92 Comments
- keitarofujiwara, on 10/13/2007, -13/+266One deceiving title.
- thcobbs, on 10/10/2007, -2/+86OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH a MIRROR!
- crackedplastic, on 10/10/2007, -2/+61Link to actual picture (larger): http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2186/1506651245_9c6 ...
- Rikushix, on 10/10/2007, -2/+59The "particularly the ceiling" was a bit unimportant.
- emptybucket, on 10/10/2007, -0/+44Thats Amazing!! Who knew a wordpress site would still be up after being dugg.
Oh, and the photo is pretty cool too. - trollick, on 10/10/2007, -1/+35So...? What's so "deceiving" about it? Lame.
- purepremiumpulp, on 10/10/2007, -4/+27maybe because there is nothing deceiving about the photo at all?
- dnacid, on 10/10/2007, -5/+25I don't think Feng Shui CAN be considered "proper" at all. You can make anything mean anything, it is just a bunch of BS.
- aariel, on 10/10/2007, -1/+19Uh, spheres?
>.> - SinisterBunni, on 10/10/2007, -0/+15illicit
One entry found for illicit.
Main Entry: il·lic·it
Pronunciation: (")i(l)-'li-s&t
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin illicitus, from in- + licitus lawful -- more at LICIT
: not permitted : UNLAWFUL
- il·lic·it·ly adverb
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW - Illegal puke. How did you manage that? - chewbacca77, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17Actually, I don't think that's proper Feng Shui at all.
- capiCrimm, on 10/10/2007, -2/+16oh... Oh! That's what it was. My God, I thought it was just about the old women on the far right jumping.
- kseymore, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13Ahhh... so the title deceived us!
- sgoogle, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8I don't recall anyone saying massive. Larger, yes, massive, no
- sheepster, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10that photo gives me a headache
- copyland, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8i was not all that stunned, sorry
- ShrimpCrackers, on 10/10/2007, -3/+10Not to mention Feng Shui is Chinese not Japanese. The cultures are vastly different.
- HunterTV, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Cooler if you rotate it 180deg in Photoshop.
- idconvict, on 10/10/2007, -3/+9Is 973x976 still considered massive? I was expecting some crazy 100mb tiff file or something, lol
- kholburn, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Ummmm,.. yes they are.
- willemmulder, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Oh I see now... they start at the very 'top' of the reflection... thanks!
- PieterOpie, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Now that’s what I call good photography capturing a brilliant architectural feature. The reflection ceiling suspended where it dramatically allows anyone on the floor to experience the scene beyond the striking frame of the window and still keeping it within that visual framework. The ceiling is the perfect width so it barely reveals its presence and is virtually “invisible” except for picture it reflects and projects deep into the space from where the scene cannot be viewed. Quite brilliant.
I want one…….. - Saiing, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4You're looking at the wrong part of the floor.
Don't worry though. In a few years you might learn to look a a photo for enjoyment, as the photographer intended without your anal infatuation about whether it might be photoshopped. - Computer_Kid, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Hey, I thought is was cool, minus the blog spam.
- mapkinase, on 11/11/2007, -1/+4digg, you are impressed easier than my 2-year old boy.
- NeMoD, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3(click for massive version)
first line on the page :) - solinent, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4or is it a man
- Sharky35, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Vertigo
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Would have been better if they flipped the photo upside down...
- RealmDown, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Looks to me like it is right on the Earth Turtles back.
- OMGIAMTHEMAN, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2no man, they're all there, this really isn't a deceiving photo after all
- gullevek, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2That might be, because I used a wide angle lens and slightly moved it up. Things on the edges get distorted then ...
- gullevek, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2It can be confusing, plus its a sldie, so highlights are burned.
But I didn't retouch the photo in any way at all. - Jugalator, on 10/10/2007, -1/+32000x2000:
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1053/1038464701_979 ... - Shenanigans, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3A cool picture, maybe, but definitely not digg worthy.
- Renton, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Not really. When ever someone says "photoshop" you automatically connect it with "image manipulation program" I use GIMP, and I say "photoshop" all the time.
Whenever somebody asks for a Kleenex, I know they mean tissue.
Whenever they want to play my Nintendo, I know they mean Wii.
Whenever somebody wants me to Google something, I know they mean search.
We just live in a corporate society. - maelstromwar, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2DECEPTIVE! It's a DECEPTIVE reflection, goddamnit!
- Komgol, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Wait, a picture is good if it can make you nauseated? You have... interesting standards.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Original artist: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gullevek/1038464701/
- Renton, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Nerv HQ?
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Hey, that's Web 2.0!
- xquizit, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1i don't think anyone got deceived...
- gullevek, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Yes it is. Amazing view. Check out some of the other shots. Really amazing view of Tokyo ...
- EmperorAnton, on 10/10/2007, -3/+4It makes me nauseated..good photo if it can illicit nausea. Not sure if I had the nausea words used correctly, but if anyone would like to correct me, please do so.
- icegoddess13, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1very cool pic :)
- DrummerAndrew, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Not deceiving. It's a reflection. Things are usually opposite in reflections. Deceiving would be a reflection of the sky on the ceiling.
- drouk1556, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Dennis.
- manonfire285, on 10/10/2007, -0/+12641
- SonicRush, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1No friggin kidding. Top 3? Gimme a break.
- BlueSkyfish, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I was thinking more along the lines of Evangelion
-
Show 51 - 91 of 91 discussions



What is Digg?
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official