5 Comments
- tomboy501, on 11/12/2007, -0/+11Profilic shout-sharing your own story will replace quality content as the route to popularity if the trend continues. ...it's ultimately going to degrade the quality of the site. I can't believe digg staff didn't see this coming when they built the feature in with the changes...and still continue to leave it the way it is. Therefore, I assume it must be part of The Master Plan.
- atdigg, on 11/12/2007, -0/+9I completely disabled shouts, I got tired quickly of people who wanted to digg their story.
- inactive, on 11/12/2007, -0/+4maybe, I am missing something but trying to find a comment in an an old submission seems weird also; all I know is at some point when I see someone sending a mass shout on every lame thing they submit, I reluctantly click unfriend, I really don't won't to do it; overall I think you have to give the digg crew high marks for what they have done.
- inactive, on 11/12/2007, -0/+4Propeller has a good system that allows for shouts while still making it hard to constantly spam. You can "share" a story just like Digg, but you only get to send it to 5 people at a time. I've sent a few, but it's so time consuming when you have dozens or even hundreds of friends that it discourages it's use (at least for me) unless you have a really good story that you really, really want to share. If Digg did something like that, it would cut down on the spam, at least a bit.
- weiwuwei, on 11/11/2007, -0/+1Perhaps if more digg users would regularly check their friends' activity submissions, there would be less "spam" shouting going on.
What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved