What is Digg?128 Comments
- cricoste90, on 10/10/2007, -3/+75Starcraft is one of those games that you'd actually buy...
- celestial, on 10/10/2007, -3/+57 Nuclear Launch Detected
- juicebag, on 10/10/2007, -1/+36There's no Zerg pics because they need to spawn more overlords.
- brocklese, on 10/10/2007, -3/+30So I take it there is not a 200 unit max in this one :P
- paulisnotdead, on 10/10/2007, -4/+25My life for Auir
- Irfit, on 10/10/2007, -1/+19Graphics are important, but not as much as gameplay. For example, the original starcraft.
- arunforce, on 10/10/2007, -0/+16Online Play. #1 Reason.
- djblast, on 10/10/2007, -4/+19Power Overwhelming
- psykiv, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15WHERE THE HELL IS THAT LITTLE RED DOT?!?!?!?
- psykiv, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14Several times. Your playing addiction will outlast the poor CD three times over. I know, there's a reason why I've purchased this game four times.
- jimic79, on 10/10/2007, -2/+15*Craps pants... looks for ghost
- arunforce, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14It looks ready. Give me it. :(
- jlgosse, on 10/10/2007, -7/+17How was Earth 2150's online? How about game play? How about story and depth of unit(s)? How big is Earth 2150 in Korea, or anywhere? How come I'm playing TFT and not Earth 2150? Where can I buy this "Earth 2150" game? I haven't really seen it around, or even heard of it before. Also, how come you only "remember" playing Earth 2150? Was the game THAT good that you can only "remember" playing it? Lots of questions to be answered, it appears.
And no, I'm not just being a dick; you're saying the sequel of one of the best games EVER, multiplayer or not, isn't impressing. The original Starcraft is still impressing FFS, and thousands of people STILL play it, online and off, and it's like a decade old. Get a clue, man. - arunforce, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8If I remember correctly, they said they will still maintain it. :O
- Trendecide, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8could 3 billion Koreans who remain addicted to the original SC be wrong?
- cleverhanz, on 10/10/2007, -5/+12Entaro Adun.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+94v4 BGH
- GamerzCorner, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Gameplay > Graphics
- daveisfera, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6There was a pretty strong Terran contingent in the original and I imagine that this one will only be more balanced.
- DigitalGnome, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5It looked like there were only Terran & Protos pics, where are the Zerg?!
- DontThinkSo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Those "screenshots" are actually cheap camera phone shots.
- asnider, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7This looks ***** sweet. This alone is reason enough for me to finally get around to upgrading my 5 year old piece of ***** computer.
- SonnyW, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6You have your work cut out for you, since I'm betting none of us have ever played Starcraft 2.
- JanYpe, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7There are galleries, you dumbass.
- Daedalus81, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Yea because the factions in Supreme Commander are sooo unique. Its the same ***** units on all sides (save the experimentals which you never get to because you get zerged well before then). BOOORRRING.
- gungaroo22, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Starcraft is so balanced. I have no clue what you are talking about.
- closertogod, on 10/10/2007, -4/+7These screen shots look like they AOLed starcraft. its all kiddie looking.
- wackymacs, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3I seriously hope this is fun to play - good graphics doesn't promise good gameplay. I really loved Warcraft II, but with III, Blzzard removed sea units and other great features - Lets hope they don't make sacrifices with Starcraft II...
- paulisnotdead, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3How awesome would that be though zergl rush with 1000 zerglings *drools*
- daveisfera, on 10/10/2007, -4/+7"when it's done"
- BigSax, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3When the first theatrical for SC2 came out I went out and bought the original again, cause I wanted to do the single player again and couldn't find my old disks.
- aaronm67, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Heh, I know I have bought at least 5 different copies of Diablo II (multiple CD keys were very useful, and several were also banned)
And...it seems like every year or so I end up buying a new copy of Starcraft because I can't find my damn CD key...
It's nice the games are only 10 or 15 bucks now. - jubrand, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Did the exact same thing.
- arunforce, on 10/10/2007, -4/+6Drugs are bad sir... Supreme Commander? It's just a copy of StarCraft. Just look at the initals for god's sake.
- 77boy84, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2The game isn't even in beta yet. They still have more than a year of development ahead of them.
Remember the halo 3 beta? Everyone defended it because it was in beta.
What makes Starcraft 2 different? - chicksdigme, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Entaro Adun, Executor.
- BugMeNot2, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Here are some screens that show off Starcraft II's graphical awesomeness.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v502/Einhanderkiller/Starcraft%202/1025833390_aab83b15d4_o.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v502/Einhanderkiller/Starcraft%202/1024973627_f1b99106e7_o.jpg - elementfire, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2No, that's a cheat. The unit limitation still exists.
- Orlex, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2I think that SCII is going to be good not just because of the first one, but because Blizzard has never made a game that wasn't well received and hasn't been a huge success and loved by millions. Basically, they haven't made a bad game, so I imagine they aren't going to make a terrible sequel to one of the most played games ever.
- aaronm67, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3...I'm not sure if you've played recently, but Terran were very powerful. Hell, look at bunkers...they're almost indestructible if you have a few SCVs repairing it.
- HolyChimp, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3This isn't the greatest game I've never played.
- robszol, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2"It all looks so nice on this side"
- pissflaps, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3That's right, I TOTALLY remember being instructed to construct additional pylons in Supreme Commander.
- enforcerpsu, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I am very, very excited about SC2. I played the hell out of the first one. Probably played every single version of BGH and some standard money maps. That said, I am a little wary of all the time being spent on the protoss. They were a bit over powered in the SC1...now they are getting all kinds of crazy attention in SC2?
- aaronm67, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Really? Is that new?
- mtnsoccerguy, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I still play it on my N64.
- psykiv, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14v4 BGH nr20 Cable+ TVB no BS
Ahh, the good old days - BugMeNot2, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1The Zerg are still in the conceptual stages; they aren't even playable yet.
- glasnostic, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1wow. never saw that game before, and now i know why.
- junk, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1For everybody complaining about how it looks like the same game with new graphics, well that's the best thing that can happen with the game. SC is one of the most balanced multi-player games ever. Just think of it like Chess. There are lots of different chess sets out there with finely carved pieces, but the game of chess is always the same and that's a good thing.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 125 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
