What is Digg?223 Comments
- Arkavus, on 10/10/2007, -3/+74Except, of course, that IW didn't do COD3. Treyarch did.
- EDmAN, on 10/21/2007, -38/+81It's nice to see a developer who is actually not lazy. These guys didn't do bad with COD3 on PS3 considering it was a launch title... Go Infinity Ward...
- cello, on 10/10/2007, -2/+33Call of Duty wants so bad to be PS3's killer holiday app.
- mywhitenoise, on 10/10/2007, -3/+32My favorite digg users are 360 certified fanboy Wageslaven, and certified Wii fanboy KingGoonie. They're both so ridiculously out of touch with reality, and the facts. I'd ban them if it was anyone else making those comments, but I think I might just add them to my friends lists because they provide more entertainment than most digg users.
- CLShortFuse, on 10/10/2007, -0/+28" No one in the professional world is 'lazy' "
You're right. Absolutely no one. - KittySpark1es, on 11/08/2007, -3/+28Just FYI, Call of Duty 4 has no 'ports'. We (Infinity Ward) developed it for PC, 360, and PS3 simultaneously. Doing this is a lot better than ignoring a platform for a year or more, then trying to clean up a mess in the last minute.
- CLShortFuse, on 10/10/2007, -5/+27Wait? No Xbox fanboys want to make their rebuttals? Everyone knows that fanboys know more than the actual developers!
*Proud owner of a Wii and an Xbox360* - CLShortFuse, on 10/10/2007, -2/+21when your 40 hours of work per week for weeks on a new gaming system is constantly criticized by fanboys with delusional omnisapience, you'd get testy too.
- WhereAmI, on 10/10/2007, -1/+20No, the PS3 crowd is feeling a little oversensitive about the constant reports of innacuracy. Yes, Madden is not as good. The reason why is simple: EA sucks, something Diggers would agree on if it wasn't a PS3 v 360 issue.
- LiquidChimera, on 10/10/2007, -3/+22Fantastic
- magic6435, on 10/10/2007, -3/+21Big damn diffrence with 30 to 60 when it comes to gameplay. their is a reason why back in the day if you went to quake con for the Q3 turneys you would see people with monster fast rigs playing this 5 years old game at the lowest possible settings but getting like 135 fps. It makes your movements much more fluid. just because your eyes cant see more than (24fps?) you and your mouse still react faster.
- lesty420, on 10/10/2007, -2/+20Getting rid of "features" and not having a game run without lag are two different things
- mywhitenoise, on 10/10/2007, -3/+20Give it 6 months. I absolutely cannot wait for Ratchet and Clank, Uncharted, MGS4, Assassin's Creed, and GTAIV.
- Sutanreyu, on 10/10/2007, -1/+16Anti-aliasing. Gets rid of jaggies.
- NsertNameHere, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17Infinity Ward skip COD3 and let another dev team work on it, to concentrate on COD4. COD4 been in development even before any of the next generation console was even released, that's why COD4 look so good.
- tbenathan, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15Need more 1080p games.
- vawksel, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15Carmack didn't write that, he said it himself. No, I don't remember where I read it, go google it yourself.
- sponsoredveeka, on 10/10/2007, -9/+23great news. Ill give it another year before we see some great ps3 lineup
- pronouncable, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14"Seeing how TVs run at about 30 FPS"
What kind of unfortunate display do you use? - CLShortFuse, on 10/10/2007, -3/+15ah the "it's a crappy game anyway" defense.
- jeff303, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13Yeah, cause I'm sure the performance is entirely in the hands of the developers and has nothing to do with any publisher-imposed deadlines.
- mywhitenoise, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13Have you played both, or are you just repeating what you read? I don't play Madden or EA games anyway, so I don't give a *****.
- faizal5k, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11EA does suck...they should change their slogan from "Challenge Everything" to "Charge Everything"
- Skitals, on 10/10/2007, -4/+15How, exactly, is Halo "cartoony"? Because it has a vibrant color palette? I forgot, games need washed out colors to be uber cool!
- marcus_r, on 11/05/2007, -20/+31Taken from the "article"
According to the dev, "Same level of AA between 360/PS3, both @ 60fps. Hate on the PS3 all you want guys, but we've done did it up right for the Sony lovers. Nothing has been 360 footage yet touted as PS3, you crack-heads! I'm not sure whats up with what you guys might have seen at E3, but we do have AA on the PS3."
---------
I'm sure the dev speaks like a teenage dropout. Buried. - KyleMistry, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13Let's not forget Heavenly Sword, Folklore, inFAMOUS, and LittleBigPlanet.
Those last two may not be coming out in the next 6 months, but they still look damn fun. - NeoTechni, on 10/10/2007, -5/+15Both Full Auto and Oblivion were superior on PS3.
- drizzlelicious, on 10/10/2007, -1/+11If I did the same thing I wouldn't be able to stop thinking about the 200 inch plasma
- pronouncable, on 10/10/2007, -11/+20I think he just meant the number 4 > 3
Or at least I hope so - KyleMistry, on 10/10/2007, -8/+17Hello Kitty Island Adventure > Halo 3.
: / - CLShortFuse, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10that's probably why the developer posted it. people on the forum were saying that the ps3 version would suck since it's not possible for the ps3 build to surpass, let alone match, the xbox360 build. so he stepped correctly them all
- strictnein, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10540 fps now? Wow. It's like that number increases everyday.
It used to be 72 fps that most people cited. Then 80 fps. Then upwards of 120 fps. It's good to know that my eyes have been improving with age. - AttackingHobo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9People can tell the difference between 30 and 60, even 60 and 120, but anything beyond 120 is pretty much lost.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9Can't believe people complain about a $600 system after they spend $2900 on a PC rig
- johnIRL, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8Gran Turismo 5
- Xebius, on 11/05/2007, -6/+13Dev does not equal english major? Also keep in mind that this guy is not a PR rep.
- faizal5k, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8Infinity Ward themselves confirmed it will bed locked at 60FPS. They said anything under 60FPS is unacceptable for this type of game.
- catharz, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9Oblivion looks better on PS3, and Codemasters have said that Dirt will have a better frame rate on PS3.
I'm sure there will be others. - gincarnated, on 10/10/2007, -2/+8Pride in your work perhaps. At least Infinity Ward has some. And now Infinity Ward will have the knowledge and experience of how to optimize and develop for the PS3 in all their future titles unlike certain other "lazy" developers.
- s1mph0ny, on 10/10/2007, -3/+9Anti-aircraft
- strictnein, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7Please, where did you get those numbers.
And what about between 320 fps and 500 fps? Or 540 fps and 650 fps? Me thinks you are making ***** up. - elvenseven, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7Why the hell do you type "fcuk"?
- s1mph0ny, on 10/10/2007, -2/+8Well to be fair to the zealots, COD4 isn't released yet. I don't really care. If IW can make a game solid on both platforms, good for them.
- skunkworker, on 10/10/2007, -13/+18What 'less usable' ram, if you are talking about the 10mb of edRam than thats fine but the whole 512 md GDDR3 vs 256XDR and 256 GDDR3 is useless, and the cell is amazing once you can program correctly for it
- Sutanreyu, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Why? If you already have the console, why not buy the game?
- razor150, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4I am sure those "lazy" EA devs work harder then you've ever dreamed of. If you've ever worked 80+ hours for weeks or months on end to ship a product you'll get the right to call somebody lazy. Until then people should shut the ***** up about call devs lazy.
- DeepFreezed, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6just wait till the game is released. I bet PS3 version will be inferior in some way
- jrbrewin, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6that'd be a fair comment.. if sony fanboys never swamped every 360 article. hyprocrital or what!
- jrbrewin, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5i think he's talking about the lack of a unified architecture. both in terms of memory, and also the fact the GPU is not unified. This is why cross platform games continue to use lower quality textures on the ps3, and texture streaming isn't going to help get round the fact you have less texture memory available.
don't even get me started on the lack of a unified architecture on the GPU. ATI / microsoft were exceptionally clever in getting this done and dusted for xbox360, whereas nvidia were being arrogant (and dishonest to a certain degree) to claim that the fact the ps3 had a non-unified gpu architecture didn't matter). - ptaylor, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Exactly what I was thinking. The Madden issue is about software, not hardware.
But 360 fanboys will digg you down and rebuke you as if you were Satan himself... -
Show 51 - 100 of 221 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is