What is Digg?70 Comments
- thoolou, on 06/13/2008, -8/+54You are so full of it.
At least post the ORIGINAL title of the post before you start editorializing... - randyr309, on 06/13/2008, -6/+46More lies about lgf. Poor people, trying to silence the truth they can't stand
- redstateredneck, on 06/13/2008, -7/+42No one at LGF is smearing Obama. In fact, posters at the Daily Kos have stood up for LGF recently. If you call pointing out his own words and actions"smearing", then you need to get a clue.
- bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -4/+39"Obama hasn't said or done anything that warrants the level of blind panic they desire."
No crap, that's why Charles put up the thread, to show the mental link between Obama and his supporters. Try to ignore your childish leanings next time you go to LGF and you might actually understand what's going on there. - davenp35, on 06/13/2008, -6/+39abuse@digg.com
- haakondahl, on 06/13/2008, -4/+33Go ahead--take the LGF test. Go to one of the LGF posts about the truly vile things being posted under Senator Obama's namespace, and take a look at the sort of things which have been allowed to remain online, in some cases for over a year. There are several blogs on Obama's site which express complete agreement with Charles Johnson's outrage over the disgusting things posted on Obama's site. My guess is that you won't see that ever "dugg" over here. So before you click on the up or down (sorry, "digg or bury") links here, go take a look at what is being said on LGF. I have been a vocal LGF commenter for years now, and the headline you see on this Digg post just plain gets it wrong.
Am I being unreasonable? Is it unreasonable to expect a candidate for President to manage (through a team, of course) the blogging associated with his name? Nobody expects perfection--the internet is a rough-and-tumble environment, and long may it remain so. But on LGF, abusive, unhinged comments are gone within the space of hours or days, whereas on Senator Obama's site, they remain for upwards of a year. The critical difference is not one of numbers, but of intent--Charles Johnson is a part-time blogger, and Senator Barack Obama is running for leadership of the free world. I expect professional management out of one of these characters, and not the other. But go ahead--take the LGF test.
Are we being unreasonable? I respectfully submit that we are not. - Sharmuta, on 06/13/2008, -2/+30The Stalker say: "In the wild world of wingnut psychology, disagreeing with or criticizing LGF is abuse."
Here's a clue- you think anyone who disagrees with your world view is crazy, yet condemn us for saying you're an abusive stalker. That makes you a hypocrite. - quickrob, on 06/13/2008, -4/+31I would just kill myself if my life was so empty that I spent my days on Digg crying about LGF
- ryukyu, on 06/13/2008, -3/+28I love how all you have to do is repeat what Obama or his supporters say and they say you are "smearing" him or "panicking." No comment whatsoever about the communists in the background though.
- sanddog, on 06/13/2008, -2/+24SkyReading, you're obviously one of those sad and pathetic people suffering from PODS. Please, seek medical attention and soon! Obama isn't your buddy or your pal, he isn't your special friend and he isn't your savior. Come back to earth, dude.... it's obvious the air is waaaaay too thin up where you are.
- mattowan, on 06/13/2008, -1/+22Title incorrect. Here's link to proper title.
http://digg.com/world_news/Ohio_judge_Mass_murdere ... - LastVisibleDog, on 06/13/2008, -2/+22You know what is weird?
If you go to the actual piece on LGF, the article presents some evidence and asks a question - allowing the reader to draw their own conclusion. I guess this type of thinking for yourself really freaks out the followers of the Obamessiah. Sock puppets like SkyReading can't allow thinking for one's self to stand unchallenged - it is not the Obamessiah way.
My only question to sock-puppets like SkyReading - does it hurts when your handlers ram their hand up your arse to move your lips? - Ciannaky, on 06/13/2008, -3/+23And if you had actually read the story it was about a judge decrying the method employed in death penalty executions and demanding they be stopped for being cruel while sitting in front of a poster of Castro's Executioner who delighted in his own sadism. The Judge just happened to be an Obama supporter, go fig.
- randallvorisek, on 06/13/2008, -2/+21Charles Johnson and LGF, by continually exposing Shills and apologists (such as the Dan Rathers forged memos and Routers photo shop hit jobs) -have done a significant amount of damage the to propaganda efforts of Militant Islamic Expansionists.
If LGF was not effective, They wouldn't care. - 186k, on 06/13/2008, -5/+23Get a clue moron, we are judged by the company we keep and the people we attract.
The thirsty left knows where to go quench their thirst for radical socialism, plus I hear they believe he turns water into wine!
The Obamatrons are pathetically desperate. - SeafoodGumbo, on 06/13/2008, -3/+21SkyReading -- don't worry, someday you'll get to kiss a real live girl. Someday.
Until then, carry on with your pathetic stalking. - bluto36, on 06/13/2008, -0/+16no dishonesty is, something the progressive just don't understand
- inactive, on 06/13/2008, -3/+18lol...
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/30327_Digg ...
Skyreading lost his account! - Ozymandiass, on 06/13/2008, -4/+18I am disappointed the the Left's obsession with using smear and snear and out right hate propaganda tactics. It's the main reason that most Americans always shift back to the Right even when the Right screws up over and over again. Americans don't like dishonest people.
- haakondahl, on 06/13/2008, -1/+15Dishonest of you. The "Hope, CHange, and Che" tagline obviously refers to the photograph, which shows either an Obama supporter with a Che flag next to his idea of a good President, or a Che Guevara supporter with an Obama poster next his idea of a good terrorist. Either way, there's a man with an Obama poster and a Che Guevara flag on the wall behind him. And that's what the tagline refers to.
- Ciannaky, on 06/13/2008, -8/+22Actually, not smearing Obama so much as the entire Democrat Party pointing out the communists inclinations amongst it's base; it's what we have been pointing out all along, your all commie pinkos.
- LastVisibleDog, on 06/13/2008, -5/+18Looks like the DemocRAT strategy this year is LIES and SPIN (yes I am being redundant)
Lie early.
Lie often.
Spin spin spin - STOP - Obama Time (doing my best MC Hammer imitation)
Obama lies about the origin of the "Whitey Tape" rumor (HINT: a Democrat pro-Hillary blog started the rumor)
Now this Lefty Loony moron wants to stalk LGF using spin/twisting/and pure nonsense - guess when you spend your life in your Mom's basement with your pants around your ankles you have lots of time on your hands for nonsense like this.
On Digg - opposition will not be tolerated - worship the Obamessiah or be attacked - guess this is the Obamessiah Inquisition
Thanks to the Lefty Loony Digg children and the horrible interface - Digg has jumped the shark - too bad, it was really cool in the beginning - Digg used to be about lots of opinions - now it is a tool for tools to spam full of spin turning it into a giant Digg Democrat Children echo chamber circle jerk. - bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -0/+13Wow. That was an...um...intelligent response. You really got to the core of what I said. I guess avoiding the topic with a joke is easier than actually having to use your brain. Can't say I blame ya. I wouldn't want use your brain either.
- TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -3/+15Ha Ha Ha Ha skyreading lost his account due to TOS violations. Yup I was one of the ones who turned the troll in along with others.
Hey libs if you refuse to stay on topic, call names, post false headlines, or try any other little commie games your ass will get banned too.
It is downright pathetic how you libs cannot even stay on topic or even answer a simple question. - bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -2/+13I did so what are you talking about? I said that the point of Charles posting that story was to show that Obama, that judge, and Che are all on the same wavelength.
From Charles' post:
"Well, here’s an Ohio judge with an attraction to mass murderers and Communist thugs—and Barack Obama."
Where in that sentence does Charles say that the judge speaks for Obama? - DanThePainter, on 06/13/2008, -1/+12It is thin, and polluted by another resident, Bull Crapper.
- Snooper2, on 06/13/2008, -5/+15Obama doesn't need any smearing. He is a complete imp and does it every time the ass opens his mouth.
- Klingon00, on 06/13/2008, -0/+9Please show one article at LGF that supports anything white supremacist? Funny how you ignore all the times LGF attacks white supremacists along with any other bigots and hate groups out there.
- Maninthemiddle, on 06/14/2008, -1/+10As I said on the original article:
It may well be that Obama does not know of this supporter - nor his obvious political leanings. And a candidate certainly cannot be responsible for all those that are supporters.
When isolated events become a trend, however, one must begin to ask (just as we did with Dr. Paul and the troofers,anti-Semites, and white supremacists) - what is it about this candidate that is drawing those with an affinity toward a Communist, murderous, unhygienic sociopath? - bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -1/+9No. It's called literary comprehension. Take a junior high English class. SkyReading asked why we wouldn't address "the fact that this guy does not speak for Barack Obama" as if the assertion had been made. It hadn't been, nor was it in any way insinuated. Nothing even close to an insinuation was said by Charles. As I've said before and am now saying for the 3rd time, that wasn't the point of the thread, the point was to show 'birds of a feather'.
- tex68, on 06/13/2008, -2/+10Liberal Mental Disorder? Yep!
- Atlatal, on 06/13/2008, -2/+10Barak "I See Dead People" Obama has already campaigned in 57 States!
Republicans are jealous that Barak brought all those "Fallen Heroes" back to life on Memorial Day! - bamapachyderm, on 06/13/2008, -0/+8It must suck, having such a pathetic life that you actually *brag* about being a "legendary" troll on ANY website.
It's like you're sitting there bragging about having bad breath or bowel incontinence (and actually, trolling is rather like the verbal equivalent of it). What a loser! LOL!!! - Ciannaky, on 06/13/2008, -0/+7Yeah Ratz (how fitting) and even the most vile comment on the most conservative of all blogs couldn't hold a candle to the filth spewed on any of the left wing sites, and yes you are all communists you're just not hiding it anymore.
- falstaff, on 06/13/2008, -0/+7Speaking of smearing people with the words of others....
http://digg.com/search?section=all&s=hagee
Most with many thousands of diggs. - dwneylonsr, on 06/13/2008, -1/+8what a crock
- bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -1/+7Kenya is not a race.
- reformislam, on 06/14/2008, -2/+8The best way to smear Obama is to quote him.
- moski, on 06/14/2008, -0/+5WOW! How delusional of a lib do you have to be to say you had seen white supremacist stuff at LGF?
WOW!
There has to be some sort of medical term for reversing information to the complete opposite of what is written. Kind of like dyspepsia but not. - bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -1/+6Nothing even came close to "guilt by association" in what Charles posted. Any subtleties or insinuations you're trying to create are all in your head because of the right wing nature at LGF.
"Hey, David Duke reads LGF!"
Then go put it on a blog somewhere. You're free to. - lmcurtis, on 06/13/2008, -1/+6If you judge a website by it's comments, I guess you condemn HuffPo as well, right?
Hypocrite. - bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -1/+5You didn't have to explain that you were using pedantry, it was rather obvious.
- bamapachyderm, on 06/13/2008, -1/+5Project much?
- Idiggapony, on 06/14/2008, -0/+4An furthermore, why does Obama consistently refuse to renounce his various racist, pro-terrorist, and just-plain-crazy supporters unless and until he is convinced that he just can't get away with continuing his relationships with them?
- knotboy, on 06/13/2008, -2/+5Dugg by mistake
- bentman78, on 06/13/2008, -4/+7The Che flag in the background is dead giveaway the guys is a loser...also buried as spam...
- Verchiel77, on 06/15/2008, -0/+1Excellent job of refuting my "lies" with more verbal abuse.
- bosforus, on 06/13/2008, -0/+1Reminds me of the Comic Book Store Guy from The Simpsons.
- TheHomeOffice, on 08/08/2008, -2/+2Get a ***** life tard. Like I have said before you cannot even write a comment without lying.
- Verchiel77, on 06/13/2008, -5/+2Not sure why you're laughing there, chief. How many times have YOU been banned, "legrand" or "aldasfail" or whatever else you're calling yourself?
Your constant stream of childishly abusive rhetoric has has gotten you the gate more than once. -
Show 51 - 70 of 70 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is