What is Digg?Sponsored by Best Buy
You Are The Last-Minute Gift Master! (Guaranteed Win.) view!
bestbuy.com - This gift is never obsolete, everyone likes it and it's always in stock at the last minute...
137 Comments
- Yggdrasil03, on 10/10/2007, -11/+51"This has been the 1,595th day since the decoration of 'Mission Accomplished' in Iraq."
- chicoer2001, on 10/10/2007, -10/+29Bush doesnt fire anyone. Look at Gonzales
- funkytaco, on 10/10/2007, -4/+21Olbermann usually ends his commentary with the count just to remind people of the obvious manipulation of truth by this administration for self-affirming public relations. I mean, if the GOP says something, it must be true.
How weak minded must you be to still follow Bush? - otep, on 10/10/2007, -11/+28Olbermann is a true Patriot.
... - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -15/+29FTA: In this clip, he runs down the astonishing and outrageous list of Bush administration lackeys who, instead of being demoted or fired for their failures (sic) surrounding the September 11th attacks and the subsequent invasion and occupation of Iraq, were promoted and awarded medals for those failures (sic).
You’re nearly there, Keith. Just one more step. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -8/+21Yeah but Olbermann isn't running the country, bootlicker.
- Sublime059, on 10/10/2007, -5/+16Seriously.. these Bush Apologists are morons.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+12How dare anyone criticize the government!
- SeethisPass, on 10/10/2007, -13/+22Government In Action
In October the State Department awarded a $15,000 "outstanding performance " bonus to the head of the office that permitted 13 of the 19 Sep,11 hijackers to enter the country via expedited US Visa's
Mary Ryan, who retired in September after a 36 year tenure ( reportedly eased out after she defended her "visa express" even after Sept. 11), received her award specifically for the 12 month period beginning April 2001. The express program which was spearheaded by Thomas Furey, the U.S. Consul General in Riyadh, allowed Saudi nationals to apply over the internet without ever being seen by a U.S. official. Furey got a bonus too.
Chuck Shepherd writes for Universal Press Syndicate. Send weird news to Chuck Shepherd P.O.Box 18737, Tampa, FL33679 e-mail Weird@compuserve.com - Namco, on 10/10/2007, -3/+12@JamesSpaza. Hey troll, go ***** yourself. If you're so ignorant that you can't see past the ignorant red state conservative hawk agenda, and see this administration's failures for what they are, then there is no convincing you. You have your knucklehead in the sand. This administration has done nothing to lessen terrorism and needs to be held accountable. It is the American way to question one's leaders to make change for the better. The more you defend Bush, the more the nation suffers and gets weaker.
- williamdyer, on 10/10/2007, -4/+12I care just enough to touch the digg-down button.
The promotion of failures is easy to explain: The weakest people were coopted by a foreign government to start a war against this country's interests. They were rewarded for succeeding in this treason. But they remain just as weak, stupid, and criminal as ever. - mrmworth, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9terribly sad when i remember my friends that died in the world trade center. and it's even worse to think our government has not captured the supposed mastermind behind it all. a slap in the face everyday.
- jessehadden, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10You call it like it is, Mr. Olbermann! He forgot to mention one of the biggest beneficiaries of neocon policy, though: the Democrats. The Republicans have assured at least 8 years of rule for the *other* pro-war anti-Constitution party, based only on the virtue of 1) they aren't the Republicans, and 2) American voters (and their media) suffer from terrible amnesia. Let the false dichotomy continue!
- spucky, on 10/10/2007, -3/+11"whose free speech borders on treason"
Wow. - hawkspur, on 10/10/2007, -3/+11And you are a true idiot.
- MaTT2011, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10Your comment is sickening, and you should be ashamed that such a stream of nonsensical words and intentionally illogical words could even make its way out of your small little mind and into reality.
Democrats are not terrorist apologists, and republicans are not inherently evil. However, though, the actions of President/dictator Bush and his cohorts have done NOTHING but assist our enemies, terrorists, in their goal to harm, discredit and dishonor the great country of America. How? Well if the terrorists really do hate us for our freedom and seek any means to harm our country than president Bush, and his supporters like yourself, has been their number 1 ally in achieving those ends through his destruction of civil liberties and his violent international policies. By his actions to destroy civil liberties he is playing directly into the hands of the terrorists; if they really did want to screw us up than president Bush has screwed us up beyond anything the terrorists could ever DREAM of and im sure our enemies are laughing in our face because of what Bush has done. Because of his misguided and intentionally deceitful wars he has inspired nothing but hate, disrespect and anger towards the U.S. and has given our terrorists enemies the ammunition to recruit more and more individuals who would see us and our country harmed.
Individuals like you, who seem to support president bush and his illogical statements like "Well if you dont agree with us then your helping the turrrists!" , are only helping to destroy the greatness of this country and as a result you should feel nothing but shame for your role in the degradation of our nation.
Now go back to watching your Faux News propaganda to make yourself feel better about harming our country with your idiotic beliefs. - relaxeder, on 04/17/2009, -5/+12Watch this and see how many people reaped the rewards of their involvement in this war, its pretty ***** disgusting. These people have failed their way to the top.
- growler1, on 10/10/2007, -3/+10"My thoughts? Yeah, Olbermann is a slanderous liberal scumbag whose free speech borders on treason."
--You sir, are a coward and sycophant. Treason is seeking to damage or subvert the idea that is at the heart of this country--that people have inherent rights and government, by the people and for the people, should respect and uphold them. Calling someone's right to free speech "treasonous" is begging the question in the worst, most unpatriotic way. You should put on your thinking cap and figure out what it means to be a real American. - orangedog, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9Yes, O'Reilly is still on the air.
- mrASSMAN, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7.."failure" is correct spelling. And I assume you want him to conclude that they committed the attacks, or am I misreading your comment?
- ccheath, on 10/10/2007, -2/+8too bad you're wrong... especially on the ratings front
KO's rating's are the best in prime time cable news... didn't you know? - biotch, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6hahah you took that way too seriously to call anyone else feeble minded
- tehbishop, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7... and how does that do anything for Americans? See, if there had been WMDs it would have been THAT -- "ridding Iraq of WMDs" ... but there weren't any, so again, what has been done there that has helped the common American? Not going after those that did 9/11, not finding Osama, losing Afghanistan back to the Taliban (drug harvests anyone?).
Wake the ***** up. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -5/+10Hmm, 70% of Americans want out of Iraq?
- bonerjams2k3, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5the kid is about as sharp as a marble....
- exomni, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7Have you ever met the average American? They are the kind of dumbass, ignorant, *****, skull-***** morons that would elect someone like George W. Bush into office twice.
I'd hardly give a ***** if I got bad ratings from them. - defektiv, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4..not near as much money as the owner of those buildings made in insurance.
- bonerjams2k3, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4i bet you masturbate to the o-factor, don't you? c'mon, be honest....
- knomevol, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4ah, the insult. the last defense of the hopeless.
- dukeeeey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4no afghanistan doesn't have oil but the caspian sea does. And guess what ? they are building a pipeline through afghanistan to get the oil out.
- DAE51D, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com -- skip about 1/2 way through to see the 9/11 stuff.
- biotch, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Oh for crying out loud poser... you really take that comment seriously?
Dont you belong on youtube sobbing about britney spears? - Castronaut, on 10/10/2007, -3/+7Let it go.
- RGWX, on 10/10/2007, -3/+7The Lord Haw Haw of our time.
- Me1000, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5the word is 'your'
- dukeeeey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas Kean
and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book, Without Precedent, that they were
"set up to fail" and were starved of funds to do a proper investigation.
They also confirm that they were denied access to the truth and misled by
senior officials in the Pentagon and the federal aviation authority; and
that this obstruction and deception led them to contemplate slapping
officials with criminal charges.
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/peter_tatchell/2007/09/911_the_big_coverup.html - funkytaco, on 10/10/2007, -4/+7Abre Los Ojos
Open Your Eyes - williamdyer, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4The real story is that Israel led us into a disastrous war, and wants us to start another one that would be five times larger. Nobody can say that on American TV and have a job the next day.
Land of the free, my ass. - DavidJay, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Don't reproduce.
- the6thReplicant, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3A parrot for whom? Democrats. Well, he doesn't like those guys either. Some sort of left-wing machine run by Soros?
Really what is he a parrot of? - TheZorch, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Maybe he should run for President. I know I'd vote for him. What this nation needs is a man with his hand on the pulse of the American people. I'd say KO fits that bill nicely.
- jessehadden, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5Go fox yourself. =-D
- dforty3, on 10/10/2007, -23/+26Keith Rocks!
Has anyone ever seen this article before? I'd love to hear your thoughts.
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=4362 - ren1999, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3This White House is interested in turning America into Saudi Arabia. That isn't good.
This White House is interested in serving Halliburton. That is a conflict of interest.
This White House is the enemy of both Republicans and Democrats who are patriots! - knobtwiddler, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3not "permitted"
DEMANDED
still not getting it huh? - heepajunk, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2You can't decide the truth anymore then you can decide you can fly. The truth is independent of your personal convictions.
- superal1394, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2WTC 7 was hit by the mass of falling and burning debris from WTC 1+2. This caused massive damage to the super structure, which was further weakened by the ensuing inferno. Also, WTC 7 was not typical of most buildings, its weight around the center of the building had to be distributed to the right and left of the structure due to a large Con Ed substation underneath the building. This hence made it more vulnerable to a single point failure causing a collapse, which is what happened. It is noted by fire fighters on the ground that a visible bulge appeard around the critical 5th through 7th floors in the wall as the steel super structure began to warp and fail due to the fires heat.
"The building was constructed above a Con Edison substation, which had been on the site since 1967.[3] The substation had a caisson foundation designed to carry the weight of a future building on the site of 25 stories containing 600,000 sq ft (55,700 m²).[4] The final design for 7 World Trade Center was for a much larger building covering a larger footprint than originally planned when the substation was built.[5]
The structural design of 7 World Trade Center included numerous features to allow a larger building than originally planned to be constructed. A system of gravity column transfer trusses and girders was located between floors 5 and 7 to transfer loads to the smaller foundation.[3] Existing caissons installed in 1967 were used, along with additional new caissons, to accommodate the building. The 5th floor functioned as a structural diaphragm, providing lateral stability and distribution of loads between the new and old caissons. Above the 7th floor, the building's structure was a typical tube-frame design, with columns in the core and on the perimeter and lateral loads resisted by perimeter moment frames."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Actually, they don't. "In most cases, the possessive adjective is used only where the context doesn't make clear whose body is being referred to."
Source: http://spanish.about.com/od/spanishvocabulary/a/body_parts.htm - heepajunk, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3I'd love for you to explain what was crazy about this particular video.
And how could it possibly be more crazy then our occupation in iraq? -
Show 51 - 100 of 138 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is