4 Comments
- RuffRidr, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Your arguement is stupid. He bought nearly $1000 worth of guns. You don't think he would spend another $100 on a box of 9mm? All your solution does is penalize law-abiding citizens who wish to protect themselves.
- flipside3, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2And I'm saying let's not keep the guns from law abiding citizens... just slow the flow of ammunition they can use. The Virginia Tech incident might have been a little different if the kid could only afford say 5 rounds instead of a box of 50. Those who want and use guns still can. Make bullets tax free a shooting galleries, or for a local municipal militia... both of which make sure no ammunition is unaccounted for.
- timstevens, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1IRS: you can't deduct the bullet tax
goodfella: hey, whacking that guy was my job - so, its job-related - newbee70, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Long rant, Same ole lame rhetoric from the ban the guns group. When will they wake up, and quit blaming everything but the kitchen sink, instead of an individual. Remember Flipside3 An armed society is a polite society. just because you try to keep the law biding citizens from guns, you can't stop a criminal with a law.


What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved