digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Picture: Stealing Wireless Internet Lately?

blizzmax.com — From the girls whose internet you've been jacking.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • WordsnCollision, on 11/14/2007, -4/+195Jacking indeed...
    • Dokument, on 11/12/2007, -11/+3the whole situation will be okay since you are already a master debator
    • goffy59, on 11/12/2007, -9/+1hah! lol
    • themastersb, on 11/13/2007, -3/+36They should just encrypt their wireless. It's their responsibility to do so.
      • K4P741NxKRUNCH, on 11/13/2007, -2/+13Hey, they didn't say they had a problem with him using their wireless, they just asked him to disallow filesharing, at least for the porn collection part anyways.
        Hmm, I don't get it though, even if he shared it, they'd have to go looking for it to find it..
      • SRSco, on 11/13/2007, -3/+15But they're girls.
    • exomni, on 11/12/2007, -12/+1I see what you did there.
      • humanerror, on 04/03/2008, -2/+5exomni: All your comments get dugg down. How about you take the hint and stop commenting?
    • jackal42, on 11/13/2007, -2/+3i cant see what you did there
    • mikesbaker, on 11/13/2007, -1/+3stealing someone else's content lately?
    • asdfuku, on 11/13/2007, -2/+6Boring... This is what they _should_ have done.
      http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pete/upside-down-ternet. ...
  • ephrils1, on 11/13/2007, -18/+6hahaha... Hmmm.... I wonder how this ended.
    • banmaster, on 11/12/2007, -7/+5Huh? There is no evidence that its even real!!
      Just coz you see it on the net doesn't mean its true!
      • psyjoniz, on 11/13/2007, -1/+1yeah huh!! how you think they got it there?? from their imagination?! sheesh, internet info is ALWAYS reliable, duhhhhhh!!!#$&*()@#
    • razrielle, on 11/12/2007, -1/+5Them putting a password for the wireless?
    • dpv1, on 11/13/2007, -4/+8Hot SEXXXXX.
    • Velnich, on 11/12/2007, -2/+6In at least a threesome?
  • SteveKubrick, on 02/11/2008, -6/+271Why is it attached to a mattress?
    • solo1181, on 11/13/2007, -2/+22That is where you hide anything that has the word porn on it.
    • gotcheaprice, on 11/14/2007, -2/+37It's probably the inside of an elevator. You know those pads they have so it doesn't get scratched when people move? Yeah, I helped my uncle move over 10 times -_-
      • Markpdotcom, on 11/12/2007, -4/+1Then how come the fingers seem to be holding both the sign and mattress up? The mystery deepens! :D
      • johnny222, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1Arthritis? :)
      • univerio, on 11/13/2007, -2/+2You helped your uncle Jack off a horse?
    • bjornski, on 11/13/2007, -1/+3It was stuck there.
  • jollyholly, on 11/13/2007, -8/+31I guess he was caught red handed..
    • thr33m, on 11/12/2007, -21/+1Literally...
      • mrASSMAN, on 11/12/2007, -2/+16how is it literal.. do your hands turn red when you jack off? Unless you use bleach as lubricant or something..
        • bonds, on 11/13/2007, -3/+8You mean you don't use ketchup? Try it, it's great.
        • sexybobo, on 11/12/2007, -1/+6Only Slap fighting Nancy boys use bleach as a lube us manly men use lye
    • Iamironman, on 11/13/2007, -0/+1OH ***** I've been discovered
  • dsully215, on 11/13/2007, -12/+100Amy Reid is hot
    • scallon, on 11/12/2007, -10/+22Amy Reid is dressed up white trash and needs to get back to her trailer park as quickly as humanly possible.
      • Pake, on 11/12/2007, -4/+17Don't lie. You'd still tap it.
        • Dokument, on 11/12/2007, -2/+4then run away. like that dude with the elephant seal
        • Detritus, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2Dude I just went to her site... she is friggen old. She should have quit smoking, she looks to be ~40. No way in hell would I tap that. I agree with scallon's assessment of her caste as well.
      • HerrEisenheim, on 11/12/2007, -6/+1Ugh. Agreed. I do NOT get her appeal.

        But hey, there's porn for everyone on the internets! Yaay porn!
        • Pake, on 11/12/2007, -6/+3/inserting obligatory "2 Girls 1 Cup" reference.
        • KanchoBukkakeku, on 11/12/2007, -2/+3she has big natural nicely shaped jugs, and a good body, her face isnt that bad either, although she has some weird turkey neck thing going on
        • Apoc, on 11/12/2007, -2/+1Rule 34.
      • clala1220, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2Agreed. If you take a monkey and gave him/her fake boobs you guys would love it. lol.

        btw, is it sad that I know who Amy Reid is? siiigh...
    • khockett, on 11/12/2007, -1/+10Gotta Agree. That girl is a nice body with a damn fugly face hidden under that makeup.
    • MrTea, on 11/12/2007, -0/+4Yes she is.
      By the way, she gets donkey punched in Penny Flame's Out of Control.
      • iguanapunk, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1Never understood why she's so big in the business but lately she is looking rather nice. Great mamary glands it has to be said.
    • SRSco, on 11/13/2007, -2/+5Hot? She's got all this loose flesh hanging under her chin. Usually only fat people have those.

      She's disgusting.
  • MikeonTV, on 11/13/2007, -9/+53he's got good taste in porn. Amy Reid is fine!
  • wisam, on 11/13/2007, -4/+196If you open your wireless connection then anybody using it is definitely not stealing. Secure your damn wireless if you don't want people to use it. I would understand your frustration if you intentionally left your wireless open to the public and someone abused it by using it to watch porn.
    • linuxlucas, on 11/13/2007, -4/+28I second this, it is completely legal to use an unsecured network.
      • RobotBuddha, on 11/13/2007, -4/+20Indeed. I leave mine open because that's the world I want to live in. I was lost, in the freezing cold, and found my way back thanks to someone's open connection that I got onto with my pda. Another time I got a job thanks to an open connection which let me use skype after our new phone connection failed. If someone's abusing it, sure I'll kick them. There might be a tiny danger of personal liability from leaving a connection open, but the possible good outweighs it. And the idea that something broadcast through someone's body is off limits by assumption is just asinine at best.
        • ajchavar, on 11/12/2007, -4/+17how severely lost were you if you could find wireless on your PDA? maybe i'm missing something about the situation, but if your predicament was that dire I'm sure that you could have probably seen the house/business/school that the signal was coming from and get directions. i hate to be a dick, and i support open networks as much as the next guy, i'm just confused as to how an open wireless network was your only salvation.
          • KennMac, on 11/12/2007, -0/+4Lost on the road perhaps, driving aimlessly? Pulled up Google Maps?
        • bonds, on 11/13/2007, -0/+12Severely lost inside a Starbucks. Literally yards away from civilization.
    • NeoSporin, on 11/12/2007, -2/+3I leave mine open, but I highly doubt the 70+ year olds will steal my connection to pirate the latest episodes of South Park
    • Viva43, on 11/13/2007, -14/+2No. Its not. Just like its not legal to rob a persons house if they leave the front door open.

      (Quote my I.T. teachers analogy.)
      • ElRayQuieres, on 11/13/2007, -1/+14The contents of their house dont radiate into your house though.
        • theholyraptor, on 04/07/2008, -3/+8or do they? Doesn't everyone keep a rod of uranium in their spare bedroom?
        • bingobongony, on 11/13/2007, -17/+2So? I don't care how much you want to pretend that your opinions are law, but taking something that yuo didn't pay for is stealing. They are paying for the full amount of download and upload. If you take it, they do not get what they paid for. Period. It is NOT up to the owner to secure it. Sure, they shuold, but that does not make the act of taking it any less stealing.
          • Twelve-60, on 11/13/2007, -0/+5God damnit I accidentally hit digg up
        • Sixcolors, on 11/12/2007, -1/+6@bingo A wireless signal radiates outward, possibly into other's homes and apartments (there's at least 30 different wi-fi networks in my vicinity alone). How is one supposed to determine which networks are being willingly given away and which ones are just unsecured? My personal favorite providers are "linksys" and "netgear". The point being, if you don't want people using your wi-fi, take time to learn how to secure it.
      • mithrasinvictus, on 11/12/2007, -0/+5Will you be covered by insurance if you left the door wide open?
        A better analogy would be making your house look like a cafe (and even advertising for it) and then suing people for actually walking in.
        • alecks, on 11/13/2007, -2/+1Actually, it'd be more like making coffee for yourself, the smell seeping outside, and people coming in cause they smell coffee and want one.
      • brufleth, on 11/12/2007, -0/+3Well your IT teacher is wrong. Nobody is forcing them to use a wireless network. They can run CAT5 if they wanted. Instead they open up their network to anyone in range.
    • pradador, on 11/12/2007, -9/+0Leaving your car open and having it taken is still stolen. However, you are a sort of accomplice to the crime. I wouldn't go as far as saying that leeching off wireless isn't stealing.
    • Dawnrazor, on 11/13/2007, -3/+6Legal? tell it to this guy

      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/07/tech/mai ...

      Or this one

      http://www.woodtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6546307
    • manstein01, on 11/12/2007, -0/+4Completely agree. Pay the neighborhood geek $50, and he'll do it for you. I have zero sympathy for people who bitch about this.
      • ronaldinho, on 11/12/2007, -1/+4Pay a geek $50? The routers actually already offer instructions on how to make your network secure. Other than that, someone said it before, but that's like leaving your house's front door open. Don't give people a chance to steal anything if you don't want them to. Case closed
    • orlyfactor, on 11/12/2007, -4/+2The law disagrees with your statement, though.
    • cloudyprison, on 11/12/2007, -3/+3If you open your home then anybody using it is definitely not stealing. Secure your damn home if you don't want people to use it. I would understand your frustration if you intentionally left your home open to the public and someone abused it by using it to watch porn.

      Fixed that for you, oh wait.
      • page2, on 01/17/2008, -0/+1Yeah, while I do think there is a difference, the home analogy does come to mind. I think it's crappy of people to prosecute for use of their open wireless networks, but at the same time it's hard for me to say that they have no cause for complaint.
      • roystgnr, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2Does your home have a sign on it that says "Come on in"? Or, to make the comparison to public router settings more accurate, does your home broadcast that welcome message to anyone and everyone close enough to hear it? If so, I think you're going to have a tough time prosecuting a trespassing charge.

        As Dawnrazor pointed out, you can successfully prosecute someone for using your public wireless router today, but I think that will change as technology-ignorant judges get old and get replaced. There is no significant moral difference between a public router and a public webserver - don't use either one so much that you qualify as a denial-of-service attack, but to think you have to manually get someone's permission before making a WiFi connection is as ludicrous as getting permission before making an HTTP connection. Being able to automatically allow or deny people access is one of the things we design computer systems to do! We're not talking about buffer overflows and exploited bugs here - if you're using a computer that is configured to authorize anyone else to access it, you haven't been "hacked" when someone else decides to.
    • Zyphon, on 11/12/2007, -0/+0I would agree with you, but there are so many people who want to allow access to their internet connection to computers around the house, but lack the expertise (however simple the setup actually is) to know how to, or that they even need to, secure their connection. If you don't know whether someone has their connection opened up for free use, ask them first. It's common courtesy. Otherwise, you're taking advantage of their forgetfulness, or more commonly, their lack of knowledge.
    • MuffinPatrol, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1This has been a problem for me, can someone let me know how to do this please. (prepares to get flamed)
  • Hawk117, on 11/13/2007, -2/+71They told me they weren't going to post this!
  • dagetti, on 11/13/2007, -19/+45The girls are retarded, it's called a WEP code, learn to apply..

    ps - amy reid is bangin.
    • iceman0113, on 11/13/2007, -11/+8better to secure it using MAC addresses, easier too
      • schroeder, on 11/12/2007, -1/+14MAC address spoofing is pretty simple.
        • Dokument, on 11/13/2007, -12/+5yeah havent you seen those fake macs coming out of china?
      • krusader3z, on 11/12/2007, -5/+1Wouldn't you need to know the specific MAC address you intended to spoof?

        Wouldn't you need access to the house/computer you were stealing the internet from in order to get that MAC address?

        • xlent, on 11/12/2007, -5/+2no

          i remember learning something about some sniffing program that can find the mac addresses
          • Audacitor, on 11/12/2007, -1/+1There is a script kiddie in our midst!
          • abandonedhero, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1It's called KisMAC, which also allows you to crack WEP, assuming you have the right hardware. The Linux version on which KisMAC is based is called Kismet.
        • dickbain, on 11/13/2007, -0/+1You setup a honeypot access point with the same SSID as the AP you're trying to "hack". A node will connect to your AP and you'll have a good mac address. Spoof it and you're in. I know this works, I've 'tested' it a few times...
      • legendxx, on 11/13/2007, -1/+8amateur networking wannabe trying to give security advice.. lol
        give someone a linksys router and setup wizard and they think they're data-center admins
    • Audacitor, on 11/13/2007, -2/+41WEP? No good, anyone can crack it in about ten minutes. WPA FTW.
      • EllimistX, on 11/13/2007, -1/+15Why stop there? WPA2 FTW!
        • antdude, on 11/13/2007, -3/+1Even better, don't use wireless! Turn it off.
      • Sixcolors, on 11/13/2007, -7/+2... (baleted)
      • deadmann, on 11/12/2007, -0/+5But WEP is still not 'open' and you'd have a case. Since not all devices support WPA.
      • dagooh, on 11/13/2007, -0/+1But but... I have a Nintendo DS and I need my WEP!
    • HerrEisenheim, on 11/13/2007, -2/+4WEP? MAC address filtering? You can bust down both of those in no time at all with KisMAC. WPA/WPA2 or epic failure.
    • TechCF, on 11/13/2007, -1/+5Maybe he was smart enough to crack/guess the WEP, but not to turn off his porn shares
    • DiggzDE, on 11/12/2007, -1/+7Mac address specific, non-broadcast ssid, and WPA?
    • buckrogers1965, on 11/13/2007, -0/+5Exactly. WEP and mac address blocking is like why screen doors have those tiny little locks. The lock is big enough to signify do not enter but not enough to really stop someone from coming in if they want to.
    • Amazetbm, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1She would probably do better just going wired and running the cables under the carpet.
    • darkamster07, on 11/13/2007, -1/+9***** it, 99% of people don't wanna put in the effort to crack a WEP, just leave your wireless open, and name your network something like "$2.99 per minute", it will scare off your avarage wireless thief, and you can use your open connection status to get out of filesharing lawsuits should they arise
      • mGARANDEUR1, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1Interesting idea
      • TennisElbow, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1Yeah but consider the time, stress, and legal fees that you would have to deal with if you got hit with a file sharing lawsuit. It's not like you could just tell the RIAA, "my wireless network was open, it could have been one of my neighbors sharing files." They'd still sue you regardless, and you might win, but at a significant out of pocket cost and a major interruption in your life.
    • Heiliger, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1The girls are resmarted.
    • sinrtb, on 11/13/2007, -0/+3actually i think that he had marked his pr0n folder to share with all on the network. and they didn't mind him using their net only that he wasnt at all hiding what he was doing on their net. I leave my network unlocked too just so my neighbors have net access should they care to use it.
    • woohhaa, on 11/13/2007, -0/+6WEP is like locking your car doors with the windows down.
    • soehner, on 11/13/2007, -1/+1WEP is way broken, you might as well leave your wireless open if that is what you are using.
    • JeffD, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2Maybe they don't actually mind that hes mooching WiFI? They just saw his massive porn collection shared and wanted to embarrass him for leaving it open.
  • schuchwun, on 11/12/2007, -11/+5lame really old...
  • quaxon, on 11/13/2007, -10/+8So if someone is mooching off your wireless you can see the websites they go to? how hard is it to do that? do you have to be some kind of agg hacker or is it pretty simple?
    • sonic11, on 11/12/2007, -1/+2they're going through your router and you can monitor its traffic. this can be done with a number of http sniffing utilities. this works for non encrypted websites only.... such as 100% of porn sites... ... from what i've heard :)
    • bluemist, on 11/12/2007, -1/+9Ooh girl techies using http sniffers eh?
    • HerrEisenheim, on 11/12/2007, -1/+3You don't even have to use a sniffer. Many routers can dump a log file. If you are using something like OpenDNS as your DNS servers, there's even a web-based interface you can use to see domain name queries.

      Even cheapy Netgear routers can usually log HTTP requests for you and dump them to a text file.
    • hollyminkowski, on 11/13/2007, -6/+1If they used TOR then you could not see what they were doing.
    • tgoose, on 11/12/2007, -2/+3Where does it say they have monitored the websites he has looked at?
    • redavni, on 11/12/2007, -1/+18Read the sign again...it implies he had an open share with his porn collection on it.
      • mcduckov, on 11/12/2007, -1/+2Ya know I'm not sure how that would work. If you set up workgroups then someone on the router would need to know the workgroup name in order to browse shared folders. I think. I know on my router i can't just plug in a computer and start browsing the shares on the other computers unless I know the workgroup name.

        Then again maybe they were all just using the default workgroup name.
        • radiometric, on 11/12/2007, -0/+3Or you just go up/out to the 'whole network' and then drill down to the different workgroups...
        • mcduckov, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2I'm no networking expert but when I try to do that on a home network it never works unless the computers are members of the same workgroup already.
    • sinrtb, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2actually i think that he had marked his pr0n folder to share with all on the network.
    • queenstarsha, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2it's easy. i'm not your teacher, but google your router's make and model and read the manual.
    • bovox, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2If these girls are too stupid to secure their wireless connection, what makes you think they're smart enough to use a sniffer or examine router logs? Geez. This guy made his porn collection an open share that any n00b on the network can discover.
  • sonic11, on 11/13/2007, -9/+0LOLZ!!!!!!!
  • samurimaster, on 11/13/2007, -4/+20Its called a password learn to use one or get a long eithernet cord and why the hell is it on a mattress
    • sctechguy, on 11/12/2007, -2/+1It's called ethernet, learn how to spell it. Also, the things above and below are called comments, learn how to read them before asking the same question that others have already asked....questions you ask that were already answered.

      Also, what does a long ethernet cord have to do with anything?
    • bingobongony, on 11/12/2007, -4/+1The answer to yuor last question is because it is fake, and the morons who faked it neve thought about how obviously having it on a mattress would make it. (I mean for everyone except the gullbile morons on digg.)
    • sinrtb, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1actually i think that he had marked his pr0n folder to share with all on the network. and they didn't mind him using their net only that he wasnt at all hiding what he was doing on their net. I leave my network unlocked too just so my neighbors have net access should they care to use it.
  • dweeb79, on 11/13/2007, -4/+18Is this SFW?
    • tnoy, on 11/13/2007, -1/+15The most skin shown is about 1/2 of three fingers.
      • ajchavar, on 11/13/2007, -2/+24because the rest of those fingers is in A NAKED VAGINA
        just kidding its SFW
    • dmightx, on 09/21/2008, -1/+5Its SFW.
    • dweeb79, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1Thanks. It was worth the wait.
    • heypetray, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1yes
    • Mullinsmcd, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1yes, its a note and a mattress, nothing more
  • goonbaggins, on 11/13/2007, -6/+140Oh, today's xkcd is perfect for this

    http://xkcd.com/341/
    • thewindfish, on 11/12/2007, -12/+1*****
    • mrASSMAN, on 11/13/2007, -3/+6wow, that really was perfect..
    • Murdats, on 11/13/2007, -2/+16xkcd is perfect for anything, anytime.
    • WhiteHamster, on 11/13/2007, -2/+6you know, thats the sole reason i came to post a comment . . . you bastard beat me to it
    • HisTumness, on 11/13/2007, -0/+6I was so happy that this article *wasn't* just today's xkcd that I dugg it.
  • manmademark, on 11/12/2007, -20/+2http://www.xkcd.com/341/
    • hackerssidekick, on 11/12/2007, -3/+6wtf ... the guy above you posted the same exact thing ... AN HOUR BEFORE YOU

      moron
      • goonbaggins, on 11/12/2007, -1/+6actually it was one minute after me. You must have caught it right as digg rounded mine up an hour
  • ledguitar, on 11/13/2007, -6/+124So the girls are smart enough to monitor the websites he looks at, but not smart enough to encrypt their wireless connection
    • tgoose, on 11/12/2007, -8/+1Where does it say they have monitored the websites he has looked at?
      • dmightx, on 09/21/2008, -3/+3The fact that they know what sites he has been using proves that there is someone smart enough to monitor his browsing history.
        • tgoose, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2Where does it say they know what sites he has been using?
    • Juntistik, on 11/13/2007, -1/+13he left his network share open.
    • legendxx, on 11/13/2007, -2/+13so you're smart enough to leave a comment, but not smart enough to figure out that they looked at his shares
    • sinrtb, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1why does everyone assume they are looking at what sites the guy was looking at? Also some people choose not to encrypt their connection just so people have access to the net around them
      • saltinekracka20, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1"some people choose not to encrypt their connection just so people have access to the net around them"
        I can has names?
        • BigBrother87, on 11/12/2007, -1/+1I can has grammar police that is wrong?
    • queenstarsha, on 11/13/2007, -0/+3there are lots of legitimate reasons to leave your network open. really, people who abuse it are stupid. they're just begging to have their access completely shut off.
  • thelatermonths, on 11/13/2007, -18/+3"If you open your wireless connection then anybody using it is definitely not stealing. Secure your damn wireless if you don't want people to use it. I would understand your frustration if you intentionally left your wireless open to the public and someone abused it by using it to watch porn."

    Then if you don't leave your door locked and someone came in and takes your stuff, it's not stealing? A bit exaggerated, yes, but that's pretty much the argument you're making...
    • spyd3rweb, on 11/12/2007, -2/+13You don't own the radio waves, and they are located on his property.
    • SeekerDarksteel, on 11/12/2007, -2/+10Default allow.

      If you don't know the meaning of those two words, go figure it out. THEN come back and make that stupid ass door analogy me and every other person with half a bit of knowledge of the subject are sick and tired of hearing.
      • bingobongony, on 11/12/2007, -6/+1I LOVE how you think you are the correct one in calling it not stealing. Make yourself look stupid.
    • RobotBuddha, on 11/12/2007, -2/+4More like asking if someone's stealing something if a stranger walks up to his door, opens it, and then places the item in question on his coffee table.
      • bingobongony, on 11/12/2007, -5/+2Not at all. Because the person stealing the signal has to purposely take it. They are not just innocently workig on their computer and POOF, they have internet.
    • Dhalgren, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2He's not stealing anything. This is more like leaving your door unlocked and finding someone sleeping on your couch...
      • johnny222, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1More like lying on the couch reading Maxim.
    • queenstarsha, on 11/13/2007, -1/+1the actual analogy is that if you store an unlocked car in your neighbor's garage, he gets to drive it.
  • f4nt0m4s, on 11/13/2007, -20/+236Buried as being fake. Girls don't know how to operate routers.
    • MalDON, on 11/13/2007, -5/+23exactly why it was not secure.
    • Dhalgren, on 11/12/2007, -2/+6Her boyfriend set it up...
    • gyrfalcon, on 11/12/2007, -1/+1No kidding... look through the list of CCIEs in the world, and there will probably be less women than the largest piece of change in your pocket.
    • saltinekracka20, on 11/12/2007, -2/+2You dont have to know anything about routers if someone is mooching your wireless. You just go to "view workgroup computers" and bam. The guy didn't have a password on his shared files. Easy as that. We used to do this stuff all the time in the dorms in college.
      • alperea, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1not really because you still have to setup a home network, ie the setup wizard in XP. It's not just "on" by default.
    • BigBrother87, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2I'm looking for the one that does.
    • TennisElbow, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2Obviously they don't know how to operate routers, that's why they decided to leave a hand-written sign in an elevator instead of going into the router's properties, turning on WPA, and setting a password.
  • theabbaguy, on 11/12/2007, -12/+2There should be a proper name for wireless theft. How about "weft" or "wealing". Or the not so severe "worrowing"! Would wireless porn be "worn"?
  • williamw, on 11/12/2007, -25/+24http://duggmirror.com
  • Grumps, on 11/12/2007, -7/+7Lol he steals wireless and pay with porn.
  • ianweir, on 11/13/2007, -0/+33I took it from the 'hide your porn' part that they weren't logging his internet usage so much as accessing a shared folder on his computer that didn't require a password via their network. Thus they knew he had porn, knew it wasn't hidden, and knew he was on their network.
    • Wartz, on 11/12/2007, -1/+4maybe he was hinting to the girls what he wanted them to do for him.
    • Dhalgren, on 11/12/2007, -0/+3Windows will "discover" shared folders on a network. Especially if they both were using the default workgroup name of "workgroup" in Windows.
  • rideroyals, on 11/12/2007, -2/+6amy reid is hot
  • solo1181, on 11/13/2007, -6/+87Reply
    Dear Lady, the only thing I have been jacking is myself. If you want that to stop you can come over and assist.
    Your truly,
    The guy stealing your wireless
  • PhrosTT, on 11/13/2007, -12/+20to anybody calling the girls dumb for their open wifi, please stfu....

    they clearly know it's unlocked and don't care

    and no they aren't hacking him he just has a shared pr0n folder.
    • Velnich, on 11/12/2007, -2/+5They cared enough to rant via mattress.
    • cnot3, on 11/13/2007, -2/+12It would take less time to put a password on that ***** than to write that note.
    • Pureeviljester, on 11/13/2007, -0/+4i leave mine open.. planning to use the open wifi defense in case im charged with "illegal downloading"
      • DreKor, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1yeah, because that hasn't been struck down a few times already...
        • BigBrother87, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1As soon as those asshats stop suing, we're going to rule the world.
    • Maynza, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2Maybe not everyone feels they need to bogart their internet? :/ I leave mine open, if I can apply a password while I need it but most of the time it doesn't matter.
  • crazybugger, on 11/12/2007, -1/+3“Desperation is like stealing from the Mafia: you stand a good chance of attracting the wrong attention.”
  • Velnich, on 11/12/2007, -4/+2Aside from NOT sharing folders over the stolen network, what else could he have done to hide what his usage was? Anything?
    • cnot3, on 11/12/2007, -2/+3lots of things...
    • dcn00, on 11/12/2007, -1/+5And you need to ask this why? :P
    • mcduckov, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2If you're going to use someone else's connection you're going to have to go through a lot of hoops to be sure they can't "see" what you're doing. You'll probably need some kind of tunneling encryption.
    • queenstarsha, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2i bet he could hack their router to turn off the logs, actually. most routers are not very well-protected, with default names and passwords. actually, he could just take the connection all for himself, until they hit the router reset button.
  • RNEMESiS42, on 11/12/2007, -4/+5So...why didn't they just secure their damn network? I live in a college town, and my wireless adapter picks up up six different unsecured networks. It's not that hard to protect it!
    • bingobongony, on 11/12/2007, -8/+3Gee, your honor...she WANTEd me to rape her. Look at how she was dressed!
      • TennisElbow, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2Broadcasting her free, unsecured wireless network into this guy's apartment would be more like her taking off her clothes, sneaking into his house and laying spread-eagled on his bed...then complaining to the judge that he raped her.
    • queenstarsha, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2they should, since they don't seem like the generous type. but i wouldn't complain about all those open networks! some people do that on purpose.
  • bingobongony, on 11/12/2007, -4/+10Gee...there is NO WAY this message could have been written purely as a joke. It MUST have really been some girls in a nearby apartment who left this note! CAN'T be fake!
    • johnny222, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1If it's fake, how does that change anything?
      • bingobongony, on 11/13/2007, -1/+1Yuo are kidding right? This falls under the cateogry of things that would only be funny if it were true. (And even then it is barely funny.) It takes away 100% of its humor if it is just some guys who sat around and said "you know what would be funny? If somenoe got caught with porn while stealing someone's WiFi...let's pretend it happened."
        • johnny222, on 11/13/2007, -0/+1Well of course it isn't as funny if we know it's fake. However, since we can't know whether it is or isn't real, there's no point in arguing if it's real or not. By assuming it IS real, we make it a lot easier for ourselves.
    • elhaf, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1It can't be fake, you can see the fingernails!11!
  • bingobongony, on 11/12/2007, -10/+1By the way...that is CLEARLY a man's handwriting.
  • IIIKrazyKiDDIII, on 11/13/2007, -2/+16Any network open to the public should be used by the public. Encrypt your network if you don't want anybody to use it.
    • edwartica, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2So, a cafe I go to has an open node. They have signs posted all over saying "Don't look at porn here." Does this mean they don't have the right to tell you not to look at porn using their connection?
      Its a matter of privileges. These girls don't care if this guy uses their wifi, but they DO care if he uses their wifi to share porn. I think that is a perfectly reasonable request.
    • queenstarsha, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2yep. i don't think anyone doubts this guy's claim on their open connection. what's at issue is whether the chicks are ***** nosey gossip bitches or not.
  • lcmatt, on 11/12/2007, -2/+12Open network - free for anyone to use
    Closed network - Private network
    If you don't want others using your connection password the thing, or leave it open and re-direct all traffic to Meatspin like I do.
    • woohhaa, on 11/12/2007, -1/+2WTF is meatspin? I tried to Google it but the Gestapo in my dept have it blocked.
      • abandonedhero, on 11/12/2007, -0/+3Consider yourself lucky.
      • BigBrother87, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2It's blocked for a reason. Think about the word for a second and you'll dig your eyes out with a spoon.
    • queenstarsha, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1what's meatspin? i'm afraid to look.
      • BigBrother87, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1Don't be scared. It's a music video. Yeah, that's it.
  • bbeep, on 11/13/2007, -5/+46How typical, the girl would rather bitch than address the problem :/
    • Dochtuir, on 11/12/2007, -1/+5Yes! 100% Winner
    • sinrtb, on 11/12/2007, -1/+1how is she not addressing the problem?
      • TennisElbow, on 11/13/2007, -0/+3By not turning on her wireless router's WPA encryption. If you're going to push your wireless network into my house, don't bitch at me when I use it.
        • sinrtb, on 11/21/2007, -0/+1seems to me that is a very passive aggressive way to deal with the problem.She does not have a problem with him using her net connection only the fact that he is broadcasting his pr0n folder to everyone else on the network. I would feel the same way if i was sharing my net with everyone in my building and they couldn't respect that one wish.
  • bean48009, on 11/12/2007, -3/+1I bet its more than just wireless that hes jacking!
  • unitedstatians, on 11/12/2007, -1/+5I leave my wifi open most of the time, so my neighbors may be able to use it for legitimate purposes only. I mac block moon vampires on school days and leave wifi access totally unrestricted on sundays. so that in the future if i need to use the publicly available wireless internet connection, they can return the favor.
    • radiometric, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2moon vampires?
      I googled it and found mostly anime references. Uncyclopedia had an interesting take on it, however.
      • BigBrother87, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2Yeah, I just checked. Nothing is quite interesting, isn't it? C'mon, that's a simple one. Moon = late night, vampire = blood sucker = leecher.
  • passedoutghost, on 11/12/2007, -0/+7You know you've been looking at a lot of pr0n when you know who Amy Reid is, what nationality she is and can fill in the gaps to 'Mr. Big _ Hot Chicks' and 'Share my_'
  • DarkSalvation, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2Wow, that guy really doesn't know where to store his porn collection. Now personally I... I've said too much.

  • exomni, on 11/12/2007, -3/+1"Ha sucker"? The only suckers here are the girls who wrote that note, who are still having their internet jacked and probably don't even know what to do about it, and the girls in the porn the guy is enjoying thanks to their open unprotected WiFi network (but at least they're getting paid for it).
  • MateyO, on 11/12/2007, -0/+25Anybody notice this was in 'offbeat news'?
    • codehkr77, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1yeah, he was off beating to ... nevermind..
  • databoy, on 11/12/2007, -4/+2Some people are just too stupid to own a computer. Get expert advice.
    • badenglishihave, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1A wise man once asked: who's more stupid, the one who leaves his wireless network open or the one who shares porn on it?
  • nofactor, on 11/13/2007, -4/+3Some incongruence here. So the girls were able to have a look at their APs log and even browse the network and access the guy's drive, but at the same time, unable to setup WEP encryption.

    PS - We all love Amy.
    • TennisElbow, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1WEP is an old form of encryption can be hacked in under a minute using a variety of freeware utilities available all over the internet. If you want security, you need to use WPA not WEP. Another advantage is that with WPA, your wireless password can be something like "tastes great, less filling" or anything easy for you to remember and type correctly...not some long random hex string like E04FF9ADE375FFF5F6A1 that you get with WEP.
  • slapded, on 11/12/2007, -9/+3so they know how to look at router logs but cant add WEP? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHA stupid women
  • blackmage439, on 11/13/2007, -5/+8So, they're smart enough to know exactly who is stealing their WiFi, but not smart enough to enable encryption or MAC filtering...?
    • radiometric, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1MAC filtering your wifi is like filtering the air with a tshirt - no, that's more effective than MAC filtering.
  • 5xSTUN, on 11/12/2007, -5/+6I am in love with these girls because they used the word "whose" instead of "who's" or "hoos" or "whos." Maybe one person in twelve actually knows the difference in this country anymore. If they'd correctly used "you're" I don't know what I'd do, probably try to send them flowers. But, seriously, why don't they just secure their connection, or block the guy's MAC address?
  • Me1000, on 11/12/2007, -8/+1http://www.duggmirror.com/
  • friesco, on 11/13/2007, -9/+6Its called a password learn to use one or get a long eithernet cord and why the hell is it on a mattress
  • infiniphunk, on 11/13/2007, -9/+6*IF* this is real then it's entrapment; offering someone free WIFI and then "busting" them for its use/abuse. Not to say that college girls are incapable of this sort of thing, but you could almost suspect this to be the work of a semi-tech savvy boyfriend.
    I've been saying for years that it should be manadatory for wireless routers to ship with some kind of encryption turned on by default.
    • localzuk, on 11/12/2007, -1/+3Entrapment is only applicable if it is done by law enforcement...
    • redrum781, on 11/12/2007, -0/+2lol you think you know things
    • wearenotsickmen, on 11/13/2007, -0/+2I don't think that would work either. They would either have to have unique passwords on each router, which would be impractical for the company, or they would have a default password and people would still be too stupid to change it. How many people still have admin as their router password?
  • Sidzilla, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1On a bright note these girls can download all the mp3s and movies they want, and then just blame their autoerotic parasite for it.
  • Pelapp, on 11/13/2007, -1/+14Give me a freaking mirror!
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 81 of 81 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.