5 Comments
- sultanknish, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5i guess you people know by now that no one will read the post if you say it's Ron Paul up front
buried as spam - barnis, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2Ron Paul Spammers should be banned!!
- dshPls, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3He's actually from 200 years ago too, that's where the racism comes from!
- militant, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2my edits r fail :/
http://www.ronpaulregistry.com - joybran, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1Are you saying you thought the description fit someone other than Ron Paul and buried it because it misled you? Or are you saying you knew it had to refer to Ron Paul, so you buried it because you bury all Ron Paul articles, no matter how interesting they might be to other digg members?
BTW, if no one will read Ron Paul posts, why are so many people putting his name on posts that have nothing to do with him, if not to get more diggs because of his popularity? And why is this post, which doesn't have his name on it, languishing with only 7 diggs after 3 1/2 hours?


What is Digg?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our