What is Digg?206 Comments
- MBHoy, on 10/10/2007, -1/+174You know, I've made one hell of an improvement:
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/9746/hotwomanlgto8.jpg - rumorsofdemise, on 10/10/2007, -1/+154dugg for "Plus, in one of his e-mails, the guy said he didn't like pancakes. What kind of ***** doesn't like pancakes?".
- NineSpoons, on 10/10/2007, -10/+105Pics or "Michelle" doesn't exist!
- alpha_male76, on 10/10/2007, -4/+97That is a good article. Wish we found out what happened to Michelle. Did she find her man? i guess we will never know.
- Moxxon, on 10/10/2007, -4/+90I actually read the whole thing through and it was a great read. But holy ***** im really disappointed at the immaturity of the digg crowd I cant say im surprised but its nice to actually read a lengthy article with some backbone and integrity instead of seeing a picture of turtle sex getting to the front page. I mean come on its a 5 minute read.
- hmunkey, on 10/10/2007, -18/+93The picture on the first page of it made me stop. That is a transvestite hooker.
- COLDshiver, on 10/10/2007, -8/+77Great Read! Read the whole thing
- Moxxon, on 10/10/2007, -4/+70I know so did I.
But holy ***** im really disappointed at the immaturity of the digg crowd I cant say im surprised but its nice to actually read a lengthy article with some backbone and integrity instead of seeing a picture of turtle sex getting to the front page.
I mean come on its a 5 minute read. - shibbay, on 10/10/2007, -0/+65We need more stories like this on Digg: Well written, eloquent, and with more substance than "turtles having sex", as Moxxon says. It was an interesting article, written from the point of a GUY who helped his female nanny sort through the perils of online dating. Through the many creepy and cocky men that emailed her, the moral of the story shows how "with great beauty comes great responsibility". If you feel that this is a "long" article, stick to the videos sections...I for one would love to see more 'news' like this front paged.
- AJay85, on 10/10/2007, -1/+66From reading the comments, it's as if some of these Diggers are anonymously featured in the article... and are a little bitter.
- stevencon, on 10/10/2007, -48/+100that is way too many pages and the intro didnt make it interesting enough to read
- DivisibleByZero, on 10/10/2007, -0/+44I thought there were too many pages at first, but they read pretty quickly.
- Yoshi39, on 10/10/2007, -1/+38It was actually the guy who wrote this article who had the "stupid criteria" and the reason he wrote about them was to show how he was getting drunk with power
- Nanobe, on 10/10/2007, -1/+34It was the face of the guy writing the article on the body of a beautiful woman. The article is about his experience posing as a girl online (specifically, the girl he's trying to hook up with a good match).
- Ascendant, on 10/10/2007, -0/+32Ah, the joys of Digg. An interesting article hits the front page, replete with a page full of comments talking about how they haven't bothered to read it.
- ExSlashdotter, on 10/10/2007, -0/+30The writer is a guy...
- smackywentz, on 10/10/2007, -1/+31Given the length and the nature of the comments below, most of the said buriers are burying him simply out of hate for the article. They looked at the picture barely read the first page and made an assumption. Which given the nature of the article is ironic in and of itself.
- remisser, on 10/10/2007, -2/+30I won't be able to sleep tonight with that opening image in my head. This is why photoshop needs to be confiscated from certain people.
- weeeezzll, on 10/10/2007, -1/+27Disturbing but quite possibly the most interesting article i've read in a while...
- rejoined, on 10/10/2007, -0/+25It's still ugly because the face somehow got ingrained in my head. Dugg uyo up though for the effort.
- bkrishnan, on 10/10/2007, -5/+30I think I'm in love with Michelle. I keep imagining her with snorg tees.
- foooey, on 10/10/2007, -3/+27I must be disturbed too, because I thought that quote was hilarious.
- cklol, on 10/10/2007, -1/+24Actually it's a photo illustration, or, in simpler terms, a pshopped photo.
- Cl1mh4224rd, on 10/10/2007, -1/+22It's a photoshop of the author's(?) head on a model's body. It's supposed to be funny. Good lord, you people are idiots.
- inhaler, on 10/10/2007, -3/+23That's not necessarily true. I've put in plenty of effort - witty remarks and observations, not to mention my charming demeanor should be enough, but genuinely it seems all the women who want to "take a chance" or "meet someone who makes me laugh" really don't mean half of that, or forget that wrote it in the first place. Don't get me wrong, I'm not some jaded overweight sweat stained man child - I'm in good shape (workout/run/vegan), I'm fairly attractive (by that, I mean my face doesn't look like a burn victim's) I'm sarcastic and wry with humor, and am working towards my college education. Still single though...
Good article. - HunterTV, on 10/10/2007, -5/+23OMG! TEXT! This is like... school or something. ***** THAT!
- FXPooky, on 10/10/2007, -1/+19That's because the attention span of the average digger is roughly equal to that of my goldfish.
- waveman216, on 10/10/2007, -1/+18When I got to the end of it I thought of sending it to some of my friends. Then I realized I don't know a single person that would actually finish reading it. Man modern culture sucks...
- theragu40, on 10/10/2007, -1/+18I'm not sure why you're being dugg down. I read the article when Esquire printed it a couple months ago, and I thought it was very funny, if a little disturbing.
- solonGFX, on 10/10/2007, -1/+17Too Long; Didn't Read
I think. - schroeder, on 10/10/2007, -3/+17The Game is a ***** book and reading it is not the way to true confidence. Following it will most likely make someone with real confidence and women issues look like an ass.
- neuropsychguy, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14"the attention span of the average digger is roughly equal to that of my goldfish."
I don't know, my goldfish just keeps staring at me with those big bug eyes of his. Staring, always staring. - redneckblues, on 10/10/2007, -4/+18IT'S A TRAP!!!
- BevansDesign, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14I keep seeing this, and normally I just digg it down. But, what does it mean?
- RaggTopp, on 10/10/2007, -39/+53Buried for 9 page article that isn't very intersting.....I can't believe I wasted my time reading that.
Also buried for liking a guy cause he said "I'm a geek, but a cool geek because I use a Mac," ***** You douchbag fanboy. - HornyFox, on 10/10/2007, -0/+13You missed the best part.
- HueytheFreeman, on 10/10/2007, -0/+13That's "The photograph was enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® software." (Yes, they care that much!)
- briankeith, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14Sad isn't it? I always just thought I was "lucky" with women. now I see there are many reasons for my "luck". It's called other men like these.
- colincornaby, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11For those that don't know, the author, A.J. Jacobs, has written an excellent book called "The Know-It All", which is about him memorizing the encyclopedia for an appearance on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire:
http://www.amazon.com/Know-All-Humble-Become-Smartest/dp/0743250621/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-4373100-1428467?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1186872106&sr=8-1 - RobotBuddha, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11It means the writer is functionally illiterate, and has never read anything that didn't come off a webpage. When nine, small, pages are considered too much reading I have to weep a bit for the future.
- shinynew, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11This guy is WAY out of line.
I mean who doesn't like pancakes? - mrASSMAN, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11As if it isn't completely expected? You'll only fine mature diggers 1 in every 6 comments or so.
- HunterTV, on 10/10/2007, -0/+10Okay, thanks for the effort, really, but seriously if Diggers are that lazy to click through, then oh well.
I mean it's not a top 50 list you have to click through 49 times, it's just a 9 page article.
I think 9 pages of text automatically weeds out the weak. - dyslexicsUNTIED, on 10/10/2007, -3/+13i think that was simply a great read. awesome
- FiP0, on 10/10/2007, -0/+10I found it creepy.
- joeshlub, on 10/10/2007, -6/+16Seriously, that's the lamest 'I'm a geek' excuse I've ever heard. Cause I use a mac? I had the same reaction. Because he uses a mac and says that it makes geekinees okay, he's a ***** tool. Mac vs GNU/Linux vs Windows aside, anyone who thinks that using a mac in any way makes geekiness more acceptable is a loser.
- shibbz, on 10/10/2007, -38/+47I read the first page, noticed there were 8 other pages, and was not nearly interested enough to continue reading.
- HornyFox, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9No, it's not. You can stop masturbating.
- JrGhoull, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9totally agree...i thought it read even quicker towards the end (just seemed to get more interesting towards the end to me). what i didnt like was the ending. sending a guy who is in a bad position a mesage from a hot girl saying "chin up" is in my world, not cool. i understand that the idea would be to raise his confidence..get him to say "hey a pretty girl told me that i'm a nice guy" but it could also make him instead say something along the lines of "great, now i have people emailing me because they feel sorry for me"
-
Show 51 - 100 of 204 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 