What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Play the flash game. view!
DragonAgeJourneys.com - Play the free companion flash game to Dragon Age: Origins.
52 Comments
- teemingvoid, on 06/11/2009, -0/+17inaccurate title.. says nothing of the like in the text
- asgardshill, on 06/11/2009, -1/+9Here's the mugshot of this prizewinner.
http://pysih.com/2009/06/07/korena-elaine-roberts/ - phillymatt, on 06/11/2009, -1/+8I don't know that there would be a lot of takers in the raping of the crazy, ugly, fat chick scene. But who know, there's a niche for everything.
- elryanoo, on 06/11/2009, -2/+8Throw that psycho bitch in a wood chipper and be done with it.
- inactive, on 06/11/2009, -1/+5Even if she could obtain some semen, I'm certain that even semen would run the other way after getting a look at that mug.
- seltaeb4, on 06/11/2009, -2/+6This "cult of the baby" thing in this country leads to psychos like this committing such acts.
- tehstyles, on 06/11/2009, -0/+4*angry*
- evergrim, on 06/11/2009, -1/+5That thing is disgusting.
- protogenxl, on 06/11/2009, -0/+4And another Craigslist PR person jumps off a bridge.
- LeepII, on 06/11/2009, -0/+3Once again being too ugly to ***** cost lives.
- joot2112, on 06/11/2009, -1/+4It's because it sets a precedent that unborn life deserves protection. The intent of the mother is irrelevant once the law punishes people for violating the fetus' independent "right to live".
- nutzngum, on 06/11/2009, -0/+3If you ever want to lose faith in humanity, read through that site...man. All of a sudden the ***** who cuts in line in the bank doesn't seem so bad...
- WELLDOITLIVE, on 06/11/2009, -1/+4I've taken ***** that look prettier than her.
- sandersdamnit, on 06/11/2009, -0/+3FTA: Republican Sen. Bruce Starr said Tuesday he is drafting a bill that would create a crime of assault on an unborn child and expand criminal homicide to include the death of an unborn child.
Imagine that, a politician using this tragedy to pander to his constituency. - Arkz, on 06/11/2009, -1/+3that's not really the issue here. and it said she was in her third trimester. that's a bit more the a foetus.
- PowderedToasty, on 06/11/2009, -0/+2The person who the baby was cut out of was a person and was murdered, why should they have to muddy the waters of this case?
- freedomischaos, on 06/12/2009, -0/+2That makes sense, thanks.
- maffiou, on 06/11/2009, -0/+2The psycho dealing with the psycho... Great...
- inactive, on 06/11/2009, -0/+2The ***** is wrong with people.
- s0nicfreak, on 06/12/2009, -0/+2A tumor CAN have nerves, CAN have brain cells and heart cells. Yes it is made differently and has a different result (as I said) but is the same as a fetus IN THE WOMB. And a tumor DOES happen naturally; it is an abnormality but it is natural.
So is a fetus who's heart or brain won't develop correctly not human? Not a person? Was that baby born without a brain not a person? How about babies that didn't happen naturally (was the result of IVF, fertility drugs, etc.)?
I thought we were discussing the difference between fetuses and people, didn't know I was suppose to make pro-choice arguments. But on that note you haven't made any good pro-life arguments. - dasdef, on 06/11/2009, -0/+2wtf?!
- phillymatt, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1Damn girl, you got crazy eyes!
- joot2112, on 06/11/2009, -1/+2Maybe she couldn't conceive. Or she couldn't conceive of a better plan.
Sorry. - jeffmon, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1I thought for a moment her first name was Korean. The word Korean.
- protodon, on 06/11/2009, -1/+2Couldn't she have just tried to get raped or bought some sperm online?!?
- freedomischaos, on 06/11/2009, -1/+2"Abortion rights have claimed fetal homicide laws are often a backdoor way to determine that life legally begins at conception and can pit a mother's rights against those of her unborn child."
I don't understand how that works. If the mother is harmed and had no intentions of aborting the fetus, this mother was 8 months in, then why is a law that gives a unborn child the "right to live" via assault and battery laws a problem? I'm pro-choice, but this is just strange. I just don't want the government being able to tell a person what the can and can't do to their own bodies in their own mind. - sideclosedy, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1If the fetus was determined to be breathing at the time, it would be considered to be a child and wouldn't it also be prudent to add the charge of kidnapping?
- purkel, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1Death penalty asap.
- s0nicfreak, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1It DOES change what the thing is because a fetus and a baby are different things.
A fetus is just something attached to and leaching off of a pregnant woman, much like a tumor. A tumor has human DNA and a human "parent" but it's not murder when it's "killed". Just because some people want the end result of a fetus while none want the end result of a tumor does not make it any diffrent. - inactive, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1Kosh...You're not making any sense.
If a fetus is a person, then isn't Abortion murder?. - nepidae, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1Yep. This is horrible but it is not a reason to allow religion to dictate law.
- Kosh, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1EDIT: Stupid jumping comment box and reply button failure. This was a very well thought out post until now, believe me.
- s0nicfreak, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1I justify it by saying that "unborn children" don't exist. Let's call them what they are, fetuses. When something is in the womb it is a fetus. Once it is born it is a baby.
A person can terminate a fetus, but not kill their baby/child.
Just as eating balut is not the same as eating duck or chicken, a fetus is not the same as a child. - WELLDOITLIVE, on 06/11/2009, -1/+2www.ratemypoo.com
- Kosh, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1Unique human DNA...the fact that organisms don't magically change species...the fact that it has two human parents...it's human allright, but as to "person" that's more tricky. How would you define person?
- Kosh, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1Why does legality matter? Come on now, this is the internet, we of all people don't care what the government says is right. If you don't think an unborn child is a person, justify it with something better than "well it's not born" (which is just re-stating what an unborn child is) or "the government says so".
- kennyfulgencio, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1pics or it didn't happen.. er nvm
- s0nicfreak, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1Someone who has been born.
- Kosh, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1@s0nic: Call if whatever you want, I was just using the language Promiseland used. It doesn't change what the thing is. I have no problem calling the thing a "fetus" in the womb and a "baby" outside of the womb, but you have yet to demonstrate why when it is in the womb it somehow loses personhood. Or gains it the moment it is outside of. Mere semantics doesn't demonstrate this.
I don't believe that there is any difference, though, in something being human and something being a person. I think huge sociological problems can arrise whenever you try to deny any human or group of humans personhood. There are times, I think, when it killing a human is justified, but I don't think abortion is one of them.
@Promiseland: I never claimed abortion isn't murder. As a matter of fact, I think it is. - Kosh, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1Bad definition. What relevant difference is there between someone who is just out of the womb and just in it? It's not like anything besides location changes in those few minutes, and why should location alone be relevant to whether or not someone is a person?
- inactive, on 06/11/2009, -0/+0I still want to kick the crap out f the ***** who cuts in front of the bank queue, i just want to do worse to this evil excuse for a human being.
- Kosh, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1You cannot in any kind of intellectual honesty compare a fetus and a tumor. A fetus is the natural result of two sex cells combining, a tumor is an unnatural result of genetic mutation. A fetus in nine months develops into a recognizable human baby, a tumor won't do this in a million years. A fetus develops nerves and a brain and a heart, a tumor doesn't do any of this.
I'm sorry, there are good pro-choice arguments out there, but you haven't made any. - WELLDOITLIVE, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1You mean not the fruit Korean?
- withoutasol, on 06/11/2009, -1/+1You can't rape the willing
- inactive, on 06/11/2009, -1/+0I'm glad I'm not located in your mind, it seems like a scary place. On another note, you'd make a great writer for Happy Tree Friends.
- inactive, on 06/11/2009, -1/+0A psycho is the best way to deal with a psycho, didn't you learn anything from movies?
The best way to destroy evil is not with good, but to confront it with another kind of evil.
On a more serious note, this woman deserves her guts cut out without pain control, and i would vote for a mental patient to do it, preferably one that believes all people have an infant demon in their guts. - ricksickle, on 06/11/2009, -2/+0Didn't you see her picture? Don't you mean rape.
- w1cked1, on 06/11/2009, -4/+2Even a woodchipper would spit that ***** out.
Here's my idea:
Know how they test some rockets or missiles by firing them down a rail a and ramming them into a cement wall? I'd do that. Only, Maybe a meat hook through the base of her spine and hips, catching a few guts, and tethered firmly to the starting point, on a bungee who's point of elasticity elapses about a dozen feet before the cement wall. -
Show 51 - 54 of 54 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is