What is Digg?79 Comments
- ChristPissed, on 10/10/2007, -4/+39"But Mr. Bush, you have hidden behind the General’s skirts, and today you have hidden behind the skirts of ‘the planted last question’ at a news conference, to indicate once again that your presidency has been about the tilted playing field, about no rules for your party in terms of character assassination and changing the fabric of our nation, and no right for your opponents or critics to as much as respond.
That, sir, is not only un-American — it is dictatorial." - SeethisPass, on 10/10/2007, -2/+33What the ***** are you smoking?
- MonsterChaOS, on 10/10/2007, -2/+29Lies? What lies?
Quit being a baby. - Dumbledorito, on 10/10/2007, -3/+24And the "oh, I'm not a Republican" thing is getting SO old, James. Unless you're secretly Lieberman, methinks you doth protest too much.
- gmiley, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17Man, he totally ripped into Bush. Good stuff, quite a few good points.
- Bdog2g2, on 10/10/2007, -4/+18Ahhh...Once again JamesSpaz...has blessed his thoughts and concerns...and they caulked full of references and sources that refute Kieth Obi "lies".
Once again he has pointed us to the primrose path with his guidance and wisdom, because now after reading his comments I know EXACTLY what lies Keith told.....
James, you're working hard at the block list again...you're taking up my precious page with useless, factless accusations. Now go to the corner and think about what you did. - pintomp3, on 10/10/2007, -4/+18neo-con *****
- sturat, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14My man Olberman! Always concise, insightful and inspirational. I learn from this guy, how to frame my arguements against the neo-conartists. Olberman has added another loyal viewer of the Countdown. Suck it O'Reilly, Olberman's my God now!
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+15Grow up
- TheSwashbuckler, on 10/10/2007, -1/+12How sad that the general shows more loyalty to the President than to the country...
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+12yawn...faux repub outrage bores me.
- lazyrussian, on 10/10/2007, -4/+14lol it's not like you get a cookie for getting dugg up to the front page...grow up child.
- awtripp, on 10/10/2007, -2/+12unless you're a fecalphiliac with your head up Bush's ass it's near impossible to find some positive about the situation.
- neoblaque, on 10/10/2007, -3/+12James can't cite it, because it doesn't exist, so he keeps on showing us all that Bush did have a child with someone who live in a house trailer.
- vap0r, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10Keith Olbermann is a modern day Edward R. Murrow.
Good night, and good luck. - mrcoderga, on 10/10/2007, -4/+12His state combined corporatism, nationalism, and a focus on traditional values. He ruled as a dictator, repressing dissident opinions through institutionalised torture, concentration camps, heavy prison sentences, and the application of the death penalty against criminals and political opponents.
Every death sentence had to be signed by him. From the beginning of the revolt, all his generals ordered massive public and summary executions to spread fear and reduce resistance among the civilians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Franco - hipswiggle, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9I thoroughly enjoy and welcome these commentaries, but Keith Olberman could at least use small words so Bush would be able to understand him.
- shabumike, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8and one more thing mr. bush - "***** you"
- intelligensia, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8His message could not be more spot on...Petraeus was a great leader of Soldiers, now he's this year's dandy, supplanting Colin Powell as a credentialed man of 'conviction' This all reeks of Rove. "OK Mr President, here's what we'll do to promote delay so we can continue to shift the blame and remain unaccountable..." Hopefully Blackwater is the start, but I have a feeling that one's going to turn "classified" soon, unless the press (or us!) decides to drive holes thru it...
- SeethisPass, on 10/10/2007, -6/+13So long as HE's the dictator.
- Eivo, on 10/10/2007, -2/+8Hence, your e-penis shrunk!
- guntario, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6Wake up man. At best, the US is now an oligarchy.
a political system governed by a few people;
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/oligarchy - natedouglas, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7Who said anything about Bush? For all you know, mrcoderga was pointing out that Bush isn't so bad.
- thespiff, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7Wow. Just wow. I hope this is a precedent for some change in the media. No matter how low Bush's approval gets, it still seems like dissenters are afraid to speak up. Please let the media become useful again. If media were to start using its resources the way they were intended -- to keep government honest -- we could start fixing this F'd up administration.
- uberfu, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6Then why click on the comment link and spend your precious time reading the comments - then only to post thereafter ?
- julietdervin, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Finally. Informed commentary. Thank you, Keith Olbermann.
- razor150, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2And everyday you guys hide under your bed afraid of the bogeyman. Yes Bush, spy on all of us more, and throw people in secret prisons and torture them because the big bad Bin Laden scares me. Republicans you go along with that crap are cowards and traitors.
- defektiv, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4i don't know what we'd do without keith to give us hope in these dark times. one day the country is going to awaken fully from its slumber. and when it does, bushco and all of its cronies.. ALL of them, even the ones posting desperately here and on other social sites to try and prolong this degradation of democracy, will see the short end of a too long awaited disciplinary stick.
these men & women supporting this immoral, hateful and hypocritical administration may be loud and stupid, but they are far fewer than those of us who want truth, honesty and integrity. like the many thousands of people that cohesively stood up together to bring down the wall in germany, so will the same happen here in america.
people are waking up and standing up. we've been pushed in a corner for years now and now we're desperate. we're the cornered cat and those idiot neocon loyalists do not even realize the power of the dragon they are awakening.
keep pushing people. like all true evil, arrogance is your downfall. - TheKappa, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Here's my digital hand, raised to high five Keith Olbermann.
- razor150, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2So nobody can say anything until it is that? That brilliant!
- Damian91, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3I don't care what people say, Keith Olbermann will keep on bitching, preaching, screaming, talking and etc etc! And I am with him, anything that will get everyone's attention is worth it if you ask me. The people going "I'm tired of hearing about Bush". Don't get tired, get mad and involved!
- defektiv, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3nice speculation. by chance (or maybe you follow my posts on digg, awwww how cute a fan!) you are right. but only for the last election. i voted democrat in 06 for change and we got it. the dems may have betrayed us, but we took away the immediate steamrolling of our rights and freedoms we were getting with a republican majority.
i dare you to show me any truth honesty or integrity in any of the bush loyalists in power now. and then i encourage you to look those words up, preferably while standing in front of a mirror evaluating your own self. you need not answer here, it's an evaluation that is best suited to yourself and no one else.
here's a hint.. integrity is doing the RIGHT thing, even when NO ONE is looking. (PS. the right thing is not what someone else tells you is right) - DJH2112, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4Keith Olbermann is the man!
- GangsterCompute, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2It's like, Olbermann's so right on the money, that who today would want to listen to him, or have anything to do with him? Please, go back to sleep America, your government has everything under control...
- uberfu, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Yep - all he did was merely post a quote from Wikipedia_ There was zero reference to Bush_ AND we all should know by now to rely on Wikipedia for all of our reference needs_
- razor150, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1It's a start, since none of that is embodied in most republicans.
- Fhwqhgads, on 10/10/2007, -3/+4BUSH GOT BITCHSLAPPED!
***** OWNED! - amoirae, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Do you mean a ploy like O'Reilly begging his viewers to DVR him on Fridays to shore up his lagging ratings?
- mattewood, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1That's one of the best things I've ever seen or heard. Well done Olbermann.
- keyboardduder, on 10/10/2007, -4/+5then how come it didnt refuse to post the "dupe", dumbass?
(sorry, had to get into it) - kilraaj, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1That is some eloquent vitriol.
- palantir, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I know, because yesterday it was 20 degrees below the norm for Anytown USA there's no such thing as global warming, hmmmm?
- BohicaTwentyTwo, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2What makes you think this is an exclusively military counterinsurgency? You should read Michael Totten's articles from Ramadi to see the non-military progress that's actually being made.
http://www.michaeltotten.com/archives/001517.html
Look at the seventh picture:
"Children hugging State Department civilian reconstruction team leader Donna Carter." - intelligensia, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Oh course our best and brightest are doing their best to make a good of a horrific situation....I would expect nothing less.
what concerns me is despite all the rhetoric, we truly are unable to cohesively focus all of of National Power, so it ends up falling 'back on the military operations, eventually. Example: why does the State Department need it's own Army? Don't we have 130,000 folks over there already? To think that we do inter-agency cooperative operations at all is a farce. Petraeus has been saying as much for years now....
Baghdad is still a violent cesspool of criminal activity. Like the wild wild west. It requires police action, not military action. - kuhe, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0So it means you are against your government not country.
- intelligensia, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0are you on his friends list too? what a coincidence!
- ButterBuddha, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1mindboggled = Neo Con *****-Suck
- intelligensia, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0funniest headline ever?
"Bush Accepts Petraeus' Plan"
Washington Post, day after the testimony - ButterBuddha, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Male-Paris-Hilton....Good One, REALLY funny.... -1
- intelligensia, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2one more thought. I know GEN Petraeus personally, he is a great leader of men and I believe he thinks he's being a good soldier and following orders. He obviously thinks that 'this time (my time)' a military counterinsurgency campaign will be successful. The US has NEVER had success waging an exclusive military counterinsurgency campaign. 1st look up the definition and then research it (The Pentagon Papers is a good initial source).
GEN Petraeus: to thy own self be true. Save your troopers. They deserve better. -
Show 51 - 79 of 79 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is