Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
Neo-Libs Label Ron Paul Money Bomb "Abject Failure"
prisonplanet.com — Neo-liberal establishment wannabe e-rag Wonkette and its sycophantic bloggers have dismissed the 2007 Tea Party fundraising event, which set a new campaign record by hauling in a record $6.6 million dollars for Ron Pauls presidential run, as an "abject failure".
- 466 diggs
- digg it
- Eyebee, on 12/17/2007, -3/+52How can anyone say that raising $6.6 million in such a short time (and I understand this is actual cleared amounts - not pledges) is any kind of failure?
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -6/+15Jealousy and a very small penis comes to mind. Not only that, but i'm sure being an assboy of the neo-cons has to hurt.
- chaosium, on 12/18/2007, -7/+4"Jealousy and a very small penis comes to mind."
Maybe you should think of other things for once.- EditorResponse, on 12/19/2007, -0/+4I just watched a video of Ron Paul and it looked fairly well balanced. As anyone would know I've never posted FOR Ron Paul anything. In fact its quite the opposite. It looks at times like here on Digg his campaign has been hijacked by Truthers and Neanderthals. Neither of which I can stand. So I am going to give Ron Paul the benefit of the doubt this one time and post the links to the videos and let his voice be heard.
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf6JWC6B5Zo
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGvPVN5pUI0
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFzi5HNJ4_w
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dt3-GaP9P-w
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46RyYFQuOYc
Part 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7VBmI8g3BA
Part 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqNavOoFtoQ
Part 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfOU6gxbRvM
Being a Republican like I said if he wins the next race I'll vote for him in the election.
- EditorResponse, on 12/19/2007, -0/+4I just watched a video of Ron Paul and it looked fairly well balanced. As anyone would know I've never posted FOR Ron Paul anything. In fact its quite the opposite. It looks at times like here on Digg his campaign has been hijacked by Truthers and Neanderthals. Neither of which I can stand. So I am going to give Ron Paul the benefit of the doubt this one time and post the links to the videos and let his voice be heard.
- chaosium, on 12/18/2007, -7/+4"Jealousy and a very small penis comes to mind."
- Ulisses, on 12/17/2007, -23/+8How can anyone say that they don't accept evolution? It's been established science for such a long time (am I to understand Ronald speaks out of fear, not reason?).
Ron Paul is a failure.- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -4/+12Your mother was a failure blowing you last night, *****. However, that being said, your statement is a fallacy. Evolution is not established science. Science is merely the mechanism we use to understand the observations of the world around us. Evolution is a philosophy that cannot be experimented with to either corroborate or falsify a particular theory, therefore, it is outside the realm of scientific study. Your assertion is based upon nothing, therefore making you a ***** stirrer with no logical sense. And you spelled "Ulysses" wrong.
- Ulisses, on 12/17/2007, -11/+10Thanks for the insults and platitudes. Evolution is not a philosophy, it's a scientific theory to explain biodiversity in its present and how it came to be so.
It is quite testable if that's what you mean - I couldn't hope to understand what's going on in that utterly confused writing of yours.
Not only is it 'able to be experimented with' it forms the backbone of bio-sciences and is instrumental in fields from virology to genetic engineering.
At this point I will refrain from pwning you in every possible way and just quote your fine prose for the sake of... well, laughter:
'Evolution (...) is outside the realm of scientific study.'
Have to point out that I spelled the Portuguese latinization for the name of the Greek hero Odysseus quite correctly, I'm afraid. Nice try, though. - shagywashere, on 12/18/2007, -11/+2Ron paul believes in evolution....
- chaosium, on 12/18/2007, -3/+7No, he has outright said he doesn't.
- m0neybags, on 12/18/2007, -7/+9It makes sense you'd vote for a guy who wants to dismantle the Department of Education.
- jeremiah77769, on 12/18/2007, -0/+3The department of education has done little or nothing to progress your average american and the general intellegence of our people. Unless you consider indoctrination a good thing then it NEEDS TO BE DEALT WITH very much the same as the FED or the IRS needs to be "dealt" with... TOTAL REMOVAL!!!
- Ulisses, on 12/17/2007, -11/+10Thanks for the insults and platitudes. Evolution is not a philosophy, it's a scientific theory to explain biodiversity in its present and how it came to be so.
- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/17/2007, -4/+11I'm not sure how someone can say they don't believe in evolution, but we're not talking about Mike Hukabee or Sam Brownback. Ron Paul did not say he didn't believe in evolution, so do your homework please. This is not debate, it is just an incorrect assertion.
- Ulisses, on 12/18/2007, -7/+6Yes he did, at Spartan, SC.
He said he doesn't accept evolution and that it is just a theory. - m0neybags, on 12/18/2007, -8/+3http://www.digg.com/politics/Ron_Paul_Thinks_Evolu ...
- Ulisses, on 12/18/2007, -7/+6Yes he did, at Spartan, SC.
- VisualBasic, on 12/18/2007, -3/+10Evolution is a theory. All theories have their limitations and falacies. Even the praised theory of relativity has holes in it.
Even in the scientific community there is talk that evolution might not be 100% correct.
Besides, unlike Huckabee who will force his theocratic thoughts on evolution down our throats, Paul realizes that his views are just that, his. I'm sure he would allow the scientific debate over evolution to occur, and not enforce any personal views.
The thing with paul is that he realizes the diffrence between his views and public policy. I'm voting for him because of his public policy. - ringelman5, on 12/20/2007, -0/+1Of course "Evolution" is a theory; ALL science is based on theory, some of which has even been proved -- sort of. These theories continue to evolve, and some are even refuted to one degree or another.
The fact that Man has a "vestigial tail" is not sum total proof he evolved from apes.
The theory of evolution is based upon many well placed assumptions. This theory, which means we guess, is the underpinning of Communism. If the Communists can make us believe we are but animals and the survival of the fittest is the key to life, they can kill anyone they determine unfit to survive.
This theory can be smashed with two simple laws. First, the theory presumes that man came from “soup,” with one cell developing through spontaneous generation. Life just came into existence “out of nothing.” This theory teaches that man is gradually over eons of time moving upward and getting better. However, there are undisputable Laws of thermodynamics, when understood, that smashes the Theory of Evolution into a million little pieces. Then we have to look elsewhere for the real source of life!
The two Laws of Thermodynamics stated: 1) the first Law is energy conservation. Energy can be converted from one form to another, yet the total amount of energy remains unchanged. Energy is neither being created nor destroyed at the present time. 2) the second is the Law of decay. It affirms that although the total amount of energy remains unchanged, there is always a tendency for it to become less available for useful work. There is a universal tendency toward DECAY and deterioration, a transition from a more orderly state, to a less orderly state, finally to deenergization. In other words, the earth is running down.
Notice the absolute Law of Thermodynamics that has been proven. and the Theory of Evolution that cannot be proven. Evolution says we are evolving upward to a better condition. The second absolute Law of Thermodynamics proves we are decaying – not evolving to a better state.
The Theory of Evolution implies increasing organization and complexity in the universe and is in effect a doctrine of continuous creation. The first Law of Thermodynamics affirms that creation is no longer occurring, while the second Law states that the original creation is decreasing in organization and complexity.
Either Law of Thermodynamics smashes the Theory of Evolution into those millions of pieces.
Physical evidence all over the world reveals a great flood in the past that destroyed a “golden era” of great achievements. Genesis 6-9 in the Bible tells us only scanty portions that caused this great flood by the Creator of mankind. They were so advanced that “gene splicing” was commonplace. They performed brain surgery that makes modern man’s efforts look like kindergarten play.
The floodgates of heaven were opened. The underground oceans were broken up. The horrific forces of violence were unleashed upon that “golden age” that became so evil and degenerate. Large landmasses with their advanced populations slipped into the sea. The surface of the entire globe became a giant cauldron, in which continents and seas churned up together.
There were screaming hurricanes, tidal waves pushing 6,000 feet high swept toward the poles. A blanket of lava and asphyxiating gases extinguished all life except a ship with eight people and animals that was sealed tightly to protect its inhabitants from the elements.
Not only were the antediluvian people buried, but their advanced technological achievements were also buried and destroyed, including all forms of machinery and construction. In most areas of dense population they were submerged by the sea and buried under thousands of feet of debris. It has been scientifically estimated that over 75 percent of the earth’s surface is sedimentary in nature extending in many areas to 60,000 feet deep.
There are some 600 individual Flood traditions in various nations that concur on ALL essential points of the Genesis account. Very remarkable is the persistence of that Biblical name Noah around the world in most cultures today. This is very remarkable considering the multitude of language differences.
Yet the name survived virtually unchanged in such isolated places as Hawaii (called Nu-u), the Sudan (called Nuh), China (called Nu-Wah), the Amazon South America region (called Noa), and among the Hottentots (called Noh and Hiagnoh).
Did each of these nations independently concoct the same name for its flood-surviving ancestor? Or did these widely separated peoples refer back to the same family of survivors? Were these tragedies an example of gradually getting better or decay? Going from a “golden age” of advanced technology to a depopulated world does not seem to fit with Darwin’s Theory of Evolution!
It is an archaeological fact that within four hundred years after this great flood that destroyed a previous “golden age” of technological advancement that there SUDDENLY APPEARED civilization worldwide. Egypt about 3,000 B.C. sprang into existence suddenly – FULLY DEVELOPED! It suddenly emerged from a primitive state to a fantastic ready-made high society. How? Suddenly great cities, enormous temples, pyramids of overwhelming size, colossal statues, luxurious tunnels, and tombs emerged. There were splendid streets lined with magnificent sculptures and perfect drainage systems. They used the decimal system from the start! How? They had ready-made writing with a perfect language. How – if gradualism were true? Egypt had a well-established naming system using as many as five names per person [Pharaoh]. This was true all over the world from India and China to Central America and Europe! How did it just suddenly come into being? The truth about our past is stranger than fiction, but nevertheless true. These civilizations that suddenly came on the scene about 400 years after the flood knew how to organize armies, civil service, and had a well-organized hierarchy in government. They had a court system with a well-defined precedence of laws and form.
Egypt and other far-flung civilizations were very advanced. They did not gradually develop over eons of time. It was sudden! It was not just Egypt.
The appearance around 3,000 B.C. of Sumerian civilization was SUDDEN, unexpected, and came out of nowhere. The Maya of Central America dates back to the approximate time of both Egypt and Sumer. At the beginning of the Mayan culture, their writing and money system was perfect. No evolution there!!!
At precisely the same time, there came along the megalith builders of northwest Europe. How did the world become so advanced so quickly? Noah, his three sons, and their wives brought with them knowledge from the other side of the flood. That civilization had first God-given knowledge, later the “fallen” angels corrupted much of that knowledge for evil purposes.
Noah walked with God; therefore, he would use this advanced knowledge only for good. As the waters receded and the population grew, it was time to spread out again over the face of the whole earth.
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -4/+12Your mother was a failure blowing you last night, *****. However, that being said, your statement is a fallacy. Evolution is not established science. Science is merely the mechanism we use to understand the observations of the world around us. Evolution is a philosophy that cannot be experimented with to either corroborate or falsify a particular theory, therefore, it is outside the realm of scientific study. Your assertion is based upon nothing, therefore making you a ***** stirrer with no logical sense. And you spelled "Ulysses" wrong.
- Herkimer56, on 12/17/2007, -22/+6Weren't you people predicting ten million? I'd say that raising just two thirds of your stated goal is not a stunning success.
- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -2/+13Well, you are free to be wrong if you so choose. Drop the context all you wish, no one has ever pulled in so much. That being said, this immature taunting is just making Paul look that much better.
- shagywashere, on 12/18/2007, -8/+1the goal for Nov 5th was 10 million too. It's just an insane goal to get people to donate.
- card51short, on 12/18/2007, -1/+10the goal wasn't 10 million...we were hoping for 10 million for a 2 day total.
The goal was to beat the record...which we did ;) - card51short, on 12/18/2007, -0/+8actually the goal was to raise 12 million in the quarter and we almost have 20 million...owned
- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -2/+13Well, you are free to be wrong if you so choose. Drop the context all you wish, no one has ever pulled in so much. That being said, this immature taunting is just making Paul look that much better.
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -6/+15Jealousy and a very small penis comes to mind. Not only that, but i'm sure being an assboy of the neo-cons has to hurt.
- whizkidsecrets, on 12/17/2007, -3/+25Hey neo-cons SIT UP ONTO MY FUQSTICK
- Herkimer56, on 12/17/2007, -12/+4It's always entertaining when the Junior High kiddies get home from school.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+2says herk the jerk trying hard to not show glee
- Herkimer56, on 12/17/2007, -12/+4It's always entertaining when the Junior High kiddies get home from school.
- Drgonz0, on 12/17/2007, -3/+39hehe Ron Paul rocks and u know it :P
- dijonH, on 12/17/2007, -2/+37GO RON PAUL!!!!
- oruval, on 12/17/2007, -3/+34This is where they are fighting us. Laughing and Ignoring didn't work.. They are scared and when you're cornered and scared after telling nothing but lies the only thing left to do is fight.
I say let the fight begin...there are alot more of us than there are of them. RON PAUL PRESIDENT 2008!!! - paralentor, on 12/17/2007, -3/+28Neo-Cons and Neo-Libs join to fight the voice of the awakening people. New York times
doesn't even list Ron Paul in this sundays campaign expose. Imagine if Fuk-A-Bee raised 3 million, they would be falling all over themselves on National Petroleum Radio and Faux news.
We are now awake against the two headed Neo-Con/Lib snake!- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -2/+10Yes, we are. Lets also show them extreme civility and not drop the f-bomb or lose our temper. We have reason on our side. Remember this.
- rasbradley, on 12/18/2007, -2/+3word.
- Lasthorseman, on 12/18/2007, -2/+9I thought it was National Propaganda Radio!
- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -2/+10Yes, we are. Lets also show them extreme civility and not drop the f-bomb or lose our temper. We have reason on our side. Remember this.
- Safety1stJoe, on 12/17/2007, -3/+29When I was calling my local media to ask them if they were going to cover this. I got the impression that they were told ahead of time to not cover it.
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -2/+15They are vying with the Spice girls. that's news to them. The media are nothing but their corporate whores. They will be replaced too.
- srodolff, on 12/17/2007, -30/+6So, his polling is higher than 6th nationwide???
No?..........failure........money is worthless unless it produces results.- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -2/+23Isn't that the point? Our money is worthless, so it matters little to us. The Ron Paul message of Freedom is idiot proof. The national polls don't add him in them. But wait until the primaries. Ron Paul will win by a landslide victory. The corporate owned media will be powerless to stop the people. We are the media. You will be replaced.
- Herkimer56, on 12/17/2007, -15/+6Ron Paul will not win a single primary. He will finish no better than fourth in Iowa and not that well in New Hampshire. If he's still in the race come Super Tuesday he will finish no better than fifth in any of the primaries. Money does not immediately translate to votes. If it did then Ross Perot would have been President for eight years. You have to have a program that people want and Ron Paul has no program at all. He's just whining and bitching about the things he doesn't like but he offers no real agenda to correct those issues. The man is a waste of space on the ballot.
- shagywashere, on 12/18/2007, -1/+7The problem is Ross Perot didn't run as Democrat/Republican
- ZZeke, on 12/18/2007, -0/+3yeah, yeah - we already know that the amazing Herkimer - who's afraid to tell us who he supports - doesn't like Paul. Big news flash. Anyway, Herk - If money doesn't translate into votes, then why is the amount of $$ raised so g-damn important to the press? And why is it that the one with the most $$$ goes on to the White House more often than not? Also, if it was your (mystery) candidate breaking fund-raising records, would you still be saying that money raised is not a good barometer, or would you take it as a good sign that your candidate stands a chance? I've said it before - I support Paul, but I also realize that he's basically fighting a losing battle (like Perot) and the chances he will even get the nomination are slim to none - but these fund-raisers prove a pretty sizeable amount of grassroots support in his favor, and I think you're going to be surprised about New Hampshire when it happens (ALOT of libertarians there, maybe you weren't aware). Either way, I think if it were your candidate, you would take something like this as a good sign, instead of just offering up sour grapes as usual.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1wonder how many times Jerkimer needed to repeat that litany before he believed it.
Fact is, Jerky, you really are becoming tiresome spouting the same old meadow muffin crap.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1It would seem srodolff is unaware that his own "money" is as worthless as ours. And too stupid to realize that part of Ron Paul's agenda is to restore our money's real value.
- Herkimer56, on 12/17/2007, -15/+6Ron Paul will not win a single primary. He will finish no better than fourth in Iowa and not that well in New Hampshire. If he's still in the race come Super Tuesday he will finish no better than fifth in any of the primaries. Money does not immediately translate to votes. If it did then Ross Perot would have been President for eight years. You have to have a program that people want and Ron Paul has no program at all. He's just whining and bitching about the things he doesn't like but he offers no real agenda to correct those issues. The man is a waste of space on the ballot.
- Observant1, on 12/17/2007, -1/+10I cant decide whether douchbag or enema nozzle would be more appropriate
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -2/+23Isn't that the point? Our money is worthless, so it matters little to us. The Ron Paul message of Freedom is idiot proof. The national polls don't add him in them. But wait until the primaries. Ron Paul will win by a landslide victory. The corporate owned media will be powerless to stop the people. We are the media. You will be replaced.
- DFet, on 12/17/2007, -3/+36It is clear that the opponents of Ron Paul are frustrated and emotional by his success.. EXCELLENT! "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.” -Ghandi
- m0neybags, on 12/18/2007, -10/+4Ghandi and Ron Paul are political opposites.
- FatesWebb, on 12/17/2007, -4/+18but the money isn't even spent yet, so how is that worthless? isn't money that is SPENT more powerful than just collected money? you guys are looking at the donation as the power, rather than the effect of the donation. have patience. This is just the beginning
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -1/+17Um... in a sense the donations are a power. It is the expression of the people behind it. Please try to look outside of the box. Your linear thinking is annoying. But you're right... this is just the beginning. The beginning of the end of the corporate established lying piece of ***** media slaves.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+2What the MSM fails to emphasize, or even mention, is that Ron Paul's donations come from Joe and Mary Citizen rather than from large corporate and foreign interest donors as do Hitlery's.
- Safety1stJoe, on 12/17/2007, -1/+29One of my local news channels here in Connecticut did mention the money bomb a few minutes ago but they said that if he can do it why can't Huckabee. They are trying to use this to boost anyone else except Ron Paul.
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -2/+14Because Huckabee's numbers are lies. And Ron Paul isn't even added in the national polls. i heard one brave news lady laugh and say sarcastically, "I don't know WHERE these numbers come from... But Huckabee won't last." And that's the truth. Wait til the primaries and see what happens. Ron Paul will be the upset of the decade!!!
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -15/+6What makes you think that every independent polling organization is fabricating Huckabee's polling numbers?
- Herkimer56, on 12/18/2007, -16/+6Because he doesn't like what the polls indicate. Huckabee is actually reaching the Republican and Ron Paul is reaching just the fringes of the right and the left wing. And Huckabee has a real shot at this while Ron Paul's only political future is obscurity brought on by an early exit from the primaries.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1Please hold your breath.
- card51short, on 12/18/2007, -2/+8"Ron Paul's only political future is obscurity brought on by an early exit from the primaries."
remember those words, herky, i'ma make you eat em- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -10/+4Don't be so confident. Ron Paul isn't polling very well and the Iowa Caucus isn't very far away.
- card51short, on 12/18/2007, -0/+7OK I'ma make him eat those words tho...if he thinks he's going out any time soon he's wrong
- NSResponder, on 12/17/2007, -2/+16Huckabee can't do it, because he's a weasel.
-jcr
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -2/+14Because Huckabee's numbers are lies. And Ron Paul isn't even added in the national polls. i heard one brave news lady laugh and say sarcastically, "I don't know WHERE these numbers come from... But Huckabee won't last." And that's the truth. Wait til the primaries and see what happens. Ron Paul will be the upset of the decade!!!
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -16/+7I just want to thanks that Wonker guy personally! I'd love to buy him a drink and peaceably chit chat with him. So, if anyone has an address or a phone number, please email it to me asap!
- onlytruth, on 12/17/2007, -2/+5thanks for what - are you kidding me - I do't get it..
- poparf, on 12/17/2007, -2/+31Ron Paul $18,000,000 Huckabee $5,000
Are people really going to fall for this Huckabee surge *****? I think the slip is in and that they have Huckabee picked for the cheat in the election. I predict he will be the person set up to steal Ron Paul votes and when he does, the dumb public will just assume, yep my TV was right Huckabee is the man. AAAARRRRGGGGHHHHH Get mad people!
Ron Paul 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -2/+13I feel you may be correct except for one thing: God will not be mocked. Watch and see. Ron Paul will be the upset of the decade.
- onlytruth, on 12/17/2007, -2/+10good point - mock god and the hand will serve!!!
amen!
The second american revolution is NOW!!!!!!
- onlytruth, on 12/17/2007, -2/+10good point - mock god and the hand will serve!!!
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+2If the vote rigger boxes are this easy to hack
http://digg.com/politics/Magnet_and_PDA_Sufficient ...
then it could be a real free for all.
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -2/+13I feel you may be correct except for one thing: God will not be mocked. Watch and see. Ron Paul will be the upset of the decade.
- NSResponder, on 12/17/2007, -2/+29Six million bucks in a day... How can I have an "abject failure" like that?
-jcr - mickstriker, on 12/17/2007, -8/+5What's with Ron Paul!!!!!!?????
Please check out the links!
http://www.amazon.com/Case-Gold-Lehrman-Lewis-Paul ...
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/lehrman/lehrman ...- cwabray, on 12/18/2007, -1/+7It was Reagan's commission; they may have come to the same conclusions on this issue, the gold standard, but I wouldn't take it as an endorsement of his other views or positions seeing as Reagan was able to choose the commission members, which Ron would have liked to do
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -1/+1I find it interesting that Lehrman was/is involved in Arbusto Energy, the Bushes' oil company.
- yellowbox98, on 12/17/2007, -31/+5Buried as spam
- crlingerfelt, on 12/17/2007, -4/+10We'll just keep submitting and digging Biotch!
- Ulisses, on 12/17/2007, -9/+6You don't look anything like a fat looser.
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -9/+7The wife beater was an excellent touch in my opinion.
- artemus, on 12/18/2007, -3/+5My, my, what an intelligent response. You really showed him.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -6/+5What would be an intelligent response to "We'll just keep submitting and digging Biotch!"?
- Ulisses, on 12/17/2007, -9/+6You don't look anything like a fat looser.
- xdream, on 12/17/2007, -3/+12Marked as a liar. Marked as a fake. All of your time is spent finding ron paul information and buring it. that makes you a shill ass boy for your masters. pig. I'd spit in your ***** face if i'd ever met you you ***** coward.
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -12/+5How is he a liar, xdream?This is at least the third submission of this very same "article" today. Face it, the folks at Prisonplanet.com are shameless spammers.
http://www.digg.com/odd_stuff/more_whiny_ron_paul_ ...
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/neo_libs_label_r ...
The Administrators at Prisonplanet.com clearly violated digg's Terms of Use by taking down the widget because they didn't like the headline and resubmitting it their selves.- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1jcm ' s college edjumacayshun isn't serving him too well. He has trouble with possessives and case.
Try "Perrin's Guide", kid.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1jcm ' s college edjumacayshun isn't serving him too well. He has trouble with possessives and case.
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -12/+5How is he a liar, xdream?This is at least the third submission of this very same "article" today. Face it, the folks at Prisonplanet.com are shameless spammers.
- onlytruth, on 12/17/2007, -2/+10Yellow box is a brainwashed individual or working for the hijacked US government.. People can see through your BS
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -5/+3Yellowbox is one of you guys. He even posts on Paul Joseph Watson's Myspace page!
- NonServium, on 12/18/2007, -0/+3He's probably a sock puppet of yours, and you did your usual "buried as spam" thing but forgot to switch to the jcm account first.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1shhhh Don't blow pencilneck's cover
- chaosium, on 12/18/2007, -4/+2Then why do you Paulsies vote him up?
- card51short, on 12/18/2007, -0/+6no...please no...please don't tell me you visit his myspace page...jcm....no....please...
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1jcm should change his username to "*****" because like it, he's all over the place.
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -5/+3Yellowbox is one of you guys. He even posts on Paul Joseph Watson's Myspace page!
- Tofubadguy, on 12/19/2007, -0/+4yellowbox buried as spam.
- osullibhean, on 12/20/2007, -0/+2Is yellowbelly98 a jcm267 sockpuppet or just a jcm267 fanboy?
- crlingerfelt, on 12/17/2007, -4/+10We'll just keep submitting and digging Biotch!
- spiritsoup, on 12/17/2007, -1/+18Any time anyone speaks truth. Regardless of what truth it is, 9-11, 7-7, CIA drug deals, Bay of Gauguin. We are told by the media and the Globalist that we are what's wrong with this country, we should be ashamed and are labeled traitors, yet they are the ones who should be hung for treason, they are the proprietor's of unjust policies, remember
"All enemies...Foreign and Domestic"
These enemies are on our soil and they are selling it right from underneath us. "They" are the Bush-Clinton regime The Federal Reserve, The royal crown of England, the Zionists that have been dictating policy for the last twenty years, these puny puppets of the elite global bankers are waging a war on us, though not undeclared.
It's time to grab the weapons of this war. Not rifles and knives, (Though I fear they want to take it there, because that's what they do kill rap and maim) but information. Speak loudly on the things the sleepy don't want to hear. Throw it in there faces, smack them with facts. Eventually the 2x4 of truth will hit them hard enough to rouse them from their slumber.- cuda72, on 12/19/2007, -0/+2Did all that in the area of wisconsin i live in.In dane county(they call it dame county for obvious reasons) Cant get a job,bank closed my account and told me never step foot in one of their banks for talking about Ron Paul and 9/11.Cant even get a job at a temp agency.Think this poor boy has been black balled.Passing out video's to professors at the UW.To representatives, senators,congressmen.police chiefs,mayor etc.Ya they want to hurt me.They are but screw em.Wont be long those dirt bags will be in the same soup line as me.Should see the fear in peoples eyes when i tell them how im getting screwed by the man.Been this way most of my 47 years.Just cant find it in me to kiss ass and say what i know isn't true.Bugs me when some people claim to have the corner on being held down.lol been railroaded and the cop was found to be a liar.(convicted on his word alone by order of the judge).I told her years after i know where Satan lives.She bugged eyed and says uhuh(and this was years ago).Angela Bartel never forget you.Ordered the jury to take pigs word as physical evidence that i hit him.Didn't have a mark on him because the fat ass couldn't catch me in my younger days.I was a fast white boy lol.So i may not have any money to give for the cause and Ron Paul but what i have given is more than money.Funny thing is i feel like I'm the one getting beat with the 2x4.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+1I never recanted on the oath I took to "protect and defend the constitution" but it seems like Herky and Horty have.
I think they believe the 2nd Amendment is all about arming the bears.
0¿0
- jdjeff, on 12/17/2007, -2/+17What's really funny about all this is that Ron Paul is raising the counterfeit notes that are going to put the counterfeiters out of business. Hah!
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -26/+5This is the third submission of the same piece article. Prisonplanet needs to stop spamming digg.
- choppasizzle, on 12/17/2007, -5/+13your submission doesn't count loser
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -14/+5How old are you? 12?
- choppasizzle, on 12/17/2007, -4/+9yeah same as you
- onlytruth, on 12/17/2007, -2/+10your pitiful jcm
- onedeaddj, on 12/18/2007, -3/+14Now that JCM has completed Halo 3, he can fully devote all of his time to writing "buried as spam" under any digg submission that doesn't ass kiss his beloved anti-American Bush administration - oh yeah that and wanking over pictures of Ann Coulter in his Mom's basement.
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -9/+4Is this you, Paul Joseph Watson?
- artemus, on 12/18/2007, -2/+6No, Paul Joseph Watson would not stoop down to the level of a loser like you.
- card51short, on 12/18/2007, -1/+8watson has a phd...h'e s a great writer, like his content or not you have to admit.
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -8/+3A Ph. D in what? Obviously not in a scientific field.
- ringelman5, on 12/19/2007, -0/+3and jcm's field is what, alchemy? pseudophysics? Ex-Laxian philosophy? practical pud pulling?
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -14/+5How old are you? 12?
- onlytruth, on 12/17/2007, -2/+12YOu scum piece of filth this is not spam.. this is real.. I see your recent favorite article is "The Neo-Nazi Candidate" Why don't you admit that you hate america and the constitution.. stop wrapping yourself in the flag enemy..
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -13/+4Did you read my comment? This is the third time this same "article" has been submitted today. This is spam.
- choppasizzle, on 12/18/2007, -1/+7why did you submit it then? you are a walking contradiction
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -9/+3I was the first to submit this article. All repeat submissions are spam.
- card51short, on 12/18/2007, -1/+6but jcm all prison planet articles are spam, remember? You posted spam, liar. You're now a member of al qaeda if we're judging by your book.
- Look4Truth, on 12/18/2007, -1/+5Must be hard working being that lame jcm. I wish you could see how ridiculous others see you as. Why not just stop all your foolishness and take time out to study what's going on. We've all been there and are waiting for you to do the same.
- choppasizzle, on 12/18/2007, -1/+7why did you submit it then? you are a walking contradiction
- jcm267, on 12/17/2007, -13/+4Did you read my comment? This is the third time this same "article" has been submitted today. This is spam.
- artemus, on 12/18/2007, -1/+9PrisonPlanet didn't submit it, Moron. You need to stop comment spamming with your brain dead rhetoric.
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -9/+3Prisonplanet put up the widget. I submitted it, then Prisonplanet removed the widget, put up a new one, and had one of their guys submit it with a Prisonplanet approved spam headline. Are you really this stupid?
- ganjerific, on 12/18/2007, -1/+8HAHA HEY JCM....... NO!!!
- choppasizzle, on 12/17/2007, -5/+13your submission doesn't count loser
- truthforearth, on 12/17/2007, -3/+22i know i'm voting for ron paul
- Herkimer56, on 12/18/2007, -14/+4If you're not in a state that holds it's primary on or before Super Tuesday you'll never have the chance unless you write him in. He's going to lose in a major way and then drop out of the race.
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -10/+3Speaking of which, I just checked and I found that I still have time to switch party affiliation to Republican. Looks like there will be one more vote for someone other than Ron Paul in Connecticut on Super Tuesday.
- Liverwurst, on 12/19/2007, -1/+2JCM,
Morbid curiosity. Who'd you go with, Rudy or Mitt? - ringelman5, on 12/20/2007, -0/+2Write in Lech Walesa.
He was a commie too.
- Liverwurst, on 12/19/2007, -1/+2JCM,
- osullibhean, on 12/20/2007, -0/+2Just keep telling yourself that... I know it is probably comforting, as such delusions often are.
- jcm267, on 12/18/2007, -10/+3Speaking of which, I just checked and I found that I still have time to switch party affiliation to Republican. Looks like there will be one more vote for someone other than Ron Paul in Connecticut on Super Tuesday.
- Herkimer56, on 12/18/2007, -14/+4If you're not in a state that holds it's primary on or before Super Tuesday you'll never have the chance unless you write him in. He's going to lose in a major way and then drop out of the race.
- dexton77, on 12/17/2007, -2/+18Ron Paul 2008!
- onlytruth, on 12/17/2007, -1/+14losers.. Ron Paul is the bomb and they are flunkies who want to Deny the American peoples power...
Listen wonket and the communist Red State! you better watch what battles you choose.. because we did it before and we will do it again.... the Revolution will happen and you can be an American enemy or you can join the side of good..
THe Lord said all those that hate me love death.. we want peace and to stop the killing.. Freedom is godly.. you have sided with Satan and your fate will be most dismal.- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -0/+8Please don't give Ron Paul a bad name. Getting mad is one thing. We all need to get mad, but losing control and ranting and raving, yelling "filth" and "scum", is no way to win the field of ideas. It turns potential seers off and they will not look back. That's why, while I agree with Alex Jones on most things, and his info is on the mark, I have stopped listening.
Reason and liberty can be won without screaming and growling and losing our outer calm.
- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -0/+8Please don't give Ron Paul a bad name. Getting mad is one thing. We all need to get mad, but losing control and ranting and raving, yelling "filth" and "scum", is no way to win the field of ideas. It turns potential seers off and they will not look back. That's why, while I agree with Alex Jones on most things, and his info is on the mark, I have stopped listening.
- mickstriker, on 12/17/2007, -15/+2Ron Paul co-wrote a book, "The Case for Gold" with Lewis E. Lehrman, who is on the Board of Directors of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC document).
Please see links in my last post.
This is pretty surprising and upsetting. Has anyone else heard of this yet?- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -0/+9If that's the case, Ron was as duped as Ayn Rand. Before one of her students, trusted and allowed into her inner-circle, turned to the dark-side, he wrote: "Gold and Economic Freedom". That student was Alan Greenspan.
The false will always try to be seen as the true. Reason, history and knowledge cannot be forgot or go unused.
- BeingJohnGalt, on 12/18/2007, -0/+9If that's the case, Ron was as duped as Ayn Rand. Before one of her students, trusted and allowed into her inner-circle, turned to the dark-side, he wrote: "Gold and Economic Freedom". That student was Alan Greenspan.
- rasier, on 12/18/2007, -1/+23ITS RON PAUL OR NOBODY FOR ME.
- Observant1, on 12/18/2007, -1/+14its pretty funny, I've heard of Ron Paul, he's breaking records for 1 day hauls in fundraisers! but who the hell are the wonkette's, willy wonka's cheerleaders?! I've never heard of THEM, but my guess is they like trying to chase down and brainwash oompa-loompa's
- onedeaddj, on 12/18/2007, -2/+19Now that JCM has completed Halo 3, he can fully devote all of his time to writing "buried as spam" under any digg submission that doesn't ass kiss his beloved anti-American Bush administration - oh yeah that and wanking over pictures of Ann Coulter in his Mom's basement.
- Tofubadguy, on 12/19/2007, -0/+3LOL. Funny
- rasbradley, on 12/18/2007, -0/+15I Love Ron Paul! oh and wankett sucks a big one... what a joke!
- LalW, on 12/18/2007, -0/+17All that needs to be said is thank God for those renegade Ron Paulers who WHOOPED THE ASS of the Establishment once again!! $6 MILLION stick-it-in-your.... Now *that's a message they won't soon forget, even if they want to ignore it!
- JaegerR, on 12/18/2007, -0/+10“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you; then they fight you, then you win.” - Mohandas Gandhi.
Doesn't this say something about what we're doing? At first, they ignored Dr. Paul, now they ridicule us. Next comes the fight, and finally (and quite possibly) victory. Don't unroll your sleeves just yet if you're an active supporter -- we've got a lot of work to do still yet. - Lasthorseman, on 12/18/2007, -0/+13Fully embrace events like this. Point them out to asleep people. Let the false left right paradigms eat each other and expose the New World Order because that is all that will be left. Bring it into the light until even a five year old American know who the Illuminati is.
- Shanich, on 12/18/2007, -0/+10 Its time for US all to take back the U.S.A. There not going to hand it back to us , all military personnel past and present , we now know we have domestic enemies that want to gut the constitution and create a police state , they must be stopped NOW !!!!
- alittlebrookie, on 12/18/2007, -0/+12There's no need to be concerned about these idiots -- Ron Paul is impeccable.
He is a true man for the people and is acting as a unifier for all of America across the political spectrum. - impsick, on 12/18/2007, -0/+8Spread the Word!!! Ron Paul 2008!
- Hawkwind39, on 12/18/2007, -0/+9Clowns like the wonkettes obviously use tactics like this to attempt to belittle their apponents by appealing to the kind of people who are not intelligent enough to reach an informed conclusion on their own.
Example:
Wonkette Spokesperson: "Ron Pauls 6 million record breaking fundraiser is a failure!!!"
Wonkette followers: "Ron Paul.... Failure..... Ron Paul.... Failure.... Ron Paul.... Failure....b'aaaa, b'aaaa" etc etc (Robotic sheep voice) - antiklaus, on 12/18/2007, -0/+9The masses must be heard... at the ballot boxes or on the steps of the White House. Ron Paul wins by popular mandate. I've done the counts. The media cannot put the cork back in the bottle... we know the truth now.
Demand a fair election, or take it to the streets! - joshlanjaron, on 12/18/2007, -0/+7The final "straw" for me in relation to Obama was Oprah's self righteous support. Chat show hosts ruin peoples lives and usually take some goodie goodie right wing stance. We have Kilroy Silk, the leader of the U.K Independent Nazi Party. No black man should vote for that fake (Obama). He's about as black as Colin Powell. He who gave the go ahead to kill one million Iraqis.
- cadooda, on 12/18/2007, -0/+8The Man stuck it to us-- let's stick it back! Vote Ron Paul in 2008 my friends!
- rubberman2007, on 12/18/2007, -0/+7Man! I could really use an "abject failure" right now.
- Malig, on 12/18/2007, -0/+6Damn, they are running scared. Go Ron Go!
- simbolo, on 12/18/2007, -0/+4Remember to register and vote in primary for RonPaul2008!!!
http://www.gop.com/RegisterToVote/ - maxfirepower, on 12/19/2007, -0/+2It's telling that they don't go after Paul himself really. That's because they have nothing wherewith to blame him and the message is not easily refuted. They cannot point to the successes of the current system in any way. Instead they attack (albeit pitifully) those who support him. Who cares what some outfit called "Wonkette" thinks anyway? But it's pretty clear they care what Paul supporters think and we're not playing by THEIR rules. They are soiling their diapers over it.
max - virtualk, on 12/19/2007, -0/+3Gee, what are 'they' sooooo afraid of? FREEDOM for AMERICA??????
Ron Paul 2008! - keenonfreedom, on 12/19/2007, -0/+3Vote Ron Paul in 2008!
- sunguard, on 12/19/2007, -0/+2I hate those wonkette *****. They sensor their forum. There is no way to rebutt any of the senseless drival they promote.
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our