What is Digg?79 Comments
- Cyre, on 10/10/2007, -5/+149Yes it has.
- SmackMyMac, on 10/10/2007, -3/+68To a man who had wondered the desert for a week to finally come upon a river, water has been more beautiful.
Neat pic though. - whatthefu, on 10/10/2007, -3/+62What a ridiculous title.
- Ajjah, on 10/10/2007, -5/+36I am so sick of these pictures that are absolutely... ugh
- wildfire, on 10/10/2007, -6/+35I concur: http://www.autoblog.it/uploads/SEXYWASH1.jpg
- jkizzle, on 10/10/2007, -2/+28this isnt news. this isnt even offbeat news.
GTFO - geoboy, on 10/10/2007, -1/+27http://dew.ytmnd.com
- zenlunatic, on 10/10/2007, -3/+24Wondered?
- erkokite, on 10/10/2007, -0/+16Water is the essence of wetness, and wetness is the essence of beauty.
- sallos, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15Thanks, I did just click... on bury.
- supernovasky, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14[Pic] Photography has never been so stereotypical
- 19ninety, on 10/08/2008, -0/+12http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/3250/photocapturedbeautywpivxf3.jpg
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/8941/photocapturedbeautyxxvitf3.jpg
much better imo. - rglover, on 10/10/2007, -0/+10Great photo, but I definitely was expecting two girls kissing in a fountain or something as per the usual submissions.
- Somnabot, on 10/10/2007, -3/+10Looks like boobs. :)
Sorry, I had to. - scabbers, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8What a load of *****.
- Pic0, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5two drops of water? what the hell
- DaffyDuck, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5It's kind of a rather ordinary water droplet shot. I've seen much more creative shots in this genre on photo.net. Why don't people submit some good photos here?
- CapeKid, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5And an awful description.
- kwazyJAS, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4"Traffic on this photo is off the chart. I wonder where it is coming from. I'm currently getting a hit a second at as of sunday at 4:00pm."
I guess he hasn't heard of digg. - chyperbola, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4I've seen much more creative shots in this genre on digg *recently* ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevewall/ - Ajjah, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Recockulous, you might say.
- borninda818, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4You think too much.
- TechCF, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Looks just like 25% of the pics on flickr
- fatnutz, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3I hear you, I'll gladly digg dupes and pointless drivel when it comes to Apple stories, but when someone posts something they think is cool that is totally unrelated to apple, that's when I draw the line..
- rwtf91, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3I am convinced that with a nice enough camera, you can take a close up picture of just about anything and it will look bad ass like this.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3"Water has never been so beautiful"
what, two balls of crystal?
wtf, you've never.. seen before? - crazybrit, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Concur means agree.
But I dugg you up for the link. - donkeyshow, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3weak...i was hoping for fountain in some remote and exotic desert.
- rspeed, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Flickrspam?
Congratulations on buying a macro lens. - wildfire, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Hi, I'm wildfire; I love long walks on the beach, LOLcats (sarcasm), and being a sarcastic douchebag on Digg.
- markperia, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Mer-man dad, MER-MAN!
- Magnj, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Good Flickr Photos should NOT make Digg front page...wtf has happened.
- DaffyDuck, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Examples:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1620281
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1141753&size=lg
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3759192
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4262275
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3782128 - neshcom, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2It's okay, but it ain't great.
No digg, but not bury. - m00by, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2are you kidding me? water looks better pretty much every day. how can I get *my* photos p1mped to such an easily impressed person?
- jonlee, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Here's one that's as beautiful that was on digg months ago: http://www.athousandandone.com/21/
- marquinio, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1omg, that made me jump off my chair
- wildfire, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1MA*FRA doesn't seem to think so.
- MasterThief117, on 10/10/2007, -3/+4Sort of NSFW warning.
- Unr3a1, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Offbeat news huh? BURY
- crossmr, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1somehow I bet he has... plausible deniability and all that..
- philippbock, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Noooooooooo! This is sooooo wrong!
- crazybrit, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Okay...
- YoHenYo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Eck! It is submissions like this that are really making me dislike digging.
It's like people troll around flickr are post any picture that is taken up close. - ranarium, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Hasn't Digg had enough photos of water droplets in the last month? Apparently not.
- wush, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1all the generic macro stuff strikes me as people buying expensive equipment and then looking for a way to use it. should be the other way round
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Much better use of refraction here. http://digg.com/offbeat_news/pic_Gorgeous_Water_Droplets_Reflecting_the_American_Flag
Buried for posting such a similar, yet inferior photo, after one had already been posted. This one has half the diggs that the other one does, so consider that when digging me down for bashing a mediocre version of a previous post. - LMaxey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1no ***** sherlock
- WonderBoy55, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Surface tension rules!
- Kyouto, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1dugg because the guy was wigging out about where all the traffic came from.
also because it looks pretty. so ***** what if it's been done before, if it's not offbeat news, etc.... it's pretty. that's all that matters. -
Show 51 - 74 of 74 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
