What is Digg?372 Comments
- nahsrocketeer75, on 03/15/2008, -5/+483So, wouldn't the ultimate premium call-girl service include a videotape of the encounter so as to protect both parties against prosecution?
- TomK88, on 03/15/2008, -14/+372Prostitution should be legal, period. It's not the government's place to dictate how you use sex.
- ReidFleming, on 03/15/2008, -2/+344Someone could conceivably say to a prostitute, "I don't want to have sex with you, I want to film a movie with me and you having sex. I will pay you $$$ for your acting services?" Then they just film it and nobody can get in trouble -- or am I reading that wrong?
- Bggnz, on 03/15/2008, -1/+286"Officer this is not what it looks like, Im making a documentary"
- MoneyShot, on 03/15/2008, -6/+186"Selling is legal. ***** is legal. Why isn't selling ***** legal? Why is it illegal to sell something that is perfectly legal to give away for free?" - George Carlin
- jstohler, on 03/15/2008, -2/+160That's genius. Time for you to go into business.
- bitterbug, on 03/15/2008, -2/+119They've been doing the on-camera prostitution in New York for years. There was a tv show on Showcase/Bravo about it a few years back. You pay the money and either operate the camera or have sex on camera, and as long as you "direct" the action, you're making a film, not engaging in prostitution.
I certainly don't understand why prostitution is illegal anyway. It would be safer for women if it was legal and they were able to operate from businesses with doctors and security on staff. The trade isn't going to go away, so at least minimize the danger. - inactive, on 03/15/2008, -14/+119Its all about money, adult industry has to pay taxes on the movies they produce, and the actors have to pay taxes so its a money thing. Hookers and such dont pay any taxes and so thats not cool for the Govt. Its sad people have to do this if you are married or want to get married you would think you would want to invest your Love to someone as a person not an object.
- FriedTurkey, on 03/15/2008, -3/+103Only problem with that is some people really don't want evidence of them having sex with a prostitute.
- inactive, on 03/15/2008, -8/+87I am SERIOUSLY considering starting this as a business. I have about $5k saved up in stocks which is not going to make me rich.
Craigslist, here I cum. - Yez70, on 03/15/2008, -5/+74Yep, it's called the First Amendment. Once you film it, it becomes speech - protected by the constitution.
- ADVIZR, on 03/15/2008, -2/+62A better question: why are parts of Nevada enlightened in realizing that prostitution should be legal, licensed, and controlled -- while the rest of the USA is in the Dark Ages? Illegal prostitution, like the phony "drug war", creates an underground market = crime/violence, human trafficking, etc.
- mille716, on 03/15/2008, -0/+51This is why I write a thirty page script and hire sound, lighting and camara men before I ***** each prostitute.
- AlphaToker, on 03/15/2008, -0/+48I lived for a few years in Germany and prostitution is legal there. Lot less trouble and people are not so stuck on the whole thing. Now I myself don't like the idea of having sex with someone who just had sex a dozen times, but many out there do and they should not be punished for it. Never the less people should have the right to sell their body if they wish to do so and be protected against abuse the legitimate way. This addresses a lot of issues like prostitution and crime and also the rape argument.
- WraTH017, on 03/15/2008, -31/+78George Carlin: ***** is legal. Selling is legal. Why is selling ***** not legal?
Same reason pot is illegal. Because it might make people more free and happier, and the government can't have that. - loganarcher, on 03/15/2008, -2/+49I'm sure bringing up the first amendment up with the cops will go down real well.
- EXreaction, on 03/15/2008, -3/+45It wasn't founded on it, just taken over by them.
- tehbishop, on 03/15/2008, -1/+43so offer to them to keep or destroy it. It's actually just using the loophole for full effect, as long as they know it all should be good. or have a blurred lens so the 'porno' isn't usable. :)
- brutalentropy, on 03/15/2008, -1/+41Remember, remember the times you came in her! The rhythm, the reason, the *****. I know of no reason the times I came in her should ever be forgot!
- Slick37c, on 03/15/2008, -2/+42They would have the option to be a prostitute you ***** dolt. Not to mention regulating it would be a lot safer than what goes on now.
- WNW3, on 03/15/2008, -4/+42Have the johns wear a Guy Fawkes mask
- dselliott, on 03/15/2008, -4/+39Sexually, the US is among the most backwards nations on earth... and leadership obviously feels no compunctions about exporting ignorance and religious zealotry. Sad.
- HenvY, on 03/15/2008, -9/+41I'd be willing to go into business with you. You could finance, organise and run the business, and i'd supervise the filming for a small fee. I warn you though, i've been known to turn up to work without any pants. Don't worry about it, it's just a quirk.
- MadHarvey, on 03/15/2008, -0/+31Thats the beauty of it. Its a catch 22. The incriminating evidence itself makes the act legal.
- Player1, on 03/15/2008, -0/+31Looks like somebody learned a new word today.
- Zarokima, on 03/15/2008, -3/+33Just keep his face off camera. Also, at that point they're not "prostitutes" they're "actresses."
- inactive, on 03/15/2008, -0/+29For making the whole thing even more convenient you could just ***** her brains out as a practice session and decide the scene was no good so you don't shoot it.
- smarty927, on 03/15/2008, -0/+28I've been saying this for ages, and I think it goes further than just the tax issue mentioned above. I think it's a shame for this girl too. Sure, she did something terrible in the eyes of society, but what about a sorority girl who screws once a week with different men? The sorority girl gets labeled as someone enjoying her twenties while the girl in this story gets labeled as one of the worst people on Earth. ::shugs shoulders::
- reubencm, on 03/15/2008, -0/+27its legal here in New Zealand and there wasnt an increase at all, just an increase in safety for the working girls. and it has also made it easier to ensure that underage girls arnt working the streets.
- inactive, on 03/15/2008, -4/+31If that were the real issue, they would just legalize it and tax it
- thrallie, on 03/15/2008, -0/+23Its protected under speech codes. Do I have to sell my school essays for them to be free speech?
- TheDarkstarter, on 03/15/2008, -3/+26Watch the credits of a porno...?!? Oh, uh yeah, errr emmm of course yeah I do that, I knew that!
- LordVance, on 03/15/2008, -1/+22It's the NAPLA keeping prostitution from being legal (North American Pimps Lobbyist Association)
- enclaved, on 03/15/2008, -2/+23What are you talking about, Jesus loved prostitutes. It's in the bible.
- stanti, on 03/15/2008, -0/+20You don't pay a hooker for sex, you pay her to leave.
- dinostabOMG, on 03/15/2008, -1/+20He's getting dugg down, but there is some insight to this - taxation was one of the main issues in the rise and fall of prohibition, as well as the whiskey rebellion.
- TheDarkstarter, on 03/15/2008, -1/+20Pretending? If there is really a penis going in a vagina (or other orifice) that's not pretending, that's sex.
- inactive, on 03/15/2008, -5/+24Legally, they have to.
- aserer511, on 03/15/2008, -3/+21in light of recent physical changes, sex on camera should get Jenna Jameson shot
- inactive, on 03/15/2008, -10/+28Only the puritan U.S, remains with such puritan ideas. Them and the Iranians.
No wonder they fight for who is the most puritan. - Herostratos, on 03/15/2008, -0/+17What's wrong with Amsterdam?
- SLockhart, on 03/15/2008, -6/+23You really believe the government is out to get you?
- iFrikkenR, on 03/15/2008, -0/+17Thats why they legalised it over here in NZ - it's a fully legal, TAXABLE profession. as is running a brothel. and with some hookers/brothels are making thousands per night so thats a good tax taking.
The other thing about legalisation is that when it's illegal there are no rules at all. When you make it legal, you can then place restrictions on it. For example, no hookers nears schools, or on certain streets at certain times. No brothels within 100metres of a church or playground for example. Thats what they did here. It's perfectly logical and works for everyone.
It's also safer for both the client and the worker. The worker can now go to the police about any abuse from clients and as it's legal, the police then have to act and can't give the hooker ***** because she's (or he's) a hooker. Certain rules must be followed to ensure a safe work environment for both the workers and the clients.
It all makes so much sense. and the taxes, think about the taxes. a girl makes $1000 a night? less 19.5% PAYE... thats $975 tax per week! or $50,700 tax per year (assuming the work is constant) - however you look at it, even a hooker making a mere $200 a night is going to be an excellent source of tax revenue. bette rthan them being either a: unemployed and collecting the unemployment benefit at taxpayers expense, or b: being unemployed and receving the benefit AND selling sex illegally and make big dollars - MrPhelps, on 03/15/2008, -0/+16In European countries where they are legal, hookers pay taxes like any other worker ...
- webefools, on 03/15/2008, -2/+18need to protect the pron... if it wasnt for pron, we's would not have interwebs and internets today... no pron, no internets, no digg... need to protect pron.
- Ibox, on 03/15/2008, -0/+16not the cops... you'll have to deal with the judge... If you would tell the judge you were making a porn flick... and had a really good lawyer... you should be able to get off, or get a really reduced sentence not to push the issue, cause I'm sure the judge wouldn't touch that one with a 10 foot pole.
- dannyboy3020, on 03/15/2008, -2/+17I don't think the government is on some sinister mission to keep us unhappy.
- FeargusMcDuff, on 03/15/2008, -3/+18Its different because both parties get paid (or at least don't have to pay) for the sex, so neither is hiring the other for sex; its not prostitution.
- reed311, on 03/15/2008, -0/+15I don't think it works that way. You can't get someone to consent to letting you murder them and then you get out of it because you filmed it and it's protected speech.
- SpikeZ, on 03/15/2008, -0/+14We are on digg, I don't' think you really need to even ask that question.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 365 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is