What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Play the flash game. view!
DragonAgeJourneys.com - Play the free companion flash game to Dragon Age: Origins.
52 Comments
- yeeaauuh, on 05/08/2009, -3/+25Can feminine hygiene products be added to this bill?
- RandomGorilla, on 05/08/2009, -0/+16Now if we could only do the same thing for that Geico ad with the creepy eyeball-stack-of-cash. One time I fell asleep with the TV on and that ***** commercial was there when I woke up. Having a pair of googly eyes staring directly into your soul be the first thing you see upon awakening is nothing short of pure trauma.
- origamistars, on 05/08/2009, -0/+12This man has put way, way too much thought into erectile dysfunction.
- powatom, on 05/08/2009, -1/+11I hate adverts for Vaginal Thrush treatments which are all perfectly timed to appear as I am eating or when I am watching TV at my mother's house.
My British sensitivities are incapable of coping with such embarrassment! - freefreedude, on 05/08/2009, -0/+9For you women out there who don't know, it's a myth that only old men have wrinkly balls. I'm in my 30's and my balls have been wrinkly for as long as I can remember.
- mostie, on 05/08/2009, -0/+9finally
- TechnoRabbit, on 05/08/2009, -0/+8I like the feminine hygiene product ads. They let me know which kind I should buy based on which one absorbs the most mysterious blue liquid.
- seltaeb4, on 05/08/2009, -4/+12This will be hard to enforce among the Republican Teabaggers.
- Dribblemaker, on 05/08/2009, -1/+7I second that as the only happy period I know of is the one at the end of this sentence. Idiots.
- LostOnion, on 05/08/2009, -1/+7Can't they just pass some legislation banning kids?
- charlie6969, on 05/08/2009, -4/+9I have to admit it; I would be pleased about such a law. They have those Extenze commercials on CARTOON network!
I have already had to explain, VERY simply, why this guy is happy and why his woman is happy about Extenze. My girl is 9. I was not happy about this..... - Wingin, on 05/08/2009, -0/+4Aw. Seriously I feel for you. That is so unnecessary. (We don't get that where I live - I am sick of seeing men play a piano with no hands - but at least that ad is on late enough, that I don't have to talk to any little kids about it!)
- s14sh3r, on 05/08/2009, -1/+5Can we add JG Wentworth commercials to that? IT'S MY MONEY AND I WANT IT NOW!!!
- Cerialthriller, on 05/08/2009, -0/+4it always feels like someone is watchin me
- scubachef11, on 05/08/2009, -0/+4only in certain conditions..
- askantik, on 05/08/2009, -0/+4Moran is going retarded with this one. Why don't we address the whole "TV is ***** up our youth because of ***** like Real World and American Idol," not ED ads. Not that I think necessarily legislation should be passed to force awful shows out of existence-- but I'm personally much more worried (although still not THAT worried) about kids wasting like 8 hours a day watching TV than I am about them having to ask their parents about some middle-aged man renewing his boner. If that is the hardest thing you've ever had to tell your kid, then your kid is going to be real sheltered.
I had never heard of Moran 'til now... he has some good things, like being against the Iraq war and supporting an end to the Darfur genocide... but he also supported the impeachment of Bill Clinton (did he think Bill Clinton's blowjob was going to be on TV sometime between the hours of 6am and 10pm??) - goatworship, on 05/08/2009, -1/+4Yeah, and those "male enhancement" commercials. Oh! and free credit report.com commercials. God damn I hate those. TV advertising would be trauma free again.
- mwalker05, on 05/08/2009, -1/+4when you have a problem with your penis, consult a physician, not the television.
- gordigor, on 05/08/2009, -0/+3Me also. What are un wrinkly balls?
- butterbee, on 05/08/2009, -1/+4- psychosis stemming from the US' puritanical upbringings. Old balls exist. Get used to it.
Once we Americans take the medicine of these various uncomfortable aspects of sexuality, they'll give us a spoon full of topless beaches. - Solkre, on 05/08/2009, -1/+4You just don't get it do you?
- zuiquan, on 05/08/2009, -1/+4I'm for this. Who gives a ***** if some old guy can't get his ***** up or his peepee is too small to satisfy the lincoln tunnel ***** his wife is packing? It gets annoying having to explain to my 9 year old why some dude is happy about his being able to "last longer" while his skank wife is happy about him being "bigger" while we're watching a ***** hockey game. Everything has its proper place. Dick commercials during every ***** sporting event are not appropriate. If your ***** doesn't work there's this place called the INTERNETS where you can find out all sorts of ***** stiffening information. Also, your doctor may be able to help with some sort of medicine.
- inactive, on 05/08/2009, -1/+3Botox shots in the balls for everyone! you get a botox shot! you get a botox shot!
- Satualanus69, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2sounds like a job for the " Nut Bra"!
- rebotfc, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2In the uk you cannot advertise prescribed drugs at all.
- Andrwmorph, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2They are almost as prevalent as the Miss Cleo commercials used to be.
- t3chn0b0y, on 05/09/2009, -0/+2Viagra might strike back with a no wrinkly ball left behind act... But seriously I'm sick of watching all these sex products even at the late hours of the night.. that and those damn chat #'s...
- jggube, on 05/08/2009, -1/+3Damn I hate getting those. In my balls, not thoughts.
- rchargel, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2So that's who this guy was talking about. Finally we know it's Rep. Jim Moran and his kin.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/zoom.php?imageid=75 ... - SalmonGod, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2it's basically loose elbow skin... with pubic hair
- kbillar, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2Everyday I learn something new on Digg. Thanks mysterious stranger, I'll spread the knowledge!
- sgxyay, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2The women on those commercials are generally more attractive than those men deserve. Wouldn't call them milfs, but if I were that old, I'd take drugs so I could hit that for sure.
- nyxerebos, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2Oh-please-oh-please-oh-please!
- nyxerebos, on 05/08/2009, -0/+2"Dick commercials during every ***** sporting event are not appropriate."
I disagree. - SoonerRoadie, on 05/09/2009, -0/+1I didn't see that, but it nevertheless does not change the fact that it's probably unconstitutional. There are lots of things that I don't like, but that you could never pass a law against. Also, it seems like a waste of ad money to run these on channels intended for children. And even if they did, I remember reading very recently (in the wake of FCC v. Fox about expletives on TV) that young kids (12 and under) don't have the ability to comprehend such abstract references. This is especially true when it comes to sex and sexuality, since they have no frame of reference.
- black27696, on 05/08/2009, -0/+1FTA: "But whatever will remove from my mind the persistent, unwanted fantasy of salt-and-pepper-haired men with fake teeth and impossibly large chins grinding away on top of their dissatisfied wives is alright with me."
I'm with the author. - INV3Ntv, on 05/09/2009, -0/+1If only there was an option to opt out of commercials. I'd pay a little more to the cable company.
- nyxerebos, on 05/08/2009, -0/+1Beats baby commercials.
- txdv48, on 05/14/2009, -0/+1Depressing? Upsetting? Coming into my home at all hours? I already Can't sleep at night knowing the absolute vast majority of children in this world go to bed either hungry or with dysentery from drinking the water they collect in the gutter outside the hovel were they live. Thank you very much Sally. I agree with the Congressman. Television is never supposed to offend, upset, or annoy me as long as I am powerless to turn it off. SARC/
- nyxerebos, on 05/08/2009, -0/+1More of them, especially in sports. It tickles my feminist leanings. I'd rather not see them on Nickelodeon or the cooking channel.
- SoonerRoadie, on 05/09/2009, -0/+1This is just ridiculous and almost certainly unconstitutional. Under the Central Hudson test, the test for content-based regulation of advertising, in order to regulate truthful (or at least not misleading) advertising there has to be a substantial government interest, the regulation must directly advance that interest, and the regulation cannot be more extensive than necessary.
"Because I don't want to see those ads anymore" is not a legitimate government interest. I'm not really sure if there is any legitimate interest here. I mean people always try to talk about protecting children as a reason to ban speech, but I don't see how kids are harmed by this in any way. They don't know what ED is, so it is doubtful children even know what the ads are about, let alone could they be harmed by them. Ultimately, this is just a waste of government resources: the time, effort, and expense to pass this law (which it probably won't), and then the time, effort, expense to try to get it declared unconstitutional (which it will be). Not only that, but they are targeting a cash cow. Big Pharma doesn't look too kindly upon trying to take dollars out of their pockets.
This whole thing is probably about this congressman trolling for some campaign contributions. He probably never got any money from the drug makers and is pissed, so he introduces a stupid bill to get their attention. He might as well have donated to his opponents, cause the drug makers certainly will now. - robish518, on 05/09/2009, -0/+1Wow... I'm glad to know the recession has been averted and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are over... Gays have equal rights, and all is well in our country. Congress can now get back to satisfying the lame ass parents in our country who are too lazy, tired, and mistrusting of their own kids, and censor what is broadcast on TV. After all, our government IS responsible for what we watch. Bravo Mr. Moron!!
- zuiquan, on 05/08/2009, -0/+1I don't get your comment. Are you trying to be ironic or are you saying you enjoy ***** commercials and want to see more of them?
- Vosona, on 05/08/2009, -2/+2Finally getting tired of these Teabaggers, then?
- WarriorBlake, on 05/08/2009, -0/+0"IT'S YOUR MONEY AND I WANT IT NOW!"
*fixed it for ya - vilago, on 05/08/2009, -2/+2i hate those commercials. that stupid song they play every time is really obnoxious too.
- t3chn0b0y, on 05/09/2009, -0/+0The shouldn't be allowed on any channel that is dedicated to children in any way shape or form, no matter what time of day or night.. We are suppose to be able to trust just tossing our chidren in front of the tv to keep them busy without supervisation..
- t3chn0b0y, on 05/09/2009, -0/+0Maybe would of been better as a freudian pychologist, listening to woman laying on the couch, and visualizing everying as a penis..
- t3chn0b0y, on 05/09/2009, -0/+0As stated in another post they are being aired on children broadcasting channels...I sure wouldn't want a daughter sitting in front of the tv watching scooby doo one minute and watching 3 woman talking about a vibrator or dildo and how it makes them feel good down there..
-
Show 51 - 53 of 53 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is