What is Digg?74 Comments
- thefoxtrot, on 10/12/2007, -6/+32no love for firefox?
- Zzyw, on 10/12/2007, -3/+17@DDoSAttack:
It's Nazis, without the apostrophe. - jessestay, on 01/21/2009, -4/+18No love for Linux either
- snypa, on 10/12/2007, -7/+19Certainly no love for FF. Marked as lame.
- soogy, on 10/12/2007, -2/+12You know what's funny? It supports Netscape 7+, from which point it was based on Mozilla's Gecko.
My Opera heart is broken. - Fratm, on 10/12/2007, -2/+9"Unsupported Browser!
The browser/system configuration you are currently using is not supported by this application.
This application currently supports the following browsers:
Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0 (or higher) on Windows 98/NT/2000/ME/XP
Netscape 7 (or higher) on Windows 98/NT/2000/ME/XP
Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.2 (and higher) on Mac OS X"
I'm using Ubuntu 6.10, with FF2.0
Nice... - Scottamus, on 10/12/2007, -6/+13English mother *****! Do you speak it?
- DDoSAttack, on 10/12/2007, -5/+12@axel2k
Only because they left out one simple word... 'as'
You won't get this AS it is an office joke, but here is a finished one I made so you can see the results:
***** grammar Nazi's suck :-| - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -6/+13no love for OS X.
- wild, on 10/12/2007, -8/+14No mac support. Lame!
Come on Bud, your better than that. - Nycto, on 10/12/2007, -5/+11No support, no digg
- diktator279, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5What a group of douche bags.
- dnthomps, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7Made this for my girl..
http://www.budsmack.com/service/RetrieveCard?id=YmKFTqP12XgpOQsiL1rBEW - number9ine, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5For those who can't seem to find the place to upload a picture: To the upper left of the coach guy's head is a link that says "UPLOAD YOUR OWN PICTURE, CLICK HERE!"
I'd suggest clicking that. - Rekcah5, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5George Bush as requested:
http://www.budsmack.com/card/Le4zOAT12Xg5oSUj1ENTha - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5on a side note, who still uses netscape?
- bookishboy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Steve Ballmer
http://www.budsmack.com/card/KoVLpzr22XgQP.u9AQpB.W - signal15, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Ok, how many of you just went an uploaded a pic of a vagina?
- baronvonrolo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2In the last 3 hours of knowing about budsmack, it has changed my life.
No, really... - TheSolomon, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3FYI- I had to add that site to my Trusted Sites list before IE7 would do anything with the selected image. Probably something to do with Java security.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Get useragent switcher add-on for firefox.
- spectrox, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2it works just fine with firefox
- dig412, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Doesn't work in IE7 either for me.
- levellers, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1can it be saved to desktop??
- bookishboy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Jack Thompson loves Rockstar
http://www.budsmack.com/service/RetrieveCard?id=rklnuD512Xg4tPox7PbxIa - shosterman, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I'm lazy or otherwise I would do one with Clarett.
....and Go Bucks, and go Tara Reid (at Sugar Bar)!
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l194/shosterman/tara.jpg - mtage, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1DJ Saddam doing Grandmaster Flash.
http://www.budsmack.com/service/RetrieveCard?id=upOBxln12Xg.yzbuJVWPGG - number9ine, on 10/12/2007, -4/+5You won't get this it is an office joke, but here is a finished one I made so you can see the results:
http://www.budsmack.com/service/RetrieveCard?id=oR61LDH02XgeYon9DYWMwq - EGOvoruhk, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Is it just me, or is it no longer allowing the uploading of pictures?
- wild, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3"Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.2 (and higher) on Mac OS X""
Thats a lie. I just tried it. - dan4prez, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I'm guessing you did
- JDOG, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Fight Club anyone?
http://www.budsmack.com/service/RetrieveCard?id=ul7t3Qb12XghsPEdltmrSG - Feyr, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2retarded browser detection. marked as lame
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Once you click upload your picture ... there is a browse box ... once the path is in there there is no button to hit, it does nothing.
- dinopio, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2My IE7 doesnt work either!
digg down - antdude, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Also, it looks like Java is used.
- VanillaBaron, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The English language does not have any officiating body that determines the rules (unlike the French language, and many others). There is no definitive set of "rules" for English. English is, and always has been, only ever defined as "the language that English-speaking people are currently using".
It is this ability to evolve to meet the needs of modern speakers, and to co-opt any desired word from any desired language, that combined with its completely decentralised nature, makes English so popular and so powerful.
So, there is no official rule for the singular use of "they", only current standards for its use. True, 100 years ago, it was frowned upon ... but English speakers since then have desired a word which refers to a singular, gender-unknown, person. "It" was considered to be insulting, so "they" has come to be highly popular in the singular use.
The singular "they" has become such a common and well-used word, that is now easily an "official" part of the English language. It is as official and correct as any other rule or word in the language.
For the future, understand that English is changing all the time, and there are no rules except "what the people are currently speaking". That's it. If you don't understand that, then you do not know the English language at all, and you should not therefore be lecturing upon the topic. - azzkicar, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I install IE just in case, but doesn't even work in IE 7 for Win? That's just lame.
- AtomicCow, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Here ya go, me doing Bush: http://www.budsmack.com/service/RetrieveCard?id=YIygLlH12XgPJ6siL1rBEW
- Hergio, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1It won't work for me...getting JavaScript errors in IE 6.0. WTF!? Anyone else had such problems?
- yuutokun, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I apologize for my retarded post. I should have proofread.
- number9ine, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3Meh, I only use IE at work because we cannot install anything else. Yes, this means I spent all day at work making budsmacks.
- Gregbrown, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Trainspotting anyone?
http://www.budsmack.com/service/RetrieveCard?id=uKaZLnP12XgIJ_0t9QHodG - honorablesauce, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2No love for Fire Fox. Pttthhhhhtttt!!!
- crlarkin, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3@ DDoSAttack
Actually, they is still incorrect as only one person posted the comment, if one does not know the gender, then "he or she" is used. Therein lies your correct English grammar lesson for the day. - baronvonrolo, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Its ridiculously unstable, but when it works. Oooph, it's spot on.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Surprise no one has done George Bush
- Scottamus, on 10/12/2007, -4/+5I think someone needs to animate that "Jesus on a dog's rump" picture. Jesus on a dog's rump is one thing but a talking Jesus on a dog's rump? That's a whole different ballgame. (And no, not that kind of ball game.)
- bookishboy, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1NOT SAFE FOR WORK!
goatse.cx
http://www.budsmack.com/card/uUDPGAP22Xg5oSUj1ENTha - EtherGnat, on 10/12/2007, -4/+4If you like this you might want to check out CrazyTalk. It's a standalone application that lets you create high quality, animated talking images. I've had a blast playing with it.
http://crazytalk.reallusion.com/ -
Show 51 - 74 of 74 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 