What is Digg?354 Comments
- toconnor, on 10/10/2007, -3/+61So the Apollo landing was faked, but the Nazis had a moon base possibly as early as 1942?
- Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -8/+57That fact that you're being Dugg down into oblivion gives me hope for Digg as a community.
- apologeticus, on 10/10/2007, -16/+59I was really glad to see the 9/11 conspiracy listed here. I knew there would be lots of diggers getting all upset about it. Dugg for flustering the nutjobs.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1001-24.htm - dshPls, on 10/10/2007, -33/+71Conspiracy theories would be funny if they weren't sold as merchandise and tragedies weren't manipulated and skewed to favor unreal events. People like Alex Jones and that dumb ass John Conner (created the resistance manifesto) are selling products based on fear and paranoia. They scare their base into submission, it's a cruel game. No matter how many times they get proven wrong on the facts, they still trumpet the same BS.
- Mysticum, on 10/10/2007, -5/+37Wow, that's probably the messiest web site I've ever seen. Where does one entry end, and the following begin? Sucky, pointless, boring.
- CaptMonkey, on 10/10/2007, -1/+32Yeah, we couldn't go to the moon for obvious reasons... Space Nazis.
- evi1, on 10/10/2007, -5/+34KFC makes black men impotent? Who the hell thinks that?
- speedk0re, on 10/10/2007, -10/+38your mom is an inside job
- sancho320, on 10/10/2007, -0/+25Sorry to interrupt, but this is plagiarism.
View the original here: http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx - Wargalas, on 10/10/2007, -14/+37Same thing with Dylan Avery. I watched Loose Change with an open mind, but being a Science and Math geek, this guy's full of *****. His "documentary" is so filled with inaccuracies and wild speculation along with creepy music may fool idiots like Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen, but take a look at the report from Popular Mechanics. Hell, don't believe me, watch the Loose Change guys debate with the Popular Mechanics guys and tell me who's the bigger whackos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stVmEmJ666M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d0XEHahJ2Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_Fm3Zc7D8I - fuzzmeister, on 10/10/2007, -1/+24The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, not the one refuting it.
- Aldhelm, on 10/10/2007, -4/+26Calling the Royal Family reptilian is harsh. They're only German.
- Eljefedeath, on 10/10/2007, -2/+24Your inability to read the evidence does not mean it does not exist.
- aahpandasrun, on 10/10/2007, -8/+29I think most people already know about these conspiracy theories, so I wouldn't consiter them "wacky".
Check out the Hollow Earth Theory. Now that is wacky.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollow_earth_theory - georgetds, on 10/10/2007, -1/+20Well, yeah, obviously the Apollo landings and all missions were faked, because you know, the Nazis would have killed them if they really went to the moon and all.
- doctechnical, on 10/10/2007, -2/+21Do you realize that some of the first instruments the astronauts placed on the moon can still return information?
Yeah, back in the 60s we rode around on ***** dinosaurs and sent messages using smoke signals. Nothing in the world existed before the internets. - afruff23, on 10/10/2007, -7/+25What about Hillary thinking that there was a republican conspiracy to impeach her husband when it was rally just contempt of court (perjury)?
- Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -10/+28Get ready for a bunch of truthers to come in and claim that Popular Mechanics was 'in on it'...
- TheMidnight, on 10/10/2007, -3/+21I for one welcome our new Reptilian overlords...
- mpn401, on 10/10/2007, -2/+20Soylent Green is people!!!
- BuddingMonkey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+17Didn't you learn anything about "Space Hitler"?
- NeoCortex, on 10/10/2007, -4/+21John Conner was wrong? You mean we don't have to worry about cybernetic assassins from the future? I was getting all ready to take down SkyNet, too.
- bbjohnnyt, on 10/10/2007, -3/+20Oh sure, the Bush Administration can plan, coordinate and hide such an incredibly complex attack, but is too stupid to simply plant a couple of WMDs in Iraq to justify the war? You're deluded.
- N10E, on 10/10/2007, -1/+17Every time I'm drinking Mountain Dew I run into at least one person that says "You do know that Mountain Dew makes you infertile".
- bspender, on 10/10/2007, -5/+21Sure, you can argue that our government is incompetent, greedy, and bloated... but if you think there is some evil organization that is capable of controlling so much and pulling off (sorry for the obligatory South Park quote) "the world's most intricate and flawlessly executed plan ever, ever" - and more so, actually be able to keep it secret (ex: Pat Tillman's death happened in some of the most remote parts of the world and they couldn't even keep that secret)... then you live in a sad miserable existence.
LOOK OUT!!! Another black helicopter!! - Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -0/+16Blind patriotism of any kind is not good. It's not only an American problem.
- Mothrog, on 10/10/2007, -2/+18What section of academics and professionals think 9/11 was an inside job? The opinions of philosophers and theologists don't count.
- TyCage, on 10/10/2007, -3/+18That's just silly. Everyone knows that the royal family are werewolves. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tooth_and_Claw_%28Doctor_Who%29
- chaos36, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17But the reptiles live in the hollowness of the Earth. Didn't you know
- didiman, on 10/10/2007, -1/+16You obviously don't have an engineering background
- lucidapathy, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17*cough* plagiarism *cough*
http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx - Mothrog, on 10/10/2007, -11/+25No, *****, 9/11 was not an inside job. The only people that believe that horse ***** are the people that think a professor of theology can speak authoritatively about structural engineering.
- oldhick, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15You are wrong. http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
- fuzzmeister, on 10/10/2007, -3/+16Funny, I dugg it for dismissing 9/11 conspiracy theories.
- Mothrog, on 10/10/2007, -4/+17Go ahead an digg me down, troofers. You still can't cite a single scholarly paper.
- Haroshia, on 10/10/2007, -2/+15Funny, I dugg it for that reason
- noumuon, on 10/10/2007, -0/+13because there are no scholarly paper. a mechanical physics class is all one needs to begin to analyze what happened, yet i'll wager that not one 9/11 conspiracy theorist has ever taken a real physics class.
- robisfunky, on 10/10/2007, -2/+14Yes... Oblivion for you. Dugg down. At this rate you might hit China!
- reed311, on 10/10/2007, -5/+17They forgot the "liberal media".
- dshPls, on 10/10/2007, -0/+12I'm on there, because you know...anyone can register and they never check your ***** out.
- fuzzmeister, on 10/10/2007, -4/+16Looking at the physics, mathematics, and chemistry further refutes those conspiracy theories. Nice try, though.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+12There is no scientific evidence that backs the claims of the truthers. None at all. Every real, credible scientific investigation of the events of 9/11 have shown that the truthers have absolutely no clue what they're talking about.
- fuzzmeister, on 10/10/2007, -1/+13But your own patriotism is just fine and dandy?
- ki1022, on 10/10/2007, -1/+13There is nothing wrong with being patriotic and loving your country. Yes, blindly following leaders and letting your govt run wild is not good. Those are 2 different things. When there are no patriots left, there will be no one left to save our nation.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+13Yo momma is a potato chip.
Fri-to-Lay.
>_> - Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13You'd be surprised what people believe.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+12The truther theories about WTC7 are pretty wacky all on their own. In fact, they are simply ludicrous.
- Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -3/+14Yes, the conspiracy theories are wacky, especially after looking at the science.
- Mothrog, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11Did I ask for names of stupid engineers who believed this *****? Nope. I asked for scholarly papers. Just because someone got a paper doesn't mean they're a great engineer. I ask again, where are the peer reviewed scholarly papers?
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+12Out of curiousity, would you call Islamic extremists or radical Christians "wacky" ? Because that's just about the same "significant portion" of the academic community who actually buys into that inside job *****.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 347 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is