What is Digg?Sponsored by Sony Pictures
Adam Lambert sings the 2012 theme song, "Time for Miracles" view!
whowillsurvive2012.com - Watch the Adam Lambert music video for the 2012 theme song. See 2012, in theaters Nov 13
459 Comments
- rdldr1, on 03/30/2009, -32/+324Hypocrites such as PETA have their own circle of hell to burn in.
- Lucas123, on 03/30/2009, -15/+160I like PETA bread warmed with a little chicken salad or roast beef and melted cheese in it. Very nice combo.
- misterfrog, on 03/30/2009, -48/+168PETA*
*People Eating Tasty Animals - waluigi14, on 03/30/2009, -5/+122Along with child molesters and people who talk in the theatre.
- manzplan, on 03/30/2009, -59/+165I am NOT trying to defend PETA - I think they are wackos.. but recent reports show where the funding came from to make PETA look bad, and it was pretty bad...
http://digg.com/politics/Why_Center_for_Consumer_F ...
PHILLIP MORRIS the tabacco company
Outback Steak house
AND KFC all are funding attacks on PETA...
remember if people dont adopt from shelters.. and if shelters are over run with animals.. YES THEY ALL EUTHANIZE!!!! - custangro, on 03/30/2009, -9/+81If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made of food?
- Paranoidmarvin, on 03/30/2009, -5/+72I'm a volunteer for Boxer Welfare Scotland, a rescue charity for Boxer dogs across Scotland.
We've had hundreds of dogs in over the past few years and we've found homes for ALL of them - and we are much stricter than, for example, the RSPCA in re homing our dogs.
It's sickening that PETA can get away with this. - Cloned, on 03/30/2009, -7/+74Yes, euthanasia is a sad truth of animal welfare. But for such a large and outspoken organization, there is no excuse for them to be euthanizing 95% of their animals. They only adopted seven animals! I used to adopt out two or three times that in a week when I worked at a shelter, and our animal intake was less than than PETA's.
- JMilton, on 03/30/2009, -14/+80***** PETA!!!
- wilf_brim, on 03/30/2009, -10/+65While most if not all shelters euthanize, PETAs statistics are completely off the board. Most shelters in the US end up euthanizing about half their animals. PETA did about 98%.
- DBLOCK916, on 03/30/2009, -11/+60How do you know when it's raining cats and dogs?
A: When you step in a poodle. - Trick07, on 03/30/2009, -33/+82***** on you not trying to defend PETA. Who gives a ***** if KFC paid to expose those hypocritical losers? The very losers who tried to keep the PETA killings a secret in the first place would be the only ones who would care.
- Hetman, on 03/30/2009, -8/+57http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwM6f0liHpo
PETA is a huge organization and they are no where near as good as this one person. It is ridiculous. - NSResponder, on 03/30/2009, -5/+53If you care about animals, support the Humane Society or your local SPCA. PETA is just a money-grubbing nut cult.
-jcr - OneOfNone, on 03/30/2009, -3/+48They all euthanize, but >90% euthanasia rate? Really? PETA is NOT EVEN TRYING for adoption.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PETA#Animal_euthanasi ... PETA are ***** extremists who believe that killing a pet is better than letting it "suffer" in adoptive home. They forgot to ask animals though.
On the very day when PETA proves that animals prefer death over captivity, I'll listen to them (while herds of flying swine head south from glaciating Hell).
Yes, Center for Consumer Freedom is a sleazy crap-slinging machine, but this is in no way an excuse for PETA being a bunch of hypocritical media whores. Hitler was against smoking, but it means precisely nothing. - SkippyDoorknob, on 03/30/2009, -9/+49Meat is murder... tasty tasty murder
- billraydrums, on 03/30/2009, -7/+44***** PETA. They are grandstanding hypocritical idiots.
- Destrider, on 03/30/2009, -2/+38Anyone that calls fish "sea kittens" in a thinly veiled and utterly foolish attempt to tug at the public's heart strings, deserves nothing but contempt.
- oxdeltaxo, on 03/31/2009, -5/+40I mind if you eat pets.
I don't mind if you eat live stock.
One is a companion the other is meant for food. - AboveandBeyond, on 03/30/2009, -15/+49I could have eaten them :(
- tyho, on 03/30/2009, -14/+47Yeah PETA doesn't need any HELP to look bad.
- Otto, on 03/30/2009, -15/+44Why does somebody always make that joke every time PETA is mentioned anywhere? It was funny once. It's not funny the next million times you see it.
- vidaliasweet, on 03/30/2009, -1/+30Actually they don't There are plenty of no kill shelters which, incidentally, PETA officially considers inhumane.
- thegoldenshovel, on 03/30/2009, -7/+35Hypocrisy or irony? I can't decide.
- Nephrastar, on 03/31/2009, -1/+28I support animal rights...
..animals have the right to be delicious. - ATL, on 06/20/2009, -10/+36ROFLMAO zOMFG LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLL
People EATING tasty animals HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - CaptOblivious, on 03/30/2009, -5/+31*****!
Talking about them may help prevent them from hoodwinking any other people into supporting them and giving them money.
As far as I can see from their actions, peta is a bunch of ***** LYING hypocrites, interested only in lining their pockets and controlling others. The only interest they have in animal welfare is the power and money it brings them.
For proof I submit Molly the 3 legged pony.
The "experts" at peta would have certainly killed Molly out of hand yet here she is, happy healthy and setting an example for humans with disabilities.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/molly.asp
Further
Anyone who insists that living in luxury as a pampered family pet is abusive and that living "in the wild" is the only acceptable way hasn't the intelligence to realize that ALL animals in the wild meet their death by being EATEN ALIVE. Even the top of the food chain predator animals eventually weaken to the point that they are taken down by those that were formerly below them on the chain.
I's love to see some of those people taken to Africa so they can try to convince the lions to become vegetarian. It might be too gross for a youtube video tho... - BooLag, on 04/23/2009, -1/+26The SPECIAL hell...
- Gnar04, on 03/31/2009, -3/+28for every animal you dont eat, i will eat three
- michelspc, on 03/30/2009, -0/+25Yeah, it's called eating meat.
- greenlight2001, on 03/30/2009, -0/+24DON'T ***** PETA! We don't need anymore of those crazy ***** running around.
- Gguillorn, on 03/31/2009, -2/+26If dogs and cats were raised for food I would have no problem with you eating them. Not mine though, I like my dogs. Just like I couldn't care less if you eat fish, but if you broke into my house and ate all my fish I would be kinda sad.
- Phughu, on 03/30/2009, -15/+39So what? The people who funded the report were dicks -- that doesn't make it any less abhorrent. I can't tell if you're making an ad hominem argument or a tu quoque, but either way it's an invalid argument
- SirVenro, on 03/31/2009, -0/+23There's room for all God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes.
- carpeclunes, on 03/31/2009, -0/+23That's just what an evil vegetarian would say.
- CaptOblivious, on 03/31/2009, -3/+25Better than that, what about the campaigns that peta had mounted against KFC and Outback? Sounds more like tit for tat to me.
Sadly for peta, they have deplorable practices that they themselves are PERSONALLY responsible for, as opposed to them exposing KFC's suppliers cruelty and then KFC CHANGING suppliers because of it.
Do you think peta will fire the people that killed all those animals? - Travelsonic, on 03/31/2009, -2/+24"I think most people believe that animals should be treated humanely."
That's animal WELFARE, not animal rights. - MannaPC, on 03/31/2009, -1/+22Suddenly digg believes in hell!
- defenswens26, on 03/31/2009, -0/+20*Whoosh*
- WarpCode, on 05/08/2009, -3/+22Your wrong.. Not all shelters Euthanize.. Oregon Human Society for example will only euthanize an animal if it has a medical condition which will cause it to die anyways or if it is a violent animal that should not be adopted out. Otherwise, animals will stay there indefinitely until they find a home.
- jsuther, on 03/31/2009, -0/+18MEATA
- MaynardJK, on 03/31/2009, -1/+19Yeah. Keeping pets is slavery!!! Killing them is ok though.
- sexybobo, on 03/30/2009, -3/+21Where in that huge wall of text does it say they didn't kill 2,209 animals?
Oh wait it doesn't say that because they did kill the animals because this is a real statistic.
I do understand that in a lot of casses putting the animal to sleep is the best thing to do.
What people are complaining about is peta has all this press getting them into the papers saying they saved all these animals for the slaughter when they really just kill them later.
Also peta supports alf which kills people by bombing colleges
http://www.animalscam.com/references/peta_davidwil ...
so have fun supporting the terrorists. - DforSpiD, on 03/31/2009, -0/+18Yeah eat my dogs... they won't ***** shut up...
- askantik, on 03/30/2009, -2/+20I'm a vegan and about as liberal as anyone (at least anyone in the US) and I hate both PETA and Bill Maher.
- jjohnstn, on 03/31/2009, -0/+17Kind of funny since cats love to eat fish.
- Tablecrusher, on 03/31/2009, -6/+23Because it's funny everytime.
- wellu, on 03/30/2009, -29/+46PJ news... same people that hired "Joe" the "plumber" as a war correspondent?
i'll take HuffPo over this... - mova, on 03/31/2009, -4/+20Look - it doesn't matter that they all euthanize... the fact here is that PETA, who is radically AGAINST killing animals is killing animals.
The other places that euthanize aren't radicals against, say eating meat...
Practice what you preach - PETA obviously isn't doing so - that is why this is such a big issue.
I want to know who's blind and funding these quacks? - culbeda, on 03/31/2009, -2/+17From a comment on another site...
"Ok I hate PETA as much as anyone but the numbers are really being played with here..Here's the supposed PDF that proves this.
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKill ...
Lets take dogs for instance:
From page 1: 3317 total dogs. From page 2: 2716 dogs were RECLAIMED BY OWNER 4 were adopted, 21 moved to another facility and 555 euthanized.
Ok so 555 out of 3317 dogs were euthanized. That's 17% not 95%.
Take the totals: 10,016 animals. 7525 were reclaimed by owner, 59 were adopted, 34 were moved, etc.
2369 were euthanized out of 10,016.
Thats 23%. Not 95%.
They get to 95% by ignoring the nearly THOUSANDS that go back to their owners, then if you subtract out those THOUSANDS and everyone who got transferred or misc stuff, then you can make it look like they kill 95%...
The site conveniently fails to acknowledge that PETA did in fact return almost 80% of the animals in their care to their rightful owners.
Regardless, I still hate PETA." -
Show 51 - 100 of 472 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is