+13yes those are the only two possibility's. if you don't vote for Obama you hate democrats or you hate blacks.
      yep that can be the only two choices, hate and hate.

      idiot
      • JEAH, on 07/25/2008, -14/+2yea, that's why I used the qualifier "most", which would indicate that there are more possibilities. I guess you missed that, even though it was the first word in the paragraph.

        heh, 'idiot'... good one!
      • txchica, on 07/25/2008, -1/+10JEAH,
        Using "most" is not normally seen as a qualifier, "some" would have been more appropriate. I don't hate democrats and I'm not a racist and I wouldn't vote for Obama because I don't agree with his ideology. So much for your two possibilities, and I say two because you used the word "either" which denotes a choice between 2 objects.
        Try not to make such broad generalizations, you'll find that you'll be wrong a lot of the time when you do make unfounded assumptions.
      • jamesotis, on 08/01/2008, -0/+1Hate is mother's milk to the Left.

        Obama beats Hillary, and all the fizz-brained dhimmi democrats cry "sexism." Were it the other way 'round, "racism" would've undoubtedly been the caterwauled refrain.

        Of course that will be nothing compared to the absolutely nauseating and endless rants about racism we're in for should McCain pull it out.

    • zugzug01, on 07/25/2008, -4/+12"Obama's policy plan is a HUGE change. Not sure what's so unclear about this."

      More.. change rhetoric.. nothing substantial...

      You know why it's such a change ? Because an inexperienced eye is quick to foul long term progress for short term gain. WE are not a short-term society are we ? (not yet).
    • osko2052, on 07/25/2008, -6/+10Hussein is his middle name and I don't see any problem with using his given name. I have no problem whatsoever with him being black. I have a problem with him being Karl Marx. I am an Illinois resident and have never voted for the man. In fact when he was running for US senator from Illinois, I voted for his opponent Alan Keyes who is black. I am far from racist.
      • JEAH, on 07/25/2008, -10/+5You don't find it odd that people overly refer to Obama by his middle name. This doesn't seem to be the case with McCain. Why is that? Unless people are using Obama's middle name to make a point.

        (read: gimme a break dude, most people obviously use his middle name in an attempt to slander him. This point is practically irrefutable and indeed racist)
      • osko2052, on 07/25/2008, -4/+11Kinda odd the guy has the same name as one of this country's greatest enemies in the last 50 years. If his name was Hitler would it be racist if I called him Hitler? By the way I am not dude. If you want my respect you will address me as sir. Learn some manners.
      • ConAmoreEFuoco, on 07/25/2008, -10/+4Sir, people use Obama's middle name more often than middle names are usually used. For instance, what's McCain's middle name? How many times have you heard his full name spoken on television?

        Why would people stress the "Hussein" middle name? Because they are trying to tie him to Saddam Hussein in peoples' subconscious. I agree that Saddam Hussein was a horrible dictator, but it seems clear that emphasizing Obama's middle name with the goal of making people think of a dictator is a cheap, reprehensible and dishonest ploy which draws away from a discussion of the issues and policies.
    • rjwusa, on 07/25/2008, -3/+11"...Obama's policy plan is a HUGE change. Not sure what's so unclear about this..."

      Obama's policies will be a HUGE change. They'll also cost me and my family a HUGE chunk of change in new taxes.

      "...Either you don't like democrats in general..."

      You're right. Many of us don't care for liberal policies which punish self-sufficiency and hard work. It's not a hatred for the liberal person. We leave the hate up to the liberals. They're quite accomplished at hate.

      "..or you're a racist..."

      Oh-oh! There's that branding people a racist thingy again. Tired tactic. I like African-Americans. I don't like the politics of leftist African-Americans. Big difference. Get a clue.
      • JEAH, on 07/25/2008, -7/+3"Obama's policies will be a HUGE change. They'll also cost me and my family a HUGE chunk of change in new taxes."

        Fair enough, but my comments are directed to people that don't understand why an Obama administration will represent change (i.e. a response to the article) in comparison to the Bush administration. Good or bad, if elected, there most certainly will be change.


        "You're right. Many of us don't care for liberal policies which punish self-sufficiency and hard work."

        I actually agree with you. Again, the article doesn't discuss policy. It suggests that Obama somehow doesn't have a plan other than saying 'change'.


        "I like African-Americans. I don't like the politics of leftist African-Americans."

        Cool. Although I'm certain that there are a lot of people who dread the idea of having a black man in office, my comments on racism are directed at the over use of his middle name. This is clearly in an attempt to slander Obama as a terrorist sympathizer and is based solely on his name. This is racist. I'm merely stating a fact. I'd personally rather have a debate on policy. I'm assuming you agree.
      • rjwusa, on 07/25/2008, -1/+4JEAH, dugg you up for clarifying. Thanks!
    • SuperVepr308, on 07/28/2008, -1/+4I don't vote for ***** Communists so Bo Fana won't get my vote. As for your racism charge, I would vote for Keyes in a heartbeat. I suppose you will say he isn't black enough or a sell out I suppose.
  • allisonrose870, on 07/24/2008, -14/+20What's so sad, is that even when spelled out, they still don't see it. Any of it. I didn't know so many could be brainwashed so fast!

    • ramiro, on 07/25/2008, -5/+14The politically correct is work of decades.
  • DerangedPenguin, on 07/24/2008, -7/+15Wow amazing article, it helps to express my own reservations about The Democrat "Chosen One."
    While, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has an amazing story to tell about growing up in deplorable conditions and being able to institute reforms in a country that was formerly under the control of a dictatorship, Barack Hussein Obama is coming from a different world, one where the grand-daughter of a share cropper can become the Secretary of State. Or a child who grew up in ghetto can rise to the level of Supreme Court Justice or an American of African and Jamacian descent can rise to the level of Joint Chief of Staff and Secretary of State.
    Barack Hussein Obama is living ins fantasy world.
    • ramiro, on 07/25/2008, -5/+4"Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has an amazing story to tell about growing up in deplorable conditions and being able to institute reforms in a country that was formerly under the control of a dictatorship"

      That is completely inaccurate.

      Lula was only an union leader during the military regime and his way to popularity was discreetly endorsed by the regime itself just because the military wanted to get rid of the old left revolutionary leaders.

      After the military gave up control, Brazil had a terrible president (remember Zimbabwe but without the human rights violations by the government) and a half bad president (he confiscated people's savings but at least he tried to reduce the size of the state). After them, came a "social-democrat" who was in part responsible for the current economic stability in his 8 years mandate.

      Lula's only merit - and a very small one - is to continue the same economic policies. Lula put all his cohorts and activists in government positions, so Brazilian democracy is seriously at risk.
  • solesoul, on 07/25/2008, -13/+14I am so sick and tired of all this talk of how "blind" and "ignorant" anyone who is voting for Obama is. No, there is no possible way that someone could ever agree with the mans politics, right? No, they must be a black person, a white person trying not to appear racist, a socialist, or a uneducated fool whose mind has been warped by the liberal media. And there definitely is no possible way that someone looked at the positions of McCain, Barr, Paul, and whoever else is running, compared them to those of Obama, and thought that Obama is a candidate they'd rather vote for.
    • jb1965, on 07/25/2008, -5/+6Nope, a vote for Obama is a vote for an inexperienced, racist, anti-Semite, raving Marxist ideologue who will return this country to the laughing stock status worse than that of the Carter administration.

      A vote for McCain might slow the process a little...but won't correct the trajectory.
      • wild, on 07/25/2008, -5/+1We are the laughing stock of the world. Nervous laughter too. Other countries hate and fear us.
  • weside, on 07/25/2008, -15/+10Obama's entire rise to power is so sadly reminiscent of a certain other politician that spoke in Berlin...
    • ConAmoreEFuoco, on 07/25/2008, -3/+6JFK? I am a jelly donut?
    • Digitalicious, on 07/25/2008, -8/+5Association fallacy. Go jump off a building.
  • irvman21, on 07/25/2008, -12/+7You have to admit it been almost 70 years since a charismatic socialist has taken Germany by storm like Obama. The German people really do have a type, don't they?
    • jb1965, on 07/25/2008, -3/+5Charismatic? They needed two rock bands to open up for him to get people in the seats!
  • ChristNewsWatch, on 07/25/2008, -10/+2All part of God's plan in these last days...

    Obama or McCain does not matter, both are puppets for the coming one world system of the anti-Christ and will continue to do Satan's will, rather then God's.

    May all true believers in Christ Jesus continue to pray for wisdom and insight, for the next 4 years will see the world fall further away from God and closer to destruction.
  • garryw, on 07/25/2008, -10/+11I welcome our Marxist overlord, and his recently proud wife.
  • osko2052, on 07/25/2008, -10/+5Do you think your messiah Obama Hussein Obama goes around addressing people as dude?
  • MoniqueMoniCat, on 07/25/2008, -14/+4YAH, IT'S AMAZING WHAT AMERICA CAN DO WITHOUT GOD. AND NOW WE HAVE A RISING STAR ANTICHRIST ON THE HORIZON OF AMERICA TO TAKE US FURTHER AS WE CIRCLE THE DRAIN.

    Obama does NOT believe that Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Life and that NO MAN COMETH TO THE FATHER BUT BY JESUS CHRIST. Obama said he thinks all religions lead to God, or Allah or Budah or any other "religion." Just running around saying your a "christian" doesn't make you a christian. BUT giving credence to "allah" like obama does DOES in fact make you part of the antichrist regime. Allah is NOT Jehovah, NOT YAWEH and NOT THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, ISAAC, AND JACOB. Do some research (about 30 minutes on google ought to do it) and you will find in fact that "allah" is derived from "allat," the FEMALE MOON GODESS depicted by the crescent moon, whom is not God our creator, but a created spirit being a la fallen angel demon spirit. She is also known as the "Queen of Heaven" in the old testament.

    JESUS CHRIST, SON OF THE LIVING GOD BY WHOM ALL THINGS WERE MADE SAID:

    "And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world." (1 John 4:3)

    Plain and simple, this verse is telling us that those who refuse to believe that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, came down from above, was manifested in the flesh, and was in fact the promised Jewish Mesiah is of an ANTICHRIST spirit.

    Seeing obama at the wailing wall in Jerusalem should really show all believers just how easy the antichrist will in fact enter in the land of Israel.

    NOBAMA - ANTICHRIST!
    • suntzusputnik, on 07/25/2008, -1/+6hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.
    • pedepy, on 07/25/2008, -2/+2wow i had no idea allah was a chick

      makes sense though, doesn't it ?
  • suntzusputnik, on 07/25/2008, -3/+5what's with the 0?
  • screamthenrun, on 07/25/2008, -4/+11What is happening to digg.. i mean, i am more conservative than liberal.. but how the hell does this article have this many diggs/commnets?...
    where are the liberal points of view that i have fun arguing with‽‽

    [and btw... the article isn't even a good conservative article]
    • wild, on 07/25/2008, -4/+7Its being posted somewhere and everyone there is jumping over here to log and digg and game the system. Thats why these always show up at the same time of night, get to around 150 diggs with comments over 100 positive.

      Then the rest of us catch it in the upcoming section, realize they are hit pieces, and start burying them. This locks them in upcoming for a few hours before they drop off the radar. Its been the pattern for several weeks now and I doubt its going change between here and the election.
    • Jareth86, on 07/25/2008, -5/+1Its being eaten by libertarians.
    • Froderick, on 07/25/2008, -4/+0I figured someone posted it here, and told all of their like-minded neo-conservative friends about it so they could come here and flood the comments with comments that practically never appear on Digg is this number.
  • dunnduggit, on 07/25/2008, -5/+7So let me get this right. Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein? Well he surely must be evil than, because Sadam Hussein's last name is Hussein. How could anyone ever vote for him. Holy *****! He's an Anti-American, terrorist fist-bumping, non-flag lapel wearing, racist, not fit to run a third world country, Muslim in disguise, communist, birth certificate forging, pro-terrorist who flies in an unsafe plane.Really thank you guys, I thought something was funny when this article appeared, but clearly the author knows what he's talking about. You guys have converted me, critical think be damned!

  • bobsheiskawy, on 07/25/2008, -7/+8http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/And_now_for_the_ ...
    http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/CBS_scrubs_a_sec ...
    http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Obama_speaks_in_ ...
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/24/mccain-fo ...
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brandon-friedman/vet ...
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/24/obama-ber ...

    ...and obama is the poorer of the two candidates...mmhmm, right.

    there is a reason that those six stories are on the front page, and that reason is the fact that people are sick of all of the mccain campaign's mudslinging and *flip-flops*/errors, not to mention the fact that obama has more support both in and outside of this country than he does.

    the only thing mccain ever says that isn't against obama is, "vote for me, i'm a pow". and that's such an important quality to have, right, regardless if he cannot get facts straight or put forward any good policies.

    and as far as the whole "change" thing goes. we, as a nation, are in dire need of it. i don't know if anyone else read this, but the PESO is making a comeback on the dollar. our economy is going down the drain, and another 4-8 years of bush (read: mccain) is not going to make it any better, especially not if we remain in iraq for another 100 years, as mccain suggests.
  • pedepy, on 07/25/2008, -8/+3eh ...

    although this article does bring up some good points, it's nothing new. Candidates have been put in power with just as little credentials as Obama did, however they had in general a 'lineage' of some sort to counter that fact.

    Obama is popular for one simple reason: he's everything the current government isn't. And the other guy is just like 'em.

    If you haven't been paying enough attention to politics these past 8 years to realize how badly you've all been butt raped by your elected officials, then you can't understand why most Americans want somebody who's nothing to do with the current establisement for president.

    The only problem with Obama's campain is that he's tamed it down: He should be saying more of the honest straight talk that made him get noticed in the first place.




  • ironeus, on 08/01/2008, -6/+1interesting article. Isn't the Brazilian author doing what most criticize about U.S. foreign policy by casting his opinion about a domestic issue? Just raising a valid question, but go ahead & digg me down ---->
  • Rotzooi, on 07/25/2008, -7/+6I wanted to digg this so more people would read the comments for this post, but I couldn't bring myself to do it.
    Man, this really brought out every bigoted troglodyte on Digg.
  • tufftugg, on 07/25/2008, -8/+4 Poor Republicans, trying to live down the Gong show of the last 7 years. Republicans should be embarrassed!
  • Falldog, on 07/25/2008, -5/+4Who would've known republican spammers would be as bad as truthers.
  • umbriago, on 07/25/2008, -5/+1So someone halfway intelligent comes along, and El Gordo here thinks he's an idiot. Well, roll down to a Brazilian shantytown and see how well they take care of each other, and then tell us all how we should be taking advice from the ***** Brazilians.
    http://www.bahiastreet.org/shantytown/

    As for "many decades will be necessary to repair the damage, if indeed that is possible," listen caballero - I thought you were talking about Bush here - you know, the whole doubling the national debt from $6 to $12 trillion? THAT is what is going to take decades to repair.
  • mikesbaker, on 07/25/2008, -3/+4I can sum this article up real quick for you guys: Obama is a black man who has a name that sounds muslim and doesn't have enough experience to do the job. Now be scared.

    to quote wikipedia: source needed (and how about one that doesn't involve an email forwards from my grandmother)
  • Cymrubeats, on 07/25/2008, -6/+2LOL at most of the comments here, you can just smell the cowardice, and fear, reeking from them.

    Cheezo
    22 hr 22 min ago
    tea party soon

    osko2052
    12 hr 50 min ago
    I'm there!!

    The only tea party you pair will be having will include scones...and mutual masturbation.
    • costi81, on 07/25/2008, -0/+5excuse me? what?
      you are not making sense
    • chickenbig, on 07/27/2008, -0/+2I agree. What a moronic post. I guess drugs will do that to you...
  • itstodd, on 07/25/2008, -3/+6I've always thought BO stunk.
    • GWBARNHOUSE, on 07/28/2008, -1/+3Stinks is the correct word. Reeks might be better. Or his ideas are putrid. Or he's nothing but a teleprompter reader.
  • chickenbig, on 07/26/2008, -2/+8The reluctance on the part of the electorate and the media to criticize Obama is soft racism at its core. Another of many reasons why liberalism is truly a mental disorder.
  • chickenbig, on 07/26/2008, -2/+6A "lobotomy" is when part of your brain is removed to control you by rendering you emotion-less. An "obatomy" is when empty words are added to your brain to control you by making sure everything you do is based on emotion.
  • Navigator7, on 07/26/2008, -4/+6I believe øBama, if elected, will make Carter look like a great president.

    Kids today won't remember what it is like to live under such a "giving society". Carter damn near stopped ours.
    He wore a damned cardigan sweater in office and I swear that caused the yoots of America to vote for him.

    øBama isn't popular for what he says, just how he says it.
    Like Carter's sweater, øBama is wearing a whole new skin color and getting votes for it.

    Thats like receiving praise for turning oxygen into carbon dioxide and water
  • GWBARNHOUSE, on 07/28/2008, -5/+3Have y'all ever noticed how the Obomination crawls out of the of the woodwork. Don't try logic they; have their logic locked up in a little lock box, They will fall for any silly cliche . "America has lost prestige abroad," is the most ridiculous. Who cares what European socialists think?
  • kayala, on 08/16/2008, -4/+2Well, at least you freaks have no problem admitting you're racist. Damn uppity black men trying to join a TRADITIONALLY white lineage? No way!
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.