digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

World behind a mirror

artsdesignblog.com — Fantasy, future or reality? (creative photos)

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • Grenada, on 10/10/2007, -10/+2WoooooW!
    • kylesellers, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9If by "WoooooW!" you mean boring, then, yeah... "WoooooW!"
  • AirwavesV2, on 10/10/2007, -30/+2But, will it blend?
    • thecompkid, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8How about I take a blender, shove it up your ass, and turn it on. The resulting ***** smoothie will be much more appealing than your mindless, utterly retarded repetition of an already stupid internet joke.

      So the answer is yes, yes it will blend.
    • griz, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Not every story on Digg is suited for that question.
      • Verdanic, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Very little, in fact. Very, very little.
    • XxXoldsaltXxX, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1I hope that i speak for everyone when i say (prepare for nerd rage) SHUT THE ***** UP. YOU ARE NOT FUNNY. All the ***** that use these stupid, overused catchphrases need to die in a ***** fire. If you absolutely NEED diggs so you can stroke your e-penis, think of something original for christ's sake. Blend that, *****.
      • Verdanic, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2... or you could ignore it? Maybe?
      • theholycow, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Isn't "die in a [*****] fire" a 'catchphrase'?
      • ChewMyFootOff, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Feed the troll, and it will grow strong and health. So, then: Will it blend?
  • Wonderkind, on 10/10/2007, -14/+8Those aren't even clever. Lame.
    • juttman, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1i agree, why is it that everytime we think something artsy isn't that cool our comments get buried?
  • Limezor, on 10/10/2007, -15/+5No it won't blend and neither will your brain, because you don't have one.
  • LiamIsOnFire, on 10/10/2007, -9/+6This wouldn't ever happen to me, because I'd be too busy admiring my own reflection and my reflection would be too busy admiring me.
  • Shootfast, on 10/10/2007, -7/+2Those were cool
  • shutz, on 10/10/2007, -13/+1www.duggmirror.com
  • kutateli, on 10/10/2007, -2/+14Site is down already.. anyone got a mirror?
  • shutz, on 10/10/2007, -0/+72Doesn't anybody else in here find it ironic that this site now needs a mirror?
    • shutz, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5I mean, this is hilarious:

      "Sorry, a mirror of World behind a mirror is not available."
  • DarkReign16, on 10/10/2007, -6/+1word press error FTL
  • aazn, on 10/10/2007, -5/+3Is that Neo? Bend the spoon!
    • enigmaticsoul, on 10/10/2007, -1/+11You must realise the truth. There is no spoon.
    • zybch, on 10/10/2007, -4/+1Yeah yeah, we all get it!
      Seriously, you have to be totally retarded to not get it!
  • Katocan, on 10/10/2007, -11/+2http://www.duggmirror.com
    • richgustavson, on 10/10/2007, -3/+41) Why would you post that without first checking if duggmirror caught it?
      2) Even if it was caught, why wouldn't you post the whole link so that people could just click it?

      We are all now dumber for reading your post. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
      • meatmcguffin, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Duggmirror doesn't need the whole link. When you click that link it'll redirect you to the correct mirror
    • arcooke, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Instead of just lazily posting a dugmirror url in hopes of getting dugg up, why don't you actually check to make sure it WORKS first?

      You people piss me off.
  • jorelvo, on 10/10/2007, -2/+27grabbed a mirror just in time. http://bayimg.com/JaeCKAaBl
    • kylesellers, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2The whole image is of mirrors...
  • HunterTV, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2Mirrors mirror?
  • urbannomad23, on 10/10/2007, -8/+0that is easy to do....PHOTOSHOP!
    • djpants428, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0um... yah... so it was most likely a composite of two or more pictures in Photoshop. What's your point? Was it not interesting?
      • urbannomad23, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1i was just saying it was easy to recreate such things. of course it was interesting. :)
  • richgustavson, on 10/10/2007, -5/+1Wordpress error. SHOCKING.
  • ToxicBomber, on 10/10/2007, -7/+2ok...someone was ***** bored
  • Grumps, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1Where is the baby!
  • ajchavar, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1meh. not terrible, not great, meh.
  • kylesellers, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2Buried as SPAM, since mjbanks posts nothing but links to loot-ninja stories.

    Jackass...
    • kylesellers, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2crap I had two articles open and I commented on the wrong one... bury me, bury, me, say that you'll bury me!
  • UCFartstudntJON, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Front page? I'm very disappointed.
  • voetsjoeba, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Fantasy, future or reality? No, just photoshop.
  • AgentMull, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1There is no spoon.
  • silverchrysalis, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1that's an ikea spoon
  • MisterNetHead, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0Any bored techie with a camera and GIMP could do this in an afternoon. Buried as lame.
  • toetagger, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0I don't get it.
  • GangsterCompute, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Dugg because we could all use a good spiral in our day.
  • Ontario, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I admit I have not been a Digg user for long, but if this kind of lame nonsense is what Digg is all about, i will switch to Newsvine or another service.
  • dimebag1000, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1That woman has a really bad smile.
  • SupremeBeing, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1.
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.