17 Comments
- LouisCipher777, on 04/20/2009, -6/+26Part of me is scared of that day. Part of me is looking forward to it.
- qwikk, on 04/20/2009, -4/+19I watched this video last night, and remember a call for revolution, but nothing about it being 'violent.' and a revolution should not be violent if it's not necessary.
- Minarchian, on 04/20/2009, -5/+16Here's part two:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoJVeQ6imRg&fea ... - inactive, on 04/20/2009, -1/+8Relax, it's all part of the show. World powers would not permit such a disturbance to the order of things for long.
- inactive, on 04/20/2009, -3/+9I agree. The term "violent" should not have been in the title. Violence was never mentioned.
- richmomz, on 04/21/2009, -1/+7I hope he is wrong - violent insurrection is likely to only hasten the formation of a totalitarian police state. We need a 'soft power' revolution via coordination with like-minded people via the Internet, educating our friends and family about what's happening, re-discovery of our Constitutional rights and civil disobedience when necessary to effectively steer our country back to the right direction, IMHO.
- inactive, on 04/20/2009, -3/+9"They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength, they shall mount up on wings as eagles, they shall run and not grow weary, they shall walk and not feint." ~Isaiah
- bigp3rm, on 04/21/2009, -1/+4Who is this guy again? Never seen or heard of him.
- THETEH, on 04/21/2009, -2/+5What an idiot. He's seriously comparing the bailouts of businesses to fascism? He clearly has no idea what fascism really is then. Anyone who has a doubt should take a look at diggstown's excellent definition of fascism above. Anyone who has to resort to making fascism comparisons is employing a desperate, childish, foolish argument strategy known as hyperbole, and should be ignored not only by liberals but by anyone with an ounce of common sense. It's possible to argue against the bailouts without calling them "fascist" and calling for a freakin' REVOLUTION. Buried.
- diggstown, on 04/21/2009, -3/+5This guy is a loon.
Count the number of times he (incorrectly) defines fascism. Clearly he has an agenda and is looking for shock value.
BTW, here's the actual definition of fascism (Merriam-Webster):
1: often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control - NoLibertarians, on 04/21/2009, -4/+5Buried as bull *****. Who the hell is this clown? Only from the Campaign For Liberty will you be exposed to this type of garbage fear mongering.
- fadeout, on 04/21/2009, -2/+3So who's unAmerican and unpatriotic now, eh?
- brad3378, on 04/21/2009, -1/+2Agreed.
This is not Sparta. - inactive, on 04/21/2009, -2/+3Given the history of the United States Federal Government, violence will not be avoided. Hopefully I'm wrong.
"Keep thy faith, but keep thy powder dry." Oliver Cromwell - diggstown, on 04/21/2009, -1/+1No, you're not a shill.
- inactive, on 04/20/2009, -5/+3I think my subscription to his Trend Journal was $99/year. Best Benjie I've spent in a long, long time.
- WhiteHatTrick, on 04/21/2009, -4/+1A very insightful person


What is Digg?