11 Comments
- crablaw, on 10/12/2007, -3/+6He did the right thing.
- Euangelion, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Considering you don't know the difference between Phil and Bill Donahue you have zero credibility
- Euangelion, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2OneWayDave, the leaks were from Richard Armitage not Rove and Libby. Once again you are shown to be wrong.
"Scooter Libby, Rove and the administration had been delivering fake leaks to her." - r00fus, on 10/12/2007, -4/+5The NYT, as a part of the corporate media, can be bought just as easily as any other media outlet. The religious reicht has a lot of $$$.
- juls, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3time to back up the good move by Edwards.
- JQuinton, on 10/12/2007, -6/+6I've got to stand up for John Edwards because he's standing up for me.
- Damek, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2"feminazi"? Interesting. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2Prysorra:
>Wow. NYT a right-wing tool?
The New York Times has uncritically reported administration reports -- incorrect administration reports -- on Iraq and did so regularly leading up to the war. It was so bad that one of their reporters who had inside knowledge of the plame investigation was jailed for contempt because she didn't want to reveal that Scooter Libby, Rove and the administration had been delivering fake leaks to her. She was eventually fired -- or "let go." That said, it's still probably one of the better papers in the US. - stang966, on 10/12/2007, -4/+3Have any of you actually read these blogs? Marcotte is a raving feminazi idiot.
- MJvC, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2Take action. Edwards is a stand-up guy and we need to support him.
- Prysorra, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1Wow. NYT a right-wing tool?
What is Digg?