What is Digg?205 Comments
- inactive, on 11/20/2007, -8/+127Your mom needs a lot of photoshop.
- Squigy, on 11/20/2007, -11/+122WALLPAPER!!!
- Dustmuffins, on 11/20/2007, -2/+89You should see my house! The interior is COVERED in the stuff!
- inactive, on 11/20/2007, -18/+85It doesnt look like a pigeon.
- RoadTipper, on 11/20/2007, -5/+54Looks like it also needs the coincidence of good fog. Great shot!
- kevyn, on 11/20/2007, -3/+43guys.... i think she likes me...
- GemStar38, on 11/20/2007, -3/+43Spectacular! And not everything on here is photoshopped.
- Hayaemsay, on 11/20/2007, -9/+47Yeah, the shadows are all wrong.
- linzichan, on 11/20/2007, -0/+37Oops, you forgot all the punctuation.
- owlfeathers, on 11/20/2007, -3/+40You're a cop. I can feel it in my child-hungering, 40 year old boner.
- Jwoey, on 11/20/2007, -0/+36FTA
"Highly unique and one-of-a-kind"
Also, its the only one and there's none like it. - kevyn, on 11/20/2007, -2/+36some people get far to excited when they see a good wallpaper...
- suppazone, on 11/20/2007, -0/+30did you read the description at all?
"Then I started this shot which was about 2 minutes long, followed by 2 minutes of noise reduction again. So by the time I had my shot it was too late for a do-over. So this is it, I only got to take one photo and this is what I got, so I hope it worked out." - Tarantulus, on 11/20/2007, -4/+31why is it when people on digg see something beautiful, it must be "photoshopped" and couldn't possibly actually be real?
- cowboy86, on 11/20/2007, -7/+32you're gay.
- mlostracco, on 11/20/2007, -6/+28And for some unknown reason, everyone feels the need to comment that they've "found my new wallpaper," as if that's useful information.
- hybridcreation, on 11/20/2007, -2/+23According to you idiots the entire world is Photoshopped.
- cowboy86, on 11/20/2007, -4/+25It's called the moon...
- EvaMonkey01, on 11/20/2007, -3/+23Beautiful.
And as for everyone screaming "PHOTOSHOP", just know that I will find you... and when I do, you are going to get such a pinch. - counciltax, on 11/20/2007, -1/+20Wow. This lighthouse and more incredible examples...
http://deputy-dog.com/2007/11/15/12-stunning-light ... - theOster, on 11/20/2007, -1/+19or roughly 114 seconds of exposure at a 200 iso. prob the temp slider in photoshop to get rid of and sodium light noise (thats bound to be there) and maybe a little contrast
- kkitsune, on 11/20/2007, -0/+17How much bigger than 3008x2000 do you need it?
- beargrylls, on 11/20/2007, -2/+19They keep it like that for five minutes so all the hundreds of spectators can get the same shot...
But it's one of a kind! - JordanTW90, on 11/20/2007, -2/+19That has to be real.
- tk0680, on 11/20/2007, -1/+17.. Wow.
- JDoorjam, on 11/20/2007, -0/+16You have a point.
- Nougat, on 11/20/2007, -1/+17I can tell by the pixels.
- PaperMonkey, on 11/20/2007, -1/+16Not much of a reader...? It's a 2 minute long exposure try actually reading the description with a picture before you shoot your mouth off. intoflatlines was asking a question and theOster was kind enough to help him out with an answer. You are just being a dick..
"Capturing a shot like this is tricky because the lens itself actually rotates, which looks great but is tough for long exposures. But for the first 5 minutes they leave it static to indulge all of the photographers who turn out and want this shot (this highly unique and one-of-a-kind shot of course). When they switched to this light my camera still had about a minute of noise reduction to do on my final test shot to get the exposure right, so I missed the first minute. Then I started this shot which was about 2 minutes long, followed by 2 minutes of noise reduction again. So by the time I had my shot it was too late for a do-over. So this is it, I only got to take one photo and this is what I got, so I hope it worked out." - inactive, on 11/20/2007, -0/+13sore loser
- therightclique, on 11/20/2007, -2/+14that's how photography works, *****. if you are a modern photographer and you aren't using photoshop for basic touch-ups and color corrections, you are a tool.
- ronaldinho, on 11/20/2007, -0/+12Damn, every time someone posts an incredible picture there will be cynical souls claiming it's photoshopped. YEAH of course it's photoshopped, you still need to refine the raw picture. But the person did not photoshop the whole thing. I hate those douchebags though who claim every spectacular pic is photoshopped just because they don't take the time and effort to get a good picture (or they can't).
- amypwnsnoobs, on 11/20/2007, -1/+12They're too used to seeing photoshopped models and pictures of porn stars to believe in anything.
- arcooke, on 11/20/2007, -1/+12Ironic and clever? There was absolutely nothing about your post that was ironic.. let alone clever.
- Eccohawk, on 11/20/2007, -0/+10Please don't touch me.
- xtmno3, on 11/20/2007, -1/+11The entire world IS photoshopped.
http://www.xkcd.com/331/ - linzichan, on 11/20/2007, -0/+10http://www.flickr.com/photos/ccilker/251622108/
There you go. Personally, I like that one better. - nynety, on 11/20/2007, -2/+12The 20th century called. It wants its joke back.
- rawkes, on 11/20/2007, -2/+11"It's also noteworthy that the fog last night was insane, even for a San Francisco local." - Quote from the photographer.
- egonSchiele, on 11/20/2007, -0/+8douche called they want their bag back
- HypocriteDigg, on 11/20/2007, -1/+9RTFA you goddamn Diggiot.
- Frecklefoot, on 11/20/2007, -0/+7Actually, all his stuff is really good. Take a look at some of his other photos.
- hangtown2004, on 11/20/2007, -0/+7Hey very cool, I installed the carpet along time ago in that lower right hand building. It was a hostel then for travelers. What a view from that place.
- ColorBlind, on 11/20/2007, -3/+10It's the gas station angel!
- marcduke, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6I need an adult! I need an adult!
- inactive, on 11/20/2007, -1/+7brought back some bad memories from the aol era
- xTRUMANx, on 11/20/2007, -7/+13That's a UFO on the upper left. I choose the truth to believe.
- Whackly, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6He has some very good pictures, yes, but why does he insist on attempting to capture the moon in each night shot and why, in the name of Cthulhu, does he shoot directly into the sun so much? Half the pictures the sun is IN the frame.
- Kerrigore, on 11/20/2007, -0/+6I find your lack of original conversation disturbing...
- Bologner, on 11/20/2007, -2/+7Bangor, if you wanted to get the point across, you add /sarcasm a line after your joke.
Idiot.
/sarcasm - djAnakin, on 11/20/2007, -1/+6I don't get it.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 197 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is