11 Comments
- JesseJames27, on 08/06/2008, -0/+3Where else but New York do you get public art like this?
- Shiftgood, on 08/06/2008, -0/+3Gitmo.
- thedingman, on 08/07/2008, -0/+2Ahhh, freedom.
- BXRWXR, on 08/07/2008, -0/+1So who's ready for their cockmeat sandwich?
- corteb88, on 08/08/2008, -0/+1If anything, it would've shown people it really IS torture had he gone w/his original plan (even though it is f***** up)
- Darren07, on 08/07/2008, -0/+1Every sleezebag Republican should be subjected to waterboarding before voting o whether waterboarding is torture.
- gandhii, on 08/07/2008, -1/+1lame ass art. Would have meant something 3-5 years ago.. Kinda dated and an old idea now.
- jorichter, on 08/07/2008, -0/+0This really is pretty ***** up. It also doesn't make "the US doesn't torture" argument look weak. In favor for "torture is entertaining."
- RayPugh, on 08/07/2008, -1/+1Do you have to bring your own tissues or are they provided? Last thing I want to do is end up cupping a hand full of warm jizz, looking desperately for somewhere to wipe it, you know?
- scatterbrain, on 08/07/2008, -0/+0what the *****
- vexingmodstwo, on 08/07/2008, -1/+0So the artist's original plan was to let people be waterboarded? You do realize that he's inadvertently proving it really isn't torture, right?



What is Digg?