digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

Online couple CHEAT with each other

news.com.au — Sana Klaric and husband Adnan, who used the names "Sweetie" and "Prince of Joy" in an online chatroom, spent hours telling each other about their marriage troubles... little realising they were ALREADY MARRIED!

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • Buckey1983, on 10/10/2007, -6/+130Haha, wow what are the chances?
    • shredswithpiks, on 10/10/2007, -5/+23good enough to happen?
    • snurfle, on 10/10/2007, -60/+4Well, apparently, 100%!
      • pardonmedoug, on 10/10/2007, -0/+68*smacks forehead*
        • Akaji, on 10/10/2007, -3/+64A million probability/stats professors suddenly cried out in pain...
      • kufu91, on 10/10/2007, -2/+23i almost considered reporting you for your offense to human intelligence
      • elnerdo, on 10/10/2007, -14/+3I don't see why everyone's so outraged at snurfle. The chances ARE 100%
        • oneoverzero, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14If you flip a coin, and it lands on heads, does that mean the coin has a 100% probability of landing on heads?
          • ToadLeg, on 10/10/2007, -9/+3Yes. It didn't land on tails did it? There is no chance of the coin landing on tails because it already landed! You can't flip the flip that you just flipped again! In the same way, this event already occurred, and therefore the chances of it occurring was 100%. It may not happen in the future, but it definitely 100% did in the past.
          • ericisshort, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7that is some fuzzy mother ***** logic
          • SolidEnder, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0haha, fuzzy indeed. Also incorrect?
          • Shirly, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1Now that's some crazy ***** right there.
          • accelleron, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6In given scenario, there is a 0% chance the coin will land on heads and a 0% chance it will land on tails.
            Reason: It already landed.
            Smoke less. Do more.
          • Otto, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Use of the word "probability" only makes sense when the event has not yet occurred. After the event has occurred, the probability is 100% that whatever happened actually happened. I mean, you saw it happen, right? So it's not probable anymore, it's guaranteed.

            Probability is a way to measure unknowns. When they become knowns, it no longer makes sense to speak of probabilities.
      • reubencm, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3sick.
    • humperdeath, on 10/10/2007, -1/+48If you like Pina Coladas. . . . And getting caught in the rain.....
      OK, dupe comment, I know, but come on, it's so obvious.
      • thecliffbar, on 10/10/2007, -6/+3exactly what I thought of
      • awfulgrace, on 10/10/2007, -3/+2Thanks - yet another terrible 80s song stuck in my head (... if you're not in yoga, and you have a half a brain...)
      • LocalDocal, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2I was waiting for someone to mention that song. Also, a fun fact is that there was another recorded case of this happening in Jordan. That one also ended in divorce.

        Then again, I can't imagine too many people staying in a marriage after spending a long time telling each other how much their marriage sucked, and how abusive/neglectful/ugly their spouse are.
      • nox327, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3OK everyone, this story is FAKE and here is the proof.

        Times of Oman
        6 Feb 2005

        Budding Jordan cyber love ends in divorce

        AMMAN (AFP) - A budding romance between a Jordanian man and woman turned into an ugly public divorce when the couple found out that they were in fact man and wife, state media reported.

        Separated for several months, boredom and chance briefly re-united Bakr Melhem and his wife Sanaa in an Internet chat room, the official Petra news agency said.

        Bakr, who passed himself off as Adnan, fell head over heels for Sanaa, who signed off as Jamila (beautiful) and described herself as a cultured, unmarried woman -- a devout Muslim whose hobby was reading, Petra said.

        Cyber love blossomed between the pair for three months and soon they were making wedding plans. To pledge their troth in person, they agreed to meet in the flesh near a bus depot in the town of Zarqa, northeast of Amman.

        The shock of finding out their true identities was too much for the pair.

        Upon seeing Sanaa-alias-Jamila, Bakr-alias-Adnan turned white and screamed at the top of his lungs: "You are divorced, divorced, divorced" -- the traditional manner of officially ending a marriage in Islam.

        "You are a liar," Sanaa retorted before fainting, the agency said.

        ===========

        This story was printed in 2005 and is completely identical to the one in question, just the location i different.
    • ch33sehead, on 10/10/2007, -9/+4"Haha, wow what are the chances?"

      I believe Murphy's Law applies to this situation. Not so much in the sense that something will go WRONG, just that if something is statistically unlikely, but it gets millions of chances of occurring, it will.
      • Akaji, on 10/10/2007, -1/+26You know that Murphy's Law is not a law, right?
        • mywhitenoise, on 10/10/2007, -0/+38Yes it is. Have you ever watched Robocop? Murphy is the law.
      • oneoverzero, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Thats not Murphy's law, its basic probability.
      • Tippis, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Btw, the whole "something will go wrong" isn't Murphy's law, it's Finnagle's Law:

        Finagle's Law: n.
        The generalized or ‘folk’ version of Murphy's Law, fully named “Finagle's Law of Dynamic Negatives” and usually rendered “Anything that can go wrong, will” ( http://catb.org/esr/jargon/html/F/Finagles-Law.html )

        compare:

        Murphy's Law: prov.
        The correct, original Murphy's Law reads: “If there are two or more ways to do something, and one of those ways can result in a catastrophe, then someone will do it.” This is a principle of defensive design, cited here because it is usually given in mutant forms less descriptive of the challenges of design for lusers. For example, you don't make a two-pin plug symmetrical and then label it “THIS WAY UP”; if it matters which way it is plugged in, then you make the design asymmetrical (see also the anecdote under magic smoke). ( http://catb.org/esr/jargon/html/M/Murphys-Law.html )
      • picsectionpleez, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Um, that would be the Law of Numbers. Basically, if there are large numbers of chances involved all kinds of seemingly unlikely things happen. Like a roulette ball hitting black 20 times in a row, or a coin toss resulting in heads 100 times, or Digg fixing this ***** comment system.
    • NikoKun, on 10/10/2007, -10/+6"You've Got Mail" Anyone? lol
      • mywhitenoise, on 10/10/2007, -1/+41::crickets chirping::

        No, I think you're about the only guy here who has seen that piece of crap.
        • saifatlast, on 10/10/2007, -1/+21Or who will admit it. *sidelong glance*
        • bagboyrebel, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2ok, one of the only 2 guys here who have seen it.
      • diktator279, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Isn't that the one with Tom Hanks and the volleyball..?
      • kufu91, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2dang, i was hoping to have forgotten that movie by now
      • Shorties, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Oh come on, I was thinking the same thing.
    • vertinox, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9I'm pretty sure I read about this back in 1999 on some newsgroup hoax post.
    • najdorf, on 10/10/2007, -2/+12Reminds me of that video where brother and sister are flirting on the internet with their webcams, then they're called to lunch where they recognize each other from the clothes... Can't find it though...
    • vornan19, on 10/10/2007, -6/+4"If you like Pina Coladas
      And getting caught in the rain
      If you're not into yoga
      If you have half a brain
      If you'd like making love at midnight
      In the dunes on the Cape
      Then I'm the love that you've looked for
      Write to me and escape."

      http://www.lyricsondemand.com/onehitwonders/pinacoladalyrics.html
    • spootmonkey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3There's a Rom Com in this story....starring tom hanks
    • bluezinc, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Shouldn't they take this as a good sign instead of a bad one? I mean, after all, they did seem to fall in love again.
    • madams15, on 10/10/2007, -3/+0Its a 3.29043% chance it would happen.
  • ChubbyCheese, on 10/10/2007, -4/+701"The truth emerged when the two turned up for a date. Now the pair, from Zenica in central Bosnia, are divorcing after accusing each other of being unfaithful."

    retards. apparently they're meant for each other if they met that way and fell in love all over again.
    • smackhero, on 10/10/2007, -1/+137seriously. it seems like they had a serious communication problem but were given a second chance through a fortunate coincidence. clearly they were both "guilty" of the same thing, but actually sought out one another in reality. and instead of counting their blessings and taking the opportunity they were given to rework their marriage problems outside of their previously established emotional walls, they instead got a divorce and accuse one another of the same thing... what retards.

      idiots like that don't deserve happiness. not if they're going to throw it away like morons. some people just gravitate towards hatred over love, i guess.
      • tomokatsu, on 10/10/2007, -15/+13Or you could just recognize that this is a joke, and chill out. I hate it when people seem so prone to give out advice over the internet.
        • vornan19, on 10/10/2007, -0/+28Wow! Advice about not giving advice. I dugg you for the contradiction.
      • jrizzo, on 10/10/2007, -24/+7"some people just gravitate towards hatred over love, i guess."

        Those people are called Republicans.
        • Scorpy2643, on 10/10/2007, -3/+4I hope you see the irony in your own comment. If not, I hope your mother cuts your food into small enough pieces so lil babybjrizzo doesn't choke.
        • karel747, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Please...Keep the political ***** in the political articles.
      • humperdeath, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7Unfortunately, now htere are 2 retards out there looking to hook up with 2 other unsuspecting victims. They should stay together just to save the rest of us from the possibility of a chance encounter with these 2 idiots.
      • narcosis219, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1At least now we don't have two retards who have equally retarded children.
      • reubencm, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0thanks dr phil
    • EchoSpree, on 10/10/2007, -1/+73Funny how both of them seem to go directly back to hate once they found out the person he or she fell in love with just so happened to be the person they married!

      Seriously, fall in love TWICE with each other and still need to divorce?
    • VitriolAndAngst, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11Classic case of not wanting what you already have.

      This should become a parable in time.
    • MrFisty, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1But more to the point, they felt the need to disclose their online encounter.

      The only thing dumber than retards who do this stuff are the one's who tell everyone about it. The "I was unfairly banned for playing pre-release Halo 3" Kid, I'm looking at you.
    • ndteja, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I wish it ended with them not wanting to get divorced. But I guess I watch too many movies.
    • adrianmonk, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Well, that's certainly how it happened in episode #44 of "The Munsters" back in 1965. Herman and Lily both get jobs as welders at a shipyard, and though they can't see each other's faces because of the welding masks, they start flirting with each other. When they find out, they're both furious at the other for being unfaithful. Then Grandpa (I think it was) convinces them that they are truly made for each other if they fell in love all over again without even knowing they were doing it, and they all live happily ever after. (Except for their "homely"-looking daughter, of course, because the family is always scaring away her boyfriends.)

      Actually, it was kind of a clever episode. Sort of a "Gift of the Magi" type of thing.

      http://www.tv.com/the-munsters/happy-100th-anniversary/episode/12843/summary.html?tag=ep_list;ep_title;5
      • calvmari, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I loved this episode! They also copied this same theme in home improvement a couple decades later.
    • AceLy, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Maybe the bonus points from what they imagined each other to look like was the final bit to tip the scale.
    • picsectionpleez, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Watch and see- they'll get divorced and meet again one day in another chat room, talking about how each of them got busted by their spouse....
  • polymath22, on 10/10/2007, -5/+290i KNEW this would happen some day. i just KNEW it! priceless
    • thcobbs, on 10/10/2007, -1/+24I don't know... I think the commercial where the brother and sister about to flash each other is priceless.
      • CanceledCzech, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2What? What kind of commercial could that possibly be?
        • andypatil, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2See my response to archibal below and you will get the commercial :)
      • CanceledCzech, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4What?
      • over90000, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I know what he's talking about. I think it's a finnish commercial. You see a guy and a girl flashing each other through webcam, but you can't see their faces. Their mom calls them downstairs for dinner and both of them recognize each others clothes and become awkward. it's on youtube somewhere.
      • Sink41, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11the commercial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHnVbBEUDGY
    • felman87, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Pics or it didn't happen.
  • radison2, on 10/10/2007, -4/+330Do you like pina coladas? .... And getting caught in the rain?
    • floridiot2, on 10/10/2007, -9/+91Yes I like Pina Coladas, And getting caught in the rain...... and buttsex.
    • Jwoey, on 10/10/2007, -1/+45If you like making love at midnight!
      What the hell? Who doesnt like making love at midnight?
      "Im sorry, I can't. Its 12."
      • carpespasm, on 10/10/2007, -0/+34cinderella.
      • bill679, on 10/10/2007, -5/+1"Im sorry, I can't. It's 12 and I am about to submit this article to the Daily Telegraph".

        Fixed.
      • thecliffbar, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0It's "if you like making love at midnight, in the dunes of the cape"
        maybe not everyone likes sand in certain areas?
      • Gabberwok, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Gremlins.
        • mc7winkie, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Just don't get them wet or feed them your *****...
    • dassin, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11Seriously. First thing I thought :P
      • rossnyc, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1^^^^^^^
      • p51d007, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Same here. Heard this on the radio, and the Pina Colada song was the FIRST thing that came to mind.
      • opticsnake, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Ditto. Damn I wish I would have read this earlier.
    • masterdbugger, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11She said, "Ah, it's you."
      "I want a divorce."
    • rodted2, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Damn, beat me to it....... This is really stupid though. They are divorcing because the other was cheating on them.... uh hello you both were unfaithful.... that mean you both are idiots.

      OK, I'm off my soapbox.
    • dimplemonkey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2I was tired of my lady...
    • Bentearwalking, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2YAY! My first thoughts. Glad I'm not the only one who knows more to that song than that ONE verse.
    • AUmrysh, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Except the end isn't really as happy :-/
  • blorc, on 10/10/2007, -0/+185It reminds me of a video that floated around a while back where you see a guy stripping for a girl (and vice versa) via webcam, and they end up being brother and sister or son and mother or something of the sort.
  • toolegittoquit, on 10/10/2007, -3/+53People like this would have been Saber-toothed Cat food back in the day. I think we're de-evolving.
    • Lapdog1123, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11unfortunately the world as turned into protect the people no matter what. Not "some people are dumb and try to bathe with there toasters, let them kill themselves" We protect the morons of society and they have kids, then those kids have kids. We are doomed....

      No use trying to educate them either thanks to the No Child left Behind load of crap. Lets lower our standards so the little moron children can graduate. How about the "if you don't want to do anything with your life, and don't apply yourself then you get to flip burgers or starve policy." I would go for that. Hooray natural selection!
      • skyfire1, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Don't worry, eventually that idiot will become president and we'll have natural selection all over again!

        Wait a minute....
      • darienphoenix, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3The problem with your theory, Lapdog, is that under a 'free market' system, the dumb children of rich parents are still allowed to progress above their more intelligent peers.

        However, I'm all for taking the warning labels off everything and letting the problem take care of itself.
        • Gabberwok, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2That's why you need a 100% estate tax...
      • diggimator, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2No Child Left Behind is actually about No Child Left Behind In Neglected ***** Schools. Sure, bad implementation, Bush bash, etc., but why should students suffer the consequences of having idiot faculties?
    • ryodoan, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Well... at least they are not breeding.
    • Jotaro, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Your mom is de-evolving
    • Geoth, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Idiocracy is now!
  • FreakyD, on 10/10/2007, -11/+4Alright people stop making fun of me. how was I supposed to know I was cheating on my wife, with my wife.
    • jjesusfreak01, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Hmm, makes you wonder if its technically cheating...
    • masterdbugger, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5I'd call it role play.
  • mandarin, on 10/10/2007, -1/+56Damn, Bosnia must be a really small place...
  • floridiot2, on 10/10/2007, -0/+38LOL, so now they're mad at each other for complaining to each other about their own marriage.
    • VitriolAndAngst, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3I can just imagine the conversation.

      Every man who want to get laid; "You are too good for him -- he doesn't deserve you.
      Every woman starved for attention; "He doesn't understand me -- we hardly talk. Why hasn't a great guy like you not been taken by some woman?"
  • ahawks, on 10/10/2007, -2/+66Capitalizing CHEAT really helps send your desired emphasis.
  • VeryBoredNow, on 10/10/2007, -2/+38Shoutout to Bosnia!

    I was in Zenica about 3 years ago it's a small city, real nice.
    Bosnias population is aprox. 4 mil. people so the odds were
    not that bad, especially if you take into account the # of people
    that use the internet in bosnia that takes the number down to maybe
    a few hundert thousand.

    But still, Bosnians have always been a weird bunch.
    • MattZed, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Yeah, if you knew Bosnians like I know Bosnians, you would be 100% sure that they are the only species on this planet capable of this sort of thing.

      Love from Croatia
  • benny87, on 10/10/2007, -6/+14hahahaha FAIL.
  • echolalia, on 10/10/2007, -1/+56Daily telegraph always has these ridiculous stories that you never know how true they are. Honestly, how do they know about a couple from Bosnia, being an Australian site, is beyond me. I remember a story about a Mexican guy who had his brother sleep with his girlfriend on the Telegraph also. I am finding it all hard to believe.
    • Alegis, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4"Honestly, how do they know about a couple from Bosnia, being an Australian site, is beyond me."
      FTA: "telling each other about their marriage troubles, Metro.co.uk reported. "

      Not that it makes the story more convincing if Metro.co.uk is full of *****, but here's your answer as to how they did "find out".
    • dvsbastard, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Sounds a case of the blind leading the blind... You would be better off getting your "news" from the World Weekly News... Odds are it would be a lot more accurate too!
    • JustinTense, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_press
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters

      There almost like the Digg.com of broadcast media. If you like something, you instead "digg" it onto your newspaper/teevee box.
  • COLDshiver, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7Hehe, what a happy ending it *could* have been :/ Reminds me of the movie "You've Got Mail"
  • compgeek, on 10/10/2007, -3/+3lol that was just way too funny.
  • aoneal417, on 10/10/2007, -0/+20that would be a good sequel to You've Got Mail
  • pyry, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5I swear this happened once already, and made it into the news.
    • Shandooga, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1I remember the story too. A couple of arabs; he divorced her on the spot. Over there you can divorce your wife just by saying "I divorce you" three times.
      • SlipstreamLucas, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4really? imagine the divorce rates in the states if THAT law was passed.
  • mortigon, on 10/10/2007, -12/+2Shot to the heart
    And you're too late

    You give love
    A bad name
    • exomni, on 10/10/2007, -7/+1Actully it's 5-7-5.
      • geminitojanus, on 10/10/2007, -0/+41st, it's a Bon Jovi song, not a haiku, 2nd, he got the lyrics wrong; "shot to the heart, /and you're to blame/..."
      • BossKey, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0comment buried for insufficient awareness of pop culture
        (and for confusing Bon Jovi with haiku)
    • TranceNW, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5you mean
      'Shot through the heart
      And youre to blame
      You give love a bad name'
    • flashingcurser, on 10/10/2007, -3/+2Die 80's hairmetal, die....
  • ZenMojo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+29There are two ways to look at this. Does this just show how easily they could repair their marriage with a little attention and communication (considering they were probably complaining about stuff the other did, it shouldn't be hard)? Or does this just show how online couples can lie and conceal their real selves from each other (considering they were probably complaining about stuff the other did, it should be pretty well-concealed)?
  • masterc, on 10/10/2007, -1/+19Prince of Joy? I'd be more worried that he might be gay than a cheater!
  • wolvin, on 10/10/2007, -1/+35I am also waiting for the day that some TV news people and some police department run into each other on a sting.
    • SlipstreamLucas, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1haha yeah that would be the best :)
  • gibsonic, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6i was just thinking that this could have turned out even better if they had met up at a costume party and slipped away in a private room and got it on and then afterwards realized they were married. Imagine the carnage!
    • petebot, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0That happened in Clerks. Or at least in the Clerks backstory.
  • TajesMahoney, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9this seems straight out of "The Onion". I'm still waiting for the gag to be revealed. They "fell in love" with their on line aliases, but as soon as they realize who is behind the screen they hate each other again? I really thought this was going to turn into a positive "venting out our troubles to one another that way really helped our marriage". oh well...
    • Shandooga, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1It did seem to have that potential.
    • SlipstreamLucas, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2no it didn't.....their....bosnians.
      it will likely result in some for of blood feud that goes on for centuries now.
    • TheSpore, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1The source of this article is the Daily Telegraph. I've never heard of them before, but their home page seems to be all about celebrity news. Credibility is probably not a high priority for them.
  • Starkey82, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2I guess Dr. Phil missed this one:)
  • nizzy1115, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2this happened in some tv show i saw a while ago.
    • ajgv, on 10/10/2007, -6/+2omg! you are soooo cool! can i have your autograph?
    • Matt174e, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Simpsons did it?
    • snurfle, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Drew Carey, lying in the tub, shower running, screaming "Nooooo!!!"
  • Bossy, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7"The truth emerged when the two turned up for a date." Both of them were looking forward to being screwed.

    I mean what are the chances of them not realizing that they are already married based on their striking similarities like name, location, job, etc. They probably lied to each other about everything... just to get screwed.
    • ztrek, on 09/01/2008, -0/+0This comment reminds me of an old song: Escape (The Pina Colada song)
  • tomokatsu, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4it clearly states "Metro.co.uk reported. " I'm pretty sure that it is fake. (although admittedly funny)
  • Fly1m1, on 10/10/2007, -6/+1I like pina coladas, & getting caught in the rain......
  • Shandooga, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2That must have been sobering.
  • SilenceGold, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1It should beat the marriage therapy.
  • bigtime2, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10im bosnian, and iv been waiting for a cool story to show up on digg about bosnians and ...two ***** ***** up my hopes.
    lol
    • SlipstreamLucas, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1i could make up a cool one for you.
      just need a hundred or so morons to digg it and it will become true :)
    • eddosa, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0u not the only bosnian here :)
      respect
      out all of people in the world, it had to be bosnians, lol
  • wheresjim, on 10/10/2007, -4/+15My brother once met this really cool chick on eWorld. As they got to talking they discovered how much they had in common. From the same state, same town? Wow! They even went to the same high school. Turns out it was my sister. LOL! Pwned!
    • WillHutch5, on 10/10/2007, -3/+9You're brother is a loser, and you probably are too.
      • AustinMeoang, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2At least he didn't use "you're" incorrectly. /grammar nazi
    • Jedwards32, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2Pwned for incest.
    • RainNIU, on 10/10/2007, -1/+22So did they hook up or what?
      • YoureAllSoDumb, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0If so, do you have a video tape for us or what?
    • rabiddachshund, on 10/10/2007, -3/+0Are you his sister?

      Also, I still hate this comment system. It says there are 4 replies to wheresjim's comment.
      • redlinedzx, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0There are 4. Why is this system so hard for people to grasp?
        • rabiddachshund, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Jedwards32's comment wasn't there when I posted.
    • Ridikul, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Reminds me of that one episode of Fresh Prince.
    • Influsion, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1e-ncest.
  • jun2san, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2that was one of the shortest articles I have ever read. The whole thing could have fit in the description
  • jimsf, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1No flipping way... this has got to be fake. I'm waiting for the hoax announcement
    • tomokatsu, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1It is fake... It was from "Metro.co.uk" a joke website.
  • nicheplayer, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1Total, utter *****. Never happened.
  • keyme, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0What the hell are the odds for THIS to happen??
  • timjim31, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2sounds like a stephen glass article
  • BlinderBomber, on 10/10/2007, -0/+22Does anyone else think that the fact that they're getting divorced after falling in love with each other online is even funnier than the initial situation. If that happened with someone I was married to, I'd take it as an opportunity to realize how great they were and reconnect with all the reasons I married them in the first place - not as an even bigger reason to divorce.
    • SpyDerMann, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1They obviously still hate each other and are not willing to forgive each other for the miserable life they've been giving to each other.
    • flashingcurser, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2On line, he can be rich and she can be slim.
    • wrzhydr, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Or all the things they were saying online to each other were complete lies. Once a cheater always a cheater.
  • phuzzy3d, on 10/10/2007, -3/+2Wow ... now that is stranger than fiction.
  • peterA650, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1True or fake makes little difference. The question here is has the web really brought us any closer? My answer is no, virtual interaction is worthless and I'm sticking with it. Time to go out for a walk into the real world.
    • narcosis219, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Virtual interaction is worthless and you're sticking with it? Either you're weird or you have bad grammar.
  • mandarin, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Dont you usually call each other first on the phone before heading out on a date?
  • SpyDerMann, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4This HAS to be a coincidence. Yesterday, a mexican comedy show about a couple with problems, was about them cybercheating on each other... with each other! The guy registered at a restaurant under the name "Fire Machine", and the girl as "tasty69". They arrived at the restaurant for their first date, and...
  • JNudda, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0Reminds me of the mom and son who did a similiar thing.
  • giddytonk, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2It's like a modern-day Pina Colada song!!!
  • daniilm, on 10/10/2007, -6/+1wait, there's internet in Bosnia already?
  • briLo, on 10/10/2007, -7/+4I'm calling ***** here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    I'm an online pedofile and I always get the name and a description of the kid, I mean adult, that I'm going to meet, so there's no possibility that they're one of my students, err co-workers.
    • RxDaniel, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Hi, I'm Chris Hansen from Dateline NBC.
  • thewebguy, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7total *****
  • Chassit, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0lol
  • m4rk0551, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0Can I post a big LOL!
  • ctc803, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1what are the chances they both stumble on the same chatsite and start talking to eachother.. pretty hard to believe if you ask me
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 119 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.